K.V.Sarma v. 1. The State of Telangana

' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring action of second respondent corporation in digging a new open drain on existing 60' road instead of existing open drain from Sneha Society School as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the second respondent to lay the drain behind Sneha Society School. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Between The Municipal Corporation Nizambad, rep.by its Commissioner, Nizambad 503001 AND .PETITIONER/RESPONDENT-2 .--*=_ ./

1. K V.Sarma, S/o Late Prabhakara Sarma, aged about 65 years, Retd Servant, Rio. H.No.6-22-251, NGO's Colony, lV Phase, Goutham Nizamabad - 503 002 . Govt. Nagar, ... RESPONDENT-1/vl/RIT PETITIONER 2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, N.4unicipal Admrnistration & Urban Development Department, Telangana Sec!-etariat, Hydcrabad - 500 C22

3. The Collector & District tulagistrate Nizamabad - 503 001., - ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ir the afiidavit file rn suoport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the nterim order dated 19.11.2015 in WP tMP No. 39150 of 2015 in WP No 30273 of 2015. l.A. NO: 1OF 201S(WPMP NO: 39150 OF 2015) Petltion under Section 15.1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fileC in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to lay new open drain on and adjacent to 60' road from Dubba road to 1()0' by pass road situated in Nizarnabad town, pendtng disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SATYAM REDDY FOR Smt. K.V. RAJASREE Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V.SATYAM REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER .71 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.3O273 of 2015 ORDER: T1-ris u'rit petition is filed sceking follou'ing reliei "To declare the cLctlon of 2"d respondent corporation rn d[ggtng o neLU open drr.ttn on e-risting 60 Jbet road instead of existrl.g open drcL{n from Sneha Socrety School, os illegal and arbitrary. "

2. Heard Sri S. Satyam Reddy, learned Senior counsel representing Smt. K.V. Rajvzr Sree, lcarned counscl for the petitioner on record and Sri V. Satyam Reddr', learned Standing counsel for respondent No.2

3. Learned Senior counsel fbr the pctitioner submitted that respondent has taken up construction o[ neu'drainage abutting to existing drainage behincl Sneha Societv School, Go\\'rflam Nagar. He further submitted that instead of strengthening existing old drainage , the respondent taken up conslruction of neu, one bv making unnecessary cliversion Aggrieved by the same, prescnt writ petition is hled

4. Learned Standing counsel for respondent No.2 by referring to the counter would submit that new drainage has becn taken up for convenience of residents of colony, as the existing kachha nala drain water is stagnated in open plots l .rn(l Ieadinq to rnoscluilo brcr:cling. I le lurt[-rcr subnrirtecl that 1h(' ( oustrltctron of ncu' clrittn:rg<: l-:rs br.en cntrLlsted to al lc)r'rlr';icl()r i1n(i 8() ( 1)nslrrtc'Liorl uor-l< is corrrplelccl excepl stn;rii Por-tron lrecir-isc ol irrtL'r'inr ordtrr grantr:ri bt: tlii< gor,rr, Ilc lurtircr- sutrrnittcd that alter completion of ne$.' drainage, t hc kachir.t n:rl.r u iil bc closecl zrnd thc drainagc u,atcr rn,ill bc ciranrrclcd ir:to nt,u drainagr:: that the construrction of neu, rlrainagt' u oLrld not alfccl lhe school in qLrestiolt an(l 'hc'rCiir-c. ;r',rvc'cl l() \:r(:tLc tlic intr:ritn ordt:r'

5. i-elrrneri Senior counsel fairh subnlirtcd that let the .orl)o1'at ion cornlllcte lhe corrstruction of neri, drainage line ancl Tirnr' 1'r'lnre rr;rr- lte lixed to close the existrng opcr.r Ii:rc Ir l.i a n:11:r (). Consi<ii'r-ing the submissions made b,r, learned Senior c'oLr:rsr:l lcrr Ilrc pct;tioncr as r.r'ell as l(,arned Stzrndine c:oLrnsr.l for rcsponclent No 2. this Writ Petitron is disposcd of, rvith a dir-r.r:tion io r-es;porrdcut No.2 to proceed with the constt'uctiolt of nc\\' drai:rage ancl on completion of n err,, drainagc, responderrt No.2 sha1l close the kachha l1ala ivithin a period of for-rr (O4) months h-om the clate of receipt of cop\i of this ordcr. No ordct- as lo c()sts, I ! o ) Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismis sed To, //TRUE COPY// I SD/- B. REKHA R SISTANT REGIS ECTION OFFICER The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & U Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 an Development 022

2. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Nizamabad Nizamabad - 503 001 3. The Collector & District Magistrate Nizamabad - 503 001 ' - 4 One CC to SRI K.V RAJASREE, Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to SRI V SATYAM REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY IOPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUTI

8. Two CD Copies PMK BI\,I -a{ -l I I l II l I l I I i. I i I I I i I i i I HIGH COURT DATED:1 111112025 ORDER WP.No.30273 of 2015 t oR iHE s- t4 (J -T 2:9 .* ? 3 w$ 20?0 sFArctr@ * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ coPrc'\ I EK, Av)v