Sri. K.P.Subbaiah v. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Bench
- GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Between: Sri. K.P.Subbaiah S/o Venkata Narayana K.S. Junior College, Ponnur-522 124 Guntur District ..... PETITIONER
AND 1 Govt. of AP. Rep. by its Secretary Higher Education Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2 Commissioner and Director of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3 Secretary & Correspondent, K.S.Junior College, Ponnur, Guntur District. .....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in rejecting the Petitioner's Claim to place him under the 16 years Special Promotion Post Grade Vide Proceedings No.L.Dis. No.1901/JC5-3/98, dt.28/09/1998 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to grant the Petitioner the benefit of 16 years Special Promotion Post Grade from the date of completion of 16 years i.e, 31/07/1998 and pass all consequential benefits and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.MAMIDALATIRUMALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION NO : 2245 of 1999
ORDER:
Operative part
Yesterday i.e. on 03.06.2009 when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. Hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal today. Even today also when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. ---------------- 04.06.2009 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT PETITION NO : 2245 of 1999
04.06.2009 Kvsn
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.