High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 35 4020F 2015 Between: sri. Ali Younus, S/o omer Bin Ahmed, aged 66 yrs, Rl/o. H.No.19-443gl44rN1 and '" 2, B.Nabi Kareem, BNK Cotony, Bahadur[ura. Tddbl"; Hyd;rab"o, fdrr"gj;;r"-bi. AND .....PETITIONER

1. The State oj Telangana, panchayat.Raj Department, Rep.by its principal Secretary. Telangana Secretarra[, HyOerabiO.

2. The District Cottector, (pts),, Ranga Reddy Diskict, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The District Panchavat Officer, panchayat Raj Department,, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Divisional Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District. 6. Hyderabad Metroporitan Deveropment Authority,, Block A, District commerciar uomptex. Iarnaka, Hyderabad _ 500007. Teiangana, lndia. Rep.by its Secretary.

7. Venkatesh, S/o not know to the petitionel, Aged about 35 yrs, panchayat Secretary, Kacharam Gram panchayat, R. R:District.

8. Sudarshan, Sio not know to^the petitioner, Aged about 45 years, Husband of Saritha, IvlPTC, Kacharam Grani panchayat,"R.R.District.'

9. Narasimha, S/o not know to the petitioner, Aged about 50 yrs, Deputy Sarpanch, Kacharam Gram panbhayat, R.R."Diskict.

10.Ramulu Goud, S/o not know to the petitioner, Aged about 35 yrs, R/o Rayanagudda, Kacharam Gram panchayat, iR.{.Oistrict Petition under Articre 226 o'f rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be .....RESPONDENTS pleased to issLle a \Vrit, Order, or Direction' more particularly one irr nature of Writ of MANDAMUS tr) declare the action of the respondent No i'rd in ordering demolition of tht; ccnstruction in the structu res/house raised' n the land in Sy.No.72lAJ6 72t,\l'7, of Rayanagudda Village' Kacharam Grzrm Panchayat' R.R.District,thepstitionerslandWithoutanynoticeoropportunitycnthebasisof representation r>f some local people along with respondents 8 to 10 and further demolition of p;lrt o1'the compound wall on 27-10-2015' as illeg€Ll' arbitrary and violating of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to Ci O I\4s'N'r'11'1 ' M'A and UD, (ll) Deparlrn()r'1': dt.08-03- 1996,and consequently restrerin tlre respondents the land in from in anpve y iT terfering with the structures/house raised in 't'2l.thl7, ol Rayanagudda Village' Kachztram Gram Sy.No.7214/6 R.R.District, in ].ho lnterest of Justice' PanchaYat, t.A.NO :1 OF 20'15rt,vP I'irP. N e45492_SE29l9 Petitiorr -Jnce,r Section 151 CPC praying that in ther circums:ances stated in the affidavit filird rr support of the petition' the High Court ma" be pleased to RESTRAINth€rol;pondentsfromdemolishingthestruct'Jres'hou';eraised'inthe land in Sy.r\o.72l,4/6 & 72lAt7, of Rayanagudda Vrllagt: Kacharam Gram Panchayat, fl.lL l)istrict, in the Interest of Justice, Pending Distr:osal of the writ petition. Gounsel for the Petitioner : SRI B'SUDFIAKAR REDDY AND NEt:RAJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos'1, 2,4 &5: AGP FOR PANCHT\YAT RAJ Counsel for tl"re Respondent No'3 : AG'P FOR REVENUE Counsel for the F.espondent No.6 : SRI Y'RAMA RAO Counsel forthe Fiespondent No'7 : SRI G'NARENDER REDDY Counsel for the Flespondent No'8 : SRI KISHORE RAO PUSKUT:lU (SC FOR TS zILLA PARISHAtTS) Counsel for the Flespondent Nos'9 & 10 : - The Court nrad€ 'lhe following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.354O2 of 2OLS ,l l ORDER: This writ petition is frled under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the lollowing relief: ".-.to i-ssue o Writ, Order or Direction more particularlg one in noture of Writ of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondent I{o..3 in ordering demolition of the constntctton in th.e structures/ ltouse raised in the land in Sg.No.72/ A/ 6& 72/A/7 of Rayanagudda ViLhge, Kocharam Gram Panchagat, R.R.Distict, the petitioners land uithout ang notice or opportunity on the r).:si.s of representation of some local people along utith respondents 8 to 1O and further demalition of part of ttre compourul wall on 27.10.2O15 as illegal, arbitrary and uiolating of Prtnciples of Natural Justice and. contrary to G.O.Ms.No. 1 1 1, MA and {ID (ll) Department, dt. 08.03.1996 and conseqttently restrain the respondents from in angu-tag interfering uith the stntctures/ llouse raised in the lond in Sy.No.72/A/6 & 72/A/7 of Raganaguddct Village, Kaclnram Gram Panchagat, R.R.Distict tn the Interest of Justice..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader lor Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the matcrial on record. t

3. L,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the \ t stage of admission, this Court has granted interim order on

30.10.2015 and directed thc respondcnt-authorities not to 2 demol.Ls [ 1.he constructions of the petiti,rne:- without issuing any notcr: emd opportunit5r to submit explzrnat.ion

4. IrL spite of lapse of more than r-iine: (C,9) years, the resporLderr'-l; did not choose to hle any counter/r'acate petition in this rn€:tter for denying the averments nrade by the petitioner in the wr r- aLfhdavit.

5. Ir: irit:w of the same, the writ pet itio.r TI: disposed of, directinll llrr: respondents not to intci icre r,vith the possession ol subject prcrperty of the petitioner without 'bllc,n,ir g due process of law. 'llLt:re shall be no order as to costs.

6. Misceilaneous petitions, if any, penrlingr shall stand closed To //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTA.NT REGISTRAR SEI:)TIoN oFFICER State of T,llztngana at Hyderabad.

1. The Principrrrl Secretary,. Panchayat Raj Department Teli:gan a Secretariat, ? Ih" 9 st -ir; 3ollector, (Pts), Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapocl Hyderabad 3. The Dlst-i() Jevenue Officer, Ranga Reddy District 4. The Dist'icr ranchayat Officer, panchayat Ral Depadmerrt. R;tnga Reddy 5. The Sec et?i/, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority. Block A. Districl C orrrrercial Complex, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500102. Telangana. India. District-

6. Two C]s lC) GiP FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ, High CoU( for the S:ate of 7 Two C,ls tc : P FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Stater ol 1 elangana a Telangarra a llyderabad. [OUT] Hydera b;rcl. OUTI /4.

8. One CC to SRI B.SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY, Advocate 9. One CC to SRI KISHORE RAO PUSKURU (SC FOR TS ZTLLA toPUCI PARISHADS) Advocate [OPUC] 1O.One CC to SRI G.NARENDER REDDY, Advocate (OPUC) 1 1 . One CC to SRI Y.RAIMA RAO, Advocate (OPUC) 12.Two CD Copies @):- I I l l I + v .aI -a' HIGH COLIFTI' DATED:0210112025 ) ) ., 1A 16 t$ JUN il6 * crr( ).,* \r,\- l)..\: ORDER WP.No.354102 of 2015 1!, \1 \ DISPOSING OF THE W,P WITHOLIT I]:OSTS. 6 "e