High Court · 2025

1 1 . Vangapalli Srinivas, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ Agriculture l2.Bommidi Santosh Reddy, S/o Kanakareddy' Aged about 37 years, Occ' Agriculture

13. Jaligama Venkataiah, S/o Latchaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture 14. Kasturi Rama Lingam, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture 15. Gundaboina Raju, S/o Sailu, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture 16. Burra Sravan, S/o Chandram, Aged about 1 8 years, Occ. Private Employee '17. Nune Laxman, S/o Mallaiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Agriculture 18.Nune Ramesh, S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Private Employee 19. Bingo Bhaskar, S/o.Mallaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Agriculture 20.Bairoju Govardhana Chary, S/o Durgaiah, Aged about 33 years, Occ Driver 21 . Jaligama Renuka, Wo Venkataiah, Aged about 44 years, Occ Private Employee

22.Kol7e Nagamani, S/o llaiah, Aged about 45 yeat, Occ. Agriculture 23. Burra Laxmi, W/o Chandram, Aged about 38 years, Occc. Agriculture 24..Jaligdma Nirmala, W/o Yadagiri, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Agriculture

25. Kasturi Kanakavva, Wo Rama Lingam, Aged about 53 years, Occ Agriculture

26. Sankati Latachavva, Wo Balaiah, Aged about 12 yearc, Occ. Agriculture 2T.Bairoju Laxmi, Wo Durgaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Agriculture 28. Nune Mangavva, W/o Narsaiah, Aged about 3g years, Occ. Agriculture 29. Shanakonda Yadava, Wo Raju, Aged about 3Z years, Occ. Agricutture 30. Bommidi Geetha, W/o Santosh Reddy, Aged about 34 years Occ. Agriculture 31 Madipalli Bapaiah, S/o Chan_draiah, Aged about 45 yeard Occ. Business All are residents Anathasagar Village, Chiinakodui, ffli,iO"f , Siddipei Di;i;;i ' .PETITIONERS AND Telangana al Hyderabad. Rurat DevetopmeniDepartment,'s.iretari ji erlliinil-r_rvoerauao

1. The State of Telanoana fep py^its principal Secretary, panchayath Rai and 2. The Commissioner, panchayath Raj and Rural Development, State of 3. The District Collector, Siddipet, Siddipet Diskict. 4. The District panchayath Officer, Siddipet, Siddipet District. 5- The Mandar Parishath Deveropment officer, chinnakoduru Mandar, Siddipet District. Rep by its Panchalh Seiretary.'

6. The Tahsildhar, Chinnakoduru Mandal, Siddipet District. 7 The Anantlasagar Grampanchayath, Chinnakoduru Mandal, Siddipet District. 8. Thikka Karnakar, S/o Bhadraiah, Aged about 3g years, Occ. Business, R/o 9. Kadir..Syed, S/o Hameed. Syed, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o .10. Mohammad Masoor Ahmad, S/o Sheik Ahmad, Aged about 43 years, Occ. -sibo-iiJi Ananthasagar Viilage of Chinna(oariru rr,fa-nOjr, SOiliJet Oistrict. Ananthasagar Viilage of Chinnakodu;u M;a;i, S-iafip=et Oistrict. Rro Ananthasasar Vilase oi Chil#iilrru r,,lantir, Bi.iir5". ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of respondent authorities, particularly the respondents. No. 3 to 6 in trying to bifurcate the Ananthasagar Grampanchayath into two Grampanchayaths Ahmed Abdulah Khan i.e., 1) Ananthasagar Grbmpanchayath, 2) Hanuman Nagar Grampanchayth basing on Transport Minister of Telangana State, dated. 13-03-2025 and unofficial respondents representation, daled. 2910312025 as illegal, arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and in contrary to the Section 3(5) of the District Formation Act, 1974 and Section 3(4) Panchayth Raj Act, 2018. Consequently to direct the respondent authorities, particularly the respondents. No. 3 to 6 in trying to not bifurcate the Ananthasagar Grampanchayath into two Grampanchayaths i.e., 1) Ananthasagar Grampanchayath, 2) Hanuman Nagar Grampanchayth basing on Transport Minister of Telangana State, dated. 13-O3-2O25 and unofficial respondents representation, dated. 29-03-2O25 by considering the Petitioners representation, dated. 07-04-2025, Section 3(5) of the District Formation Acl, 1974 and Section 3(4) of Panchayath Rai Act, 2018. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities, particularly the respondents. No. 3 to 6 in trying to not bifurcate the Ananthasagar Grampanchayath into two Grampanchayaths i.e., 1) Ananthasagar Grampanchayath, 2) Hanuman Nagar Grampanchayth basing on Transport Minister of Telangana State, dated. 13-03-2025 and unofficial respondents representation, dated. 29-03-2025 by considering the Petitioners representation, daled. 07-04-2025, Section 3(5) of the District Formation Act, 1 974 and Section 3(4) of Panchayath Raj Act, 20'18 , pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. CHALAKANI VENKAT YADAV Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1,2 & 4:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos 3 & 6 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos 5 & 7 : SRl. PRADEEP REDDY' SC FOR TG ZILLA PARISHAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos 8 to 10 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.12156 of 2025 ORDER This Writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents No.3 to 6 in bifurcating the Ananthasagar Gram Panchayat into two Gram Panchayats, i.e., Ananthasagar Gram Panchayat and Hanuman Nagar Gram Panchayat, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Learnecl counsel for the petitioners submitted that basing on the recommendation made by the Transport Minister of Telangana dated 13.03.2025 and the representation of certain villagers dated

29.03.2025 lor bifurcation of Ananthasagar Gram Panchayat, the respondents are ltifurcating the Ananthasagar Gram l)anchayat into two Cram Panchayats, i.e., Ananthasagar Gram Panchayat and Hanuman Nagar Gram Panchayat. Therefore, the present Writ Petition has been t-rled t

3. Learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, appearing for respondents No. l, 2 and 4, has lorwarded a copy of the written instructions received by him, according to which the local MLA as well as some of the villagers have opposed the said \ I 2 TMD).. wp 12156_2025 proposal and therefore, the representation has been forwarded to respondent No.5 for submission of the proposals regarding the lormation of a New Gram Panchayat from the existing Gram Panchayat so that the same can be forwarded to the Govemment, but as on date no proposals have been received to his olfice 4 In view of the above submissions, it is evident that no proposals have been initiated as of now by the Government to bilurcate the Ananthasagar Gram Panchayat. Therefore, this Court finds that this Writ Petition is premature and the same is liable to be dismissed.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed SD/- AHMEDABDULLAH KHAN S\STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, I

1. Thikka Karnakar, S/o Bhadraiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, R/o Ananthasagar Village of Chinnakoduru Mandal, Siddipet District.

2. Kadi Syed, S/o Hameed Syed, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Business' Rl/o Ananthisagar Village of Chinnakoduru Mandal, Siddipet District.

3. Mohammad Masoor Ahmad, S/o Sheik Ahmad, Aged about 43 years, Occ Business, Rl/o Ananthasagar Village of Chinnakoduru Mandal, Siddipet District. 4 One CC to SRl. CHALAKANI VENKAT YADAV, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRl. PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR TG, ZILLA PARISHAD [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYATRAJ RURAL DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad {OUTI

8. Two CD Copies 9. One Spare Copy. wABBASI I i HIGH COURT DATED :2310412025 ) ) ORDER WP.No.12156 of 2025 ,1.' Tfl .:, /, .11 A' 10 JUL 2025 t!) )t' I * t I DISMISS!NG OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS. ( \1 6 3.