✦ High Court of India · 30 Apr 2025

V. Sateesh kumar Reddy, S/o v. Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, aged about

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,034 words

Acts & Sections

'1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/Accused

2. G.Aruna, Wo. N Prabhakar, Aged .42yea$, Occ.School Assistant at ZPHS Girls, leeja Rl/o. H.No.1-6-32, Housing Board Colony, Gadwal Town and District, Telangana ... Respondent ...RespondenUDe facto Complainant Petition under Section S2g of BNSS.- stated In the Memora ndum of G be pleased to quash t he procee dated 1 3.05.2 024, on the file of Praying that in the circumsta nces rounds of Cnmrnal petition, th e High Co urt may dings agarnst the petitioner in FIR No.54 of 2024 Shanthi Nagar the pS .A. NO: 20 F 2025 ffi::';;ffi r#*q*,j{flnffi *+rfu :,,:,",Hu,, This Petition comir ^ ,il,h:#iit,fi'#*.,fiffi The court made the forowing: .RDER f,*h1t*it,#,ff HHr xespondent No. 2. I 1 I I I THE HONOURABLE cRIMI AL PETITION N SRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER o. s9210F2025 OR DE R: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners / accused on the file of Shanthi Nagar e offences alleged again st the 448, 147 r lw'149 of IPC' ion of the PeoPle Act' seeking to quash FIR'No'54 of 2024' Jogulamba Gadwal District' Th petitioners are under Sections 188' 353' Sections 131 and 136 of the Representat P.S., counsel for the Petitioners learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for

2. Heard learned Sri M.Vivekanalda ReddY' the resPondent - State' I

3. The only ground raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the phtitioners is up to seven years' and sought for a direction to the Police to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023 (for short'BNSS')' I ' I In view of the,st lid submission' 4. follow the procedure lard down under also ttre guidelines formulated by the the Police are directed to Section 35(3) of BNSS and Hon'6le SuPreme Court in 2 ,;r!:.4*aiE.l I Arnesh Kurnar v. State of Biharr scrupulously. Needless to say, the petitioners shall assist the investigation and shall appear before SHO as and when required, for the purpose of investigation.

5. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stald closed. Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, fu. 1. The Judicial First Class Magistrae at Alamour. 2 The.station House officer, Sni.tninr's;;'Fltice station, Joguramba Gadwar 3. One CC to SRt V MURALT MANOHAR, Advocate tOpUCl t 5. Two CD Cobies. ' prosecutor, Hidh'a;;",ii;; tr," st;a or reransana at ly3*"""r::",thePublic SECTION ER SM/SJA ' (2014) 8 scc 273 HIGH GOURT DATED: 3010412025 -- \''-- ( ORDER CRLP.No.5921 ot 2025 t t I 1HE S h fr 1 B JUt 2ilil t../ /,- '1" )qq DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION /./ / 6

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments