Manchukonda Hvmavathi v. violative of Arti:les 4

Petition l-nd::r Section'151 CPC praying that in the r;irr;.rrnslances stated in the affidavit filed rn : upport of the petition, the High court nav be pieased to stay of the lmpugnerl En,lorsement bearing No. 8/400/2025 dated 28-(t3-2025 as well as all consequernt al croceedings and consequently direcl Res;pcndent No. 4 to mutate the narTte () the petitioner in all Revenue Records ard issue Pattadar Passbooks on lehrl'of the petitioner on his name over thr: ag;rcultural land to an extent of Ac. l:l-r:)C guntas in Survey No. 60lN3l1l1l1,'1, rvhictr is situated at Vitaipalli Villagt: of ilrangal Mandal, Rangareddy District. Counsel for the Pet tioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l to 4: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to 9 : - The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY trIRIT PETITION No. 12769 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to dgclare the action of the respondent No.4 in issuing the impugned Endorsement uide No.B/4OO/2025, dated 28.03.2025, rejecting the online application of the petitioner and not mutating the name of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.3.06 gts., in Sy.No.60/A/3 lt / I /t lI, situated at Vittaipalli Viltage, Amanagal Mandal, Rangareddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and prayed for appropriate reiiefs. 2- Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and with their consent this writ petition is disposed ofat the admission stage. 3 It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor the agricultural land admeasuring Ac,3.O6 gts., in situated at Vittaipalli Village, Sy.No.6OlA/3 ll/l/111, Amangal Mandal, Rangareddy District. It is further stated that originally, the husband of the petitioner has purchased the said land from the vendor, under unregistered sale deed/sadabainama in the year 1998 and his name was recorded in the revenue lri- 2 CVBR, J 't:E t2769 2025 records iln I lattadar passbook was aiso issued. t ls further stated t:La1 sada bainama was validated under the ;trc visions of the Telanga r: Rights in Land and Pattadar Pa:.;;bool<s Act, 1971 and the su t). ecl property has been mutated in th t' na :ne of the petitioncr. I is further stated that when disputrs r:tros I over the subject [)ro :l( rtv for which pattadar passbook hzrs lreen issued to the petit.lor r:' 's husband, the petitioner's husba nd has instituted a suit liil€ t).S.No.156 of 2022 on the h1e ol tLLr: Se nior Civil judge, Shar r zrgar, seeking declaration of title a -rd conr;equential injunction. lt is stated furthcr that the said sr-rit r..': s lismissed uide orc,:t- ,l ated 1 I .lI .2022 and aggrieved t,., :-rr: s ame, the petitione r ha; frled an appeal suit uide A.S.No.(; ot -20t):i on the fiie of th : P' :r rr;ipal District Sessions .Judge, Ran,:a Re.1d I District. It is furt.-rc' ;rated that pending adjudication o1 thc saicl appeal suit, resl:)o'1,: r'nt Nos.5 to 9 approached resprtr-rclr:r: \o.4 and fraudulerrtl' obtained pattadar passbooks in r,3sl)e( t of the subject l)ro:)rrtJ,. It is further stated that the pe,_ riortr:r ters made an onlinc r Jr llication dated O9.3.2O25 for issutrn,:e cf jtattadar passbooli ir, cspect of the subject property, pLl-su1nt ic, which, respondclr It o.d, has issued the impugned Endrtrsentent ujde No.B/4OO/'.,'.{.25, dated 28.03.2025 rejectirrg r.hr online applicati.,n. Fience, the present writ petition. 3 CVBR, J wP_72769 2025

4. Learned assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, on instructions, would submit that the respondent No.4 has examined the application submitted by the petitioner and passed the impugned order as the suit vide O.S.No.1S6 of 2022 instituted by the petitioner,s l c husband for declaration of title in respect of subject property was dismissed.

5. In view of the above, since it is stated that the suit hled by the petitioner's husband was dismissed wherein, the subject property herein is the suit schedule property, this Court is of the opinion that the impugned Endorsement issued by respondent No.4, does not suffer any legal inhrmities warranting interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, if the appeal suit vide A.S.No.6 of 2023 pending on the file of the Principal District Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, is allowed in favour of the petitioner, she is at liberty to make appropriate application seeking correction of entries before the revenue authorities, in accordance with law.

6. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 4 (]\,8}R, J \':'' '.2769 2025 't As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous pr:titiorrs, if any, pending srhz: [] stand closed. No order as to cost{; //TRUE COPY// :SD/.T. TIRUMALA DEVI . QEPUW REGISTRAR .] SE(::TION OFFICER ---? Secretar at, r.(lrairatabad, State of Telangana at Hyderabad, T,:langana State.

1. The Prin:ipal iecretary, Revenue Department, Dr. &Ji.. Anrberdkar State 2. The District t-)ollector, Rangareddy, Rangareddy District, 3. The Rev:nu,:: Divisional Officer, Kandukur, Kandukur Revenu,; Division, rgana State. 'ferla RangareJdy I istrict. Hyderab,:d. C UTI

4. The Tahr;ilderr Amanagal, Amanagal [\/andal, Rangarr:ddy Dis,trict. 5. Two CCs; to liD FOR REVENUE, High Court for the {ltate of '1 elangana at 6. One CC t: Slil RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPU(]l 7. Two CD Oop es w \ To SA BS ... I I I II ! I I t I I t 6 ,.17" ' (,' s rA r"6- J o o 2t ri 2ii25 t( ( ]. o \.: ce\t; HIGH COURT DATED:2510412025 ORDER WP.No.12'769 of 2025 DISPOSINCi OF THE W'P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOIJT I)OSTS. ,4'1" 1U 9+s'* i --'1elEF*