Vangala Akhil, S/o v. Narasimhulu, age

2. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature At Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED LA. NO: 2OF 2025 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compromise the case under S.C.No. 36212019 on the file of Metropolitan Sessions Judge Nampially, Hyderabad and Crime No. 690/2018 under Sec326(b),354(D) IPCOn the file of PS SR Nagar,City/District Hyderabad in the interest of justice. LA. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) Read with 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit and Joint Memo of Compromise filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in SC 36212019 on the file of Metropolitan sessions Judge, Nampally Hyderabad and Crime No. 69012018 under Sec.326(b), 354(D) tpc on the fite of pS SR Nagar, city/District by compounding the offence in terms of compromise in the interest of justice. CRL.P. No.5908 ol 2025 : Vangala Akhil, S/o V. Narasimhulu,. age. 28 years, Occ. Student, R/o H.No. 8_3_ 2251N7t1 , Yousufguda check post, UyO"eirUiai_'slotO+S ...PET|T|oNER/ACCUSED AND '1. The State of Telanoana,.rep. by its public prosecutor, High Court of Judicature At Hydeiabad. 2. Smt M.Vasundliara W/o-M.Madhusudhan R/o H No.g-3_675/1/A, ye,areddyg ud a, F ribzy npartm.nl, Hlo"rrOri' bn SaS t OSSzzt ...RESPONDENT Petition under section 52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to cail for the records pertaining to sc 362i201g on the fire of Hon,bre Metroporitan sessions Judge at Nampary, Hyderabad and crime No. 6g0/2018 under sec.326(b),354(D) rpc on the fire of ps sR Nagar.city/District H yderabad and to quash the same against the petitioner/accused rn the interest of justice l.A. NO:1O F 2025 Petition under Section- 52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition,the High court may be pleased to stay of a, further proceedings of the petitioner/Accused in sc 36212019 0n the fire of Metroporitan Sessions Judge at Nampary, Hyderabad and crime No 690/2018 under sec.326(b),354(D) rpc on the fire of pS sR Nagar, City/District Hyderabad the above criminal petition. These Petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and compromise petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms.V.Krishna veni, counser Rep.Sri J.Ravinder, Advocate for the Petitioner in l.A.No.2 & 3 of 2O2S and Respondent No.2 in Crt.p. and Sri G.Santosh Pawan Babu, for Respondent No..1 in LA.No 2&3 of 2O2S and Petitioner in crl.P and of pubric prosecutor appearing on beharf of Respondent No.2 in l.A.No.2&3 of 2025 and Respondent No.1 in Crt.p. The Court made the following: ORDER -7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 0F 2025 ln/And CRIMINA L PETITION No.5908 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 o'f Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Ior short 'BNSS' 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in SC'No'362 of 2019 on the file of lhe Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally' of 2018 on the file of PS SR Hyderabad and Crime No'690 Nagar,HYderabad District.

2. The petitioner is accused in SC'No'362 o'f 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 326(b), 354(D) of the lndian Penal Code,'1860.

3. Heard Mr.G.Santosh Pawan Babu' learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla' learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No'1-State and Ms'V Krishna Veni, learned counsel for the respondent No 2/de-facfo complainant'

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, respondent No'2/de-facto complainant filed l'A'Nos'2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise 2 N,nrJ I.,l.h,t.t.2 and ) oJ 202 5 in/ and (.r/. P.N0.5 908 ol2025 and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in SC.No.362 of 2019

5. This Court vide otd daled 24.06.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 08.07.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise.

6. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record.

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace between the parties, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. Stafe of Punjab and anotherl and Anil Mishra v. State of lJ.P.2; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned | 2012 (1o) scc 303 'z zo24 INSC 189 3 2019 (s) scc 688 3 t\rTR,rr 1..,1.N0i.2 a lttJ 202i it/and Lrl.P.No.;908 tJ 202i proceedingsinviewofthesettlementbyexercisingjurisdictionunder Section4S2Cr.P.C.|S2BofBNSS,2023,wouldbeintheinterestof justice. B. Accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed' Consequently' all the proceedings in SC.No.362 of 2019 on the file of the Metropolitan SessionsJudgeatNampally,HyderabadandCrimeNo690of20lBon the file of P.S SR Nagar,Hyderabad District, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused. o ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of' Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed' SD/. A.V.S.PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 4 5 6 d The MetroP olitan Sessions Judg e at NamPallY' H The lll Additional Chief MetroPol itan Mag istrate, N ampally The Station House Officer, S.R.N agar Police Station, HYderabad One CC to Sri G.Santosh Pawan Babu Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri J.Ravinder, Advoca te (OPUC) Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hvderabad.(OUT) iAiong *itn'a coPY of Joint Memo)

7. fwo CD CoPies ' Ks/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:1 5l0Tt202S i COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2&3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.5908 of 2OZs ) J.) \) I I t 22IUEffi s i' Zi {tr r'.\ \) Allowing the t.A.Nos.2&3 oI2025 And disposing of the Crl.p. \o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD tA.NO CRL.P.No BETWEEN 1 Smt. M Vasundhara Wo M lvladhusudhan, age 45 yrs, Occ: House Wife. ,lo, H N9 8-3-67St1tA, yeilareddyguda, Fribzy Apartment, Hyderabad prr.!:eiosszzq oF 2025 oF 2025 2'dRespondenlDefacto Cornplainan t/petitioner AND 1 Akhit, S/o V. Narasimhulu, -Van9^la age. 28 years, Occ: Student. R/o H.No. B-3-225/N7t1 Yousufguda check post, Hyderabad_S00045 2 Tl: 9t{" of Tetansana, rep. by [s r.,uDitc prosecutor, High Court of Judicature At Hyderabad. .: .JOINT MEMO May it please your lordship, Petrtioner/Accused we both the parties compromised the matter amicabry by the intervention of elders and we decided to fire quash petition before this Hon,bre court and the 2 ndRespondent/defacto Complainant has no objection to quash the proceedings quash theprocedingssc 36212019 on the fire ofrVretroporitan Sessions Judgeand Crime No. 690/2018 under Sec.326(b),354(D) ;a;;; file of pS . SR Nagar,City/District Hyderabad registered under sec'326(b),354(D) rpcand pass such other order or orders as thisHon,bre Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. We bothsigned in this memo with our free wi, and consent and there is no any coercion or forceagainst us. Hence , this Joint Memo. Coun e for Petitioner Couns o PETITIONER Respondent