✦ High Court of India · 30 Apr 2025

At Pebbair, WanaParthY District. Counsel for the Appetlant Sri v. llanohar Rao

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Apr 2025

Court

High Court of India

Decided

30 Apr 2025

Bench

SENIOR CIVIL GORRT SENIOR CIVIL SENKRR CIVIT COURT SENIOR CIVIL

Length

45,911 words

Apped filed under Sec{ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 505 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Jr.dg|e atWanaptr$y. Betweel}: Shanthamma Wo. Pebbair Mandal, 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, ..,AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy .Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lnig6tion District. Phase.ll, Pebbair, Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.506 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Ci/l Judge at Wanaparthy. Pebbair S/o.Balaiah, 60 years, Occ. Alrio.rlture, Rl/o. Nagarala Mllage, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Coll District. ector, Raieev Lift lnigation Schene, Phase-{|, Pebbair, Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. ltlanohat Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeal filed under Sec{ion 54 of the LA.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated (13.03.2010 passed in O. P.No.477 of 2(ng on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Venkatswarny, S/o.Pedda Sailu,S7 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage' Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant ETIT'] The Specidl wanapadhy Dy.Collector, District. R.*-v l-ift lnigatbn Sctrerne, Phase+l, Pebbair' ..Respondent/ResPondent Counsel for the ApBellar* : Srl. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for tfie ResPondent : 3 Appeal filed wrder Sedion 54 of ttre L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2019 pa6sed in o.P.l{o.389 of 2009 on the fib of the court of the Senior Civil Judge atWanaparthy. Between: Mohan Village, Sagar, , Pebbair 9o. Krishnaiah, Mandal, EtIf, , Occ. Agriculttre, Ri/o. Nagarala .AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Colledor, Raioei, Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravuta Shankar Reddy Counsel for the ResPondent : LAN AppealfiledunderSectrcn54oftheL.A.Acr,aggrievedbytheOrderand decree dated08.u.mfi psed in o.P.No.120 of 2O1O on the file of the court of the Senior Civit Judge at W*r4arthy. Between:

1. SharakondaPulla,nmq Wo Badmiah -Sinoe Ded Per LR - Appellant f{o 2 2. Sharakonda Kurmaiah; SrbAdraiah, aged 52 yrs 3. &rchanna, S/o PaPe*ah, Sinoe Died Pq LR -Appellant No.2 LR Appellant No.2) ,- Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o -Wanaparthy District 3Died - a6 per Mardal, ...Appellants/Claimants The , Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme'P"hasell. Pebbair, At Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy Gounsel for the Resporldent : GP for SUIT NO: 441 Appeel filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggtibved by the Oder and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.190 of 2009 on thefile of tre Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Chandraiah, S/o. Kistaiah, 67 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Mandal, Wanaparthy District. The Speciirl Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phasell, Pebbak, Wanapadf y Dislrict. Counsel for lhe Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals AP SUIT NO:4t12 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved 'by tle Order and decree dated (13.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.193 of 2009 on the file of the Court of -lhe Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Bandari Krishnaiah, S/o. Ranganna, 75 years, Occ Agrieulture. R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. The Sp€cial Wanaparhy Dy.Collec{or, Raire, Lift krigation Sctprne, Phasell, Pebbeir' Distdct. ,..RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. ltlanoharflao Cormsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals LAND ulstTlo APPEAL SU lT t{O: OF 2425 'f43 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Ord€r and decree dated 03.03.2010 pmsed in o. P.No.118 of 20G) on the fite of the court of the Senior Civil Jt dge at Waflaparthy. Between: GoltavalaGdtaiah,s/o.ChinnaRamaiah,g3years,OccAgdcultureRlo' Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUC{aimant AND The Soecial Dv.Collector. Raieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Ptrasell, Prbbair' - w"n#"rtttv-ctiiiria. .'.RespondenURespondent - Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals LAND ACQUISlTlON APPEAL SUIT NO-.UAOF2t25 Appeal filed under Section 34 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.032010 pased in o.P.No.2OO of 2009 on the file qf the court of the Senior Civil Jr.rdge at Wanaparthy. Between: Shankaramma@sailee+a,W/o.\tenkataiah'!lyear$Occ'Agriculture'Fyo' Nagarala Mllagp-, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaprthy District' ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Speciat Dy.Collector, Rai-v Uft ln$dion Scfierne, Phaie-ll' Pebbair' i6;6;ht -Distti"t- ...Respondent/Respond€nt Counsel for the Appetlant : Sri. V. Illanohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals LAND N EPPEAT SUIT NO: 44,soFm2S Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrievd by the frer and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 119 of 2fi)9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Be8veen: Gollavala Krishnaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, P,:bbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppeltanUClalmant AlID The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scherne, Phase=ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ;Respondent/Respondent Couasel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Gounsel for rlhe Respondent : GP For Appeals LA}ID ACOUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 4'16 OF 2025 Appeai filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 117 of 2AffJ on the file of lhe Go.rrt of the Senisr Chril Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gollavala Kurmaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 54 years, OEc. Agdqrlture R/o. Nagamla Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AlID Ttre Special Dy.Cotlector, Raieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase.ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsefl for the Appellant : Sri. V. Uanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals Appeal filed under section 54 of the {-.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and d€cree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P. No. 153 of 2oo9on the file of the court of the Senhr Ovit Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Chinna Narasimha Slo. Pedda Y. Balaiah, 5-3. ygars, Oci' Agficulture, Rl/o' t titaaa MU age, Pebbaj r Mandat, W anaparthy District' ...APPellanUclaimant ETID The Special Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lnigation Scherne, (Phase-tl, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. . RespondenUResPondent Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals Appeal filed under Section S of ttre L'{Aq!'qgg!9yx| btt !!e Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P. No. 174 of 2O09 on ttrefile of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: K. Narasimha, S/o. Buchanna 70 years, occ. Agiricuhure Fl/o. l'lagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special WanaparthY Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift trrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair' Dstrict ...RespondentlR esPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 154 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Chril Judgre at Wanaparthy. Krishnaiah Setty, S/o. Venkat Sefty, Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 05 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o.'l.lagarala District. .AppellanUclaimam The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scfierne, Phase.ll, Pebbair, District. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counselror the Respondent : GP For Appeals $qlilO {ppeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and deor@ dated 03.fi,.2010 passed in O.P.No.19't of 2009 on the file of ffre Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Biija Baladasu, S/o. Venkanna, 90 years, Occ. Agrianlture FUo. Nagarala Mllage,'Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCIaamant EI'ID The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Counsel for,the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals .I'T Appeal f*ed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggieved by the Order and decree dated O3.O3.201O passed in O.P. No. 169 of 2009 on the fib of the Court of thssenior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Eathini Gattaiah, S/o. Kanenna, 51 years, Occ. Agriculture RIo. ltlaga[alaMllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Districl. The Special Dy.Collector, Raleev Lift trrigation Scheme, Phas€''ll, Wanaparthy District. for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals 5 N APP lT NO: 452 O Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.AcI, aSsrieve+ bi' the Or{er and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.1E0 of nW on the file of'treCou]t of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ... . Narsimha S/o. Naganna, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Oistrict. Village, The Sgecial Dy. Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigation WaEparthy District. Scheme, Ptps+,!|, Gounse! for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao for the Respondent : GP For APPeals 453 Appeal filed under Sec{ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved ny the Order and decreedated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.173 of 2009 ontheftleof the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between K. Budaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 65 )cars, .Occ. Agrbulture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,'Wanaparthy District. 'The Special Wanaparth y Dy.Colledor, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase.ll, Pebbair, Distriot. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. llanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 d the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated r)3.03.2010 passed.in O.P.No.158 of 2009 on the file of the Csurt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. K. Gattaiah, S/o. Yell€{ah. 80 }€ars, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparttry District. Occ. Agriculture R/o. Village, D The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Diskic{. Lift lnigation Scteme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...RespondenURespondent Gounsel for tlre Appeltant : Sri. V. tlanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals Appeal 'filed tlrder Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated Cr3-03.2010 passed in O.P.No.2'16 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Kurmanrra, S/o. Pedda Munaidr, 58 years, Occ. Agriculture Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dstic{. ...AppellanUClaimant (- The Special Dy.Crllector, Raieev Lift lrrigBtion Scherne, Phse-ll' Pebbair' District. RespondentlResponde nt Counsel for the Appetlant : Sri. V. ilanohar Rao for the Respondent : GP For APPeals IT NO Appeal filed wder Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the frer and decree dated o3.03.2O10 passed in o.P.No.114 d 2w on the fle of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Bova Komari Narsimha, S/o. Cheviti Balaiah, wi$.ata VittagB, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' -Q7 years, Occ' Agrirrlture R/o' INE The Special Dy.Cdlector, R:rjeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phasell, Pebbair' Wanapathy District. a : Sri. V. Manohar Rao the Respondent : GP For APPeals s Nra Appeat filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and dated03.03.2040passedino.P.No.152of2oG)onthefiboftheCourtof the Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy. Y D Ooc. Agriculture R/o. Nqgarala M[age' The Speckrl Dy.Coilector, Rajeev Lifi lnigatbn Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenURespondent Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V. lanohar Rao Counsel for tlrc Responde,nt.: QP For Appeal filed under.Sedion 54 of fhe L.A.AC{, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated t)3.03.20'10 rpAssed. in O.P.No.lt 51 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judgre at Wanbpadry. Between: Y. Narasimha, S/o. Pebbair Mandal, AND 6itl years, Occ .Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Mllage, .AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthlr Dy.Ccillector, Distdct. Raleev Hft tnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, .RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appeltant : $ri. V. ilanohar Rao Couhsel for the Respondent : uL\r, Appeal t'iled under decree dated 03.03.2010 64 o[ ttre L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and passed ln O.P. No. 12A ot 2OO9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanapartry. Between: Komari Mstqnu, Nagarala Mllage, ntIT.] about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. District. .AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Colledor, Raieev Lift lr-rigatirn Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. RespondenURespondent Cormsel for the Appellant : Sri' V. Manohar Rao Counsot for the Respondent : GP For Appeals LAND ACOI,IS APP STIIT NO: ,t6O OF 2025 Aprealfiledundersection54oftheL.A.Act,aggrlevedbytheOrderand decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P. l.lo. 159 of 20o9 on thefrle of ttre court of lhe Senirx Civil Judgre a{ Wanaparlhy. Betureen: Smt. Java Sree, D/o. Chinna Gantaiah, 47 years, occ. Agricrrlfure Fl/o. l.lagarala Mllagp, Mandal, Warnpathy Disttict' -Pebbair AND The Special Dy.Collector' Raieev Lift lrrtTation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair' Wanaparthy Distrft:t. ,.RespondenUResPondent ...AppellanUClaimant Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. lllanohar Rao Counselfor the Respondent : GP For Appeals LAND ACQUISITI ON APPEAL SUIT NO {61 0F 2025 Appeal filed urder Section 54 of the L.A'Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedatedo3.o3.2olopassedino.P.No.lTlof200gonthefileoftheCourtof the Senior Civil JudgB at WanOarthy- Between: Devamma S/o. Balaiah, 63 years, g6s Agriculture FUo' Nagarab Mtlage' Pebbair Mandal, WanaParlhY District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wan+arhy Dy.Colledor, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll' Peb'bair' District. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. itanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For.Appeals ANO PEAL St ITNO:. t$2AF 2/l.25 Appeal filed under Sec$on 54 oI the l-.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 113.03.2010 passed in O.p.No.f gS of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil JuQe at Wbnaparthy, Betweenl Sarakonda Kukkanna, S/o. Kistanna Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy , 63 )rears District. Occ. Agriculture RYo. Nagarala ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanapartl'ry Districl. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. llanohar Rao Counsel for the Responderrt : GP For Appeds APPEAL' ilO: 463 OF 202s Appeal filed under Section 54 df the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.,l57 of Z)09 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Betwden: P-ql R"iC .qo, l_eddn Shanthaiah, 43 years, Occ. Agriculture Ri/o. Nagarala Mllage. Pclbbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disiict. ...AppellanUClaimant ANO The Special Dy.Collecior, Rajeev Uft lnigation Scheme, Phase{t, Pebbair, Wanapartlry District. "'RespondenuRespondent counser for the Apperhnt : sEi. v. uahohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals .,t Appea{ filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the ffier and decree ffied 03/03/2010 passed in OP.No.170 of 20Og on the frle of the Cou( of the Senior Civil Judge atWanaparthy. Between Eathini Balarnrna, Wo. Sayanna, 85 )lears, Occ- Agiriculture, R/o' Naggrala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Col[ector, Raieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase ll, Pebbair, District. . Res po nde nURes Po nde nt Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP For Appeals D Appeal filed under sectiorr il d the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decreedated 03.0g.2010 passedin O.P. No. 215 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Jtrdgp atWanaparthy. Between: B. Krishnaiah, S/o. Balaiah, 67 Pebbair Mandal, AND Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village' ..AppellanUClaimant The Special Oy.Coilector, Raieev Lift lnigation Scheme, ( Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Respondent/ResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V, Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP f or Appeals LAND ISITION AP SUIT t{O: 466 oF 2U25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the ffier and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O. P.No.179 bf 2009 on the frle of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Balakistaiah, S/o. Bichanna, !'! Vpars, Occ Agricutture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair lytrndal, Wanaparthy Disirict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Speci:rl Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District "'RespondenuRespondent counser for the Appeflant : sri. V.,Jrranohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP f or Appeals LAND ISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:467 Or,1625 Appear filed under Section 54 of the L.A:Act, aggrievd by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.115 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Ci,lil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gollavala Pedda Narsimha,. S/o. Balaiah, .g0 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disitict ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaoarlhy District. counset for the Appeuant : Sri. v. Manotrar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Gp f or Appeals "'RespondenuRespondent Appeal filed under Se<tion 54 cf the L.A'Aot, aggrbved by ttre Order and d€cree dated 0303.2010 passed in o.Pllo.194 of 2ooe on the lile of the court of the Senior Civil J'rdgp at Wanaparthy. Between: Bandari Mllage, Venkataiah, S/o. Pebbair Mandal, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Cotlector, Raleev Lift tnigtion Scheme, Phase-|l' Pebbair' District .RespondentlResPondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the GPf or APPeals Appeal frted under Seetion 54 d tre L.A'Act' aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 paseed in O.P, No' 130 of 2OOg on the file of the Courl of the Senior Civil Jrdge atWanQarthy- Between: K N Mandal, 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o- District ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Raireerr Lift lnigation Schenre, Phase-ll' Pebbair' District. . RespondentlResPonder* Counsel for the : Sri. V. ttlatrohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for APPeals Appeal frled under Section 54 of the -L.A.Act, aggrbved by the Oder and in O.P.No.156 of 2009 on lhE fde of the Court of decsee dated 03.(R.2O10 pass€d the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. P-edda Shanthaiah, S/o. Bichanna, 65 years, Occ. A$ka{frJre Rlo. Nagarala ' Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disthbt. The Speci;al Wan@arthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scfierne, Phasell, Pettbair, District. Counsel fort:he Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar.Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals a NAP NT' Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, agE[ie\red by th6 Order and tlecree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.131 of 20(X)'.on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Komari Lraxmamma, Wo.K. Kukkanna,T5 years, Ooc- Agfriculture lVo. Nagarala Pehbair Manclal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant $psoi6l Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift ,rrigation Scfieme, Phase.ll; Pebbaic Wanaparthy District. -f[6 Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. ilanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP f or Appeals 3 Appeal Rl€d under SectioD 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dat€d 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 149 of 2OOg on the file of the Coud of the Senior Civil Judge d Wanaparthy' Venkatanma, D/o. Chinna Kistanna Mllage, Pebbak Mandal, Wan4arthY 47 y?-ars, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala District. .AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Re$rcv Lilt lnigration Scherne, Phaseil, Pebbair' District. Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V, Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP f or APPeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Ad, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated o3.o3.2olo passed in o.P.No.214of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanapadhy. Between: Niranjan C,oud, Viltage, Pebbair D Si/o. Batawamy Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Goud, 50 )rears, Occ. Agri culture Rl/o. Nagarala .Appellant/Claimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Raieev l-ift lnigetion District. Sctrerne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP f or APpeals Appeal filed under Sec{ion 54 of lhe L.A.Act' aggrieved by the Order and decree dated o3.o3.2olo passed in o.P.l$o.145 of 20O9 on the tile of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Betureen Komari Thirupataiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 55 years, Occ. Agrianlture FUo. Nagarala Mltage' Ptsbair Mandal' wanaparthv District' ...Apperanucraimant AND The Special Wanapartty Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scherne, Phase{|, Pebbair' District. ...Respondent/Respondent Counselfor the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for lhe Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:476 G 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.141 of 20O9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Ci,ril Judge at Wanaparthy. Betrveen: G. Kurumurthy, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, 50 years, Occ. Agriqrlture FUo. Nagerala 'Mllage, P,ebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AT{D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Sc*reme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanapal:hy District. .RespondenURespondent Gounsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP f or Appeals SITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 477 OF Appe;al filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act aggrieved by the Order and dedee dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 142 ol frOg on the file of the Court of the Senior C;ivil Judge at Wanaparthy. G. Babu. S/o. Late Krishnaiah, 53 years, 956. Agriculture FUo' Nagsrda Wlagp' Peb,bair Mandd, Wanaparthy Dstrict. The Dy.Cohector, Raieev Lift lrrigrat'ton Scheme, Phme'l 'l District. ' Pebbair' Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counset for the Respondent : GP for Appeals UtT 1 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedatedo3.0S.2olopassedino.P.No.lS3of2o0gonthefileoftheCourtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy- Jattisedframma,Wo.Buchanna,40years,Occ-Agrifllture/Rio'Nagarda Mllrue, Pebbak Mandal, Wanaparthy Distrlcl. NE The Dy.Coltector, Raieev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll' Pebbair' District. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri- V- Manohar Rao Gounsel fc the Respondent : GP f or Appeals Appeal frled under Section 5't of the L'A'Act, aggrrieved by the Order and decree dated 0 3tO3l2O1O passed in O.P'No'210 of 2009 on tte fib of tre Court of the Senior Civil Judge a( Wanaparthy. Between: lhekhar, lVo. K. Shankaraiah, 51 .years, Occ- Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dstrict ...Appell3nUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, R{eev Lift tnigation Scfieme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for tthe Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP f or Appeals LAI{D ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 480 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.AAct, aggrieved .by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.'|23 of 20G) on the file of the Gourt of the Senior Civil Judge.at Wanaparthy. Between: Komari flrishnaiah, S/o. Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ^ Balaiah, 55 . years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, phase-ll, pehair, Wanaparhy District. ...AppellantltClaimant "'RespondenuRespondent counser for the Appettant : sri. v. Manohar Rao Counse! for the Respondent : GP f or Appeals LAND SITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 481 OF 2025 Apparl filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, agErieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.134 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between [opr1 flgmtlu, S,/o. Kistianna,.gl VSao, Occ. Agriqrlture, R/o. Nagarda Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskiit. NE The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigation ScherRe, Phase-]l Pebbalr' Efistrict. ...Appellar*/Claidant Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V- Manohar Rao Gounselfor the Respondent : GP f or Appeals NO: Appeat filed under Section il of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by tlte od€r and decree dated O3.O3.2010 passed in O.P.No.184 of 20(X) on the file of the Court of the SeniorCivil Judge at Wanaparthy. Betaleen: Buddaiah, S/O. Late Laxmaiah, 67 Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, WanaParthY years, Distrkt Occ- Agriculture' RYo" Nagarala .:.APPELLAI'IT Al,lD The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Colleclor, Raieev Lift lrrigation Schenre, Phase'll, Pebbairi District ...RESPONDENTS Counsel{or the Respondent : GP for Appeals I-AND AGQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 483 OF 2O25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggnieved by the Order and ' decree dded 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 213 of 2O09 on the Rle of thsGourt of Befireen: Shrishailan, S/o. Bakkanna, 53 years, Ogq. Agr'lcultune fito. N4Arala Mllage, Pebbdr Mandal, WanryarthY Dstrict ...AppetlanUGlaimant The Specral'Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Sctrerne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Dis.trict. Counsel for tthe Appellant .: Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for tthe Resporrdent : GP for Appeals D Appeal filed undei Section 3l of the L.A.Act aqgrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in.O.P.l.lo.143 of 20(X) on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. K. Bandalaiah, S/o. Alyanna, 65 Pebbair Mandal, Occ- Agriculture R:/o. Nagarala Mllage, The Special \Ananaparthry Dy. Collector. Rajew Uft lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Distriot. .RespondenURespondent Counsel for tlhe Appelhnt : Sri, V. ilanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Sectrbn 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated i13.03.2O'10 .passed in O.P.No.'t3g of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge atwanaparthy. [. lofaigh, Si/o. Balabh, 50 years, Occ. Agriculture Ryo. Nagarala Vi]lage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapafthy District. The Specia+ Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigatkrn Soherne, Phme-ll, Pebbair' District. ... RespondentlResportde tlt Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal fited under Section 54 of tfre L.A.Act, aggrieved'by {he Order and' decree date6 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. l,lo. 116 of 2@9 on the fib of the Court of the Senkr Civil Jurdge at Wanapar{hy- Between: G. Vdnkataiah, S/o. G. Pedda Narsimha, 53 years, Nagarafa Mltage. Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy EIistr'lct. Occ. Agricuhure. Rilo. ...{ppeHant/Glaimant E[m The Special Dy.CoHector, Raieev Lift lnigation Sctreme, Phas'ell, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenUResPondent Counsetfor the Appellant : Sri- V. Manohar Rao Cotrnsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved ty the Order and decree dated 03.O3.2O10 passed in O.P.No.127 of 2009 on the file of,the Court of the Senior CivitJudge at Wanaparthy. Between: Komari Pentaiatr, S/o Late Bakkanna, aged about 78 years, Occ- Agriculture, - R o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District' ...AppellanUGlaimant ANE The Special Dy. Collector, Ra[ew Lift lrrigation Scheme; Ptrase- ll, Pebbair; Wanaparthy District. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V.Illanohar Rao Gounsel for rthe Respondent : GP for Appeals .RespondenURespondent Appearr fited under Seotion 54 of 'the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3.O3.201O passed in,O.P. No. 188 of 2O09 on,the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge atWanaparthy. Between: Shanthamma, Wo. Pdda Na,rtsimha, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Vi lla ge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy,DistriCt. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Flaieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-l l, Pebbair, District. .RespondenURespondent Counsel for{:he Appellant :,Sri. V-;Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent,: GP forAppeals LAND AGQUISITION APPEALS,#IT No: 490 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Sec[ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3lO3t2O1O passed in OP.No.198 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanapaffry. Between: Bandari Neelamrna, Wo. Bab Flam, Village, Perbbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 65 years, Occ- Agriculture. R/o. Nagarala District .AppellanUClaimant AND The Speciral Wanaparthy Dy.CoHector, ffieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .Responde nURespondent Counsel for the Appelhrn : Sri. V. Itlanohar Rao CounsEl for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 5'0 of the L.A.Act, agrgri--ved by the Order and decree dated 03.o8.201opcsed in o.P. No. 136 of 2009 on the file of tlte court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Kornari Laxmaiah, S;/o. Kistanna, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant EtII|] The Speciai Wanaparthy Dy.CoHector, Raleev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll. Pebbair' District. RespondenURespondent Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Nra Appeal frled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated o3.o3.2olo passed in o.P. No. 176 of 2O09 on the file of the colrt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. K. Pedd€ Sayulu, 9o Vlilage, Pebbak Mandal, Wanaparthy 73 years, Occ. Agdculture R/o. Nagarala District. .AppellanUClaimant The €pecial Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scherne, Phasell, Pebbair, Wariaparttry District. Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. llanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP.for Appeals Appeal filed under Sedion 54 of the L.A.Act, aSsneved by the Order and decree dated O3lO3l2O1O p6sed in O.P.No.125 of 2fi)9 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Cil,il Judge at Wanagarthy. Between: Kornari Balakistaiah, 9o Yerra Ealaiah, 65 yea.s, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Viltage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dbtrici. ...AppellanUClaimant ntlIt.] The Speci:d Wanaparthy Dy.Collec'tor, Raieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-tl, Pebbair, Distric{. .RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. ilhnohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND Appeal filed under Sectibn 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/O3/20r 0 passed in O,P.No.l13 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparhy. Between: Yerukali Th Village, Peb irupathaiah, bair Mandal S/o. 53 yearc, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala District- ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collec{or, Rajeev,l-ift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District- Counsel for thn Appellant : Sri, V. Manohar Rao nU Counsel for the Respondent GP for Appeals D Appeal filed under Sec*ion 54 of th€ L.A.Act, aggrrieved by the Order and file o{ the court of in o.P. I{o. 133 of 20()9 on th€ decree dated 03.03.2010 pass€d the Senior Civil Judge at WarEpa[thy. Between: Gopat, S/o. Karenna, age 60 years, Occ. Agrricufture Rl/o- N4arala Mltage, Pe6bair Mandal, Wanaparthy Dstid. ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift ln[ation Scheme, Phase-ll' Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Srl. V. ilanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQI'ISITION APPEAL lT NO: OF 2025 '097 Appeal filed under Secfron 5,4 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03120,t0 passed in o.P.No.126 of 2O09 on the file of the c,ourt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Boya Komari Kanenria, Village, Pebbair Mardal, 9o. Occ- Agriculture R/o. Nagiarda AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, RE*rev Lm llTigation Scheme' Phase-ll' Pebbair' District ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Itlarrchar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Ac,t, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in OP.t\b.128 pf 2009 ot the file of the Court of the Senior Ch,il Judge at Wanaparthy. Tirupathaiah, S/o Pentiaiah, aged about zto yean, Occ. Agriculture, FUo. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. EfID The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Cotlector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scieme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Gounsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. lllanohdr Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeal filed under Section 54 of .the 'L.A.Act, aggdeved by the Order and decree dated 03lfi3lm10 passed in O,P.No.132 of A)09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civi] Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Mekala Balaswamy, S/o. Late Balaiah, 63 )€ars, Occ. Agriarlture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant EIIIl.] The Speciar Wanaparthlr Dy. Collector, Rajew Lift lnigation Sc+reme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Counse! for the Appellant : Sri. V. ilanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ISITION AP SIJIT NO: 501 oF 2025 Appeal filed under S@tion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated o3.o3.2olo paseed in o.P:No.150 of 2009 on the file of the court of the SeniorCivil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Gollavda Venkataiah, S/o. Kukanna, 61 years, Occ. Agricullure R"/o' Nagarala Village, Pebtrair Mandal, Wanapafiy Districl. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Colledor, Rgjeev Uft lnigation Scheme' Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V. lllanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL NO: 502 OF 2O2s Appeal filed trnder Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P. Nlo. 199 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil JudgB at Wanapathy. Between: Sugunamma, Wo. Krishnql'ahr 53 lpars, Occ. Agriculture Ryo' Nagarala Village, P€bbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Disttict, ...AppellanUClaimant ANO The Special Dy.Colbctor, Raieevl-]ft ffiation Sctreme, Phase-ll' Pebbair' Wanaparthy Distriot. counset fof the Apperant : sri. v. r'ranohar Rao "'RespondenuRespondent Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals I.AND AGOUISITION SUIT ltO: 5o3 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Sec{ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggdeved Dy the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in O.P.No.14O of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Ci'dl Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Naganrma, W/o. Krishnaiah, 65 years, Occ. Agriculture'FUo. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..trppellanUclaimant AND The Special Dy.Colbcror, Raleev Lift lrrigation Sctreme, Phase-ll, Pebbdir, Wanaparthy District. "'RespondenuRespondent counser for rhe Appellant : Sri. v. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LATD ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 5O4OF 2025 ,: , Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggriTved .by the ffier and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 217 ot 2OO9 pn the file of the'eourt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Qhinna Munnaiah, S/o.Chinna Ramaiah, 70 )rears. Occ. .Agriculfure, Nagarala \rillage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distric{. Fl/o ...ABpellanUGlaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-|l, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals FII] Appeal filed under Sec{ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.181 of 2009 on the frle of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Baddamma, Wo. Balakistaiah, 83 !€ars, Occ. Agriculture fii/o- l@arala Village' Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigdinn Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Counset for the Appellant : Sri. V. Illanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals Appeal fited trnder Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.203 of 2009 on lhe file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Bandari Venkatesh, 9o. Swamulu, 52 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Specid Wan-a0arthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift hrigatbfl Scheme, Phasell' Pebbair, Distric{. Counset for the Appetlant : Sri. V. lf,anohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeats 1 ' Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggriraved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.187 ot 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Cirdl JudgB at Wanaparthy. Belween: Harijan N;arasimha, S/o. Chinna Bakkanna, 57 years, Occ. 4gricufture R/o. Nagarala \/illage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AtlD The Special Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigation Scherne, Phas#ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ,. Gounsel for the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Cotrnsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals . .'': : Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.AAct, aggrieVed ry'the OCer anO ',,' ::ije0ree dated t)glC/3t2}10 passed in O.P.No .192 of 2009 on the file Of'.the eburt'of - .11,ttieSeniorCivilJudgeatWanaparthy..:,'..''..,:.. Between: Brfra Kistarnma, W/o. Balaswamy, 95 years, Occ Agriatlture , R/-o. Nagaiata Mllage, Pehbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District i.., . .. Al-ro T.he Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, P.has*l[, F.ebbaiq : WanaParth)' District 'G-olrnseljqr-the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao .....-,,,,.._.--. . :'r,ffiM-for the Respondent : GP for Appeahs n o $ged filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrie\red by the Oder and decree dated 30-09-2019 passed in O.P.No. 31 ol 2014 on fhe file of the Cout of the Sen'ror Civil Judge at Narayanpet.

1. l.larsimhulu, 9o Narsirnl.ulu, aged 52 years, 2. Venkat Reddy, Si/o P.Narayana Reddy, agedsO years' 3. Eadappa, S/o Late P. Narayana Reddy' agBd 48 years, 4. PeddaLaxma Reddy, Slo Late P.Narayana Reddy, agpd 46yearc 5. China Laxma Reddy, 9o late P.Narayarn Reddy, aged 44 pars' 6. Venkat Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 5O years, 7. Eadappa, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 48 years' 8. Pedda Laxrna Reddy, S/o Late P.tlarayana Reddy' aged ,16 years' 9. Chinna Laxma Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, agpd 44 years' 10.Venkat Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged50 )€ars, l l. Eadappa go Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 48 years' 1z.P€clda Laxma Reddy, Slo late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 46 )€ars' 1 3. Chhrna Laxma Reddy, S/o Late P . Naraana Reddy, <pd /t4 years' All are Residents of Mustipally village, Mdtthal [landel, ..Appellants/Claimant No.(l,5 to l 6) AND 1 . The Land Acquisition Gadwal. Now presenl Narayanpet Clistrict. Officer- Cum- Special O/o The Special Deputy C.ollector, LA Unit PJP' . RLISP.

2. Hanumanthu Reddy, S/o Laxma Reddy 3. Govindu Reddy, S/o Laxrna ReddY 4. Anjanappa, S/o Chinnaiah. The Respondents No.2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this petition. Counsel for the Appellants :Sri. S. Venkdeshwar Reddy Counsel for the Respottdent : GP tor T) 30F Appeal filed under Section 51.of lhe L.A.AG*, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 27-A2-2025 passed innO.P.No. 2 of 2O23 on the file of the Court of the Princlpa'l Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. '1. M.Bheemehwar Reddy S/o Late.M.Venkat Reddy, age 62 yrs

2. M. Venkat Krishna Reddy S/o Late. M. Venkat Reddy, age 61 yrs

3. M.Nagariun Reddy S/o M.Venkat Reddy, age 58 yrs

4. M.Subash Reddy S/o Late.M.Venkat Reddy,, age 55 yrs

5. C.Chenna fleddy S/o Late. Kurma Reddy (Oied) per LR Cl.No.96 to gO

6. C.Krishnavardhan Reddy S/o Late. Kurma Reddy, age,l5 yrs

7. C.BuohiRerJdy s/o Thippaiah @Thippanna, agred 7O yrs

8. C. Venkat F:eddy S/o Thippanna @ Thippaiah, aged 58 )rrs

9. Chakali l{arsamma Wo Venkat Ramulu, age 6O years 10 C. Venkat,tteddy S/o Huzur, age s&yrs 1l Sana Redcly S/o Laxmanna, age 62 yrs 12 C.Muni Recldy S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Cl.No. 100 to '103 13C.Nalla Reddy S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Cl.No.61 to 64 14 C.Ranga Reddy S/o Sayanna, age 55 yrs 15 Sayamma VWo Naganna, age 55 yrs 16 Pedda Hanmanthu S/o Pedda Ashanna, age 53 yrs 17 Chinna Hanmanthu S/o Pedda Ashanna, age 47 yrs 18 Anjaaeyulu :S/o Pedda Ashanna,, age 46 yrs 19 Sayanna S/tr Pedda Ashanna, age 40 yrs 20 Myakda Ranga Reddy S,/o Venkat Reddy, age 65 years 21 Myakala Sekhar Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy (Oied) per LR Cl.No. 65 to 69 ,i 22 Ranganatfi S/o Nagappa, age 61 yrs 23 tvtyakala C,okaraiah S/o Hanumaiah, aged 7O yrs 2|Myakala Muniswamy s/o vit{alaiah (Died) per LR Cl.No. 7Oto74 25 Govindamma w/o Madhava Reddy (Died) perl-R cl.No.7s b.7T 27 M.Med/tavaReddy S/o ThimmaReddy, age 8O yrs 28 M.r.lallaReddy S/o Ttrimma Reddy, age 58 yrs 29 M.Vef,kat Reddy S/o Thirnma Reddy, age 53 yrs 3O B.Suiatha Wo Mahesh, age 33 Yrs 31 Go/hda Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, age 48 yrs 32 Damodar Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, age 45 yrs 34 Narsappa S/o Thippanna, age yrs 35 Venkatamma Wo Prathap Reddy, aEe 47 yrs 36 PeddaChinna Reddy S/o Rayappa, age 7O yrs 3Z l'.larsimhulu Slo Narsanna, age 68 years 38 C.Anianeyulu S/o Narsimhulu, age 43 yrs 39 Hanumanthu S/o Narsimhulu, age 38yrs 4O Chandrzriah S/o Narsimhulu,, age 35 yrs 41 [4anga Mrsamma Wo Beesi Reddy,, age 67 yrs 42-NarsiReddy S/oThippa Reddy' age 61 yrs 4{} Narsanrma Wo Btreemaiah, age 71 yrs 44 Hanumantha Reddy S/o Bheemaiah, age 53 yrs 45 P.Shekha Reddy S/o Bheemaiatr, age 47 yrs , ,'. ' . ' , ,. "' . i '',:. 4,6 Ambuia Rani D/o KrishnaSai (w/o seethararnmhary), age60 yrs 47 K,Laxminarayana S/o Mallappa, age 59 ys 48 K. Markerrdeya Slo Mallappa, age 55 yrs 49 Chukka Govindamma W/o Pedda AshiReddy (Ded) per LR D.Hr.No. 1Og to 112 50 M. Venkst:arnma W/o SatyaReddy, age 63 ys 5'l Myakala {tiluneendramma Wo RarBandh, age 50 yrs 52 Gooti Hanumanthu S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Cl.No.78 to 80 53 Muneppa Si/o Pedda Buddanna, age 70 yrs 54 Ashanna SIo Bqjjanna, age 55 ps 55 Chinna Savanna S/o Chinna Buddanna, age SO ys 56 Pedda Sa.yanna S/o Chinna Buddanna (Died) per LR Ct.No. 104 to 108 57 Linganna S/o Chinna Buddanna, age 53 ys 58 Beerappa S/o Chinna Buddanna, age 41...

59. Beesi Reddy S/o Masumanna(Died) per LR Cl.No. 91 to 95 60 Sivanna $/o Tayappa, age 53 yrs 61 Chukka S,atlramma Wo Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 47 yrs 62 G.Radhika D/o Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 30 yrs 63 Chukka Srinivasulu Slo tate. Chukka.NaHa Reddy age 28 yrs 64 Chukka lrnand S/o Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 27 yrs The petitioners No.61 to 6,4 added as deceased Gl.No.13 vide orders lANo.23slzo2 datd:29.1.1,t-O21. 65 M.Sujatha W/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 49 years 66 M.Jpthi D/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 3i years 67 N.Swaroopa D/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 29 lears 68 Swathi Dto Late.M.Shekar Reddy age Zl years 69 M.Praveen S/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 25 years The petitimers i.lo.66 to 69 added as deceased Ct.No.21 vide orders lA ftlo. 23d2O2O dated: 29.1.20.21. 7O lVlekala Narsingernma Wo Late.Mekda Muniswamy @ Mekala Muni Reddy age 49 y€ars 71 M.Mayuri O/o Late, Mekala Mtrniswamy @ Mekala MuniReddy 4p 36 years 72 Saraf iladhuri Dlo Late. Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekala Muni Rdldy age 32 years 73 Mekala Stretha D/o Late. ^/fiekala Muniswamy @ Mekala Muni Reddy age n 74 M.Shivaraj Slo Late. Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekda Muni Reddyage 25 years The petitioners No. 70 to 74 added as deceased Cl.l'1o.24 vide ord€rs 237 l2o?J dated: 29. 1.2021. lA No'

75. Mekala Venkat Reddy S/o Late. Madhava Reddy age '18 )rears 76 Moreddy Rameshwaramma D/o Late. Madhava Reddy age 47 years 77 Mekala ThirWathi Reddy S/o Late. Madhava Reddy age 45 pas The No. 75 to 77 added as deceased Cl.l,lo.25 vkte orders lA No. :29.1.2021. *ated 78 Jakkala Ananthamma D/o Late- Guti Chinna Hanmanthu, age 60 YIs TgM.Anjaneyulu S/o Late. Guti Chinna Hanmanthu age 45 Yrs €[) M.Anjanamma D/o Late. Guti Chinna Hanmanthu age 4{l Yrs No. 78 to & added as deceased Cl.No.52 vide orders lA No. delted:.29.1.2021. The 241 81 trloreddy Madhava Reddy S/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 60 yeas 82 lloreddy tlalla Reddy S/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 65 years 8El Gudise Venkatarrna D/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 50 years 84 lrloreddy Venkat Reddy S/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 59 years 85 Garrinolla tlaramma Dio Late.M. Thimrna Reddy age 39 years The No. 81 to 85 added as deceased CL.No.26 vide orders lANo' /2O 86 Moreddy Hanmanth Reddy S/o Late. Moreddy Tai Reddy age 55 yoars 87 Moreddy Venkat Reddy S,/o Late. Moreddy Tai Reddy age '{{) 88 G. Venkatrshwammm€r D/o Late. Moleddy Tai Reddy age 42 years 89 Venkatamrna D/o Late. Moreddy Tai Reddy age 38 years 90 G.Nagarnrna D/o Late.lforeddyTai Reddy age 50 years The petitioners No. 86 to 9I) added as deceased Cl.No.33 vide orders lA No.2ttO I 2020 dated: 31 .8:2023 91 Anjanamnra DIo Late. Besi age 44 Yrs 92 Gavinolla l-akshrnamma D/o l-ate. Beesi Reddy age 42'Yrs 93 Saraswattri D/o Late. Beesi Re{dy age 39 Yrs 94 Smt.Gangamma D/o-Late. Beei Reddyage 3Z yrs 95 Munnuru {iavithramma D/o Lata Beesi Reddy age 37 yrs The petitionens No. 91 to gS adde4as deceased Cl.No.59 vide orders tA No.24312O20 dated:31.8.2020 . 96 Chukka Prameela Wo Late.Chenna,Reddy age 55 Yrs 97 N.Rudramma Wo Nl_akshmai*l:age 36 Yrs 98 Chukka Naresh S/o Late.Gtienna Reddy age 3{ yrs 99 Jyothi Anand Reddywlo Arand Reddy age 29 years The petitioners No. 96 to gg datd:6.12.2023 ailtt€d,asicteceased Cl.No.s vide orders lA No. /2023 1OO Jangamrna W/o Late,C:Mun! Reddy age 57 yrs 101 Thirupathamma D/o Late.O.illluni Reddy age 40 yrs 102 C.Thirupathi Slo Late.C. age 39 Yrs 103 C.Ravi Si/o Late.C.Muni Reddyage 38 Yrs The^petitioners !!o. lpQ to tO3 added as deceased Cl.No. 12 vide orders tA No. l2023dald:612.m23 r .: 104 Smt. An,anthamma vu'th tateP,.eCda Sayanna, age 52 years : - 105 Venkatarnma D/o Late:Feilda,Sa\iranna age 46 yrs '106 Kurva Venkatanan S/o l-ate. Fedda Savanna age 42 yrs 107 G.Siddanna S/o Late. Pedda Savanna age 32 yrs 108 Govindemma with Late pe<lda Sayanna, age 19 years The peti'tioners No. 104 {o 108 adde<l as dece*€d CL.No.56 vide orders lA l'lo' 24ZM&led: 1og Chukka Sudarshan Slo Pedda Ashi R€ddy ll0tirpantmi Susheeta D/o Pedda Ashi Reddy 1 1 1 Bandla Sandhya D/o Pedda khi Reddy 112 Miayalakshmi D/o PeddaAshi Reddy All are occu: Agiculturist Ri/o Earladinne Mllage of ltarva Mandal Now at n,i.riiit'-ir*tii m-anOat, Wanapartny Dstrbt. AND ..AppellanUclaimant The Land Acquisition officer-cum- special Deputy collector, RLISP-||, Pebbair counser for the Appe[anr : Sri. G. purushotham *"J;"ot*"nuRespondent Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND ACQT,ISITION AP PEAL SUIT NO: 516 m25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the frer and decree dated o3.03.2O1O passed in o.P.No.189 of 2009 m the file of the court of the Senior'Clvil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Biiia Bichanna, stro. Ealaiah, 73 years, occ. Agrictrlture Ri/o. Nagarats Village' Pibbair Mand, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Spedal Wanaparthy Dy.Cofiec{or, R€{eev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll' Pebbair, Distrkl. ...RespondenUResPondent Counsel tor the Appellant : Sri. V. Manohar Rao Gounsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LANO ACOUISITK)N AP SUli[M):'s121OF 2o2s Appeal filed under Se<{ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 27.O2,2O25 passed in.GA. O.P. No. 17 ot 2022 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil &dge at W€hapanhy. Between: 1 . M.Bheemeshuar Reddy, Si/o l-de.MVenkat Reddy, aged 62 years 2. M.Venkat Kdshnafleddy,9o. Late.M.Venkat Reddy, aged 60 years, 3. M.Nagarjun Reddy, Sb LateM;Venkat Reddy, gged 58 years, 4. M.Subhash Re{<ty, S/o Late.ill.Venkat Reddy, aged 52 yea6, 5. Saroiamma, Wo. Venkd Reddy, aOed 80 years, 6. H.Bheemna, S,/o lGnenna, qged E0 lrears 7. Smt. Savaramma, w/o lGr.rcnna- (Diedher LRs Cl.No. 12 to 19 8. H. Ranganna, S/o Jammanm, aged 62 years 9. H Govindu, si/o Jammanm (Ded) for Cl.No. n b 24 10.H. Ravi, S/o Chinna Hanmanthu, aged 42 years, 1 1 . Pedda Muneppa, S/o Late. Chinnalinganna, aged 50 years 12. Anjanr:yulu, 9o Late.Flanumapthu, aget47 years 13. Chinnir Paga Bhimanna go Late. l(arenna, age 63 years 14. Praveen, S/o Bheemanna, age 27Yrs 15. Sanjer:vulu, S/o Hanmanthu, age 43 Years 16. Bhudevi, D/o fianmanthu, age 39 lrears 17. Ravi, :S/o Hanman$rir, age 3gYts 18. Ramesh, Sr/o Hanmanthu, age 25Yrs 19. Prashanth, 9o Bheemanna, age 25Yrs 20. Chinna Paga Ananthamma, W/o l,atefi.Govindu, age 51 years 21. Chinnapga Anikitha, D/o l-ate.H.Govindu, age 20 years 22.Chinna Paga ShnXhi, Db Late.H.Govndu, age 19 years 23. Chinna Paga Anjamma, D/q Late.H.Govindu, age 13 years 24. Chinnapaga Pavan t(alyan; S/otate.H.Gwindu, age 9 years Sl.No. 12 to 19 added as LRs deceased/Ct.No.7 vide crrders in lA No. 2672023 Dated. 1A.4.2O23 to brought on record as per the orders of the Hon'ble .Court. vide orders in lA No. 389/2023 DaGd. 31.8.2r-O23 to-brougfirt-Sl.tlo. n b 24 added as LRs deceased/Cl.No.7 on reconJ as per the oders of .the Flon'ble Court. AH are R/o Nandimalla Xfiodd, Amarchintha MaMal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Petitioners VERSUS The Land Acquisition Officercum Special Deputy Collector, RLISP-11, Pebbair ... ResPondenUResPondent Counsel for the Appettants :Sri. G Purushotham Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Appeals LAND AC{lUtSlTloN APPEAL--9UF }{(): 529 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrbved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No. 165 of 201 1 on the file of the Court of the Senbr Civil judge atWanaparthy- Between: 1 2 Shiva Reddy, S/o. R4hava Reddy, age 5t ye?rs Occ. Agriculture, R/o, Ngarala Mllage, Pebbair Marldal, Wanaparthy District. Naresh Reddy, S/o. Shiva Reddy, age_35years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

3. Ram Gopal Reddy, S/o. Rangg Reddy, age 12 ye€lrs, Occ. Agriculture,R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Clai mant AND The Special Deputy Cellector,,Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase'll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..ResPondenUResPonde nt Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V. Manshar-Rao Counsel for the Respondent I GPfor Appeals LAND ACQUISITION APPE, AI.'SUIT NO:529 OF 2025 Apped filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31tffi12}11 pagsed!n O.P.No. 155 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wapaparthy. Between:

1. Keshap4a Balaswanry,€/o Galenna, Age 69 y€ars

2. Galemma, D/o Balaswamy, age 36 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ANO The Special Pebbe$r, Wa Oeputy Collector, Raiiv Lift lnigation Scheme.Phase.H, Pebbair, At naparthy District. ...RespondeqrURespondent Counsel for the Appellants : Sri. V. Illanohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR.APPEALS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 580gF 202s Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.015.201'l passed in O.P. No. 164 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: '1. Surendar Reddy. S/o.Ranga Reddy, age 49 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Ngarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. B. Gopal Reddy, Slo.Ranga Reddy, age 74 years, Occ. Agriculture,Rl/o. Ngarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wsnaparthi District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy .Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigatiqn Scheme-Phasell, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. counser ror the Apperants : sri. N. Fraveen Reddy / ;X;":#::-'"" Counsel for the Respondents : GP for Appeals The Court clelivered the following: HON'BLi] SRIJUSTIGE ABHINAND KUIVIAR SHAVILI AI{D HON'BT.F. SMTJUSTICE TIRUI\,IAIA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.Nos. 28, 34, 43, 44, 45r 46, 47, 48, 379, 380, 381, 384, 386, 3g7, 38E, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396. 397, 398, 399, 400, 4O2r 403, 4041 4051 4061 407, 4081 4O9, 410, 4ll, 412, 4131 414, 415, 4161 4t7 j 418, 4l9r 42lr 423, 424, 429, 439, 441, 442, 4431 444, 445, 446, 447, 44814491 4501 451, 452,453, 454, 455, 456, 457 , 458, 459, 4601 4611 462, 4631 464? 465, 4661 467, 468, 470, 47tr 472, 473,474r 475, 416, 477, 478, 4791 480, 481, 4E2,483, '484, 485, 486, 487 , 4E9, 4go, 4gl, 4921 4931 4941 495,497 r 498, 499, 501, 502, 5031 504,505, 506, 507, 508, 512, 513r' 516, 521, 528, 529, and 530 OF 2025 (Pcr Hottble Jatite '4bhunatl Kumar Stnurh) \trfltren the mattes at€ taken up for hearing, learned cotrnsel appearing for the appellants had inforrred this C-outt that the isstre raised in these Appeals is squarely covered by the iudgrrrent, dated 27.0L.2025, passed by this C.oun in L.AAS.l{o.49 of 2024. karned counsel had fufttrcr contended that L.AAS.No.49 of 2024 was filed by claimanc No.26 in O.P.No.91 of 2014, dated

03.10.2018 and the appellans trerein are other clairnants in O.P.No.9 L of 2f.t4. Therefore, similar order be passed in ttrese appeah also. kamed counsel had funtrer contended *nt LAAS No.49 of 2024 was disposed of by relying on a Division Bench 2 judgrrrent of this Court in L.AAS.No.12i ofi 2OtS and barch, deted [email protected], whereby the marlset value of fi€ land acquired therein was enhanced by mo rnore tirrres rhen the value flred by the land Acquisition Officer {,ith all conseqrrntid benefits, however, for the delay period in preferripg the appeals, the claimants are nor entided for anyinteresc

2. [rarned counsel for the appellants had funher iontended that the judgment, dated [email protected] passrcdh L.AAS.No .125 of 2OL5 and batch was also confirrned by the Apex Coun in S.L.P.(Gvit)No.28925 of 2024, darcd 17.@2024. Therefore, rhe present apceals can also be disposed of in terms of the judgment, dated 27 .0 t.2025 passed in L.AAS.No .49 of 2024.

3. [-earned Govemnrenr Pleader appearing for the Land Acquisition Officer had contended that the purpose of acquiring lands of a1>pellants is for Raplampadu Balancing Reservoir under Jawahar L,[t lrrigarion Project and Pripdarshi Jumla proiect and G.O.IG.No.2-34, dated 15.t0.1993 and G.O-l[s.M.291, dated 3

05.08.1982 are not applicable rc the said irrigation projects. Thereforc, all the appeab are liabl€ to be disrnissed-

4. Flr"iog considered the rival subrnissions made bydo learned counsel on efuher side, this Cotrt is of the view that the Division Bench of this Coun in L.A"AS.I to: of Znrc, darcd 27 fr9.2022 and L.AAS.No.4 of 20t6, di:ed t5ffi.2022 held that the said G.Os. are applicable for all dre Irrigation Proiects, though the said G.Os. were issued specifitzllyfor SrisailarnHydro Power Proiects. L.AAS.No.125 of 2OL5 and barch darcd 27.og-2o22 and L.AAS.No.4 of n!6, dated [email protected] were allowed and the mar{ret value was enhanced bytwo more tirnes than the valtre fixed by the Land Acquisitio r. Aggrieved by the oder, dated

27.09.2022, ln L.AAS.No.L25 of 2OL5 and batch, the State has carried the matter to dre Apex Coun by filing S.L.P.(Gvil).Il'lo' 28925 of ZOZ+ and the Apex C-ourt uitk order,dated L7frg-2024, confirrned the order passed byth. oirrisioo Bench of this court in : L.AAS.I\b .125 of 2OL5 and barch. T[rerefore, the present appeals l \I 4 cari also be disposed of in terms of ttre judgrnenq dared

27.@,.2A22,passed in L.AAS.No .125 of 2OtS and batch.

5. Ac<orrdingly, all the appeals are allowed by following ttre t udgrrrenc, darcd 27.09.2022, passedin LAAS.I{o .L25 of 2Ot5 ard barch, an<l the market valrc is enhanced bytvrc nore tinrs(t+z) than the value fixed by the t-and Aoqdsitioq Officer wfuh all consequendal benefis. Flowever, rhe appeflants are norentitred for interest for rhe detay period in prefening the appeals. Ttrere shall be no orrder as to costs. IlGcelhneow Petirions, if any, pending in these appeah shall sand closed. To, I. NAGALAKSHUI //TRUE COPY// ,l \

1. The S;enior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (With reords, if any) 2. The F'rincipal Senior Civit Judge at \A/anaparthy. 3. The S;enior Civil Judge, Narayanpet. 4. Trvo OCs to the GP for Appeals,(OUT) 5-. One CC to Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate [OpUCt 6: One OC to Sri. Ravuta Shankar Reddy, ndrocate tOpUCl 7. One CC to Sri S. Venkateshwar Reddy, AdvocateiOpUCt 8. One CC to Sri. G. purushotham Reddi, AdvocateiOpUCi 9. One CC to Sri. N. praveen Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 10.Two OD Copies DL w A} ?" ( \.i t, HIG+I COURT' AKS,J & E'ID,J DATED:fl)104/2025 COiJIMON JTIDGTTIENT .[06.4p 7, - w,{10.11 1,412.11 3' o (J 25 Ns\ tffi * * 5O6.507.1O8i. 5{ 2.51 3. 516. ALLOWNGITHE LAASP \3 THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSINI L.A.A.S.Nos.125. 144.27O and 356 of 2O15.62 aad 68 of 2O21 COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Justice G. Sri Devi) The lis in this batch of Appeals preferred by the claimants pertain to common acquisition proceedings and therefore, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment

2. Heard iearned counsel for the claimants and Sri D.Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent. Perused the material available on record.

3. The present acquisition was for the purpose of submergence of priyadarshini Joorala Project/ancillary projects under Priyadarshini Joorala Project. This Court uittejudgment, dated L5.O9.2O22 has already elaborately analysed the evidence and consid.ered the identical issue raised in these appeals in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2OL6. Both the counsel have not disprrted tl.e factum of commonatity of the evidence and the issue in these appeals and in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2OL6, wherein this court has allowed the appeal enhancing the market value by two more 2 times (1+21 than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act.

4. Therefore, following the judgment passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, flated 15.09.2022 and for the reasons { stated therein, all these appeals stand disposed of by enhancing the market value of the acquired land by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with all other consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Act, No order as to ]. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed- JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI JUSTICE M.G. PRTYAI'ARSINI

27.09.2022 gkv/tsr Note: Office to append a co.PY of the judgment in L.A;,A.S.No.4 of 2OL6 with the present ju$ment. B/o gkv/tsr : IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH OAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDAND TWENW F1VE S:IIil THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE STYIT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Anjanamma, Wo Paramesh, age 38 yrs Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31.03.2011 passed in O.P. No. 3 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. : This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all conseqrcntial bendits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not enti{led to interest for the delay period of 4965 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DLw LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:ilOl04l?0.25 DECREE LAAS.No.22B of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL hdP?A #* IN THE HIGH COURT FOR T+tE STATE OF T€LANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL T\ IOTHOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE ENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HOI{OURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Mala Chandramma, Wo Chennaiah, Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy aged 81 Yrs. Occ- Agriculture, Rl/o Ngarala District. .Appellents/Claimants The Special Deputy Collector, R4iv Lift {rrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District Appealfiled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, ;rr#il:::"":;: decree dated 31.03.201 1 passed in O.P. No. 5 ot 2O1'l on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is albwed : 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (l +2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialtenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not ertitled to interest for the delay period of 4965 days in prefening the appeal.

4. Ttrat there shall be no order as to costs. To, 'l . The Sienior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two ()D Copies DL 'lcY' Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR T HIGH COURT LAAS.No.34 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL uC'{,1 &{"' t, I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOTJSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR'SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:43 OF 2025

1. Gunti Balaswamy, S/o Yenganna, aged 63 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Gunti Venlet Swamy, S/o Balaswamy, aged 50 yrs, Occ. Agricultur.e, Rl/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District.

3. G. Krishnaiah, S/o Balaswamy, aged 48 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanapa rthy District.

4. G. Sandya Rani, Wo Srinivasulu, Aged 41 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/O Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanapa rthy District.

5. G, Ashok, S/o Balaswamy, aged 42 yrs All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. AND ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 29 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Givil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case ard upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for A,ppeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellants be and hereby are not entitled to interest for the delayperiod of 4972 days in prefening the appeal.

4. Thatthere shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER ,l I I I j i i . HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 4 ? DECREE LAAS.No.,43 ot 2A25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL r{.rfd Xtr IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT +IYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TFflRTIETH DAY OF APRIL- TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FI\IE IER=Sf{m THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA T}EVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO:44 OF 2025 Between: Suraiah, S/o Gattaiah, aged 58 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, ll/o Nlgarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel la nts/Cl ai m a nts AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Schemefhase-.11, Pebbair, At Pebbair' wanaparthy District' ..RespondenuRespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.O4.201'l passed in O.P. No. 192 of 2O10 on the fib of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri: V Manohar Rao, Advoca{e for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value flxed by the Land Acquisition ffioer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period ot 4974 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no orderas to costs. //TRI'E COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER 2 d HIGH GOITRT- DATED:3O,tO412O25 Fr=rdR=li l-AAS.No.4 o12025 ALLOWING TI{E APPEAL u ,c'[ 8x,, E / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYI}ERABAD WEDIIESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOI.JSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR Sil{AVILI At{[) THE HONOUR^ABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO:a5 Of 2o25 Between: Pedda Gattaiah, S/o Late Yellaiah, aged 74 yrsOcc. Agriculture, Rt/o Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Deputy Coltector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scherne-Phase-l{, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 134 of 2O1O on the fib of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is rnt entithd to interest for the delay period of 4966 days in prefening ttrc appeal. 4. Thd there shall be no order as to oosts. /ffRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL \er NAGA LAKSHMI R,EGISTRAR OFFICER a,\ HIGH COURT DATED:3O10412/025 \ \ DECREE l-AAS.No.45 ot 2025 ALLOWING HE APPEAL c{td r.l. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE EII:FI:l-\[i THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA T'€VI EAOA D [n Betireen: Komari Ravi, S/o K. Kukkanna, aged 54 yrs Komari Raju, S/o Kukkanna, aged 49 yrs Komari Suresh, S/o Kukkanna, aged 46 yrs Komari Shankar, S/o Kukkanna, aged 44 yrs All an-. Agriculture, Rl/o Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. .Appel lants/Claimants 1 2 3 4 D The Special Pebbair, Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-PhaseJl, Pebbair, At ...RespondenU Respondent District Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.O4.2O11 passed in O.P. No. 179 ot 201O on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of the Judgment and Decree of the Court bebw and the material papers in app€al, the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants ard GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellants be and hereby are not entitfied to interest for the delay perriod of 4966 days in prefening the appeal.

4. Ttgl there shall be noorderasto costs. ,,TRUE COPY,, A INT REGISTRAR R To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL Y{ HIGH COIURT DATED:30/04/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.46 oI 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL q.odd .e, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILT AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE sI Between: .9lpuoq Bqnylq, S/o Gattaiah, aged 49 yrs, Occ. Agricutture, R/o Ngarata Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants The Special Pebbair, Collector, Distric{. Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-{1, Pebbair. At ...RespondenU Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P. No. 191 of 2010 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Dbcree as follows: '1. That the appeal beand herby is allowed; 2. That the Market value b enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period ot 4972 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/' Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL \qr' HIGH COIJRT DATED:3(110412025 DECREE LAAS.No. 47 ot 2025 ALLOWING']THE APPEAL ,4@t^ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAIIA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND KUhAR THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALAIE,I'{ $ltv|1-1 zp.e Between: Bhagavanthu, S/o Narayana, aged 69 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Ngarala Pebbair Mandal,Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Clalmants AND The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeat fited under Section 54 of the L.A.Act ;trilffi:::":": decree dated 07.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.190 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest br the delay period of 4966 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /,TRUE COPY/' Sd/-I. NAGA LAKSHMI J OFF!CER To,

1. The Seniir Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two GD Copies DLw J HIGH COURT DATED:3IO10412025 DECREE l-AAS.No. 48 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL L\.e(('b W IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE O'F TEI.ANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDI.IESOAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between M.A. Hasib, S/o.M.A.Lathif, 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, F/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUclaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.499 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequerfiial.5erefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest br the delayperiod of 5419 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no orderas to costs. To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies W NT t) I f HIGH COIJ'RT DATED:30104l/m25 EtrrcIR=Ti LAAS.No. il79 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL L{, *dA #e IN THE HIGH COURT FORT+IE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYT}ERABAD WEDI.IESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO TTIOUSAND AND TWENTYfIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE TIRI.IMALA DEVI EADA OF Between: R. thaskar Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, 42 yearc, Occ. agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapadhy District. ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 525 of 20(X) on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allotrved ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisfrion Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL Yv NAGA LAKSHMI III-{dFII^FM OFFICER HIGH COURT AKS,J & ETD,J DATED:3tllO4l2O2S DECREE LAAS.No. 380 of 2025 ALLOWINGi THE APPEAL 'q'fl"[ .-ft" IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FN/E THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDfiUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO: 381 OF 2025 Between: Thirupathaiah, S/o. Shanthaiah, 51 years, Occ. Agriculture R/0. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant EIID The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.490 of 2009 on the ffle of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offrcer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entit{ed to intercst for the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal. ,'

4. Tlrat there shall be no order as to msts. ,/TRUE COPY/' NAGA LAKSHMI III=GIFIiITIf, OFFICER To,

1. The iienior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two OD Copies DL w 7 I I I I I HIGH COIJRT DATED:3(t10112025 DECREE I-AAS.No. ?I81 ot 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL u. ..e38) 8* IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDiIESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APR{- TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KI.'{IIAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Anjaneyudu, S/o.Pedda Sailu, 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, Nagarala Mllage, Pe-bbaii Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppeltanUClaimant AND The SpecialDeputy Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-tl, P-ebbair, Wanaparthy District. .. Res ponde nURes ponde nt . Appeal frled under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No. 478 of 2009 on the fih of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeat, the Judgrment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V ManoharRao, Advocate for the appeHant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 't. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay perbd of 5419days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies 1 DL w sd/-l LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER , ? HIGH COURT DATED:iX) 10412025 DECREE LAAS.No.ilB4 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ttCAPQA k# IN THE HIGH COURTfOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TI,1/ENryfVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ANO THE HONOUR.ABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA 1AND ACOUFITION APPEAL SUITNO: 386 OF 2025 Between .t!ggamqa,- Wo. -Late Anjaneyulu, 50 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagar:ala Village' Pebbair Mandal' wanaparthy District ...Appertanuc{armant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy Collector, Pejeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .. RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 486 of 2009 on the file of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Otder and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the vah.e fxed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in pretening the appeal.

4. I'hat there shall be no order as to costs. ,,TRUE COPY" sd/-r LAKSHMI ISTRAR OFFIGER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL (( HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 LAAS.No. 3i86 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL .ee \ k* IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT*A AT HYDE WEDNESOAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOt'SAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND Kt'i'AR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV!EADA 387 0F M.A. Hafeez, S/o. M.A. Rahman, 55 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClalmant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.o3.2010 passed in O.P.No.492 of 2009 on the fib of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herbyis allowed; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefrts;

3. That appetlant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay perbd of 5419 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order asto costs. = To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w NAGA LAKSHMI N OFFICER , F HIGH COI'RT DATED:30'10412025 DECREE LAAS.No.3$t7 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ,,(c-dP@ ## IN THE HIG}I COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDIT€SDAY, T}'IE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE IEIT]=f,{{\ln THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: MA MAZAHAR, S/o. Kfraja Moinuddin, 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.201O passed in O.P.No.503 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allcwed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times {1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with afl consequentiar benefits; 3- That appe{lant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 dap in prefuning the appeal.

4. rhat there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY,, NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DLt({ HIGH COt'RT DATED:3010112025 DECREE LAAS.No.3tl8 of 2025 I !

1.\ \ ALLOWINGTHE APPEAL ur?*b &* IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI.ANGANA ATHYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWOTHOUSAND ANO TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUST{CE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LANO ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO:389 OF 2025 Between: Lathit S/o. Razak, 70 years, Occ Agriculture, Rtro. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ,,.RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggde\€d by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 497 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon peruskrg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offrcer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd,.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR N OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DLw 1 HIGH COI.'RT DATED:3()loqm2i n DECREE LAAS.No.3B9 of 2025 ALLOWING ]THE APPEAL &.w ! i I l i i / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO TtIOUSAND AND TWEIITY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUIUIAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI€ADA Between: AP Narayana Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, 75 yearc, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarata Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. : ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.523 ot 2O09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate f,or the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirres (1+21thanthe value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with allconsequential beneJits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal.

4. T'hat there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL ({ . NAGA LAKSHIII OINT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER ( t HIGH COURT DATED:3,010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.:390 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL Ld.ef-a Yv-ffif !N THE H]GH COT.IRT FORTHE STAT€OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANID AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA o M.A. t-lakeem, S/o. M.A. Rahman, 51 years, Occ. Agriculture Fl/o. Nagarata Village, Pebbair Mandal , Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme' Phase-ll, Pebbair' Wanaparthy Distrkt. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act' aggrieved by the Order and decree dated o3to3t2o1o passed in o.P.No.494 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market Yalue is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interes{ for the delay perbd of il19 days h Prefening the aPPeal.

4. Th;at there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w HIGH COIJRT DATED:30/04/2025 OECREE LAAS.No.391 ot2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL )-\ ot(na &tr {N THE HIGH COUR.T FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE EIrl=FI=NIi THE HONOI.'RABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRI.'MALA DEVI EADA Between: Santhaiah, S/o. Mashanna, 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Vi{lage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, 4 Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. Appeat fited under section s4 onhe L.A.Act, J"""::":il:::::": decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.|.lo.487 of 2O09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for heariyg and upon perusirg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the alpealbe and lTerby is allorarcd ; 2. That the Mailtet value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the valure fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with allconsequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is rrct entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 dap in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs ,/TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD CoPies DLw ;UKEHII REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.3!|2 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL u.esuA ",X^G' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI.ANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KI.II,IAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO:393 OF 2025 Between: Anand, S/o. Shanthaiah, 5O years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o;: Mgarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collecto r, Rajeev Lift lrrlgation Scheme, Ptrase-l l, ?ebbair, District. ..RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.l.lo.488 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two morc tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entit{ed to interest{or the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal. l l

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C;D Copies DL w NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR N OFFICER , / HIGH COURT DATED:301rN412025 DECREE LAAS.No.3€|3 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ,4ol'g("4 #.. IN THE HIGH COURT fOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TI"IIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOI'SAND AND TIAIENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Sundar Bheemudu, S/o. Sgilu.pO.ygars, Occ- Agricrlture, R/o Nagara{a ViHage, Pebbair ltlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCtaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scherne, Phas!- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Distr'rct ..Res pondenURes ponde nt Appeal filed under Sectbn 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved 5y the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No.476 of 2O09 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material paprs in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V ManotrarRao, Advocate for ttre appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. :' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with allconsequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled b interest forthe delay?eriod of 5419 days in prefening the appeal

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,,TRUE COPY// sd/-t MfiEf,TM REGISTRAR OFFICER To, 1

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Turo CD Copies DL Yy f ? -1 HIGH COUITT DATED:30/,10412025 IEI=GIII-{i LAAS.No.3tl4 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ).t,coR%[ &. IN THE HIGH COTJRT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TI{IRTIETH DAY OF APR,IL TWO THOUSAND AI{D TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABT.IINAI$D KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: M.A. Nazeer, S/o. Khaja Moinuddin, 50 years, Ooc. Agricultrre, Rt/o.Mgarah Village, Pebbai r Ma nda l, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appear rired undersection ilotthe L.A.Acr, #H;HTJd"": decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.|.1o.502 of 20Oe on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon penrsing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of tlre Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Adrrocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follours:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allourcd ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tuo more tinres (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all Gonseque{ltial benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not enttrled b interest for the delay Beriod of 5419 days in prefering the appeal.

4. Thert there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C;D Copies DLW Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI OFFICER I? HIGH COUfiT DATED:30ltl4l2025 DECREE LAAS.No.39S of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL q.d& K.r - ?fla, IN THE HIGH COT'RT FOR THE STAT€ OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDIIESDAY, THE THiRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAI{D AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHIIIAND KUMAR SHAvlLl AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Euddarnma, Wo.Budda Ramanna, 85 yearc, Occ. Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .. RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 484 of 20O9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Marlet vah.re is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offioer, with allconsequential benefits;

3. That appelbnt be and hereby 'ns not entifled to interest for the delay period ot5425 days in prefenftrg the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to oosts. ,/TRUE COPY/' Sd/-I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The S;enior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DLY:{", 'r/ HIGH COURT DATED:3010112025 DECREE LAAS.No.396 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL cod"[ \-t .,&e, IN TI{E HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Y\IEDT{ESDAY, TI.IE TH]RTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOI'SAND AND TWENW FI\IE PRESENT TFTE HONOURABLE SRI JTJIiTICE ABHINAND Kt,{t,IAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUT'IALA DEVI EADA Between: V. Rajavardtran @ Rajavadhan Reddy, S/o. Shg-\ar Reddy,-!0- years, Occ- Agricuiture, Rl/o. Nagardla Village, Pebbai r Mandal, Wanapa rthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, / Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District .. RespondenURes pondent Appea! filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.467 ot 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil JudgB at Wanaparthy. This appeal ooming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment ard Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. Thatthe appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the lilarket value is enhanced by .two rnore times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisiticn Officer, with all @nsequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5425days inprefrrirg the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DLw NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COUR]' DATED:30l0tll2025 DECREE LAAS.No.39'I of 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL l-tdRelb &M IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD \/\/EDIIESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRES,ENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between K.Sandeep Kumar, S/o. K. Sreenivaslu, aged 35 years, Agriculture, R/o. NagaralaViHage,PebbairMandal,WanaparthyDistrict. ...Appe I I a nt/C t aim ant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-l l, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District Appeat filed under Section s4 of the L.A.Act,;;""":::ffi::::T decrce dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 385 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the SeniorCivil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the gfounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula ShankarReddy, Advocate This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two rnore{imes (1+2).than the vafue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequer*ialtenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to inbrest for the delayperiod of 5416 days in preferring the appeal

4. Thrrt there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, / t

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL \q NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER J HIGH COUTTT DATED:30fi1412025 DECREE LAAS.No.398 of 2025 ALLOWNGTHE APPEAL u.r@ IN THE HIGH COURTfORT}IE STATE OF TELANGAI{A AT WEDNESDAY, TI-IE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOI'SAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUI,IALA DEVI EADA 3 rFF) Between: B. Laxmi, Wo. Vema Reddy Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy , 47 )rears, Ooc. agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Colleotor, Ra.ieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair' District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.526 of 2OO9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for trearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the @urt below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows: 1 . That the appeal beand fierby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is entranced ty two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not erfftled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prelening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Sienior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DLW LAKSHMI I*GrcMnR OFFICER HIGH COI.'R'T DATED:3010,412025 DECREE LAAS.No.39S| of 2025 ALLOWING I'HE APPEAL u .oP(d Yt- ."rF IN THE HIGH COI'RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI.IA AT HYDERABAD THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWOTHOT'SAM) AT.ID TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AAHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Betw€en: Pedda Buran, S/o.Ramaiah, 63 years, Occ. Agricultwist, Fl/o. Nagarala ViHage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellant/Claimant ENT' The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrbation Scteme, Phase-l l, Pebbair, Distric*. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Sec*ion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.485 of 2O09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the aqgurnents of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and he6y is dlovted ; 2. That the Market vdrc is enhanced by ttro more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Oficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefenirE the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,,TRUE COPY/' To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL \cy iufiEtrm REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:30/t)4/2025 OECREE LAAS.No.4OO ol fr25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ,r.o{uh .Xr6, IN I'ITE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOIJSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HON(ruRABLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SI.IAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JOS?ICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAIID ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO:402 OF 2025 Between: Vishnuvadtran Reddy, S/o.Swamy Reddy, 57 years, Occ. Agriculture FUo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCIaimant AND The Special Wanapailhy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .. Res pondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.469 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Sen'tor Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing tfte grounds of appeal, the Judgrnent and Decree of the Court below and the materialpapers in the case and upo.n hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Adlooate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2)than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits,

3. That appellant be and trereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal.

4. Thert there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOt OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C;D Copies DL Yv u }HGH COURT DATED:301O,41m25 DECREE LAAS.No. 4012 ot 2025 ALLOWINGTHE APPEAL u4t']> &tr, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATTIYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRT{ETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FN/E PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JT'STICE T]RUMALA DEVI EADA Between: S. Krishnaiah, S/o. Kistaia.h, Q0 y-ears, Occ. Agricutture, R/-o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District, ' ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scherne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.483 of 2009 on ttre frle of the Court of the SeniorCivil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the rnaterial papers in the case and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for tfie Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two morc times (1+.2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. ThThat appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal.

4. Thert there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPYII Sd,-I. NAGA LAKSHMI GIEfiITTrl OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two C;D Copies DL w F ,€ HIGTI COURT DATED:30104,2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 40it of 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL r.d'6d k, IN T1TE HIGH COTJRT FOR THE STATE OF TEI-ANGANA AT HYDERABA,T) WEDI{ESDAY, TTE THTRTIETH DAYOF APR'IL TWO THOUSAilID AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JI'STICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Khamurunnisa Begum, Wo. Khaja lr4oinuddin, 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Febbair Mandai, Wanaparthy District. ..APPellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Gollector, Rajeev Li{t lnigation Schenre, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... ResPondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.SOI of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanapafthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decrce of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows:

1. That the appealbe and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tvro rnore times (1+2) than the va{ue fixed by the Land Aoquisition Offcer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitted {o interest for the delay period of 5429 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// sd/-t. LAKSHMI IEGIEMnR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C;D Copies DLw i f HIGH COURT DATED:30l0tll2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 404 of 2O25 ALLOWINGTHE APPEAL uc'e tr* IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAAAD VI/EDNESDAY, TI-IE THIRTIETH DAYOF APRIL TWOT+{OUSAND ANO TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL! ANO THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Krishna Reddy, S/o. l(ane Reddy, 85 years, Occ. agriculture, R/o. Nagarala. Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant Etlf, The Special Wanaparthy .Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, .RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.518 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy, This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for tfie appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the app€al be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fxed by the Land Acquisition ffitcer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 dap in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd,.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Sienior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two OD Copies DL \x I& HIGH COUR DATED:3010'41?0.25 DECREE LAAS.No. 4tl5 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ,l^'e S^lr IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TET.ANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTI€TH DAY OF APRIL TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENry FVE TITi THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUiTALA DEVI EADA D Kudukuntla Srinivasulu, S/o. Ranganna, aged .63 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellantlGlaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigat'ron Scherne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and dectee dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 384 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Adwcate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. Thls Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . Tfiat the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tri/o more times (1+2) than the vakrc fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benef,rts;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest brthe delay perft:d of 5416 days in preferring the appeal.

4. Thatr there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY/ Sd,.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR N OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Gopies DL Vy HIGH COUFIT DATED:30l0t4l202s l.r{trl=tl LAAS.No. 406 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ."{d &, I,l I I I t i i ! i ! : : , : , IN THE HIGII COURT FOR THE STATE Of TELANGANA AT TIYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, TI-IE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRTL TWO THOUSAND ANID TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAIID KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE fIONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Venkataiah, S/o. Shanthaiah, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 55 yearc, District: Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o. Nagarala Village, ..AppellantlClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L,A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 489 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V N{anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is dloued ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two mone times (1+2)than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with allconsequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal.

4. Thett there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY// Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C)D Copies w ?\\ \ HIGH COUFIT DATED:30/,04/,2025 DECREE LAAS.No. 407 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL .gP(nI \-( &., IN T}IE HIGfI COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYT}ERABAD WEDNESDAY, TI.{E THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Narender Reddy, S/o. Mrayana Reddy, 43 yerc, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 ol the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3lO3t2O10 passed in O.P.No.524 ot 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market vah.re is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY'/ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMT REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The S,enior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two C:D Copies DL \qr HIGH COURT DATED:30/0#11025 DECREE LAAS.No. 408 ol2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL q."(se #6d' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT \A/EDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PiI{I{\TII THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA D Yoltlup,-9/o. F?-qruddin,.S1_years, Occ agricutture, Fi/o. lrlagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scherne, Phase-lL Pebbair, Oistrict. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.508 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. fhis appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the girounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Adrcoate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. Thls Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Ma*et value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the va,lue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all mnsequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest br tte delay period of 5417 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. NAGA LAKSHMI INT REGISTRAR To, 1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD GoPies w 44 HIGH COUIIT DATED:3011 4//20% DECREE LAAS.No. 4tl9 ot 2025 ALLOWING HE APPEAL a^a'e [6r' IN THE HIGH @URT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TIflRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOI,JSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO: 41O OF 2025 Between: Mahender, S/o. Krishnaiah, aged 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Vil lage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieled by the Order and decree dated 0310312010 passed in O.P.No.388 of 2009 on the frle of the Court of the Senbr Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula ShankaiReddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the RespoMent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tinres (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal. l'

4. Thiat there shall be no order as to costs. /,TRUE COPY'/ NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL Ft- HIGH COUITT DATED:3Olt 4l2O25 DECREE LAAS.No. 410 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL u.,R*ew 'r{6to tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT{A ATHYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, TI{E THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TIA'O THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE EII=FI:IIIi THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL! THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUT'}ALADEVI EADA D M.A. Rahman, S/o. Razak Miya, 80 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rfo. Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Peb0air, Wanaparthy District. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dat€d 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.491 of 2009 on tfp fih of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing {he grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by t\,vo more tirnes (1+2) than the value

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest hr the delayperiod fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, wilh all consequential benefits; of 5419 days in prefering the appeal. I

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,,TRUE COPY// SECNON OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Tno CD Copies w /? HIGH COURT DATED:3011 412025 DECREE LAAS.No.411 o12025 ALLOWING HE APPEAL 4co{"b ^*{, IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYT}ERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TIA'O THOTJSAND AT.ID TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRlJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S(AVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI Aisha Reddy, S/o. M.A. Lathif, 65 )rears, Occ- Agticulure Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, ffieev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase -ll, Pebbair, District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Sedion 54 of tfie L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.500 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allou,ed ; 2. That the Market value is enfnnqd by turc more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offioer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Sranior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w MTEIII]'II REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COUFIT DATED:301t)412025 DECREE LAAS.No.412 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL UCOR("N &ff IN THE HIGH @URT FOR TI{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEOI.IESDAY, TFE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO TFIOUSAND AND TWENTY FI\E PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUTTAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA OF Sandar: Sailu, S/o. Chennappa, 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri./o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Crcllector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.475 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appealbe and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1 +2) than the value fixed 5y the Land Acqu,is'rtion Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and heeby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5425 days in prcfening the appeal. ,'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY/' To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CID Copies DL Ve-' LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DECREE LAAS.No.4'|3 ot2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL .{rd^ k., tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA APPEAL SU Gundapally Pedda Venkat Reddy Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, ,, S/o.Gatta Reddy, 80 years, Occ. Agril., R/o. Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant Et[D The Special Wanaparthy Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 514 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal ooming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate br the appelldnf and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fi:<ed by the Land Acquisition Ofiicer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5425 days in preferring the appeal.

4. Thert there shall be no order as to @sts. To, 1 . The Sr:nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL Y{ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR N OFFICER 'u f HIGH COUF'J DATED:30l0t4l2025 DECREE LAAS.No.414 ot 2025 ALLOWING HE APPEAL qco6^ W IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STAT€ OF TELANGAT{A ATHYDERABAD WEONESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENW FI\IE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE AAHNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUI'IALA DEVI EADA 141 M.A. Razak, S/o. MA Lathif, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 35 years, Occ- Agrianlture RIo. Nagarala Mllage, District ..AppollanUClaimant Etlt The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Dstrict. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieVed by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed 'n O.P.No.498 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds ot appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirneo (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequer*ial5enefts;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period oI 5417 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no.order as to costs ,/TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Sernior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL A- NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER ? I HIGH COUFIT DATED:3O10t112O25 D=GIR=Ti LAAS.No.41,5 ot 2O25 ALLOWING]IHE APPEAL uo16"lo &e' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTTETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: B. Gatta Reddy, S/o. Fedda Kista Reddy, 70 years, Occ. agriculture, Rl/o. Nagara{a Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O3.03.2O10 passed in O. P.No.519 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Jnclge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and.Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argunrents of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GY, for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as fcillows:

1. That the appealbe and herby is allowed ; 2. That the lilarket vahrc is enhanced by ttrro more times (1+2; than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appetlant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal. ----7/ .!/ .:, i/

4. Thal:there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/' Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The S€,nior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL Y{ u d HIGH COURT DATED:3010'11m25 DECREE LAAS.No.41ti ot 2O25 ALLOWING'ITHE APPEAL ucdt" &{" IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TTIIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TIA'O THOUSAhID AND TWENTY FIVE tr-ri:FhIIiI THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE ABHINAND KIJ{IIAR SIIAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTIGE TIRUMALA n Faqruddin, S/o. Khaja Hussain, 75 years, Occ. agriotture, Fi/o. Nagarala Vitlage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distrkt. ..AppellanUClaimant The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scherne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondentlRespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.507 of 2fi)O on the fileof the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court Selow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Adrccate ficr the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decrce as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two rnore tknes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offrcer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to intercst for the delay period 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. of 5419 days in preferring the appeal. : //TRUE COPY'/ Sd/-I. NAGA LAKSHT{I J SECTION OfFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 EtrrcFtrE LAAS.No.4|i' ol2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL 'qodd HflF IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND-?ruMAR SI{AVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: shrishailam, s/o..Bakkanna, !J.years, occ. agriculture, wo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distiict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section s4 af the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.538 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgrnent and Decree of the Court below and the rnaterial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeai be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequentiat benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order //TRUE COPY// NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies fi- HIGH COIJRT DATED:31)lO4l2O25 DECREE l-ArAS. ltf s.il18 of 2025 ALLOWNCi THE APPEAL t u,r{A,& IN THE HIGH COT.iRT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDT.IESDAY, TI-IE TH{RTIETH DAY OF APRII- TWO TFIOIJSAND AND TWENTYfIVE PRESENT THE HONOT'RAELE SRI JUSTICE ABHINA}ID KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE DEVITADA Beturcen: Madhusudhan Reddy, S/oGopal Reddy, 52_ ye.ars, Occ. agdcrrlture, R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellant/Claimant At{D The Speciat Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Sctlerne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... Respo ndent/ResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by tlre Order and decree datedO3.O3.2O1O passed in O.P.No.516 of 2O09 on the frb of the Gourt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the gfounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appealbe and herby is allowed : 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes ('l+z)than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prcferring the appeal. 4. Thatthere shallbe no order as to costs. ,TTRUE COPY" JOINT S€GTON OFFIGER To,

1. The Senkx Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. Two CDCoPies w HIGH COURT DATED:30104/2025 d III=rcIiFTI LAAS.No,419 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL t-t co6'/b Fk- {qw ", IN THE HIGTI COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAT{GANA AT HYDERABAD WEDI',|ESDAY, TFIE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRTL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY F{VE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AB+IINAilIDIruMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE ilRUTiALAI}EVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUtTttO:421 OF 2025 Betrreen: shanthamma, W{9, Balasw.amy,p. years, oe. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villige, AND ,.AppellanUGlairnant Itq sp"gial Dy.collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation scheme, phase-tt, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..fiespondehUnesp6ndent ,Apbeal filed under Section il of the L.A.Act, aggrierred by the Order and decYee dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 505 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing ttre gnounds of appeal, the Jr.rdgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Adrrocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+zlthan the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequentiat benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the dday period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal. 4. T+tat there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// sd/-t. JOINT To,

1. The SeniorCivil Judge at Wanapafthy 2. Two CD Copies q/DL OfFICER HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.4?1 ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL q "'6d ffi"' IT{ TITE HTGH COURT FOR T+IE STATE tr TEIIANGATTIA AT HYDERABAD WEDT,ESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO TI.IOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI€ADA Between: venkatswamy, sb.Balaiah, 60 Ylars, occ. Agricufrur€, Ryo. Nagarala vtllage' PSGii tttanOit, Wanaparthy oisirict. \._ ...AppetlanUGlaimant A1.lD tl.re speg[al Dy..collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, WanaparthY District. "' ResPondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by tfre Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in o.P.No.506 of 2oo9 on the file of the coLnt of the Senior Civil Jtdge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the gnogrds of appeal, the Judgnrent and Decree of the Court below and the material paplrs in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is atlowed ; 2: That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+zlthan the val.ue fixed by the Land Acquisition Offrcer, with allconsequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not.entitled to ir*erest for ttre delay period of 5419 days in prefening the appeal' 4. Thatthereshall be no order as to oosts. /JTRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wan4arthy. 2. Two CD CoPies fk DL .,.,...,--i^11,/' ' Sd/-I. NAGA I.AKSTIMI JOINT REGISTRAR SBCT{ON OFFICER - f/ HIGH CC'URT DATED:3i0/04t2OZs DECREE LAAS.No.42g ot 2O2S ALLOWN(i THE APPEAL L( "de #-" rN THE IIIG+I COURT FOR TI{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD VVEDT.IESDAY, T+'IE TH]RTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO TI.CITJSAND AND TVUENTY FI\IE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT Jt STICE TIRUMALA DEYI EAIIA Seturcen: Venkatswamy, S/o.Pedda Sailu, 57 )re?rs, Occ. Agriculture, frl/o. NagArala Mllage, Pebb-ai r M a nd al, Wanaparthy D istri ct. ...AppellanUGlaimant -AND Ttre Special Dy. Coliector, Raieev Lift I rrigatkrn Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ""': ' ' Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved 5y the &der and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O. P.No.477 at 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal corning on for hearing and upon penJsing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the mderial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. ManofiarRao, Advooate-for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed : 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two rnore times (1+2)than the value fixed by the Lard Aquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entit{ed to interest f,or the delay period of 5419 days in preferring the appeal; 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ffRUE COPY// JOINT REGISTRAR SECT|oN OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparlhy 2. Tttro CD CoPies t4rou J :Trdtrxilrtf,i DATED:30/0412025 T}ECREE LAAS.No,.424 ot2O25 ALLOWNIG THE APPEAL ,r.4ub '&tr TI{E HIGH COURT FOR T}IE STATE OF TELAflGAT{A AT HYDERAAAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryFVE IiliiEI=tlIE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILT AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTrcE NRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: lvlohan Sagar,., Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. -S-lo. [rishlaiah, aged 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagara{a ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scterne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... Respo ndent/Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.389 of 20O9 on the fi.le of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal ooming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Corrt below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argiuments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enharrced by two more times {1+21than the value fixed by the Land Aoquisition Offi@r, with allconsequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5419 days in prefurrirg the appeal.

4. Thatthere I/TRI'E COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CDCopies k*, NAGA LAKSHN'I REGISTRAR R OFFICER G-e HIGH COIJRT DATED:3t010412025 DECREE 1-AAS.No.429 ot2O25 ALI-OWI'IG THE APPEAL I qard'[ #* THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAT{GANA AT WEDI.IESDAY, THE THRTIETH DAY OF APRTL TWO THOTJSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONq'RABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUi'AR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUIIIALAOEVI EADA 1 . Sharakonda Pullamma, Wfo Eadraiah -Since Died Per LR - A6pellant l{o.2 2. Sharakonda Kurmaiah, S/o Badraiah, aged 52 yrs 3. Buchanna, Sb Papaiah, Since Died Per LR -Amellant No2 (Appellants 1 and 3 Died - as per LR Appellant No.2) ,- Occ. Agriculture, Rh Nagarala Mllage Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...Appellants/Claimants D The Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrig€tion Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbak, At District. Appeal filed under Sec'tion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 08.04.2011 passed in O.P.No.120 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, ttre Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. Ravula Shankar Reddy, Advocate for the appellants and GPfor Appeals for the Respondent. This Court dotft Order and Decree as foilows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed , 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tvvo more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; /

3. '-hat appellants be and hereby are not entitled to interest for the delay period of 4902 days in prefening the appeal.

4. -lhat there shall be no order as to costs. /,TRUE COPY" lNT REGISTRAR OFFICER To, 1 . Th,: Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL Y+- HIGH COURT DATED:30/0412025 DECB.EEi LAAS.i,kr.439 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL I-\ ,.{('.b $+, € T}TE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAilA AT HYT}ERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETTI DAY OF APRIL T\trO THOUSAND AI{D TWENTY FIVE PRESENT -/ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAI{D KUMAR.ST{AVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Biija Chandraiah, S/o. Kistaiah, 67 years, Occ. Agricultune, Ri/o. lrlagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ' ...AppeltantlClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme,,rPhas+l l, ?ebbair, District. : ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act; aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in OP.No.19O of 2fi)9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon. peqlslng. the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the mabrial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sfi. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appel{ant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allourcd ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times l1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offioer, with all oonsequertialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to hterest br the delay period of 5451 days in preferring ttre appeal

4. That there shall be no order as.to //TRUE COPY'/ NAGALAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Cooies w a r" HIGH COURT DATED-xiortr4l2o25 DECREE LAAS.No.441 ot 2025 ALLOUVING THE APPEAL 14 @ '#.-' .\ THE HIGH @T'RTFOR TIIE STATE OF TELAT{GANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSATID AI.ID TWENW FI\IE III-{=b5=ilfi THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAI{D KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTGE RRUiTALA DEVI EADA Between Eandari Krishnaiah, S/o. Rangaruta, Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy 75 years, Oe Agricultur-e. R/o. Nagarala Dis{rk*. ...AppellanUClaimant EIIT' The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrr(Tation Schenre, Phase-ll, Pebbair. District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Oder and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.193 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Cotrt below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Srt. V.'Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeat be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by trc more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acqtrisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal. costs. ,/TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Vot NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER r\ 4 d HIGH COIJRT DATED:31)10412025 DECREE LAA$.No. M2 ot 2025 ALLOWNIG THE APPEAL @rt Vr '@Tp THE HIGfI COT'RT FOR THE STATE OF TELAT{GAI{A AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THTRTIETH DAY OF APRIL ' TWO THOUSAND AIID TWENTY FIVE IES{I{III THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMM, SHAVILI AND .-- THE HONOT'RABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMAI-A DEVI EADA Between: Gotlavala Gattaiah, S/o. Chinna Ramaiah, 93 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Vi llag e, Pebbai r Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanailarthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Sec*ion 54 of the L,A,Ad, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O. P.No.118 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Gourt below and dhe material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Adrccate for the appellant and GP for Appealsforthe Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhancedSy two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefeningthe appeal. 4. That there shallbe no order asto @sts. /,TRUE COPY/' To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT R€GISTRAR SECTTON OFFICER I DL 11- HIGH COURT DATED::1010412025

1. DECREE l-AAS.No;443 0t2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL cdg*l u &* € TtlE HlcH COT RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT{A AT HYDERABAD WEDI.IESDAY, TtIE THIRTIETH DAYOF APRIT TWO THOTJSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE NRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: ^s.hankararnma @_s.ajlegla, wo. Venkataiah, Nagara I a Vi I lage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. -sl years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. ANO ...AppellanUClaimant The specialQy.co[ector, Rajeev Lift rnigation scherne, phase-tt, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section s4 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed h O.P.No.200 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree asfollows:

1. That the appeatbe and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with atl consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and trereby is not entifled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as //TRUE To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies \4ror- Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOII{T REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER _l I I i c HIGH CCIURT DATED:il0/0412025 DECREE LAAS.Ncr.444 ot 2025 ALLOVUING THE APPEAL \de Sx., TFIE FIIGH COI,,RT FOR TTIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDEMBAD WEDT.IESDAY, TI-IE THIRTIET.I.I DAY OF APRIL T\AfO THOUSANO AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABTE SRt {UST|CE ABHTNAND KUtutAR SHAV|L| AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Gdlavala Krishnaiah,. s/o. Gattraiah, !f )€ Vil lage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. €uB, occ. Agricurture, R/o. Nagarala AND ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Qy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Sec'tion 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed,in O.P. No. 119 of 2009 on the file of the Court of ttre Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and uoon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Dectee of the Court beiow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals f,or the Respondent. This Court doth Order and DEcree asfollows:

1. That the appealbe and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enharrced by two more times (1+2)than the value fixed by the Land @uisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not ertitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 dap in prefenirg the appeal. 4. That there shallbe no order as to costs. ,,TRUE COPY'/ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Ju<lge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies ntY( ':-:i t? i HIGH COUFTT DATED:30ltt4l2025 DECREE l-AAS.No.4tl5 ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL r.t ."da v.r 6w \ T}E HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAtsAD WEDTIESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAN.D I(UMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA Between: Gollavala Kurmaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 54 )rears, MHage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Occ. Agriculture AND The Special Wanaparthy DyCollector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scherne, Phase-l l, -Pebbaii District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 117 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgrnent and Decree of the Court below and the rnaterial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is aHowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two moretimes t1+21than thq value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with allconsequential benef,tts;

3. That appeltant be and hereby is not entitled to interestfor the delayperkil of 5431 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That ttrere shall be no order as to oosts /ffRUE€EPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two @ CoPies DLv NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SBCTION OFFICER /? HIGH COURT DATED:ll0l04lm25 III=GI^I[{I LAAS.No.446 ot 2O25 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL \4.dA &". THE Hlctl COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAT'IGAI{A AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOIJSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUUALA t}EVt EADA LAND AGQUISITION APPEAL SUITNO: 447 OF 2025 Between: Chinna Narasimha S/o. Pedda Y. Balaiah, 53 years, Occ. Agricultrre, Rl/o. NagaralaVillage,PebbairMandal,WanaparthyDistrict. ...AppellanUClaimant NIID The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, (Phase'll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 153 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate {or the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and D,ecree as follows:

1. That the appeai be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two rnore times (1+2)than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Offrcer, with all consequential benefrts;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interestfor the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. 4 //TRUE COPY// LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DLw t HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.il47 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL % TTIE HIGH COI'RT FOR TI{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDI.IESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE }IONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AAHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOUMBLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Betreen; l(. Naraqiqha, S/-9, Buchanna 70 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala.!!Hgge, : + : Pebbair lvlardal, Waraparthy District. ..Apddh'nt Clh'imant EITTD The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, ffieev Lift lrrigation Scheme, / Phase-ll, Pebbair, District Appeal fihd under Section il d the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Oder and decree dated 0303.2010 passed in O.P. No. 174 of 2009 on the fite oJ the Court of the SenidrCivil Judge at Wanaparthy. ... RespondenUResponde nt This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advoc*e-for the appellant and GPfor Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times {1+2lttran the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That @pellant be and trereby is not entitled to interest forthe delayperiod of 5431 days in prefening the appeal. 4. That tlpre shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFF]CER To,

1. The Sen'orCivil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. TuroCD CoPies (v ..--_nr / .r' HIGH COURT DATED:i!010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.44B ot2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL \rtnd^ , S1o' TIIE HIGT.I COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATH'DERABAD . , IAI€DNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAYOF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE ..:r:i,. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUIilALA DEVI EADA Between: Krishnaiah Setty, S/o. Venkat Setly,lQ5 years, Occ. Agriofture Rl/o" Nagarala AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanU- Glaimant Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and dectee dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 154 of 2009 on thefile of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing "the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in ttre case and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2\ than t{re value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interesttor the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal'

4. Thatther.e shall be no order ,ffRUE COPY// SECTION OFFTGER To,

1. The Senior Civil .ludge at Wanaparthy 2. Tvto CD Copies DL TK I ? HIGH COIJRT DATED:3tl/0412025 DECREE LAAS.No.449 ot2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL *64u k. ''-i rte r+cHcounrfffiffffi oF rEl-At{GANA WEDNESDAY, THE TTI{RTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO TIIOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PR.ESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KTJITA,RSIIAVILI AND THE HONOT'RAB{-E SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEWEADA Between: Biiia Baladasu, S/o. Venkanna, 90 yearc, Occ. Agricdture F/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .,.AppettanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Schenre, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenUR,esponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved-by the Oder and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.191 of 2O09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing.'the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by,tr,vo more times (1+z|than{he value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequentialbenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interestfor the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/' To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies w'nl NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER HIGH CO,URT DATED:3r0/O1t2O25 44 DECREE LAAS.No.4S0 of 2025 ALLOVUIN(3 THE APPEAL u crflnL &. TFIE HIGH COURT FOR TIE STATE OF TELAT{GAilA AT HYDERABAD VVEDT{ESDAY, TTE THIRTIETH DAYOF AFRIL TWO THOTJSAND AND TWENryFIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURAALE SMT JI'STICE TIRUMALA T'EVI EAPA Between: Bathini Gattaiah, S/o. Karrenna, 51 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Milage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phasq:;;, Pebbair, District. .RespondenflRespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and . decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 169 of 20Og on the file of the Court ot the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the,grcunds of appea[, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the rnaterial'papers in' the case and upon hearing the arguments cf Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Apoeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and trerby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) thanthe value fixed by the Lanci Acquisition Offlcer, wtth all oonsequentialSenefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitked to interest forthe delayperiod of 5431 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' \*. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:30/0412o,25 J DECREE LAAS.No.451 ot2O25 ALLOWN(i THE APPEAL t( C.fUA #tr THE HIGH COURT FOR THE.STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Narsimha, S/o. Naganna, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala _ Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wahaparthy Dibtrict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrr(Tation Scheme, Phase-ll, P_ebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.180 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefering the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to ,_ ,ffRUE COPYT' To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. Two CD CoPies DL w REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:30,t04/,2025 DECREE LAAS.No.4.52 of 2O25 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL 'd-6+ , ,-, I I I i i THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUTIMIA DEVI ESDA Between: K. Budaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 65 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair ft'landal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.173 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grcunCs of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Ma*et value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value flxed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entit{ed to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to ,ffRUE COPY/' To, (t..

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies LAKSHMI REGISTRAR ,l/i OFFICER HIGH COI'RT DATED:30/0#202s LAAS.No.4S3 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL cp?qqL u r THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESE[IT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE I\BHINANSKUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 454 OF 2025 Between: K. Gattaiah, S/o. Yellaiah. 80 years Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. occ Asricurture Y.ib$fflfla'"Yllln? AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.158 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manolmr Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tims (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal. 4. That there shall be no order as to costs ,/TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies DL 1+ NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER HIGH COIJRT DATED:30/OU2025 DECREE LAAS.No.4S4 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL u ,9?d' $a* THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE STIIT JUSTICE TIRUi'ALA DEV! EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEALSUL 1{Qi455 !E2025 Between: G. Kurmanna, S/o. Pedda Munaiah, 58 years, Occ. Agriculture Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Ac{, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.216 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of -appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tuo more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal.. //

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Trivo CD Copies DLw Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI INT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER HIGH COI'RT DATED:30r0rU2025 LAAS.No.455 of 2025 ALLOVI'ING THE APPEAL .dc.A W THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUST]CE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 456 OF 2025 Between: Boya Komari Narsimha, S/o. Cheviti Balaiah, 57 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collec{or, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree daled 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.114 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. . This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment..and-Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar F[ao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. Thas Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times {1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to @sts //TRUE COPY// .I. NAGALAKSHMI INT REGISTRAR CTION OFF]CER ) To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Tlvo CD Copies DL \k *I HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.456 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL q, teP(eA 'et" THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LANDACQUISMON APPEAL SUIT NO:457 OF 2025 Between: Y.Narasimha, 9o. Buchama, pQ.Vears, Occ. Agriculture Ryo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distribt ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Coltector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.152 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court beJow and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY'/ . NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECNON OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ,Z Two CD Copies HIGH GOURT DATED:30/04l/202s DECREE LAAS.No.457 ot2O25 ALLOWNG TI{E APPEAL q ,ee[ h., u3 j j I ! t , I I I { : 1 i r \ rHE H|GH "ou*tIf[J#*T#o= oF TELANGANA WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HoNouRABLE sRt JUSTIcE ABntNnNo-t<gMAR sHAVILI AtlD THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Y. Narasimha, S/o. Btrchanna, 63 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbai r Mandal, Wanaparthy D'tstrict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Cotlector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phasell, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.151 o 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Juctge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition ffioer, with all consequertial benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5437 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order ,/TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies . NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR N OFFICER t ,r HIGH COUIRT DATED:3010412025 , DECREE LAAS.No.4,58 of 2025 AL!.OWNG THE APPEAL C8u &" THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HoNouRABLE sRr JusncE ABHrNeio-xuLrAR sHAVrLr rHE HoNouRABLE r*r r0$ficE ,RuMALA DEvr EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 459 OF 2025 Between: Komari Vishnu, S/o Pentaiah, aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Coltector, Rajeev Lift lrrlgation Scherne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 129 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the rnaterial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by trrvo morc tinres (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal 4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY'/ Sd,.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ,2i, j* CD Copies v 7 HIGH COURT DATED:301041202s DECREE LAAS.No.4li9 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL q(9P@ &tr \"=. THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHIT$AND KUI,tARSHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: S.mt. JaLa 9.ree, D/o. Chinna Gantaiah, 47 years, Occ. Agriculture Wo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 159 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Arcquisition Offrcer, with atl consequentiat benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefering the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to //TRUE COPY'/ NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. I'l Two CD Copies J { HIGH COURT DATED:3010/112025 \ -/' DECREE: LAAS.No.460 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \rse #w THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI At'lD THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI.EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:4Qi OF 2025 Between: Devamma, S/o. Balaiah, 63 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant ntlf, The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.171 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellaht and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal. a, there shall be no order as to //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. \q3. Two CD Copies NAGA LAKSHi'I JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER J HIGH COURT DATED i3010412025 DECREI: LAAS.No.461 of 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \4 ,{il Y{r - (6\af \ THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMI:LA DEVI EADA Between: sarakonda Kukkanna, s/o. Kistanna, 63 years, occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarara Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenUResponde nt Appeat filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.185 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall he no nrrlar as fn r:ncfq /,TRUE COPY// Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR OFFICER To, i,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (1n2. Two CD Copies ?'' HIGH COURT DATED:30/042025 DECREE: LAAS.No.462 ot 2025 ALLOWI.IG THE APPEAL *{.rd"A THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI{A AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Bal Raju, S/o. Pedda Shanthaiah, 43 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Mgarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant EIID The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.157 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal.

4. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. TwoCD Jflr -- Copies . NAGA LAI(SHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED i30l04l2025 DECREI: LAAS.No.463 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL l{ co((eA Yt- ,-f,ft THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE EIII THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAT.IO KUiIAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE NRUIIALA DEVI EADA D D Bathini Balamma, W/o. Sayanna, 85 yea6, Occ. Agriculture; Ri/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant NIIil The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Sc-heme, Phase ll, Pebbair, District. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in O.P.No.170 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the riaterial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tu/o more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Aoquisitkrn Otrtcer, wittl all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5437 days in preferring the appeal.. t/ ,1.l /! ,l

4. That there shall be no order as to costs_ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Tuo CD Copies DL Yt/ a , HIGH COURT DATED:30l04l202s DECREE LAAS.No.4ti4 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL b."d"A". ff THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: q. Krighlgiah, S/o. Balaiah, 67 years, Occ. Agniculture Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The SpecialDy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 215 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment aM Decree of the Courl below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, wtth all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal.. J

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY'/ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Trrl'o CD Copies DL Y( Sd/-I. NAGA LAKSHMI N OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:30/0t1/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.4$5 ot 2025 ALLOTA'ING THE APPEAL dP(QA t{ F". THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA Between: Balakistaiah, S/o. Bichanna, 51 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O. P.No.179 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the detay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// NAGA JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civit Judge at Wanaparthy r€t2. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED::10/0lU2025 OECREE LAAS.No.466 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL u C9P@,\ w 6d* THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Gollavala Pedda Narsimha, S/o. Balaiah, 90 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The SpecialDy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.115 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the argurnents of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and []ecree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Aoquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5437 days in prefening the appeal. //TRUE COPY// Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Two CD *O:: To, 1 w , ,,, HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.467 of 2O25 ALLOWhIG THE APPEAL q,rd& &(.'' : I i:t I I I I THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: B_andari_Venkataiah, s{o, Krishnaiah, 57 years, occ. Agricutture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distrlct. AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scherne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order. and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.194 of 2O09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal. //TRUE COPY/' To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy w Two CD Copies Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 D.trlil=fi LAAS.No.468 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL C@\.t ff+r THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: K.venkataswamy,^S/o Nagarala Mllage, pebbair Mandai, Wanapartny Oistiiit fe.r}taia.h, gged about ss years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. - AND ...AppellanUClaimant [fe special Dy.cottector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 130 of 2009 o,n the{ile of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as fottows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by lwo more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Aoquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to //TRUE COPY/' To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 1f1-a. Two CD Copies LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER HIGH CIOURT DATED:30/0412025 DECRET: LAAS.NIr.4VO ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE A.PPEAL "ffi 0 THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT.IA AT HYDERABAD WEDT\TESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Pedda Shanthaiah, S/o. -Bichanna, 65 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.156 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing .the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed : 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times {1+2) than the value fixed by the LaM Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for tlre delay period of 5434 days in prefening the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// NAGA LAKSHtrll To,

1. Ttre Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Tvro CD Copies DLtt{ ,& HIGH COT'RT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.{.71 ot 2A2S ALLOWNGi THE APPEAL r.d.{Sult , " THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AGQUISITION APPEAL SUI=+4$O=i 412 CF 2025 Between: -:-" Komari Laxmamrna, Wo.K. Kukkanna,T5 years, Occ- Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Pehbair Manclal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Sprcial Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.131 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the SeniorCivil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with atl consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal.

4. To, /,TRUE COPY/' Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The SeniorCivil Jtrdge at Wanaparthy Qrz. Trr,rc CD CoPies .dr HIGH COUIRT DATED:301041202s DECREE LAAS.No.4 of 2OZS '?2 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL qd6'/t ,W ffit' THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Venkatiamma, D/o. Chinna Kistanna, 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll' Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 149 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Oecree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2\ than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all. consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5440 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no /ffRUE COPY'T NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies A,- i i I I I t I I i ", ,, HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.I|o.473 ot2O25 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL ,9p?"Jt )-l $a', THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AlilD THE HONOURABLE SilT JUSTICE flRUUALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SU}T M) 174()F m25 Between Niranian Goud, S/o. Balawamy Goud, 50 years, Occ. Agriculture Rl/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbaii Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ,..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.214 of 2OOg on the file of the Cou( of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Oecree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entiued to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That th€re shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY,, -I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR N OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. Two CD Copies DL l€r 6" HIGH CCIURT DATED:3i0|OU2O25 DECREE: LAAS.No.474 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL 14 (og(@l\ [9i- FHE' THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 475 OF 2025 Between: Komari Thirupataiah, S/o. Gattaiah, 55 years, Occ. Xgriculture R/o. Nagara{a Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppeltanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaoarthy Dy.Collector, ffieev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.145 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there /TTRUE COPY/' UEEA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 1 Two CD CoPies 1^l sG HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.lrlo.47S of 2025 ALLOWIING THE APPEAL \^ ."PA &*' THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI{A AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABL E SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: iT76-OF 292f Between: G. Kurumurthy, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, 50 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.141 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the vatue fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay perid of 5431 days in preferring the appeal

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ffRUE COPY/' Sd/-I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR OFFICER To, Yr

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies ., a? HIGH COURT DATED:3;0l,0412025 DECREE I AA$.frf6r.{76 0t 2025 ALLOwlhIG THE APPEAL a u "rdob .t+,* THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT.IA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:477 OF 2025 Between: G. Babu, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 142 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the .ludgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appe.llant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal. .

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Dt. FA' LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE: LAAS.No.477 of 2025 ALLOWhIG THE APPEAL "r"d'lt &65 THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE tI{5Tq1Il THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Jatti Seethamma, Wo. Buchanna, 40 years, Occ- Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase - ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of ttrc L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated'03.03.2010 passed in O.PNo.183 of 2009 on the ffte of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 544O days in preferring the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL(t( NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR N OFFICER & HIGH CO,URT DATED:3IO10412025 DECREE LAAS.Ncr.47B of 2025 ALLOWhIG THE APPEAL "4@\t X^, THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:479OF2025 Between: Shekhar, S/o. K. Shankaraiah, 51 years, Occ- Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.210 of 2O09 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5440 days in preferring the appeal.

4. //TRUE COPY// LAKSHM REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy i ! .Fj::ri*-*- rwo CD CoPies *? , ,ro HIGH COURT DATED:3,010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.479 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ",ffi,, ^ i_\. THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TI-IIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 480 OF 2025 Between: Komari Krishnaiah, S/o. Balaiah, 55 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ,AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. .. RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.123 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy. This appeal corning on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in prefering the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL \? INT REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:30/042025 DECREE LAAS.No.480 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \w THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 481 OF 2025 Between: Komari Ramudu, S/o. Kistanna, 55 y@rs, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. . RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.134 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge.at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in preferring the appeal. costs. //TRUE COPY// To, k

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies .I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR OFFICER 1 ,l ,l -,a HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREI: LAAS.No.481 ot 2025 ALLOI'VING THE APPEAL ,^.d"]t &* THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TIYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUI SITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 482OF 2025 Between: Buddaiah, S/O. Late Laxmaiah, 67 years, Occ- Agriculture Rl/o. Na(prala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...APPELLANT AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phasell, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RESPONDENTS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order ard decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.184 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal beand herby is allowed; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the tand Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /,TRUE COPY// ALAI(SHMI .I. NAG JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To'

1. The Seniol Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' tfir2. Two CD CoPies te* HIGH CC)URT DATED:ltO10412025 DECREE LAAS.No.482 ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL \t og?e'A' f6,: THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:483 OF 2425 Between: Shrishailam, 9o. Bakkanna, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture Ryo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 213 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal beand herbyis allowed; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in preferring the appeal.. 4 That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL l+' Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR ON OFFICER .rt 'f' HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREIE LAAS.No.483 of 2025 ALLO\AIING THE APPEAL u.*q'A'#,o' THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: K. Bandalaiah, S/o. Ayyanna, 65 years, Occ- Agricutture F/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Appellant/Claimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the t-.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.'143 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5439 days in prefening the appeal. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-I. NAGA REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies w HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.484 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL ,dJ' \l .^, \\ THE HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TVVENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINA$ITLKUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRT,MALA{)EVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 485 OF 2025 Between: K. Lokaiah, S/o. Balaiah, 50 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.139 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeai be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal.

4. Thatthere shall be no order as to /TTRUE COPY// d/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Sr-2. Two CD CoPies *a. , HIGH C()URT DATED:3010412025 DECRET: LAAS.Nrr.485 of 2025 ALI.OWNG THE APPEAL L\ ,eC"t Yt" I { THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGATIIA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: G. Venkataiah, S/o. G. Pedda Narsimha, 53 years, Occ, Agriculture. R/o. Nagarala Village Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. .AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeat filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 116 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in prefening the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL \tr Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 DECRET: LAAS.N.r.486 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL \"\ dReb &^- THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: [g,r?!l Pentaiah, S/o Late Bakkanna, aged about 78 years,- Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase- ll, pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.127 of 2OO9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest .for the delay period of 5433 days in prefering the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to i I ; *t I ! ,l i //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy tfr/2. Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMT REGISTRAR I OFFICER HIGH C,OURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE: LAAS.No.487 ot 2025 ALLOW|I{G THE APPEAL l l : i i I I i i I i I I i I i I i I j t. ! t : : l: ! I I i: .lre &*, THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI -./ AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVTEADA Between: Shanthamma, Wo. Pedda Narasimha, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture Ri./o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,AppellanUClaimant ENI,] The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 188 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Ihis appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar R.ao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential . benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the'delay period of 5439 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to cpsts. //TRUE GOPY// NAGA LAKSHMI JCINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' W 2. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECRET: LAAS.N,r.489 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL u .pdu[ #-" THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 490 OF 2025 Between: Bandari Neelamma, Wo. Bala Ram, 65 years, Occ- Agriculture. R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in O.P.No.198 of 2009 on the file of the C;ourt of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in prefening the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DL\x LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER c* HIGH COURT DATED:301041202s DECREE: LAAS.No.490 of 2025 ALLOwlhIG THE APPEAL \\(9s .# THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSNCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Komari Laxmaiah, S/o. Kistanna, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Colleotor, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .. RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 135 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. I'hat the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no /TTRUE COPY'/ NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD CoPies YY : : : : : I I F,r' HIGH CIf,URT DATED:3010412025 DECREI= LAAS.No.491 ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL u.o?qtA 1k" I i. I i : : : l j I I THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND]IA'ENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND AGQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:492 OF 2025 Between: K. Pedda Sayulu, S/o. Bachanna, 73 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 176 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers [n the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appeltant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in preferring the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Dt- Ft' NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR OFFICER HIGH CTCURT DATED:3010412025 DECREI: LAAS.No.49Z ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL **:o X*'r THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Komari Balakistaiah, S/o. Yerra Balaiah, 65 years, Oec:.Agriculttire RI/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair' Wanaparthy District. ... ResPondenUResPonde nt Appeal filed under section 54 of the LA.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in o.P.No.125 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri- V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order an.d Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal'

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,ffRUE COPY'/ OFFICER To, The Senior Civil Judge atWanaparthy' 1 Two CD CoPies * ,,F HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.NIo.493 of 2025 ALLOT4ilNG TI{E APPEAL $-, THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE-- PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 49a oF 2025 Between: Yerukali Village, i Thirupathaiah, S/o. Balaiah, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Pebbair Mandal' wanaparthy District' ...Apperanucraimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lfft lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenU Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in O.P.No.113 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appealbe and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order /,TRUE COPY/ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' HIGH COURT DATED:30104/2e25 DECREE LAAS.No.494 of 2025 ALLOWNGi THE APPEAL d@u tr$. rHE H|GH GouRr Fro[JJls.lHS oF TELANGANA WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 495 OF 2025 Between: Gopal, S/o. Karenna, age 60 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phasell, Pebbair, District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 133 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on f9r hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in t- the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in prefering the appeal.. { To, 4 l I I I t : i 'i t :

4. fhat there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// -I. NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR N OFFICER

1. Ttre Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Tvvo CD Copies DL f{- HIGH COUFIT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.495 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL ,tt'Pudt #r THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT TI{E HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: Boya Komari Karrenna, S/o.Gattaiah, 80 years, Occ- Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District . RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in O.P.No.126 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers ih the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all conseqLential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5439 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to ffTRUE COPY,, NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy * 2. Two CD CoPies d HIGH COURI' DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.497 ot 2025 ALLOWNG T'HE APPEAL "%, THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APR{L TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE TIONOURABLE SMT JUSTIGE TIRTJMALA DEVI EADA Between: Tirupathaiah, S/o Pentaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase{l, Pebbair, District. ...Respondent/Respondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated C3.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.128 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acqtrisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there /ffRUE COPY// NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR / OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' Two CD HIGH COURT DATED:3t010412025 G.* DECREE LAAS.No.498 of 2025 ALLOW}IG THE APPEAL r r!@ ff#' THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between Mekala Balaswamy, S/o. Late Balaiah, 63 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village' Pebbair Mandal' wanaparthy District' .Apperanucrairnant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/03/2010 passed in O.P.No.132 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition fficer, w{th all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5440 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. fhe Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. fwo CD Copies DL Y\- OFFICER .lf* HIGH CCIURT DATED:3t0lO4l2O25 DECREE LAAS.No.499 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \^,rs"b &" THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 501 OF-2025 Between: Gollavala Venkataiah, S/o. Kukanna, 61 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.150 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. Thatthe Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in prefening the appeal.

4. That there shall be no as to //TRUE COPY// To, # The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy Two CD Copies Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER ,#e HIGH COURT DATED::30104l,2025 DECRET: LAAS.N'c.501 of 2O25 ALLOWING TI.IE APPEAL )^dss *au i I I i I I I i I i I THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVTEADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 502 OF 2025 Between: lrgyngTlna,.Wo-.-Krishnaiah, 53 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scherne, Phase-ll, Pebbair, District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 199 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by tvvo more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appetlant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in prefening the appeal. €,"t' //TRUE COPY// NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy w Two CD Copies I I 1 2 ! i :, t : 6* HIGH COURT DATED::30104l,2025 DECREI: LAAS.No.5O2 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL A,fl"A THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVTEADA - _-/ Between: G. Nagamma, Wo. Krishnaiah, 65 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. 'Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03/0312010 passed in O.P.No.140 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5433 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That /iTRUE COPY'/ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI R.EGISTRAR OFFICER To, '1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' Y IY-? cD- coPies -G* HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECRE'E LAAS.No.5O3 of 2025 ALLOVI'ING THE APPEAL L,,-eL frn: THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGA}IA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUIIAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO!5q4PE2!025 Between Chinna Munnaiah, S/o.Chinna Ramaiah, 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClalmant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P. No. 217 of 2f,og on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal beand herby is allowed; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5334 days in preferring the appeal.

4.. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w LAKSHMI REGISTRAR ON OFFICER HIGH CC,URT DATED::10/04/2025 DECREf: LAAS.No.504 of 2025 ALLOIA'ING THE APPEAL q,rPqe) ffr, THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, Tf{E THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SU|T NO:SOS OF 2025 Between: Baddamma, Wo. BalakistgiarL.sg.ypars, occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND AppellanUClaimant The Special Wanaparthy Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, District. ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section s4 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.181 of 20O9 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 daye in prefening the appeal. t

4. That there skrall be no order as to costs t t /ffRUE COPY// Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI GISTRAR OFFICER \ To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Dlr \/Y i I HIGH COURT DATED:3O10412025 .r f ? DECREI: LAAS.No.S0S of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL hra'b ffi,: THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSNCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 506 OF 2025 Between: 'Bandari Venkatesh, S/o. Swamulu, 52 years, Occ. Agriorlture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...AppellanUClaimant . 'Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.203 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civii Judge at Wanaparthy. ...RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5334 days in preferring the appeal.. ,1. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Dt. LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER u d, HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREI= LAAS.No.506 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL \^ tr-* THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 507 OF 2025 Between Harijan Narasimha, S/o. Chinna Bakkanna, 57 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift'lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.20't0 passed in O.P.No.187 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appdlant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies DLw S NAGA LAKSHMI INT REGISTRAR OFFICER I HIGH COURT DATED:301O41202s DECRET: LAAS.N'r.SO7 ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL C,RRA t^ $oo THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRI'MALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 508 OF 2025 Between: Bijja Kis_tamma, Wo. Balaswamy, 95 years, Occ Agriculture R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 0310312010 passed in O.P.No.192 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusirfg the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court-below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. r This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. Tlrat appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5434 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ffRUE COPY// .I. NAGA LAKSHMI NT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Ther Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Twr> CD Copies DLw t d -{* f":,. l"t .r". F E A'U ii!8 i 1 I.IIGH COURT DATED:3010,112025 DECREE LAAS.No.50;8 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL t ,AP f,6, , I t- i i 1 THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAT'IA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ITION APPEAL SUIT 512oF 2025 Between:

1. tlarsimhulu, S/o Narsimhulu, aged 52 years, 2. Venkat Reddy, S/o P.Narayana Reddy, aged 50 years, 3. Eadappa, S/o Late P. Narayana Reddy, aged 48 years, 4. Pedda Laxma Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 46 years, 5. China Laxma Reddy, S/o late P.Narayam Reddy, aged 44 years, 6. Venkat Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 50 years, 7. Eadappa, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 48 years, 8. Pedda Laxma Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged zt6 years, 9. Chinna Laxma Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 44 years, 10.Venkat Reddy, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 50 years, 1 1. Eadappa, S/o Late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 48 years, 12.Pedda Laxma Reddy, S/o late P.Narayana Reddy, aged 46 years, 13.Chinna Laxma Reddy, S/o Late P.Naraana Reddy, aged 44 years, All are Residents of Mustipally village, Makthal Mandal, AND ...AppellantslGlaimant No.(I,5 to 1 6)

1. The Land Acquisition Officer- Cum- Special Deprty Collector, LA Unit, PJP, Gadwal. Now'present O/o The Special Deputy Collector. RLISP.Itrlakthal, Narayanpet District. ...Respondent/Respondent -

2. tlanumanthu Reddy, S/o Laxma Reddy 3. Govindu Reddy, S/o Laxma ReddY 4. Anjanappa, S/o Chinnaiah. The Respondents No. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this petition. ...ResPondents/Cl ai ma nts App,eal filed under section s4 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dar:ed 30-09-2019 passed in O.P.No. 34 of 2O14 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civit Judge at Narayanpet. Thir; appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. s. Venkateshwar Reddy, Advocate for the appellants and Gp for Appeals for the Respondent. This Courttdoth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; - 3. That appellants be and hereby are not entitled to interest for the delay period of 1925 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR N OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet 2. Two CD Copies DL VY' a HIGH CICURT DATED:30/,04//2025 DECREIE LAAS.No.S12 ot 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ),t""fl'il $ro THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAIIGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI THE HoNoURABT-E sr.Ir f!?rcE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO:513 0F 2025 Between: ' 1. M.Bheemeshwar Reddy S/o Late.M.Venkat Reddy, age 62 yrs 2. M. Venkat Krishna Reddy S/o Late. M. Venkat Reddy, age 61 yrs 3. M.Nagarjun Reddy S/o M.Venkat Reddy, age 58 yrs 4. M.Subash Reddy S/o Late.M.Venkat Reddy,, age 55 yrs 5. C.Chenna Reddy S/o Late. Kurma Reddy (Died) per LR Cl.No.96 to 99 6. C.Krishnavardhan Reddy S/o Late. Kurma Reddy, age 45 yrs 7. C.Buchi Reddy s/o Thippaiah @Thippanna, aged 70 yrs 8. C. Venkat Reddy S/o Thippanna @ Thippaiah, aged 58 ys 9. Chakali Narsamma Wo Venkat Ramulu, age 60 years 10. C. Venkat Reddy S/o Huzur, age 58 yrs 1 1. Sarva Reddy S/o Laxmanna, age 62 yrs 12. C.Muni Reddy S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Cl.No. 100 to 103 '13. C.Nalla Reddy S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Ct.No.61 to 64 14. C.Ranga Reddy S/o Sayanna, age 55 yrs 15. Sayamma W/o Naganna, age 55 yrs 16. Pedda Hanmanthu S/o Pedda Ashanna, age 53 yrs 17. Chinna Hanmanthu S/o Pedda Ashanna, age 47 yrs 18. Anjaneyulu S/o Pedda Ashanna,, age 46 yrs 19. Sayanna S/o Pedda Ashanna, age 40 yrs 20. Myakala Ranga Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, age 65 years 21. Myakala Sekhar Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy (Died) per LR Ct.No. 65 to 69 22. Ranganath S/o Nagappa, age 61 yrs 23. Myakala Gokaraiah S/o Hanumaiah, aged 70 yrs 24. Myakala Muniswamy S/o Vittalaiah (Died) per LR Ct.No. 70 to 74 25. Govindamma Wo Madhava Reddy (Oied) per LR Cl.No.7S to 77 26. M.Thimma Reddy S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Ct.No. 81 b 85 27. M.Madhava Reddy S/o Thimma Reddy, age 80 yrs 28. M.Nalla Reddy S/o Thimma Reddy, age 58 yrs 29. M.Venkat Reddy S/o Thimma Reddy, age 53 yrs 30. B.Suiatha W/o Mahesh, age 33 yrs 31. Govinda Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, age 48 ys 32. Damodar Reddy S/o Venkat Reddy, age 45 yrs 33. Tai Reddy S/o Gaijalappa (Died) per LR Cl.No. 86 to 90 34. Narsappa S/o Thippanna, age yrs 35. Venkatamma W/o Prathap Reddy, age 47 yrs

36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49.

50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. Pedda Chinna Reddy S/o Rayappa, age 70 yrs Narsimhulu S/o Narsanna, age 68 years C.Anjaneyulu S/o Narsimhulu, age 43 yrs Hanumanthu S/o Narsimhulu, age 38 ys Chandraiah S/o Narsimhulu,, age 35 yrs Manga Narsamma Wo Beesi Reddy,, age 67 yrs Narsi Reddy S/o Thippa Reddy, age 61 yrs Narsamma Wo Bheemaiah, age 71 yrs Hanumantha Reddy S/o Bheemaiah, age 53 yrs P.Shekhar Reddy S/o Bheemaiah, age 47 yrs Ambuja Rani D/o Krishna Bai (Wo Seetharamachary), age 60 yrs K.Laxminarayana S/o Mallappa, age 59 yrs K. Markendeya S/o Mallappa, age 55 yrs Chukka Govindamma Wo Pedda Ashi Reddy (Died) per LR D.Hr.No. .tOg to 1',t2 M. Venkatamma W/o Satya Reddy, age 63 yrs Myakala Muneendramma Wo Ranganath, age 50 yrs Gooti Hanumanthu S/o Sayanna (Died) per LR Cl.No.78 to BO Muneppa S/o Pedda Buddanna, age 70 yrs Ashanna S/o Bojjanna, age 55 yrs Chinna Savanna S/o Chinna Buddanna, age 50 yrs Pedda Sayanna S/o Chinna Buddanna (Died) per LR Ct.No. 104 to 108 Linganna S/o Chinna Buddanna, age 53 yrs Beerappa S/o Chinna Buddanna, age 47 ... Beesi Reddy S/o Masumanna (Died) per LR Cl.No. 91 to 95 Sivanna S/o Tayappa, age 53 yrs Chukka Satyamma w/o Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 47 yrs G.Radhika D/o Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 30 Yrs Chukka Srinivasulu S/o Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 28 yrs Chukka Anand S/o Late. Chukka Nalla Reddy age 27 yrs The petitioners No.61 to 64 added as deceased Cl.No.13 vide orders lA No 235i2O2O daled: 29.1 .2021.

65. M.Sujatha W/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 49 years 66. M.Jyothi D/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 31 years 67. N.Swaroopa D/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 29 years 68. Swathi D/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 27 years 69. M.Praveen S/o Late.M.Shekar Reddy age 25 years The petitioners No.65 to 69 added as deceased Cl.No.21 vide orders lA No. 2361 2020 datd: 29.1.2O21. 70. Mekala Narsingamma W/o Late.Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekala Muni Reddy 71. M.Mayuri D/o Late. Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekala Muni Reddy age 36 72. Saraf Madhuri D/o Late. Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekata Muni Reddy age 32 73. Mekala Swetha D/o Late.Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekata Muni Reddy age 28 age 49 years I/earS '/ears

74. M.Shivaraj S/o Late. Mekala Muniswamy @ Mekala Muni Reddy age 25 yeafti The petitioners No. 70 to 74 addd as deceased CI.No.24 vide orders lA No. 237 l2O2O datd: 29.1.2O21.

75. Mekala Venkat Reddy S/o Late. Madhava Reddy age 48 years 76. Moreddv Rameshwarimma D/o Late. Madhava Reddy age 47 years 77. MekaliThirupathi Reddy S/o Late. Madhava Reddy age zts years The petitioners No. 75 to 77 added as deceased Cl.No.2s vide orders lA No. 23812020 dald: 29.1.2021 . 78, 79. 80. Jakkala Ananthamma D/o Late. Guti Chinna Hanmanthu' age 60 Yrs M.Anianevulu S/o Late. Guti Chinna Hanmanthu age 45 Yrs M.Anjhnarfima D/o Late. Guti Chinna Hanmanthu age 43 Yrs The petitioners No. 78 to 80 added as deceased Cl.No.S2 vide orders lA No. 241 l2O2O datedt 29.1.2021.

81. 82. 83. 84. 85. Moreddv Madhava Reddy S/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 60 years Moreddv Nalla Reddv S/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 65 years Gudise Venkatammd D/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 50 years Moreddv Venkat Reddy S/o Late.M.Thimma Reddy age 59 years Gavinoila Naramma Dio Late.M. Thimma Reddy age 39 years The petitioners No.8'l to 85 added as deceased CL.No.26 vide orders lA No /20 dated:

86. Moreddv Hanmanth Reddv S/o Late. Moreddy Tai Reddy age 55 years 87. Moreddl Venkat Reddv S/o Late. Moreddy Tai Reddy age 40 years 88. .G. Venkateshwaramnia D/o Late- Moreddy Tai Reddy age 42 years 89. Venkatamma D/o Late. Moreddy Tai Reddy age 38 years 90. G.Nagamma D/o Late.Moreddy Tai Reddy age 50 years The oetitioners No. 86 to 90 added as deceased Cl.No.33 vide orders lA No.i4otzo2o dated: 31 .8.2023

91. ,Anianamma D/o Late. Besi Reddy age 44 Yrs 92. 'Ga'vinolla 93. Saraswathi D/o Late. Beesi Reddy age 39 Yrs 94. Smt.Ganqamma D/o Late. Besi Reddy age 37 Yrs 95. MunnuruSavithramma D/o Late. Beesi Reddy age 37 Yrs Lakshmamma D/o Late. Beesi Reddy age 42 Yrs The oetitioners No. 91 to 95 added as deceased Cl.No.59 vide orders lA No.d$l 2o2o dated :3 1 .8.2020

96. Chukka Prameela Wo Late.Chenna Reddy age 55 Yrs 97. N.Rudramma Wo N.Lakshmaiah age 36 Yrs 98. Chukka Naresh S/o Late.Chenna Reddy age 31 Yrs 9S. Jlothi Anand Reddy Wo Anand Reddy age 29 years The petitioners No.96 to 99 added as deceased Cl.No.S vide orders lA No /2023 daledt6.12.2023 1oo Janoamma Wo Late.C.Muni Reddy age 57 Yrs - - ioi Thir"uoathamma D/o Late'C.Muni Reddy age 40 Yrs ioi. c.tni?upathi S/o Late.C.Muni Reddy age 39 Yrs io5. c.navi b/o Late.c.Muni Reddy age 38 Yrs TheoetitionersNo'l00tol03addedasdeceasedCl.No.,t2videorderslANo. I 2O2 3 daled'. 6.1 2.2023

104. 105. 106. 107. 108. Smt. Ananthamma with Late Pedda Sayanna,- age 52 years Venkatamma D/o Late Pedda Savanna age 40 Yrs. - . - kurva Venkatanan S/o Late. Pedda Savanna-qge 42 Yrs d.siJoinni s/o Late. Pedda savanna age 32.Yrs Govinaamma with Late Pedda Sayanna, age 19 years ThepetitionersNo.l04tol08addedasdeceasedCL.No.56videorderslANo. 242;2O2O dated:

109. Chukka Sudarshan S/o Pedda Ashi Reddy i io. t-inoanwai Susheela D/o Pedda Ashi Reddy iti. sa-nah Sandhva D/o Pedda Ashi Reddy 112. Mjayalakshmi 0/o Pedda Ashi Reddy All are occu: Agriculturist Rl/o Earladinne Mllage of Narva Mandal Now at niillrir,i"in, ,Znoai, wanapirtttioiitrict. AND "Appellanuclaimant ThsLandAcquisitionofficer-cum-SpecialDeputycollector'RLISP-ll'Pebbair ...ResPondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L'A'Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 27.O2.2O25 passed in L.A.O.P.No. 2 of 2023 on the file of the courtof the Prirrcipal Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appea, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri' G Purushotham Reddy' Advocirte for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This C:ourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal beand herby is allowed; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer' with all consequential benefits;

3. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies DL w HIGH I}OURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.|Vo.S13 of 2025 ALLOU'ING TI-IE APPEAL !-\ "r6'A &me THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAITIA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE TIRUMALA T'EVIEADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 516 OF 2025 Between: Bijja Bichanna, S/o. Balaiah, 73 years, Occ. Agriculture Rl/o. Nagarala Mllage, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. Appellanuclaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenuRespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03.03.2010 passed in O.P.No.189 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hea!'ing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5431 days in preferring the appeal..

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Dt_ \r/ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR S CTION OFFICER HIGH C(]URT DATED:30/04/2025 DECREI: LAAS.No.516 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL udR'D S*' THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 521 OF 2025 Between:

1. M.Bheemeshwar Reddy, S/o Late.M.Venkat Reddy, aged 62 years 2. M.Venkat Krishna Reddy, S/o. Late.M.Venkat Reddy, aged 60 years, 3. M.Nagarjun Reddy, S/o Late M.Venkat Reddy, aged 58 years, 4. M.Subhash Reddy, S/o Late.M.Venkat Reddy, aged 52 years, 5. Sarojamma, Wo. Venkat Reddy, aged 80 years, 6. H.Bheemna, S/o Karrenna, aged 60 years 7. Smt. Savaramma, w/o Karrenna (Died) per LRs Cl.No. 12to 19 8. H. Ranganna, S/o Jammanna, aged 62 years 9. H. Govindu, S/o Jammanna (Died) for Cl.No. 2O to 24 10.H. Ravi, S/o Chinna Hanmanthu, aged 42years, 11. Pedda Muneppa, S/o Late. ChinnaLinganna, aged 50 years l2.Anjaneyulu, S/o Late.Hanumanthu, age 47 years 13. Chinna Paga Bhimanna, S/o Late. Karenna, age 63 years 14. Praveen, S/o Bheemanna, age 27Yrs 15. Sanleevulu, S/o Hanmanthu, age 43 Years 16. Bhudevi, D/o Hanmanthu, age 39 years 17.Ravi, S/o Hanmanthu, age 39Yrs 18.Ramesh, S/o Hanmantfu, age 25Yrs 19.Prashanth, S/o Bheemanna, age 25Yrs 20.Chinna Paga Ananthamma, Wo Late.H.Govindu, age 51 years 2l.Chinnapga Anikitha, D/o Late.H.Govindu, age 2O years 22.Chinna Paga Shruthi, D/o Late.H.Govndu, age 19 years 23.Chinna Paga Anjamma, D/o Late.H.Govindu, age 13 years 24.Chinnapaga Pavan Kalyan, S/o Late.H.Govindu, age 9 years Sl.No. 12 to 19 added as LRs deceased/Cl.No.7 vide orders in lA No. 26712023 Datd. 1g.4.2O23 to brouoht on record as oer th() orders of the Hon'ble Court. vide orders in A N6. 389/202e Oatif 31.8.2023 to brought Sl.No. 20 to 24 added as LRs deceasedrct.Uo.T on rer:ord as per the orders of the Hon,ble Court. All are R/o Nandimalla X-Road, Amarchintha Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Petitioners VERSUS The L;rnd Acquisition Officer-cum Special Deputy Collector, RLISp_1l,.pebbair ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree d:rted 27.02.2o2s passed in LAo.p. No. 17 of 2o22on the file of the court of the Princilal Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Th s appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. G purushotham Reddy, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Cou,t doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2 That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, 1 . fhe Principal Senior Civil Judge at Wanapa 2. Iwo CD Copies DLW Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ** HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE: LAAS.Nrr.S21 ot 2O25 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL q-d"A fr* I t i THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTTCE ABHTNAND KUMAB$HAVIL| AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between:

1. thiva Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, age 54 years Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Naresh Reddy, !/o Shivg Reddy, age 35 years Occ. Agriculture, R"/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Distiict.

3. Ram Gopql Redly, s/o. Ranga Reddy, age s2 y€rs, occ. Agriculture,Rl/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claima nt AND The special Deputy collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 3'1-05-2011 passed in O.P.No. 165 of 2011 on the tile of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+21than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; :3. That appellants be and hereby are not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5080 days in preferring the appeal. ,{. That there shall be no order as to costs. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Dl- \r{ f,- ltr* HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECRET: LAAS.Nrr.S2B ot 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL ,^"o{'^ #s€ f I ' t . THE HIGI{ COURT Iro["T.liHE o F rE LAN G ANA wEDlr.EsDAy TIF TH|RIETH DAy oF ApRtL TWO THOUSAND Nr.rO-rW*C"GY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI rHE HoNouRABLE'nr r0Sp,cE,RUM^.;;;; ;;;;', Between:

1. KeshapaQa Bataswamy, S/o Galenna, Age 69 years ' 9,,,1"jl$;rBl? ff'try,,,Wh+:l*;,t,.. o"" unricu*ure, R/o Nsarara AND ..AppeltanUClaimant 4s #f "tifl ,iT#ilf8',!?ff Raj i v L ift r *is a t io n s ch e m e- p h a s e- r r, peb ba i r, Ar Appear fired under section 54 0f the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the order and decree dated 31tosl2o11 passed in o.P.No. 15s of 2011 onthe fire of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ... RespondenURespondent This appeal coming on for he-_.)anng and upon perusing the grounds of appear' the Judgment and Decree of the court betow and the materia! papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and Gp for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as fottows : r

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the varue fixed by ttre Lard Acquisition officer. with a, consequentiar 3. That appe*ants be and hereby are not entired to.interest for the deray period of S0gO dap in preferring the appeal. benefits; j i i !: l I ! j p

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies 'DL v( LAKSHMI REGISTRAR OFFICER *8 HIGH COURT DATED::301041202s DECREE LAAS.NcI.529 ot 2025 ALLOWI{G THE APPEAL ,.{4 &r's rHE HIGH couRr Fo[J#==*lHr= oF TELANGANA WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HoNoURABLE sRt JusncE ABHTNAND KUMeR Srmvllr AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SU|T NO: 530 OF 2025 Between:

1. Surendar Reddy, s/o.Ranga Reddy, age 49 years, occ. Agricurture, R"/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. B.. Gopal. Redd.y, s./o,Ranga Reddy, age 74 years, occ. Agriculture,R"/o. Ngarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Didtrict. ...Appel lants/Clai ma nts AND The Special Deputy.Collector, Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair, At Pebbai r, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the or.der and decree dated 31.05.2011 passed in O.P. No. 164 of ?f,11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. N. praveen Reddy/ Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and herby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by -the Land Aoquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits' /

3. That appellants be and hereby arc not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5080 days in preferring the appeal.

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY'/ Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI REGISTRAR iu opRceR To,

1. Tlte Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Ttuo CD Copies DLw It I HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 DECREE LAAS.No.Sll0 of 2025 ALLOWNG THE APPEAL Kc"fil #--"

Find similar cases Start drafting free

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments