Shaik Mohd.Ali v. '1 . The State of Telangana

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to cause immediate arrest of respondents 4 to 7 basing on Crime No.660 of 2016 Uls.120 (B),420,447,448 tPC and Sec.156 (3) CRpC on the file of the 3rd respondent including police protection to the petitioner and petitioner property, basing on the representations given by petitioner on 6-1 1- 2016 and 8-11-2016 i.e., petitioner landed property open plot in survey No.3g/3 admeasuring 600 sq.yards situated at fvlirsagar village Bunrukunuddoula, Rangareddy District and also in pursuance and compliance of injunction orders in l.A.No.sB1 of 2016 in O.S.No.183 of 2016 dated 21-11-2016 passed by the Hon'ble Additional Junior civil Judge cum XVll Metropolitan Magistrate, cyberabad at Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRt R.LAXMTKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : -- Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI MOHD OSMAN SHAHEED The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No. 44526 OF 2015 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking the follorving relief ' . . to issr/e a v'rrit order or direction rnore pafiicularly one in the nature cf V/rit of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not caLrsing anest of the respondents 4 io 7 inspite of registration of Crime No.660 of 2016 tJ/s.1208, 424. 447. 448 fPC and Sec i !;6(3) CRPC and also not proviciing poiice prottction to ihe oetitioner and petitioner propefty basing cn the represeniations given by pet;tianer on 6.11.2016 and 8.i i.2016 i.e., petiticner ianded propefiy )pen Plot in survey No.38/3 admeasuring 500 sq yards situateci at Mirsagar village Bunrukunuddouia ,qangaieCdy District and aiso not complying the injuncticn orders in l.A.No 581 of 2016 in O.S.No. 183 of 2O16 dated 21.11.2C76 Flassed by 'he Hcnbie Additionai Junior Civil Judge cum XVll Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabec' at Rajendranagar Rangareddy District as iliegal arbitrcry Luljust anci also against the article 300 A of Constitution of inciia ano consequertial directions to the responclents 2 anC .J to cause immediate arrest of respondents 4 to 7 basing on Crime No.660 of 2015 Li/s i20B 420, 447,448 IPC and Sec 156-3 CRPC on thefile of the 3rc respondent including police protection to the petitioner and petitioner propefty basing on the representaiicns givert by petiticnei' on 6.11.2016 and 8.11.2016 i.e., petiiioxer landed p:operly apeit Piot in survey No.38/3 admeasuring 600 sq yards situated at f irsagar village Bunrukunuddoula RangaredCy Districi and also in pLlrsuance and compliance of injunclion c:rders h l.A.No 581 of 2C16 rn O. S. rVo. 1 83 of 2016 dated 21 . .i 1 .2O 7 6 passed by tne Honble Additional Junior Civil judge cum XVli itletropciitati Magistrate Cyberabad at Rajendranagar Rangareddy District forthittith and pass suclt oiher order or orders...."

2. Heard Mr.V.Bramaiah Chowdary, learned counsel ror petitioner and fvlr. R. Laxrnikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader fcr Home appeanng for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Learnec counsel for petitioner wouid submit that this petition is filed seeking direct,cn to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take up consequential I I 2 action upon registration of Crime No.660 of 2016 and prays for necessary directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the crime No.660 of 2016 was investigated and final repoft was filed on 30.06.2017 endorsing 'false' on the file of Vlll l\Ietropolitan Magistrate, Rajendra Nagar. 5 Having regard to the development reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader and as the contest of the petitioner has already been addressed and the cause raised in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly. this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. lVliscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand close$. /TRUE COPY/ S D ABDULLA KHAN ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To Hyderabad. [OUT]

1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the 2. ohe cc to s'nrV.',aRAHMAtAH CHOWDARY, Advocate^t_g?!lcl 5. One CC to Sni frrfOnO OStvlAN SHAHEED, Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies of Telangana at SA MMT ?v.q. t t HIGH COURT DATED:21rcil2025 ORDER WP.No.44526 of 2016 ,t

4. 03 trc 20fi i * a.^ .:i 1416'. v'.E * DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. ?r.\cr '-rlt\\,r