High Court · 2025

8. Madugula Sriramulu, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged about 57 Years, Occ. Business, Rio. H No.2-8, Abdullapurmet Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

9. Madugula Maflesha, S/o. Late Narsimha, Aged about 51 YearE, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No 2-8, Abdullapurmet Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District '10. Madugula Srinivas, S/o, Late Narsimha, Aged about 48 Years, Occ Business. R/o. H.No.2-8, Abdullapurmet Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 1'l . Madugula Hamsamma, w/o. Late Narsimha, Aged about 50 Years, Occ. Housewife, Rio. H.No.2-8, Abdullapurmet Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [Vlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the Petitioner and also interfering into the civil disputes during the pendency of crvil suits and calling the Petitioner to the Police station and threatening to settle the dispute and threatening to handover the Plot of the Petitioner to an extent of 220 sq. Yards Plot No,131, in Survey Nos.250 aod 251, which is situated at Janachaitanya Housing Ltd, Pedda-Amberpet, Ranga Reddy District to the Respondent Nos T to '1 1 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14. 15,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No G not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty and as well as peaceful possession of the house property of the Petitioner to an extent of 220 Sq. Yards, Plot No.131, in Survey Nos.250 and 251, which is situated at Janachaitanya Housing Ltd., Pedda-Amberpet, Ranga Reddy Drstrict and not to threaten the Petitioner to hand over his house to the Respondent Nos. 7 to 1'l and not to interfere into the civil disputqs between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos T to 11 during the pendency of Writ Appeals through vide Nos.230, 233,234 and 235 of 2025 A NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into the peaceful life and liberty and as well as peaceful possession of the house.property of the Petitioner to an extent of 220 Sq. Yards, Plot No.131, in Survey Nos.250 and 251, which is situated at Janachaitanya Housing Ltd, Pedda-Amberpet, Ranga Reddy District and not to threaten the Petitioner to hand over his house to the Respondent Nos. 7lo 11 and not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.7 to 11 during the pendency of Writ Appeals through vide Nos.230, 233,234 and 235 oI 2025 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 TO 11: - The Court made the following: ORDER h THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ P ition No.12920 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ Petition is taken up for hearing and drsposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.7 to 11 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he is the owner of land admeasuring 220 square yards in Plot N0.131 in Sy.Nos.250 and 251 situated at lanchaitanya Housing Limited, Pedda-Amberpet, Ranga Reddy -between the petitioner and Districq that there arc inter se civil disputes the unofficial respondents in relation to the aforesaid land; and that the 6th respondent is interfering in the civil dispute at the behest of the unofficial respondents, which action of the authorities it is contended as highly illegal and arbitrary.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 6 while denying the rvrit averments, would -/ 'a{t 2 submit thaqas of date. no case is registered against the petitioner herein for the authorities to either cail the petitioner in connection with the aforesaid crime or to involve themselves in the civil dispute as being claimed by the petitioner. 5' Learned Government preader further submits that the petitioner apprehending that the unofficial respondents may approach the respondents-authorities by rodging a compraint and in order to prevent the authorities from taking action thereagainst, has filed the present Writ Petition. 6 I have taken note of the respective contentrons urged.

7. Having regard to the submissrons made as above, and taking note of the fact that, as of date no case is regrstered againsi the petitioner and also placing on record the submission made on behalf of the 6th respondent that the said authority is not interfering in the civir dispute, this court is of the view that the respondents are to be directed to foilow due process oflaw in the event of any complaint being lodged against the petitioner in respect of the subject property and undertake investigation into the aforesaid crime stricuy in accordance with raw without invorving themselves in the civil dispute. B Subject to above direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs 7- 3

9. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY// SD/. A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTIOJ/OFFICER The Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secretariat Building' Secretariat' T[:il'#!:qiF".liifi l;l1i*Brgfi !3;Hx:f; :?'"?i,c'mmssonera'1e ?f,:t&r;,dydJ"%'Jl:l,on"r of PoIrce, L B'Nagar Division' Rachakonda c""*"r15,iJ""[te, Ranga Reddv District The Assistant Co.r,".,on)7"";'P;ii"t';""t)"'sthalipuram klsl'r"'.Tfi :*; Bli 33, TSS J' B ililit;t P o I i ce stati o n' R a n s a R ed d v E ii'[f B;tfl",ff il? s a n a' at fu I gl sst Hfh B Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD CoPies ll'J, "'' " t3,! ^? Circle' Rachakonda To

2. a

4. 6 6 7 9 I'SK. SS HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 ORDER a-'t ,-i WP.No.12920 of 2025 ,l , /, ij l,' ,: i a: I -, !i \ --:-.. i-EL 't. :.. s ir\ ' liri :,-,' ll .!, :,/ i'7' a _,r' $* .) c DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS qI \