S. Gangadhar v. Bhavan, AC Guards, Government of A.P. Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 25-06-2008 To 1.2CCs to __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the order of the Hon'ble Tribunal dt. 14-5-2008 in OA No. 3816/2008 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 and set aside the same and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.V.KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU Writ Petition No.11636 of 2008
ORDER:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is filed challenging the interim order dated 14- 05-2008 passed in O.A.No.3816 of 2008 on the file of Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Tribunal ought not to have granted the interim direction since the first respondent is not in the feeder category and that the writ petitioner is not made a party to the O.A.
We are not inclined to express any opinion on the merits of the case as the Tribunal has not finally determined the right of the first respondent herein and the writ petition is filed against the interim order. It is for the Tribunal to decide the O.A. on merits and in accordance with law. However, having regard to the averments in the writ affidavit, we direct the official respondents to consider the case of the petitioner herein as well as the first respondent for further promotion, as per law.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. 25-06-2008 To 1.2CCs to __________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J. ___________________ C.V.RAMULU, J. // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
2.2CD copies Form-NIC-OGS/WP{VSMI}
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.