Ms. Vegesna Naga Kavya Lakshmi Bhargav v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to directRespond ent No.3 & 4 to process the pending paymentfor 1 units of sheep supplied as per requirement under SHEEP REARING DEVELOPMENT SCHE[/E (PROGRAM) (SRDS) by considering the Representation dated 14.1 1 .2024 to the Petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. E VENKATA SIDDHARTHA counsel for the Respondent Nos. I & 3 : GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANOARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 4 : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADTIAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.12699 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: "...1o issue a th il, Order or dit eclion not e pdrlic lot lf o e in lhe ndtto'e of tl'rit of llandamus rleclaring thc action of the resPondents more Pdrtic larb' Respondenl No. 3 antl t herein not pt-ocessing lhc payment lor the sheep nits supPlied as per rcquitement nder Sllt"Ll' ltt lRINC DLI'l-l.OP LlI:-NT S'Hl:t'lL lPltOGRt\, (SRDS) lot I nil to the l)etiti(,tlat desP e .tgrcetng thdt the Pavntents ore due ft r.tm Respondents lor palthrcttt (f dtnonnt tlue for the supplied shc"p untrs Ircrein os illegal, betiLles in fioldiott o/ tht Pt'inciPlcs o! notural ju\!ic! dnd conseque lll direcl the ResPondent No. 3 untl 'l to process thc pending payntent Jbr I unt of sheep supplied as per rcquircnent tnder SlltiEP Rl',lRl'\G DLVELOP'tlENl scllLLIE (PROG RIM) (SRDS) (SRDI') ro rhc l',ctitioner o d pdss .- "

2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a farmer and for his livelihood he is into sale and supply of livestock for the states of Telangana and Andl-rra Pradesh as per the requ irements. It is further submitted that the then Government of Telangana had introduced a scheme in the name of Sheep Rearing Development Scheme (PROGRAM) (SRDS) for promoting and developing the traditional shepherd community, the Kurutnas and Yadavas in Telangana.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent Nos.3 and 4 along with their officials have approached I \ 2 TMD] wp_12699_2025 the petitioner and requested fbr supply of 2l units of sheep, (one unit consists of 20 fer.nale sheep and 1 male sheep). Accordingly, the petitioner supplicd the same to respondent Nos.3 and 4 and paynrcnt fbr 20 units of sheep is made and the payment tbr 01 unit ol'sheep is still duc to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioncr had placed a copy of lettel bearing Lr.No.834/RTI1BII12024 dated 23.10.2024, obtained under RTI Act, whercin it is clearly stated that payment of 0l unit of sheep is due to the petitioner. lt is further subrnitted that in similar circumstances, this Court in W.P.No.25013 of 2024 had directed the respondents therein to consider the representation of the petitioner and process the payment lbr supply of 44 units of sheep therein expeditiously, prefcrably within a period of four weeks flom the date of receipt of a copy ol the order, if the petitioner is othcrwise eligible and the conditions are met and is seeking sirnilar in.this case as rvell

4. Learned Government Pleader for Animal Husbandary appearing for respondents No. I and 3 arid leamed Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents No.2 and 4, did not dispute the submissions of the petitioncr.

5. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, this Court deems it fit to permit the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents with regard to payment lor 01 unit of sheep, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, the respondents shall consider the said representation and process the payrnent of 0l unit of sheep within a period of four (04) weeks from the date ofreceipt of the representation from the pctitioner, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible and the conditions arc met. The copy of the proceeding be communicated to the petitroner

6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this wlit petition, shall stand closed. I I I i I 1 I To, //TRUE COPY//

1. The Principal Secretary (Animal Husbandry, Department), State of Telangana, Hyderabad SD/. K. AMMAJI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER Development and Fishery

2. The Principal Secretary (Revenue), State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The District Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Officer, Nalgonda Diskict, Telangana.

4. The Diskict Collector, Nalgonda District, Telangana, 5. One CC to SRl. E. VENKATA SIDDHARTHA, Advocate. [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] L Two CD Copies. 9. One Spare Copy. -. : ' -:".*$* &* W /1 tS HIGH COURT DATED ;2510412025 (HE S14 14: !: c :_) $\ 28;ul 6 ( f a o€.sp ATC Heo * ORDER WP.No. 12699 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS L \0