High Court · 2025

PetitionUnderArticle226otlheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ' order or direction' preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2'd and 3'd respondents in not giving possession of ptot to the petitioner as per the Letter of Provisional Allotment of Plot dated 28'B-20O7, as illegal' arbitrary and violative of the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to allot plot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per the latest Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition' Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with agreed norms' l.A.NO:1 oF ito 1s( WPMP.NO:10 328 0F2015) pr>titior Jnder section 151 cpc praying that in the cirl)umstances stated in the affid ar it f ,;d ;n 5urr._ of the petition, the High ()ouri may be pleased to direct th') 2.c and 3rd respondent to arot prot to the cetit oner with enhanced area s f,e. th€ - *"",,,","ni o;;;; ; *Ii :; ::::ffi: #T; lalest Right to Fair compensation ;:::::l ; ;r I ;T I:l;:,: 3:81,il.iii11",3ff ,:3ai,,"fl ft *ffi lisf R,LEARNED3oUNSEL Counset for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR LAND ACQUISITITON Counsel f,:r the Res pondent Nos.2 & 3 : SMT D.MADHAV I, S(:: FOR HYDERAEiAD METR OPOLITAN DEVE LOPMENTAUTHO RITY (HMDA) W.P.No i7tl23 OF 2015 Between: 51ril: sfl iilli,i'J:[*::H;r?,R#iirf,S,fr*occ : Hous;ewir >, N o 7 _2_3 1 t 221, AND 1 2 3 .....PETITIONER J:il.ll;:lllilll:i*,*il;iiE",E":JJ:'.:[$,,S1?:"#|?,:l3)t;?J."", Hyder ab;rrl I\,4etropolitan De cffi ;i;;;;I.;",i,::li'Xl;,"'L?:?Ufl Hl,.:',:?Sy;,[iJ;,itli:y;:,fi ?8[i1t,. The Sce cr,: i)eputy Collecto rarnar(a rt'cterabad 500 o,6rLA), Unit No.2, llnd O.R.Fl., HI\,4DA comptex, ..... RESPONDENTS petrtion L rrrl,:r A,rticle 226 of the Constitution of lndi;: prilying that in the circumstance s s la t3d n lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issrre :rn appropriate writ, order or direction, preferal)ly a Writ in the nature of Ma16216.rt dr:craring the action of the 2nd and 3rri respondents in not giving possess r()rr of t)lot to the petitioner as per the l-etter or provisional Allotment of F,lc t cl:tled :)__B_2OO7, as illegal, arbitrary and violative ,:f the principles of Natural Ju:;tile ,t rd consequenfly direct the 2nd and 3rd Flesp,rndents to allot plot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per the latest Right to Compensation and TranSparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Resettlement Act, 2013 with agreed norms. |.A.NO:1 OF 2015 {WPMP.NO:1033 1 0F 2015) F air Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstaflces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to allot plot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per the latest Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with agreed norms pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B.MURALIDHAR, LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI JOGINIPALLY SAI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : SMT D'MADHAVI, SC FOR ivoEnnano METRoPoLITAN DEVELoPMENT AUTHoRIw (HMDA) w.P.No :7A27 OF 2015 Between: Kr rm [Vl Java. D/o M. Krishna Reddy, Rio Plot No 10, Hastinapuram Central' VEnirr" ir.Eohapari Acharya Marg, Sagar Road, Hyderabad' .....PETITIONER AND 1- The State of Telangana, Rep' by its Principal Secretary' Revenue ' D6a-ffi;"t" SeCieiarlai' nyberibao, Rep' by its Principal secretary' 2 Hvrlerabad Metrooolitan Development Authority, Rep by its Nilelropolrtan - c6mmissioner, B[ock A, District Commercial complex, larnaka, HyoeraDao - 500 007.

3. The Special Deputy Collector (LA), Unit M'2' llnd O R R ' HN/DA Complex' Tarnaka, HYderabad - 500 007. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 o',f the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction' preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not giving possession of plot to the petitioner as Allotment ot F)tot dated 6_1_2009, as illegal, arbitra of Natural _rr.l:jtice and consequenfly direct the 2n plot to tl e ll(ltitioner with enhanced area Compensatrorr and Transparency in Land Resettlemr)n. Act, ;2013 with agreed norms. per ihe _etter of provisional ry anci vio ative of the principles d and 3rd Respondents to as per ':he tatest Right to Acquisirion, Rehabilitation Fair t.A.NO: 10F .20 1 MP. NO: 103 3s oF 20151 petilic,rr [indr-.r Section 151 CpC praying that in the cirr:umstances stated in the affid:rv t t,i,ed in support of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to direct the 2nct and Respondents to allot plot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per the lzrlest Right to Fair Compensation and Tra rsparency in Land Acquisition, flehabilitation and Reset'ement Act, 20.13 vrith agreed norms pending discosal of the writ petition. Counset for $re petition".,:.:IJ.g.UgRAL|DHAR, REPRESE NTIIvci SRI JoGINIPALLY .Ai;Hi;;iI.A. Counset for th€ Respondent No.1: Gp FOR LAND ACeUlSlTtt)N Counsel for the Resoono"lr.fg:,_Z & 3 : SMT D.MAOHAVI, Sc FOR H y D E R A B A D r/ E r R b po L I rA ru o e vt io iii:e r.r1, rtiir o n r w I H M DA) w.P.NO :8 113,Ctt: 2 015 .., LEARNED EOUNSEL Between: ii ?:i l;l :, :, fi 3 : i ,tr31i g?i .fl%?:d:, U:i,.r,B,T &lJ; f;ffi;,Sfu.p i;l AND 1 Z .....PETITIONER The Sitirtc,,l lelanqana. Rep_by its.principal Secretary Re,,,enue uepa rr, 1, ) - t se,rretariar. Hyberjoaa. R6."6y ;;'p;;iiyp,ar S,>cretary. Hyde, aba,1 l,4etDpolitan Der r4 c6.. ;, ;,, ; ; ;' iiE: il, i, ;,:ffi:? il13,:,,:? gl,,$?Ji qy,T;, ffi :,.fi i: [i11". The Spr,cr a )eputy Collecto rarnala r-t\(ierabad - 500 06rLA)' Unit No.2, llnd o.R.ft., HIVDA Comptex, ,.... RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighcourtmaybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction' preferably a Writ in the natureofMandamusdeclaringtheactionofthe2ndand3rdrespondentsinnot givingpossessionofplottothepetitioneraSpertheLetterofProvisional Allotment of Plot dated 2a-8.2oo7, as illegal, arbitrary and Violative of the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to allot plot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per the latest Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition' Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 201 3 with agreed norms' I.A.NO:1 OF 201 5 (WPMP.NO: 10700 0F 2015) petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe2ndand3rdRespondentstoallotplottothepetitionerwithenhanced area as per the latest Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act' 2013 with agreed norms pending disposal of the writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B'MURALIDHAR' LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI JOGINIPALLY SAI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No'1: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent Nos'2 & 3 : SMT D'MADHAVI' SC FOR iioenneno MErRbPoLlrAN DEVELoPMENT AUTHoRITY (HMDA) W.P.NO:820 6 0F 2015 Between: K. Chandra Sekhar Reddy,, Sio Ramachandra Reddy,_a9pd. 4o years' Rio Flat *e.io"k i, n.v.rr,trliv"ihi Apartments, lcRlsAT colonv' chandanagar' i'i"ii7. Hyderabad ..,..PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal 9"9"J'ry' Revenue D;;rffi;rt" seireiariai, Hvderibad, Rep by its Principal Secretary 2 Hydora L,ard Metropolitan Development Authority Rep. by jts Metropolitan ccrrmissioner, Btock A, oistrict bommeiiiJ C6;p;J; ?,,rn" ka, Hyderabad _ *iiff'liJB?3HYr?"jf;5511A)' Unit No 2' rrnd o R R , HMDA comprex, .....RESPONDENTS pelitior tnderr Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstancres; r;tated in the affidavit filed therewith, the l.igh Court may be pleased t() ss Lro ar appropriate writ, order or direction, pref,,)rably a Writ in the nature of [\'4ar'c1:rmus decraring the action of the 2d and 3rd respondents in not giving possession 'rf plot to the petitioner as per tho Lertter of provisionar A',otment cf prc't dated 6-1-2009, as iregar, arbitrary and viorative of the principres of Natural J -rslice and consequenuy direct the 2nd and 3.d Rr:spondents to allot prot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per tho ra:est Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, I:leha bilitation and Resettlement l\,r1, 2013 with agreed norms and pass such ottrer order or further orders as this llonbk.' court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NOi 1 OI:t 2015 PMP. NO: 10813 oF 2015 'ir€'(r petito r [JrrerSection 151 cpc praying that in the circurrstances stated in the affidavit in support of the petition, the High coLlrt n ay be preased to direct the 2ncj arrtd 3rd Respondents to alot plot to the petitiorrer with enhanced area as per the ratest Right to Fair Compensation and -fran:;parency in Land Acquisition, irRet-abiritation and Resetrement Act, 201, with agreed norms pending dispcselcrf the writ petition. Counset for the petition".,i glt B.MURAL|DHAR, LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESE N rIN(; S RI .JoGINIPALLY .Ai K'iI;iliia.., Counsel for the Flespondent No.1: cp FOR LAND ACaUlSlTlOl,l counsel for the Respond".1,-!g:,2 & 3 : SMT D.MADHAVI, SC f:oR HYDERABA D ME TROPOLITAru OEViiOPrrACrVi'AIiirONrrV (HMDA) w.P. NO:8951 OF 2015 Between: Smt. Pakiru Lakshmamma, W/o Malta Reddy, aged 5O years,-Oec Housewile., Rio F.i.ro.b, ppn colony, Hasthinapuram central, Vanastalipuram, Range Reddy District - 500 079. .....PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal QeqeJary, Revenue ' Department, Secreiariat, Uyderabad' Rep. by its Principal Secretary' 2 Hvderabad Metrooolitan Development Authority, Rep' by its Metropolitan - C6.*iSo"er. Blbck A, District Commercial Complex, Tamaka, Hyderabad - 500 007.

3. The Special Deputy Collector (LA), Unit No'2, llnd O'R'R'' HMDA Complex' Tarnaka, HYderabad - 500 007. .T...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleasedtoissueanappropriatewrit,orderordirection,preferablyaWritinthe nature of f\ilandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not givingpossessionofplottothepetitioneraspertheLetterofProvisional Allotment of Plot dated 3olo6t21}7, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to allot plot to the petitioner with enhanced area as per the latest Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with agreed norms I.A.NO:1 OF 2015 (WPMP.N O:11788 OF 20't5) PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesStatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe2ndand3rdRespondentstoallotplottothepetitionerwithenhanced area as per the latest Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with agreed norms pending disposal of the writ petition Counset for t:he petition"r.i._SIJ B.MURAL|DHAR, LEARNED COUNSEL REpRESET{Tr !G sRt JoctNtpnr-r_v ser ihrd;ili" counser fc'r the Respondent No.1: Gp FoR LAND ACQtrs[.roN Counset for the Respond..l-!9:.2 a 3 : SMT D.MADHAV|, SC FOR HvDERABAD, MErRbpoLtrAN DEGioptiiinl'atinonrw (HMDA) The Court mer<le the following COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO V'RIT PETITIO NNo s.782() 7a23 7827 8113 a2o6 and 895 10F 2015 COMMON ORDER: The issue involved in all the writ petitions is one and the same and therefore, all the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order. In all these writ petitions' the petitioners have questioned the 2. action of respondent Nos,2 and 3 in not giving possession of plots to the petitioners as per the awards passed by the District lrgal Services Authority, Ranga Reddy District and to declare the said awards as itlegal,, arbitrary and consequently direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to allot plots to the petitioners with enhanced area as per the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition' Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2O13. The particulars of the awards are as under:- W.P.No PLS No. Date 7o 8 87 512f o Pw N o2 o 2of Io 5 oNPw 32 .No.7 827 of 2O 15 w.P 51of 2o Pw oN 8 5Iof 2 8oPw N I2of P Nw 9o 8 o6 I5 o I1 3 o2 1186 1055 l7 i 187 t9 722

29.Oa.2007 02.O8.2007 06.o1.2009 29.Oa.2007 06.o1.2009 06.07.2007 3 Heard Sci --8. Muralidhar, Iearned counsel representing Sri JoginiPatlY Sai Krishna, learned. counsel for the petitioners' 2 learned appean nq learnec. lrss istant Government pleader for Land ,\cquisition cnr behalf of respondent No. I and Smt.l).Madhavi, Counsel for Hyderabad Mr:tropolital Ii:andrng Develop,111s11r; Authority (HMDA) appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 an<l !

4. I;:arned cor:nsel for the petitioners submitted tl,rat in similar circumsta n<:r:sr, this Court disposed of the rvrit petrtion uide W.P.No.i )4,17 of 2OlS dated 27.Og.2O24 and thc pe_rrroi)ers in all the prese,1. rvrit petitions are also entitled for the r;am,: rerief. A Copy of lhe said order is placed on record. Learne:c[ counsel for respondents No. I has not dtst)uted the 5

6. In vie,.l of the above submissions, this Court dr__:rns it lit and proper tc, <lisp's,5s cf all the writ petitions, directing tlrc p, rtitioners to submit :hr:. r representation to the responclents. tl]. cncr osing all the necess:rr1. proofs of earlier allotment, to en:rblc the rcsl:ondents to execute cotlvej/arlce deed/allotment deccl in lavour ol the petitioners, 'rithin a period of eight (og) weeks iron: rnt date of receipt oI a --(]py of the representation, in tcrmrs ol original allotment lettt:r. and also the Lok Adalat au,ards reft,rrerl br__l.rrv: 3 W.P.No PLS lYo. Date W.P.No.7820 of 20ts W.P.No.7823 of 201 5 W.P.No.7827 of 2Ol 5 W.P.No.8113 of 2o15 W.P.No.8206 of 2O 15 W.P.No.8951 of 2015 1186 1055 77 7787 19 722

29.08.2007 02.Oa.2007 06.Or.2009 29.08.2007 06.01 .2009 06.07.2007 7 With the above directions, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed. 4 //TRUE COPY// SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTIO OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, State of 2. The Mekopolitan Commrssioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Telangana at Hyderabad. Tamaka, Hyderabad - 500 007. Authority, Block A, District Commercial Complex, Tarnaka, Hyderabad _ 500 oo7. 3. The Special Deputy Cottector (LA),, Unit No.2, ilnd O.R.R., HMDA Complex, 4. Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACeUtStTtON, High Court for the State of 5. One CC to SRI JOGIN|PALLY SAt KRISHNA, Advocate tOpUCl 6. One CC to SMT D.MADHAVI, SC FoR HYDERABAD METRoPbLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTTY (HMDA), Advocate tOpUCl Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies SA GJP YY i I i To t I I : ; I : HIGH C:OI.JRT DATED:1tt10212025 COMMON ORDER WP. N os. 7 i320, 7 823, 7 827, 8113,8:20tiAND 8951 0F 2015 41=,; . r.4 25]tru p5 ((\'( a \i^ \ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOIJT COSTS. 1O diQ^ YL --- 1(e\u