1. G. Gopal v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA ll \O Counsel for the Respondent no.1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUT The Court made the following: ORDER ft, :.] . IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.38O1O of2OL2 ORDER: This u,rit petition is hled seeking the following prayer:- " . ..declaing the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in trying to iemolish the compound utall and also dlpJttt." the petitioners from land in surueg no'191 of Jammigadda Kapra Municipalitg Keesara Mandal Ranga Reddy District to an extent of Ac.3-25 qts equiualent to admeasuing 1452 sq.gards tuithin the boundaies East Ou.mers taid, West BJR Colong North Neighbors Land South 6O feet wid.e road uitLaut follouting the procedure prescnbei under the Land Dncroachment Act 1905 and -tuithout issuing ang proceedings rtLithout notice is illegaL of Article 14, 19, 21 and 3O0A of anrl uoid ""aLpposea constitution of india and consequentlg to direct the respondents not to interfere uith the peaceful possession anrl enjogment of petitioners land in question without clue process of laul..."

2. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that the lernd in Sy.No.191 admeasuring Ac.14-15 gts', Keesara Mandal' Ranga Reddy District belongs to father of respondent No 4' n,hiclrisanancestralproperty'Thereafter,onl5'12'2006't]]rLe petitioners purchased a portion of Iand admeasuring Ac 3- l5 gts., out of total extent of land and constructed the compound u,all, accordingly, the same was informed to thc Revenue Authorities. lt is submitted that on 04'12'2012' the respondent authorities and their staff visited the petitioners z land outside the compound wall and state<l that the whole \ localitl, is a Government land and that tlr '-v are going to demoiish the compound wall. Questioning the same, the present writ pctition is filed

3. This Court on 14.12.2012 passed the lrllowing interim " While the petitioners utould conte td that the respondents are seeking to euict thenL from their priuct.te patta lands o{ Ac.3-25 guntas in : 1.No.191 of Jamniqadda, Kapra Nlun.icipalitg, Kees:,a Mandal, Lerned C). P. .for Reuenue (Telanganc'. area), orl instructior-ts, tuould submit that uhite tt e extent of Ac.3 25 guntas in Sg.No.l91 is pnuate catta land, the pelitioners were preuented uh.en tl eg tied to encroach upon the Gouentrnent land in ,> 1.No.199 to an exlent of 0-2O guntas uhich has bee t allotted for constructiort of a Primarg Health Center. Since the petitioners deng hauing ?ncroach.ed on the Gouernrnent land rn Sy.I[o. 199, at d it is their grieuance that the respondents u.tere seeking to interfere utith their possession ouer Ac.3-i 5 guntas in Sg.No.191 . stcttus quo as on today uith , egards tltis extett of Ac.3-25 guntas in Sg. Yo.191 of Jam n'iigaclcla, Kapra ll[unicipality, Keesc ra Mandal, shall. be ntaintctined uLntil futlher orders.' ------- . -- - 3

4. A counter afhdavit has been filed by respondent No.3 stating that petitione r might have purchased the portion of subject land from respondent No.4 which is belonging to the I Government allotted for construction of Primary Health Centre and that respondent authorities are not interfering r,r,ith the patta lands ln Sy.No.l91 and was protecting ttre land in I Sy.No.199 from encroachers and that they have never visited the petitioners land to demolish the compound wall. As per the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, thc petitioners land is in Sy.No.19i and the Government land is ir-r Sy.No. 199 and that thev are having no concern lvith the larld IN Sy.No-191 and respondent authorities cannot take an1' action $'ithoLrt follorving clue procedure as contemplated under las'

5. In that view' of the matter, since the respondent authorities have stated that their land is in Sy.No.199 and the petitioners land is in Sy.No.191, this writ petition is disposed ol rvith a dir-ection to respondent authorities not to intcrlere u,ith the pctitioners land in Sy.No.191 without following duc process of lau . 4

6. Accordingly, with the above directions tlr s writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if ar y pending, sha1l stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/- C.DEEPIKA ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR 1 /?( -=- SECTION OFFICER

1. The Prl-, Secretary Revenue Secretariat, Hydera rad, Government of Telangana.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakidikapo, l, Hyderabad 3. The Tahsildar, Keesara [\,4andal, Ranga Reddy Distrir;t 4. One CC to SRI MUIUTMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, Advcr ate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for th€ State of Telangana at oT I ! I I Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies BSR TKS str- I t t i I i $ :t' E i, li. ! li!l I \ HIGH COURT DATED:0110812025 ih:\ o(-) 2 t JAI 2!26 \ \ I * Or:.. - -:.--- --.2 i'! ORDER WP.No.38010 of 2012 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS SY

5.o\ \ A/6'