High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleasedtoissueanappropriatewrit,orderordirectionmoreparticu|arlyoneinthe nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos 3 to 5 in keeping the land of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac 4 07 Gis in Survey No 77' whichisSituatedatRavalkolVillage,MedchalMandal,MedhcalMalkajgiriDistrict andblockedthelandofthePetitionerunderthestatusofBlockedTransaction without having any directions from any Court or Tribunal and harassing the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 and 300-A of the Constitutio.noflndiaandalsoviolativeofNaturalJusticeandconsequentlydirect theRespondentNos'3to5todeletethelandofthePetitionertoanextentof Ac.4.07 Gts in survey No.77, which is situated at Ravalkol Village, tvledchal I\ilandal, tiledhcal IVtalkajgiri District under the status of Blocked Transactions in Dharani Portal. IANO:1OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Coud may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to delete the land of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac.4.07 Gts in Survey No.77, which is situated at Ravalkol Vlllage, Medchal Mandal, Medhcal Malkajgiri District under the status of Blocked Transactions in Dharani Portal pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVEINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13O5O of2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following reliet "....to issue an oppropiate u.trit order or direction more particulartg one in the noture of Wrtt of Mandamts declaing the action of the Respondent Nos.3 lo 5 in keeping the lond of the Petitioner to an extent of Acs.4.07 Gts in Surueg No.77 whiclt i.s situated ot Raualkt:l Village Medchal Mandal Medhcal Malkajgiri DAtict and blocked the land of tLLe Petitioner unler the stahs of Blocked Transaction u.tithout hauing ang directions from ang Court or Tibunal and harassing the Petitioner i,s illegal arbitrary and uiolatiue of Articles 14 and 21 and 30OA of the Constitution of India and also uiolotiue of Natural Justice and con sequentlg direct the Respondent Nos.3 fo 5 to delete tlLe land of the Petitioner to an ertent of Acs.4.07 Gts in Surueg No.77 whiclt i.s situated ot Raualkol Villoge MedcLtal Mandal Medlrcal Malkojgii Distict under the status of Blocked Tron sactions in Dharani Portal and pass....."

2. It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.4.07 guntas in Sy.No.77, situated at Ravalkol Village, Medchal Mandal, Medhcal Malkajgiri District, having purchased- from the law{ul owner by name Gunuvaltha Reddy for valuable consideration through registered sale deed bearing document No.1409 of 2012, dated 09.04.2012 as such the name of the petitioner was mutated in all the revenue records and pattadar passbook was also issued in his favour under the provisions ofthe Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks , t/ /,-- 2 Act,2O2O (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2O"\. Some of the real estate brokers approached the petitioner ald demanded to sell his land on cheaper rate, the sarne was denied, due to which they developed grudge against the petitioner and approached respondent Nos.3 to 5 and influenced them, due to which the respondent Nos.3 to 5 blocked the transaction on the petitioner's iand. It is further stated that, while updating the entries in Dharani portal, the nature ofthe land has been shown as "blocked for any transaction" without issuing any notice or without assigning any valid reasons and therefore, he made online application to deie te the said endorsement. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receipt of the said application, the respondent authorities did not consider the same.

3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed ofat the admission stage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended that recording of entries in Dharani Portal is only a consequential act of carrying the entries which have already been made under the provisions of the Act 9 of 2O2O. karned counsel further submitted that the entries made in the pattadar passbook are only compilation of the survey numbers and the accounts for the extent 3 being mentioned in a particular village and therefore, it does not take away the right of ttre petitioner in aly manner unless the entries in the revenue records are corrected by following due procedure.

5. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, has not disputed the issuance of pattadar passbook in favour of the petitioner under the provisions of the Act 9 of 2O2O and also the submission of tlie online application seeking for deletion of the status in Dharani Portal as "blocked for any transaction".

6. Sub-section (4) of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 confers the power on the State Government either suo motu or on an application by any person or for giving effect to the hnal orders of the High Court of Telangana or Supreme Court of India to proceed to de-notify, either in full or in part, the notiltcation issued under sub-section (2) and rules made under the provisions of the I I Act. Further, as per the Standing Order 219 (b) of the Registration Manual Part-ll, the revenue authorities are not having any right or auttrority to list any private patta lands in the prohibited list that too without conducting any enquiry.

7. For the aforesaid reasons and since the petitioner has already submitted the online application, this Court deems it 4 a appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent authorities to examine and consider the same if there are no restraint orders issued by the competent civil Court' Further, in any event, if the petitioner is not entitled for deletion of the status of the land in Dharani Portal, the respondent authorities are directed to pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be completed within eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. I t To, //rRUE coPY/, SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL RE-GlsrRAR \Rl"Y \ lSEcTtoN OFFTCER 1 2 3 4 Cr. 7. o. Jhe Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secrf,t|ri"t, The State of Telanqana, Hvderabal The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA) Tetangana, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Medchal-Malkaiqiri District. rhe Revenue Divisionar onicer, keei'a%'oirr'ri"i'', Medchar-tVrarkajgiri District. The Tahsildar, Medchal rrlanoii, rr,t-Jo-JrrirlnrJrriXiJiii'bltri"t 9nu 99 to sri Rapotu Bhaskjr,' AJ;;;;i;joFijEi'"'' Two CCs to Gp fcir Revenue, tiign courii j;ti.,."5irt" or Tetangana. at Hyderabad [OUTI Two CD Copies TJ SS l I l k [] I i i |,tv F i I i ? HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 ORDER WP.No.13050 of 2025 \\ 1Hr. SI4 i e o t C.r) o -t- .- ,)'t 2 6 utt't nU {' * ttrj , ?a r k F l h P ! DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS