Vangooru Rukunamma, Wo v. Sudhakar Reddy, Aged about

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent Tribunal in issuing the impugned order dated 0410212021 in case No. sr/Acpr/D11491t2021 (appeal No. c1151312o17) in dismissing the appeal fited by the petitioner challenging the illegal entry of the name of 6th respondent in the RoR of the land of the petitioner in 32, 60, 74, 157, 158, 161 and 166, totat admeasuring Ac.6_30 guntas at Venkatehswarla Bavi of rurkapally Revenue village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, as illegal, unlawful and contrary to law and against the principles of natural justice and consequently remand the matter to the Tribunal for fresh disposal of the appeal by giving notice and opportunity to the parties to the appeal. :'l OF Petition under Section i s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order dated o4lo2t2o21 passed by the 2"d respondent Tribunal in file No. sr/Acpr/D1l49112021 (pending case No. ct1513t2017), by restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land in Sy. Nos. 32, 60,24, 1Sl, 1Sg, 161 and 1 66, total admeasuring Ac.6-30 guntas at Venkatehswarla Bavi of Turkapally Revenue village, Amrabad IVlandal, Nagarkurnool District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition. O:1 F 2024 Vangooru Rukunamma, W/o Y. S_udhakar Reddy, Aged about 57 years, Occ: Housewfe, Rt/o. Venkateshwarla Bavi Village, Amra6ad Mandal, N'aglrkLr;oof District. AND ...PETIT|ONERyRESpONDENT No.6 1. The State of Telangana,. Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Special Tribunal, Rep. by District Collector, Nagarkurnool District. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Achampet Division, Nagarkurnool District.

4. The Thasildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. 5. Vangooru sudhakar Reddy S/o. Late Narayan Reddv, Aqed about 58 vears. - Amrabad trrtinOat, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Venkateshwarla Nagarkurnool District. Villdge, -Bavi ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 6. Smt. Vangooru-Pramilamma, W/o. Late Venkat Reddy, Aged about 62 years, Occ: .Housewife, R/o. Venkateshwarla Bavi Vittat'e, "Amra-Oad -ltfini'af, Nagarkurnool District, Telangana. ...RESPONDENT/PETTTIONER Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order, dated o7-ot-2021 passed in l.A.No.1 of 2021 in w.p. No. 15099 of 202'l . IA :1 OF 2O25 Between:

1. K. Sravanthi, Wo Mahend.ar Reddy, Aged about 35 years, Occ: Housewife, -' R/o Venkateshwarra Bavi Viilage, Amradad Mandar, t\dgairurn;i DiaiLi.' 2 S. 9ry:18, Wo Jt/ahipat Reddy, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Housewife, F/o venl(ateshwarla Bavi Virrage, Amrabad Mandar, Nigarkurnoor District.

3. Padamati Swathi, W/o Seshikanth Reddy, Aged about 31 vears. Occ: Housewife, Rl/o Venkateshwarra Bavi viilagd, Amiabaa utanoit, N'agirkurnooi District.

4. Vangooru SgldlVa, Wo Ranjith Kumar Reddy, Aged about 29 vears. Occ: Housewife, Rl/o Venkateshwaria Bavi Viilage, AinraSaO tvtanOa[ N6S][il;;i District. ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS No.7 to 10 AND

1. Smt. Vangooru Pramilamma, W/o. Late Venkat Reddy, Aged 62 years, Occ: --UlnO"f, Housewife, Ryo. Venkateshwarla Bavi Village, A.raOici Nagarkurnool District, Telangana. ...WRIT PETITTONER/RESPONDE NTS 2. The State of Telangana,. Rep. . by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Special Tribunal, Rep. by District Collector, Nagarkurnool District, 4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Achampet Division, Nagarkurnool District. 5. The Thasildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. 6. Vango.oru Sudlakar Reddy, S/o. Late Narayan Reddy, Aged 5g years, Occ: --nfirO"f Agriculture, . Rl/o. V_enkateshwarla Bavi Village, AmraOici Nagarkurnool District, Telangana. ,

7. Vangooru Rulunamma, Wo. V. Sudhakar Reddy, Aged 57 years, Occ: Housewife, FIo. Venkateshwarla Bavi Villale, -Amraba6 Mandal, Nagarkumool District, Telangana. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim Order passed in l.A.No.1/202'l , in W.P.No.15099t2021, dated 07.07.2021 and dismiss the Writ Petition as devoid of merits and substance, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JALLI KANAKAIAH, SENIOR COUNSEL APPEAR]NG FOR SRI NARENDAR JALLI Counsel for the Respondents No.l to 4: SMT. S. SRAVANTHI, , AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI C. BUCHI REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.7 to 10: Dr. N. RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH UIRIT PETITION No.15O99 OF 2O2L DATED, THIS, THE 28rH DAY OF NOVEMBER,2025 Between: Smt. Vangooru Prameelarnma Petitioner AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and nine others .Respondents ORDER: l. Heard Sri .Jalli Kanakaiah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Narender Jalli, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Dr.Ravi Kumar: N, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.S to 10 and Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that this writ petition is filed challenging the order 2 SK,J dated 04.O2.2O21 in case No.ST/ACW lDl l49l l2O2l (Appeal No.C/ l5L3 /2O7 ll passed by respondent No.2/Tribunal, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the orders passed by the respondent No.4/Tahsildar, was dismissed.

3. As per the orders passed by this Court on

07.11.2025 the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue produced original record pertaining the impunged order. The record shows that originally petitioner filed appeal before the Revenue Divisonal Officer/ Respondent No.3 in ROR Appeal No.C/ l5l3l2ol7 against the orders passed by the respondent No.4/Tahsildar, was dismissed. Pending the appeal, in view of the amendment of ROR Act, the said appeal was transmitted to the Special Tribunal, Nagarkurnool/Respondent No.2. After receiving the saicl appeal, the respclndent No.2 without issuing notices tcl the petitioner as well as the unoflicial respondents passed t 3 SK,J impunged orders on o4.o2.2o21 . Moreover, as per the original record produced by the respondent authorities there are several corrections in thc operative portion of the impunged order, without any initials of the Members of the Special rribunal. [n view of the same, this is a fit case for remanding the matter back to the I't appellate authority as per Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025 for passing appropriate orders after issuing notices to the petitioner as welt as the unofficial respondents.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of and the impunged order passed by Special rribunal/respondent No.2 dated o4.o2.2o21 in case No.ST/ACT/DL/49L/2o2r (Appeal No.c/ L5l3l2o71) is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the I .t appellate authority/ Revenue Divisional officer, Achampet Division und.er Rute- 14 of Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Rule, 2025, directing to issue notices to the petitioner as well as 4 unofficial respondents. After hearing both sides pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ. Petition, shall stand closed. SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To 'l . The Principal Secretary, Revenue D Secretariat, Hyderabad. SECTION OFFICER n State of Telangana,

2. The Special Tribunal, Rep. by District Collector, Nagarkurnool District, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Achampet Division, Nagarkurnool District. 4. The Thasildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkumool District. 5. One CC to SRI NARENDAR JALLI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. One CC to SRI C. BUCHI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Dr. N. RAVI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies M MP BS I HIGH COURT DATE D-.28t11t2025 .-." 1' .'.''- t 20 tiil rut * a_,^'. .'r-l\' | ',1 : . _ ORDER WP.No.15099 of 2021 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent Tribunal in issuing the impugned order dated 0410212021 in case No. sr/Acpr/D11491t2021 (appeal No. c1151312o17) in dismissing the appeal fited by the petitioner challenging the illegal entry of the name of 6th respondent in the RoR of the land of the petitioner in 32, 60, 74, 157, 158, 161 and 166, totat admeasuring Ac.6_30 guntas at Venkatehswarla Bavi of rurkapally Revenue village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, as illegal, unlawful and contrary to law and against the principles of natural justice and consequently remand the matter to the Tribunal for fresh disposal of the appeal by giving notice and opportunity to the parties to the appeal. :'l OF Petition under Section i s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order dated o4lo2t2o21 passed by the 2"d respondent Tribunal in file No. sr/Acpr/D1l49112021 (pending case No. ct1513t2017), by restraining the respondents from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the land in Sy. Nos. 32, 60,24, 1Sl, 1Sg, 161 and 1 66, total admeasuring Ac.6-30 guntas at Venkatehswarla Bavi of Turkapally Revenue village, Amrabad IVlandal, Nagarkurnool District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition. O:1 F 2024 Vangooru Rukunamma, W/o Y. S_udhakar Reddy, Aged about 57 years, Occ: Housewfe, Rt/o. Venkateshwarla Bavi Village, Amra6ad Mandal, N'aglrkLr;oof District. AND ...PETIT|ONERyRESpONDENT No.6 1. The State of Telangana,. Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Special Tribunal, Rep. by District Collector, Nagarkurnool District. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Achampet Division, Nagarkurnool District.

4. The Thasildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. 5. Vangooru sudhakar Reddy S/o. Late Narayan Reddv, Aqed about 58 vears. - Amrabad trrtinOat, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Venkateshwarla Nagarkurnool District. Villdge, -Bavi ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 6. Smt. Vangooru-Pramilamma, W/o. Late Venkat Reddy, Aged about 62 years, Occ: .Housewife, R/o. Venkateshwarla Bavi Vittat'e, "Amra-Oad -ltfini'af, Nagarkurnool District, Telangana. ...RESPONDENT/PETTTIONER Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order, dated o7-ot-2021 passed in l.A.No.1 of 2021 in w.p. No. 15099 of 202'l . IA :1 OF 2O25 Between:

1. K. Sravanthi, Wo Mahend.ar Reddy, Aged about 35 years, Occ: Housewife, -' R/o Venkateshwarra Bavi Viilage, Amradad Mandar, t\dgairurn;i DiaiLi.' 2 S. 9ry:18, Wo Jt/ahipat Reddy, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Housewife, F/o venl(ateshwarla Bavi Virrage, Amrabad Mandar, Nigarkurnoor District.

3. Padamati Swathi, W/o Seshikanth Reddy, Aged about 31 vears. Occ: Housewife, Rl/o Venkateshwarra Bavi viilagd, Amiabaa utanoit, N'agirkurnooi District.

4. Vangooru SgldlVa, Wo Ranjith Kumar Reddy, Aged about 29 vears. Occ: Housewife, Rl/o Venkateshwaria Bavi Viilage, AinraSaO tvtanOa[ N6S][il;;i District. ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS No.7 to 10 AND

1. Smt. Vangooru Pramilamma, W/o. Late Venkat Reddy, Aged 62 years, Occ: --UlnO"f, Housewife, Ryo. Venkateshwarla Bavi Village, A.raOici Nagarkurnool District, Telangana. ...WRIT PETITTONER/RESPONDE NTS 2. The State of Telangana,. Rep. . by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Special Tribunal, Rep. by District Collector, Nagarkurnool District, 4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Achampet Division, Nagarkurnool District. 5. The Thasildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. 6. Vango.oru Sudlakar Reddy, S/o. Late Narayan Reddy, Aged 5g years, Occ: --nfirO"f Agriculture, . Rl/o. V_enkateshwarla Bavi Village, AmraOici Nagarkurnool District, Telangana. ,

7. Vangooru Rulunamma, Wo. V. Sudhakar Reddy, Aged 57 years, Occ: Housewife, FIo. Venkateshwarla Bavi Villale, -Amraba6 Mandal, Nagarkumool District, Telangana. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the lnterim Order passed in l.A.No.1/202'l , in W.P.No.15099t2021, dated 07.07.2021 and dismiss the Writ Petition as devoid of merits and substance, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JALLI KANAKAIAH, SENIOR COUNSEL APPEAR]NG FOR SRI NARENDAR JALLI Counsel for the Respondents No.l to 4: SMT. S. SRAVANTHI, , AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI C. BUCHI REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.7 to 10: Dr. N. RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH UIRIT PETITION No.15O99 OF 2O2L DATED, THIS, THE 28rH DAY OF NOVEMBER,2025 Between: Smt. Vangooru Prameelarnma Petitioner AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and nine others .Respondents ORDER: l. Heard Sri .Jalli Kanakaiah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Narender Jalli, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Dr.Ravi Kumar: N, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.S to 10 and Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that this writ petition is filed challenging the order 2 SK,J dated 04.O2.2O21 in case No.ST/ACW lDl l49l l2O2l (Appeal No.C/ l5L3 /2O7 ll passed by respondent No.2/Tribunal, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the orders passed by the respondent No.4/Tahsildar, was dismissed.

3. As per the orders passed by this Court on

07.11.2025 the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue produced original record pertaining the impunged order. The record shows that originally petitioner filed appeal before the Revenue Divisonal Officer/ Respondent No.3 in ROR Appeal No.C/ l5l3l2ol7 against the orders passed by the respondent No.4/Tahsildar, was dismissed. Pending the appeal, in view of the amendment of ROR Act, the said appeal was transmitted to the Special Tribunal, Nagarkurnool/Respondent No.2. After receiving the saicl appeal, the respclndent No.2 without issuing notices tcl the petitioner as well as the unoflicial respondents passed t 3 SK,J impunged orders on o4.o2.2o21 . Moreover, as per the original record produced by the respondent authorities there are several corrections in thc operative portion of the impunged order, without any initials of the Members of the Special rribunal. [n view of the same, this is a fit case for remanding the matter back to the I't appellate authority as per Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025 for passing appropriate orders after issuing notices to the petitioner as welt as the unofficial respondents.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of and the impunged order passed by Special rribunal/respondent No.2 dated o4.o2.2o21 in case No.ST/ACT/DL/49L/2o2r (Appeal No.c/ L5l3l2o71) is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the I .t appellate authority/ Revenue Divisional officer, Achampet Division und.er Rute- 14 of Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Rule, 2025, directing to issue notices to the petitioner as well as 4 unofficial respondents. After hearing both sides pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ. Petition, shall stand closed. SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To 'l . The Principal Secretary, Revenue D Secretariat, Hyderabad. SECTION OFFICER n State of Telangana,

2. The Special Tribunal, Rep. by District Collector, Nagarkurnool District, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Achampet Division, Nagarkurnool District. 4. The Thasildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkumool District. 5. One CC to SRI NARENDAR JALLI, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. One CC to SRI C. BUCHI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Dr. N. RAVI KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies M MP BS I HIGH COURT DATE D-.28t11t2025 .-." 1' .'.''- t 20 tiil rut * a_,^'. .'r-l\' | ',1 : . _ ORDER WP.No.15099 of 2021 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS