WRIT PETITION NO : 1406 of 2004 v. The Union of India
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Chapter-V of the Finance Act
- Finance Act, 1997
- Finance Act, 2000 ss. 116, 117
- Finance Act, 2003 s. 158
Judgment
Whereas the Petitioners above named through its counsel Mr. P. Srinivasa Reddy presented this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herewith, the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring; that Chapter-V of the Finance Act,. 1994 (Central Act) as amended by Finance Act, 1997 and the retrospective and validation provisions in Section 116&117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and the Section 158 of Finance Act 2003 in so far as they seek to levy service tax on amounts paid to Goods Transport Operators for carriage of goods by road as ultravires Entry 56 of List-II of the VII Schedule to Constitution of India and hence unconstitutional; and in any event declare provisions treating entire freight charges as liable to service tax as discriminatory and unconstitutional; and consequently declare that the petitioner is not liable to pay any service tax as user of Goods Transport Service during the period 16-11-1997 to 2.6.1998. And whereas the High Court upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Srinivasa Reddy Advocate for Petitioner ,and the Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice and seeks time for filing counter. directed issue of notice to the Respondent to show cause why this Writ Petition should not be admitted in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed. You viz :
The Secretary, Parliamentary Affairs, Union of India, New Delhi.
The under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, union of india, New Delhi.
The Superintendent of Central Excise, O/o. Superintendent of Central Excise, Kodada Ranga, Kodada, Nalgonda District. Contd..P.2 ..2… are directed to show cause on or before 24-2-2004 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this Writ Petition should not be admitted. And it is further ordered that pending passing further orders there shall be stay . However, the stay order granted by this court would, however be subject to passing further orders in the writ Petition. NOTE: Post on 24-2-2004 for Admission and for filing Counter. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The Secretary, Parliamentary Affairs, Union of India, New Delhi. 2. The under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, union of india, New Delhi. 3. The Superintendent of Central Excise, O/o. Superintendent of Central Excise, Kodada Ranga, Kodada, Nalgonda District. ( 1 to 3 BY RPAD) along with a copy of Petition and affidavit 4. One Spare Copy Skm HIGH COURT Dr. MBN,J & DSM,J DATED: 27-1-2004 NOTE : POST ON 24-2-2004 FOR ADMISSION AND FOR FILING COUNTER NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION W.P.NO: 1406/2004 SKM DRAFTED ON: 30-1-2004 HIGH COURT Dr. MBN,J & DSM,J DATED: 27-1-2004 NOTE : POST ON 24-2-2004 FOR ADMISSION AND FOR FILING COUNTER NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION W.P.NO: 1406/2004
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.