✦ High Court of India · 29 Aug 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
29 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,623 words

Duddu Srinivas, S/o. Balaraju, aged major R/o. Jamalpuram Village' Parvathagiri Mandal, Warangal Rural District Duddu Rani, Wo. Srinivas, aged maior Rl/o. Jamalpuram Village, Parvathagiri Mandal, Warangal Rural District

10. Pidugu Sampath, S/o. Uppalaiahm, aged major Rl/o. Jamalpuram Village, Parvathagiri Mandal, Warangal Rural District

11. Pidugu Saraiah, S/o. Uppalaiah, aged major Rl/o. Jamalpuram Village, Parv-thagiri Mandal, Warangal Rural District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lr, ia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, - e High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particuli r / one in the nature of Writ of IVandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd resl; ndent in not passrng orders either on the main Appeal No. 157|Z0ZO filed b 7 the petitioners datecl 0212020 against the deletion of the unofficial names from re revenue records in respect of the agricultural land in an extent of Ac 0.07 gt; Sy o. 120/A, Ac.0.09 gts in Sy No. 120/8, Ac.0.09 gts in Sy No. 120/C, Ac.O :,r gts in Sy no. 121lA, c 0 10 gts in Sy No 12118, Ac O.1O gts in Sy No 12111C \c.0.21 gts in Sy No 121lD, Ac.0 06 gts in Sy No 122lA, Ac.0.25 gts in Sy No . , Zt1, Ac.O.1O gts in Sy No. 12212. Ac.0.09 gts in Sy No. 12213. Ac. 0.12 gts in Sy I o, 1 1 1/H, Ac.1 .l 1 gts in Sy No. 11118, Ac.O.32 gts in Sy No. 111/C, Ac.1.0O g:s in Sy No 1111N1t2, Ac 0 10 gts in Sy No. 1111112, Ac.0.1Z gts in Sy No. 11j D, Ac.1 06 gts in Sy No.'1 11lA, Ac.1 12 gts in Sy No. 1 11lE, Ac.o.30 gts in S,r i' r. 1 i 1/F, Ac.0.30 gts in Sy No.1 11|G, Ac.O.12 gts in Sy No. 111/H situate. at Jamalpuram H/o. Thurkala Somaram Village and Grampanchayat, parv I ragiri Mandalam of Warangal District by cancelling the pattadar passbooks if :r y issued in favour of the unofficial respondents 4 to 11 is illegal and void an I opposed to Arlicles, 14.19, 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of India, conseque- y to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal in accordance with rw in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour direct the 3rd respondent Tahsildar to continue the petitione r records in respect of the agricultural lands in in an extent o 120lA, Ac.0.09 gts in Sy No. 120/8, Ac.0.09,gts in Sy No Sy no. 121lA, c.0 10 gts in Sy No. 1Z1tB, Ac.O.j0 gts in S,/ gts in Sy No. 121iD, Ac.0.06 gts in Sy No. 122lA, Ac.O.2t Ac 0.10 gts in Sy No. 12212, Ac.0.09 gts in Sy No. 122t3, t\ 111lH, Ac.1.11 gts rn Sy No 111/B, Ac.0.32 gts in Sy No - Sy No. 'l 11/N112, Ac.0.10 gts in Sy No. 111t1t2, Ac.0.17 r Ac.1 06 gts in Sy No.111/A, Ac.1.12 gts in Sy No. .t11lE a jumstances stated in may be pleased to lame in the revenu e Ac.0.07 gts in Sy o. 20lC, Ac.0.25 gts in \,1o. 121l1C. Ac.O.21 lts in Sy No. 12211, . 0.12 gts in Sy No. 11/C. Ac.1.00 gts in ls in Sy No. 111lD, r 0.30 gts in Sy No. 111/F, Ac.0.30 gts in Sy No.11'llG, Ac0.12 gts in Sy No. 111/H situated at Jamalpuram H/o. Thurkala Somaram Village and Grampanchayat, Parvathagili Mandalam of Warangal District, by deleting the names of the unofficial respondents 4 to '1 1, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY Counsel for the Respondents No 1 To 3: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No 5 To 11 :SRl Y HEMA CHANDER Counsel for the Respondent No 4: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VI' VUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.15581 OF lO2O ORDER: Tl.ris Writ l)ctition is filed seeking Writ . Mandamus declaring the ac[ion of the 2n(l respondent i] L nor passing orders either on the main Appeal No.l57 /2O)t filed bl the petitioners dated .O2l2O2O against the dcl, tion of the r:nofficial names from the revenue records in lspect o1- the agricultural land in an extent of Ac. 0.07 gts ir iv.No.12O/A Ac.0.09 gts 1n S-v.No. I2O / B, Ac.O.O9 gts tIt I r,.No.120/C, 1n Ac.0.25 gts Sy.no.121lA, Ac.O.10 gts i 5,.No.121 lB, Ac.O. 10 gts in Sy.No .l2l / 7C, Ac.O.21 gts in : y'.No.121 /D, Ac.0.06 gts in Sy.No.122lA, Ac.O.25 gts ln I ry.No. 122 / l, Ac.O.10 gts ln Sy.No. 122 /2, Ac.O.O9 gts Ac.O.12 gts 1n Sy.No. lll /H, Ac. 1. 1 1 gts Ac.0.32 gts 1n 1n I l-l ,v.No.122l3, I y.No.1l1 /8, Sy.No.ll l /C, Ac. 1.0[ gts 1n Sy.No.lIl /Al 1 12, Ac.O.1O gts in Sy.No. III I I I . Ac.0.17 gts tn S1..No.I71lD, Ac. 1.06 gts in Sy.No.llllA,,,\:.1.12 gts in Sy.No.lll/8, Ac.O.30 gts in Sy.No.111/F, A:0.30 gts 1n Sy.No. | 11 /G, Ac.O. 12 gts Jamalpuram ll lo Thurkala Somaram \ illage and 1n Sy.No. 1 1 1/ F{ situated at ,/ // ) \ I Page 2 of5 EVV,.J W,P.No. i 5581 of 2020 Grampanchayat Parvathagiri Mandalam of Warangal District b1. cancelling the pattadar passbooks if ant. issued in favour of the unofficial respondents 4 to 11 is illcgal and void and opposed to Articles 14, 19, 2 1 and 3O0 A of Constitution of India, consequently to direct the 2"a respondent to dispose of the appeal in accordance l,i,ith lau, in the interest of justice.

2. Whcn the matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner fairll. submitted that appeal hled by petitioner vide Appeal No.157 of 2020 dated Ni1.02.2020 against the dclction of names of petitioner,s in respect of property situated at Jarnalpuram H/o. Thurkaia Somaram Village and Grampanchayat, parvathagiri Manda-lam of Warangal District and pattadar passbooks have been issued in favour of un-official respondents is illegal and void and as against under Article 3OO_A of the Constitution of India and consequently directed the respondent No.2 to dispose of the appeal in accordance n,ith law.

3. Learned counsel submits that, without passing ar-ry .. orders and without following due process of law, the names Page 3 of5 E\ry,J \,' '.No.15581 oi 2O20 of the petitioner's were deleted. Aggrieved by .. re said action of the respondents, the petitioner has pr(' rrred Appeal No.157 of 2O'2O before the Revenue Divi ; onal Offlcer. Warangal Urban, as cor-rtemplated under Secl tns 5(B) and 5(5) of the Telangana State Records of Righ t ; in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2018, and the sanr is pending Hence, he seeks appropriate directions

4. Opposing the same, learned Assistatt Government Pleader submitted that after following due prorc .;s of 1arv, the narrres of petitioners have been deleted ancl ,te namcs of unofficial respondents have been incorporatecl i r the revcnue records. Consequently, the petitioners are I o longer in possession of the property. However, learrrd Assistant Government Pleader stated that she has no olr. :ction to the issuance of appropriate directions to respor r ent No.2 to conduct al enquiry in accordance with law artrl io dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioners vide App,: r1 No.157 of

2020. Hence, rvould seek appropriate direction. , I

5. Having heard the submissions of both t re counsels, this Cor-rrt deems it appropriate to direct respo,, lent No.2 to I I : EVV,J W.P.No. 15581 of 2020 'r.i:'.:'- conduct the necessar5r proceedings as contemplated under law and to dispose of the appeat filed by the petitioner vide Appeal No.157 of 2020, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the official arrd unofficial respondents, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of Six (06) rnonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6 With the above direction, this Writ pctition is disposed of. No costs As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if aly, pending, sha-ll stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR d SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana and 10 others, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal, Warangal District The Tahsildar, Parvathagiri Mandal, Warangat Urban District One CC to SRI AJAY KUIMAR MADISETTY, Advocate [OpUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.. [OUT] 4 5 Two CD Copies

6. DAN BM sd \ t I t HIGH COURT DATED:2910812025 ORDER WP.No.15581 of 2020 ( 1 o C) 0 g tB itr2E * f, '-.-- t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS s"

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments