The High Court · 2025

1. The State of telangana, represented by lts Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

2. Gunda Pavan Kumar, S/o Gundu Baluraju, Aged about 26 year, Occ. Private employee, Occ: working tn wines shop R/o H.No.12-1-15'17, Shanthi Nagar' Lalapet.

3. Naveen Reddy, S/o Sathi reddy, Aged about 38 year, Occ: Private employee R/o H.No.9-1 10/17, Street No 7, Ganesh Chowki Anjaneya Nagar, Boduuppal, WC Boduppal Malkajgiri- Medchal District ... RespondenURes pondent No.1 to 3 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash PRC No.25 of 2024, Pending on the file of Honorable Principle Junior Civil J udge-cum-lrrletropolitan [Vlagistrate, IVIedchal- Malkajgiri. Drstrict, Functioning From Kushaiguda. by way of compromise, terms of Joint lvlemo. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Between:

1. Gunda Pavan Kumar, S/o Gundu Baluraju, Aged about 26 year, Occ: Private employee, Occ. working in wines shop R/o H.No.12-1-15'17, Shanthi Nagar, Lalapet. 2. Naveen Reddy, Sio Sathi reddy, Aged about 38 year, Occ: Private employee R/o H. No.9-1 '10/'17, Street No. 7, Ganesh Chowki Anjaneya Nagar' Boduuppal, WC Boduppal lvlalkalgiri- Medchal District ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 and 2 :-.1 AND 1 The State of telangana, represented by lts Public Piosecutor, High Courl at Hyderabad. Seetha Babu Yadav S/o Seetha Balaiah Yadav, Aqel about 45 year, Occ Business, Dumbu @ ',/enu Yadav, S/o Seetha Satyanarayana Yadav, Aged about 37 year. Occ. Private employee Both are Rb 14-92. Old lVlirjalaguda li,4alkajgiri- lt[edct al 47 . .. Responde rn UComplainant 4 ...Petitione r/accused No.1 and 2 Petition under Sectron 359(6) of BNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Petition, the High Court may be pleasec to permit me and respondent No 2 and 3, to enter in to compromise in I lC No 25 of 2024, pending on the file of Prrnciple Junior Civil Judge-cum-tle.ropolitan N4agrstrate, Medchal-Malkajg ir. District, Functionrng From Kusharguda, by way of compromise, in terms of Jornt lr4emo. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying tha n the circumstances stated in the, Joint [/lemo along with Petrtion. the High Cou-t may be pleased to record the compromrse rn CrlP.No.5800 of 2025 and quaslr the proceedings rn PRC No. 25 of 2024. pending on the file of Principle Jurior Civil Judge- Cum- Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-lvlalkalgrri, Distrrct. Functionrng From Kushaiguda and quash the PRC No. 25 of 2024 in ternts of Jlint Memo This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the i\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of [\/r. IVI Ratan Srngh, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Mr. Jrthen jt:r Rao Veeramalla. Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri John Sigmani Joseph, Advocate for the Respondents No.2 & 3. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.5800 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 in P.R.C.No.25 o'f 2024, on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, functioning from Kushaiguda, registered for the offences under Sections 448 and 307 of lPC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 as well as respondent Nos.2 & 3 that during pendency of the Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to enter into compromise and to record compromise between them

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petitions

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facfo complainant in l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 which discloses that the respondent Nos.2 & 3 2 have willingly consented for compromise. Since ttre parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a c;hance to setile the matter by appearing along with their respectivr: counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vlde orders dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify, :he parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have app _-ared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 16.09.2025 stating that trr: parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercicn, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 202.3 are allowed, Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and ihe proceedings in P.R.C.No.25 of 2024, on the file of the learned principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal-M alkajgiri District, functioning from Kushaiguda, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.'l & 2, are hereby quashec :;ubject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand \ 3 Only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- A. SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// To 1 ! I Malkajgiri, District SECTI N OFFICER l The Principal Junior civir Judge'cum Metroporitan Magistrate, Medchar- 2. The station House officer, Markalgiri porice station, Rachakonda District. 3' Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana at 4. One CC to Mr. IVI. Ratan Singh, Advocate [OpUC] I 9n" !! t^o Sf John Srgmani Joseph, Advotate tOpUCl 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] (Along with a Copy of Jornt Memo of Compromrse) Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Mr. M. Ratan Singh, Counsel for the petrtroner as directed by the Hon,ble court vide order dated 24-og-202s as Rs 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only) to the "Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, State of Telangana, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 111274 of 2025 datedOg_1O_2025 I Kam/sa HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRLP.No.5800 of 2025 a:) C) 3(. ..\' 1 B iicv 2025 * o -r q[](\ BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED ..+ MEMORANDUM OF THE CRIMINAL PET]TION FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS ACT OF 2023 BEFORE THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT, FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Crl.P. No. of 2025 In PRC No. 251 2024 Between: - 1. Seetha Babu Yadav S/o Seetha Balaiah Yadav Aged about 45 Year, Occ: Buslness

2. Dumbu @ Venu Yadav S/o Seetha Satyanarayana Yadav Aged about 37 Year, Occ: Private employee Both are No 14-92, Old Mirjalaguda Malkajgiri- Medchal 47 ..Petitioner/ accused No.1 and 2

1. The state ofTelangana, represented by It's Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad AND

2. Gunda Pavan Kumar S/o Gundu Baluraju Aged about 26Year, Occ: Private employee Occ: working in wines shop R/o'H.No: l2-L-t5L7, Shanthi Nagar, Lalapet

3. Naveen Reddy S/o Sathi reddy Aged about 38 Year, Occ: Private employee R/o H. No. 9-1L0117, Street No. 7, Ganesh Chowki Anjaneya Nagar, Boduuppal, WC Boduppal Malkajgiri- Medchal District Respondent/ Respondent No.1 to 3 Joint Memo & May it Please Your Honor

1. It is Humbly submitted that, after setting of crime irr to Motion' charge sheet being filed, against respondent No 2 and 3' Res,pondent No.2 and 3 such theY called for approached the Local Heading Person' on where in, ResPondent no'2 Panchayath, among the Petitioner No'1 and 2' Petitionerr No.1 and Z,rePaY and 3, agreed to withdraw the case, Provided' Resp,:ndent No'1 and 2, the amount of Medical treatment, which this quantified the satne, for Rs 50,000/- for which this Petitioner/ accused No.1 and 2, agreed to Pay, before the Lok adalath or lulediation center as referred by this Honorable couft, for which Petitioner/ accused No'1 and 2' agreed, to that efFect, to that extent, Respondent/ Nc'2 and 3' are Filling their affldavlt petitioner/ accused No.1 and 2 l) :t'rq:lLo'!-l .] 1 1> W ;.^"1 sJsv ' ')' ' | \rp{ Counsel fo'r PetitionerT accused No 1 and 2 Respondent/ informant No'2 and 3 a Counsel for ResP ondent/ inf ,f,_N c"mant Dale:22.04.2025 Place : HYderabad h low,, 6ldr*,,(+fu No.2 and 3