The High Court · 2025

praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein for their willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.39990 of 2014, dated 22-04-2024 Between:

1. Kolli Yadagiri Reddy, S/o. Guruva Reddy, Agriculture; R/o H.No. 2-4-153, Khalas Basthi Bhadradri Kothagudem District. Aged about 50 years, Occ. , Yellandu Town and Mandal;

2. Kolli Lakshmi Shilpa Reddy, D/o. Yadagiri Reddy, Aged about 27 years, Occ.Household, R/o H.No. 2-1-153, Khalas Basthi, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

3. Kolli Gopi Reddy, S/o. Late Yadagiri Reddy, Aged about 25 years, Occ.Student, Rio H.No. 2-1-153, Khalas Basthi, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District:

4. Kolli Priyanka Reddy, D/o. Late Yadagiri Reddy, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Student, R/o H.No. 2-1-153, Khalas Basthi, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

5. Kolli Karthik Reddy, S/o. Late Yadagiri Reddy, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Student, Rio H.No. 2-1-153, Khalas Basthi, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...Petitioner AND

1. Shri. T. Vinay Krishna Reddy lAS, The Commissioner, R and R and LA, South Block, 7th Floor, Buddha Bhavan, Ranigunj, Secunderabad, Telangana State 2. Shri. Jitesh Patel lAS, The District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kothag udem, Telangana State.

3. Shri. D. Madhu, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Telangana State. a. th[ N. Balaram lRS, The Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collier.ie,s Cornpany Limited (SCCL), SingareniEhivan, Red Hi[s] p.B,No,18, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana Staie.

5. Shri. Veesam Krishnaiah, The General Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd (SCCL), Yellandu Area, Bhadraldri Kothigudem Diskict, Telangana State.. ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .grant leave to implead Proposed Respondents Nos.1 , 2, and 3 as party 'Respondents Nos. 1, 2, and 3 respectively in the instant Contempt Case and pass such othr:r order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counse! for the Petitioners: SRI SANDEEP KUMAR BODLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Revenue Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 5: SC for Singareni Collieries The Court made the following: ORDER * ,:: HON'BLE MRS. IUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA CONTEMPT CASE No.1147 of 2025 W.P.No.3999O of 2O14 ORDER: Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Bodla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos'1 to 3 and learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents - singareni collieries company Limited.

2. The contempt is filed cornplaining violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.39990 of 2OL4 dated

22.04.2024.

3. Perused the record.

4. The relevant portion of the order of this court dated 22.04.2024 passed in w.P.No.3999O of 2o14 is extracted hereunder:

5. Taking into consideration the submissions made Uy Uotn the learned counsel on record, the writ petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the ccrnpetent authority i'e', ilehabilitation and Resettlenrent Commissioner of * , , -2-,..€-- I I 2 sN,t C.C.No.7747 ol 2025 w.P.No.39990 0f 2o74 the concerned District where the petitioners' subject buildings are situated i.e., house bearing N99'Z-.1- 152 a;d 2-2-153 (Singareni No.705) Yellandu, Khammam District and raise all the pleas as put forth in the present writ petition by way of a detailed representation, within a period of one (01) week, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and upon receipt of such representation, the competent authority may consider and dispose of the same, in accordance to law expeditiously. within a period of four weeks thereafter, in conformity with principles of natural justice, in accordance to law and communicate its decision to the petitioners' However. there shall be no order as to costs'

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 brings on record Memo in Rc.Ncr.D/3274/2015, dated 22.04'2025 and contends that the orders of this Court dated 22.04.2024 passed in W.P.11o.39990 of 2014 had been duly complied with and the petitirlners were given an opportunity of personal hearing and the decision on the subject issue v'/as communicated to the petitioners through memo dated 22.04.2025 in Rc.No.D/3274/2015, which had even been acknowledged by the petitioners herein, and hence therefore, prays to close the c,rntempt case.

6. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No'4 cont€:nds that the orders of this Court dated 22.04.2024 Y 5 SN,t C.C.No.7747 of 2025 W,P.No.3999O of 2074 passed in W.P.No.39990 of Z0L4 had been duly complied with. Hence, seeks to close the contempt.

7. Taking into consideration : (a) The aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case. (b) The submissions made on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.4 and duly considering the contents of the letter dated OL.O7.2O25 in Rc.No.D/ 3274 12015 and also the Memo dated 22.04.2025 in Rc.No.3274l2OLS issued to the petitioners herein, in compliance to the orders of this Court dated 22.94.2c24 passed in W.p.No.3999O of 2Ot4 and duly bringing the same on record, the contempt is closed, giving liberty to the petitioners to pursue the remedies as avaitabte under law against the proceedings issued to the petitioner in compliance to the directions of this Court. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed / SD'. P.GOWRI SHANKAR REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ OFFICER To, r\ S. l.oneCCtoSRlSANDEEPKUMARBoDlA,Advocate[oPucl 2. Two CCs to the GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at . c1*ieries, Hish court ror the state or HYderabad TOUTI +N8,ir:::."1.fir-?8,:"J"?tEilii, \ \ I I l HIGH COURT DATED:1t 110712025 $ $ ttB ?r?r I o +. * ORDER GC.No.1147 of 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE 4 v^ NtP