C. Padmaja, Wo. M.S. Venkateswarlu v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K SARATH
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 16, 21
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Having regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons a-like in the order dated' 03'09'2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W'P'No'23 138 of 2025' this Writ 3 Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of the Respondents in releasing admifted Commuted Value of Pension (CVP) Bill for Rs.23,53,8981 vide Token No's.2522846392, 2522846403, dt.O7-10'2024, Final encashment of eamed leave Bill for Rs.16,75,115/- vide Token No.2523052739, dt.O4-11-2024, Group lnsurance Principal with lnterest Rs.67,4471- vide Token No.2602751638, dt.12-01- 2026 and TSGLI Amount for Rs.4,84,4941 vide Cheque No.2516434432' dt.29-06- 2O?4 even after finalising the bill and having generated in comprehensive Financial Management System (CFMS) as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to release and pay the admitted commuted varue of pension (cVp) Biil for Rs.23,53,898/- vide Token No's.2522846392, 2522846403, dt.O7_10_2024, Finat encashment of eamed leave Bill for Rs.16,75,1151 vide Token No.252 3os213g, dt.04-11-2024, Group rnsurance principal with lnterest Rs.67,4471- vide Token No.2602751638, dt.12-o1-2026 and rsGll Amount for Rs.4,84,4941 vide cheque No.25'16434432, dt.29-06-2024 along with interest @ 24 % per annum in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under section i 5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release and pay the admitted admitted commuted value of Pension (cvP) Bill for Rs.23,53,898/- vide Token No's.2522846392, 2s228464o3, dt.o7-10-2024, Finar encashment of eamed leave Bill for Rs.16,75,1.1sl- vide Token No.2523052739, dt.04-1 1-2024, Group lnsurance principal with lnterest Rs.67,447t- vide Token No.2602751638, d1.12-01-2026 and rsGll Amount for Rs.4,84,494/- vide cheque No.2516434432, dt.2g-06-2024 with interest at the rate of 24o/o per annum in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. LAKKADI DAYAKER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR SERVICES- lll The Court made the following: ORDER IIV THE IIIGH COURT ,, oF TELANGANA ^ri";;Hr.ff THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE K.SARATH ITIoN No.1248 of o Date:22.04.2C,26 20 26 T Between: C. Padmaja The Srot^ ^"- R.; ;..: 'l'.erangana, il";#.;"d*1,iHlr?".,,H;" AND ...Petitioner
ORDER:
Respondents Dayakar Reddy, learned counsel for the Assistarrt Govemment pleader the respondents and perused the their consent, this Writ petition stage of admission itself. Heard Sri Lakkadi petitioner and learned Services-Ill appearing for material on record. With taken up for disposa.l at tJ:e 2. Learned counsel for petitioner filed the instant Writ petition of the respondents tn not releas1ng the petitioner submits that the questioning the action the petitioner,s retiral j Il i, I I I I i I I / I i I I i I I I .."t ,r-- I 7 ''i benehts, despite token numbers having already been raised by the respondent autborities for payment ol the amounts payable to the Petitioner'
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the lis raised in the present Writ Petition has already been adjudicated bir the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23138 ol 2025, which was disposed of uide order dated O3.O}.2O25, and thus prayed to pass a similar order in the present Writ Petition also'
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-lll did not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for tl.e petitioner with regard to the disposal of W'P'No'23138 of 2025 dated03.og.2025attdsubmitsthattherespondentswillrelease the amounts on a priority basis of the token numbers and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders'
Operative part
Having regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons a-like in the order dated' 03'09'2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W'P'No'23 138 of 2025' this Writ 3 Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from today, failing which, t1e entire amount with regard to the retiral benehts shall carry interest at the rate of lOo/o per annum, from the date the amount fell due, till the actual date of its payment. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department' S ' Amtedur Telangna Stite Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts' Govt' of Telangana' lnsurance e of Telangana, Dr.B.R Building, Abids, HYderabad.
3. The District Treasury officer, Khammam district, Khammam, Telangana. 4. The Principal Accountant General A AND E' Telangana' Hyderabad' 5. One CC to SRl. LAKKADI DAYAKER REDDY' Advocate [OPUC] 6. TwoCCstoGPFoRSERV|CES-lll, HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
Two CD CoPies DAN GJP \q/ i HIGH COURT DATED: 2210412026 CC TODAY ,-'Ilit S ".:'!{A La'" ,.^ ''.i [ 2 tilfi ?l]c fl-^- ORDER WP.No.12480 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \o "@ &r"
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 21; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.