High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department' TS, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissioner, Ranga Reddy District. The Deputy Commissioner of Police' Rachakond Commtssionerate L'B Na ar' Ranga Reddy District. The lnspector of Police, P.S.Chaitanyapuri, Rachakond Commisisonerate Ranga Reddy District. Karamcheti Viswarkachainulu, S/o Srirama Chandra Murthy, aged about 30 v""i Oi.. Software employee Hotding passport N-o' Y7882279' Alpha- i.rrr|'1'"io i"innotogy Soiuti6ns INC as Senior ASIC Engineer Residing at 200 Rano DLVD, Apt. aBlB Vestal, N.Y. '13850. The Asst. Foreigners Regional Registration officer, Bureau of lmmigration Chennai. .,...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more one in the nature of wRlT oF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not reopen the Look out circular issued against the sth respondent in connection with crime No. 531 of 2023 under Section 420.406 1PC on the file of P.S. chaitanyapuri. Rachakonda i and subsequent proceedings vide Originator Ref No. 231D4-LOCICCRBIRKD/2023 dt. 1611212023 inspite of violation of the orders of the Hon'ble High court in Common order in W P No. 25192 of 2024 and 30021 of 2024 C,aled 2111112024 and also directions passed in Crl. MP No. 792 o'f 2024 in Crime No. 531 of 2023 dt. 2OlSl2024 passed by th JFCM , Spl. (Mobile) PR Act cum lV Addl. Judicial Magistrate cum lV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy district at L.B.Nagar is illegal, .arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Article. 2l of the Constitution of lndia and consequently reopen the Look Out circular issued against the 5th respondent. I.A.N :1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 and 6 to execule and implement the LOC issued against the 5th respondent vide Originator Ref. No. 23ID4-LOC/CCRB/RKD/2023 dt. 1611212023 in connection with Crime No. 531 of 2023 under Section 420, 406 lpc on the file of P.S.Chaitanyapuri, Rachakonda pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Pet,tioner : SRI cANESH BHUJANGA RAO VADDURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6 : - The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER ,l I l, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.13113 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Couft is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.s and 6 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The petitioner by the present Writ Petition is questioning the inaction on the part oF the respondents-authorities in reopening the Look- out Circular (LoC) issued against the 5th respondent in connection with Crime No.531 of 2023 in spite of the 5s respondent violating the conditions imposed by the Court below while suspending the LoC, which action of the authorities it is contended as lllegal, arbitrary and contrary to law.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.l to 4 would submit that whether there is vrolation or not of the condition imposed while suspending the LoC, is to L I 2_ -_ -,i be adjudicated only by the concerned Court and for the said purpose, the petitioner is requlred to approach the concerned Magistrate/Court, which has granted interim protection to the Srh respondent herein and for the said purpose, the petitioner cannot maintain the present Writ petition. 5' Learned Government preader wourd further submit that in simirar circumstances, the petitioner in w.p.No.3002 r of 2024 was granted riberty to file an appropriate application before the trial Court to reopen the LoC issued, if there is any violation of conditions imposed by the concerned Court.

6. Learned Government pleader further submits that since, the petitioner in the present Writ petiuon has made similar prayer, the petitioner herein shourd arso be directed to approach the concerned court by bringing to the notice of the concerned Court of the violation of the condition imposed for the Court to take a decision as to revoke LoC.

7. I have taken note of the respective contentions urged. 8' Having regard to the submissions made as above, since, it is the concerned Magistrate who had granted relaxation of LoC in favour of the 5th respondent herein, if there is any vioration of the conditions imposed by the concerned Magistrate, while granting such relaxation, the petitioner is required to approach the concerned Magistrate bringing to the notice the a'eged vioration of the condition of the order passed by the concerned 3 Magistrate and seek For revocation of the suspension of LoC and for the said reason, cannot maintain the present Writ Petition.

9. Since, it is now stated to this Court of the petitioner approaching the concerned Magistrate, thls Court is of the view that the petitioner is directed to pursue the remedy before the concerned Magistrate.

10. Granting liberty as noted hereinabove, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

11. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall I I I stand closed. //TRUE COPY// S . T.TIRUMALA DEVI PUTY REGISTRAR 7- SECTION OFFICER To \ at Buildings State of n , Ranga ReddY o^^L^r,^6.r ar,,mmissionerate L.ts.Na ar, Telangana at Hvderabad. District. 1 . The PrinciPa I Secretary, Home DePartment' TS' Se 2. The Commissioner of Pol ice, Rachakonda Commissioner 3 The Deputy Commissioner of Police' Rachakond Commissionerate L B Na ar ^ Tf,:?isB::,l1 3i:i:", P's chaitanvapuri' Rachakond commisisonerate . Tfl:t3&",1'68'P3$ *o*t, Hish court ror the state or relansana at . g#"tttSl8,'&*tt" BHUJANGA RAo vADDURT' Advocate toPUCl 7. Two CD Copies r\^ Vtr SA HIGH COURT TVK,J DATED:2910412025 ORDER WP.No.13113 of 2025 ,'! .$' q\\ Iii !,, ") ev@ DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. (t- 21, 5 v\ @