High Court · 2025

..RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to prayed that an order or direction or a writ of mandamus be issued directing the respondents herein to forebear from attempting to evict the petitioner the back yard and court yard in H.No. 1-3711, from the area of 2000 Sq. yds., in Sy No 2.10 of chandanagar virage, Seriringampary lVandar, Ranga Reddy District' and the same is bounded on East by Erectricity office, west by srinivasa Apa(ments, North by 40 wide road, south by Housing corony, without folowing the procedure laid down by law. l.A. NO:'t OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 4059 5 0F 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL rt may be pleased to pending disposal of this writ petition, the eviction of the v,ri1. petitioner the back yard and court yard in H.No- 13711, from the area of 2000 Sq. Yds., in Sy. No. 2'10 of Chandanagar village, Serilingampally L,4andal, Ranga Fleddy District and the same_ is bounded on East by Electricity office, West by Srinivasa Apartments, North.by 40'Wide road, South by Housing Colony be stayed. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. B V BAKSHI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI H. RAKESH KUMAR, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.32801 of 2016 ORDER: The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of respondents in attempting to evict the petitioner backyard and courtyard in H.No.l 37 /1 from the area of 20OO sq.yds., in Sy.No.210 of Chandanagar Vlllage, Serilingampall,y Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without following due process of laq,.

2. The petitioner submits that petitioner's father is in possession of Ac.2 37 gts., in Sy.No.21O and the said land is a Government land. Earlier petitioner had carried out wet cultivation u,ith the help of water leaking from Manjeera water pipes passing through adjoining 1ands. The land revenue in the name of Shivai Jamabandi was collected from the petitioner lrom 1983. Thereafter, the land was converted into house-site pattas rn the year 2Ol4- 15 and accordingly petitioner constructed 4 tin sheds lor cattle and for living. These structures were given H.No. 1- 37 I A and the propertv tax was also being collected and that 1U -to 15 house site pattas have been granted to the 2 \r-I poor people in the said Survey number. Thereafter, G.O.Ms.No.59 dated 30.12.2O14 came into force and petitioner applied lor regularization for he said 2000 sq.yds., or. 27.O2.2015 along u,ith Rs.50,O{)0,/- DD before MRO, Sherilingampally, Ranga Reddy District. The said applicatior-r is pending for consideration. (tuestioning the same, the present writ petition is filed.

3. Ttris Court on 30. 1 1.2016 has passr:d the following interim orrler " Notice before admtssrcn. Though the Gouernntent PLet'der .for Reuenue has taken tinte on 28.09..)C'16 for gettirtg instructions, till today no instrttctions are place:d before this Courl. The auerments in the affidauit s tcr,tL that the application filed by the petitioner s;eeking regul.arizcttion of his possession in. 'e,ms of G.O.,L,ts.No.59 dated 3O.12.2O14 is still pending consi.deration. While things stood thus. i;l is the case of the petitioner that the resoctndent- authonties are trying to dispos.s:ss the petihoner from the property u,hich i: .subject nlatter of dispute in this tuit petition witltout following due process of latu. In uietu of the aboue, if the petitioner is tn possessjon as on todag, he sholl not be rllspossessed without follouLing due process of lau- Post after tuo weeks."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even after passing of the said interim order, the application of the petitioner is still pending for consideration and no counter affidavit has becn filed by respondents.

5. Mr.H.Rakesl-r I(umar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the said G.O.Ms.No.59 dated

30.12.2014 is kept in abeyance and a decision is yet to be taken on the said G.O.Ms.No.59

6. In vieu, of the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, this s,rit petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to adhere to the order passed by this Court on 30. 1 I .20 16 till the petitioner's application for regularization is decided or till the G.O.Ms.No.S9 dated 30.12.2014 is given effect to. Till then, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed. .1 --

7. Wi:l-r the above observations, this v r-it petition IS dispose<l of Miscellerneous petitions, pending, if zlrlr, sh:rll stand closed. Hov'ever. there shall be no order as to c()sts. //TRUE COPY// SO/ M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASl; REGISTRAR ON OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Revenue DL-partment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapo:1. Hyderabad. 3- The Tahsildar, Serilingampally N/andal, Serilingampally Hyderabad. 4. The Revenue lnspector, Serilingampally lr,4andal, Serilir qampally, Ranga Reddy District 5- The Village Revenue Officer, Chandanagar, Ranga Rerlrly District 6. One CC to t\4/s. B. V. Bakshi, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue , High Court for the State ol Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD Copiers a TJ 1'K HIGH COURT DATED:2510612025 ORDER WP.No.32801 of 2016 IH: li Ro ( :=\ /: (- $15 5t :P 2U5 J o (.) I * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0 v\ ,r(