High Court · 2025

Authority.(HMD4), HMDA Buitding, Swamajayanthi Complex, Sanjeev Nagar, Srinivas Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanqa Reddy Divisin. Sanoa Reddv District. 5. The Tahasildar, Patancheru Mandal,-Sanga Reddy District.- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or directions more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, more particularly, the 2nd respondent* in trying to interfere and dispossess the petitioner by removing the existing structures and small huts of migrant laborers in the petitioner's land in Sy. No. 125185 to an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts, in Sy. No. 125190 to an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts and in Sy. No. 125193 lo an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts totally comprising as one unit to an extent of Ac. 3.00 gts of Peddakanjerla Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, perverse, besides being violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere/d ispossess the petitioner from her assigned land in Sy. No. 125185 to an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts, in Sy. No. 125190 to an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts and in Sy. No. 125193 to an extent 4 of Ac. 01-00 gts totarry comprising as one unit to an extent of Ac. 3.00 gts of Peddakanjerla Village patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District without following due process of law lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents not to interfere/d ispossess the petitionerr from her rawfur possession and enjoyment over the subject property in sy. No. 125lg5 to an extent of Ac. 0'l-00 gts, in Sy. No. 125190 to an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts and in Sy. No. 125193 to an extent of Ac. 01-00 gts totaly comprising as one unit to an extent of Ac. 3.00 gts of Peddakanjerra Vifiage, patancheru Mandar, sanga Reddy District without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt BONDEMPALLY RAMULU Counsel for the Respondent No.l: cp FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV counsel for the Respondent No.2: sRr v.NARSTMHA GouD, sc FoR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 TO 5: SRI M.SAHAS REDDY, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER t THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B' VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.l2370 0F 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) HeardMr.B.Ramulu,learnedcounselforthepettttoner, Mr.V.NarsimhaGoud,leamedstandingcounselforrespondent No.2 and Mr. M. Sahas Reddy' learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue' 2 Leamed counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the order dated 24.01-2023 in W'P' No'2004 of 2023 was passed by this Court in the writ petition filed by the petitioner directing respondent No.4 - the Revenue Divisional Officer' Sanga Reddy Division, to dispose of the stay application filed atong with appeal No.5258 of 2022 under Section 4-A ol the Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of 'l'ransfers Act) 1977 (for short 'Act 1977') seeking suspension of the resumption order passed by respondent No.5 - the Tahsidlar, Patancheru Mandal' vr'de proceedings No.C195912022 dated 04'07 '2022' Further' it was also made clear by this Court that till disposal of stay application' respondent No'5 v 2 was directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property under the guise of resumption order dated 04.O7 .2022.

3. Leamed counsel lor the petitioner further subntitted that the order passed by this Courr in W.P. No.2004 of 2023 is still subsisting anri the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 4-A of the Act 1977 vide No.5258 of 2022 is still pending belbre respondent No.4. Despite the same, there is interference by respondent No.2 with the subject property of the petitioner.

4. Learned standing counsel for HMDA, appearing lor respondent No.2, submitted that the appeal was stated to have been flled in the year 2022, and respondent No.4 may be directed to dispose of the appeal within a specific period.

5. In vierv of the order dated 24.01 .2023 passed by this Court in W.P. No.2004 of 2023, and submissions of leamed standing counsel for HMDA, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.4 - the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy Divison, to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner vrde No.5258 <tf 2.022. within a period of four (4) weeks from rhe date -.---7 To \ \ 3 of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending disposal of the appeal, respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the subject property, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Principal Secretary - Municipal Administration and Urban Development 2. The Metropolitan Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. Authority (HMDA), HMDA Building, Swamajayanthi Complex, Sanjeev Nagar, Srinivas Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sanga Reddy Division, Sanga Reddy District. 5. The Tahasildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. 6. One CC to SRI BONDEMPALLY RAMULU, Advocate [OPUCI 7. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI

8. One CC to SRI V.NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUfl '10.Two CD Copies PSK. HIGH COURT DATED:2410412025 ORDER WP.No.12370 of 2025 CC TODAY l rtE S; i5,t () - 2SAPB zffi ,'/,,.// DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETTTION WITHOUT COSTS \Lr