M/s. Diddi Kumara Swamy Adthi AND Commission Marchant. Reo.bv.it v. 1. The State of Telangana

President Sri Bommineni Ravinder Reddy, Warang'al.

7. Ml s. Warangal Chamber of Commerce and lndustry, Warangal, Rep by. its General Secretary Maduri Vedaprakash, Warangal.' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Sth respondent in non{aking action on the resolution of the 6th and 7th respondents Chamber of Commerce passed on 25.03.2025 and decided not to do business with the Petitioner's Merchant from the same day, in pursuance of the same, the 6th and 7th Respondent authorities, which had ient through whatsapp message from 10-04-2025 at 6-00 A.M to every working day of market to the Traders and Purchasers of the agricultural products that they shall noto"purchasedtheagriculturalproductsfromthepetitioner.sAdthi-and -date is an ex-facie, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, commission Merchant till ,"i""i, ,.trir, whimsical without Jurisdiction, non-application of mind ' with following of law and in violation of the provisions of the Telangana State ;;;;;;;;. ngiiJrrtrrrr produces and Live Stock Act 1966 and Amended Rule,s time to time aid in viotation of Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300-4 of the conslitution of lndia and also against the catena of Judgments of this Hon'ble courtand an Apex Court and set aside the same and consequently, direct the Sth Respondent to direct the 6th and 7th Respondents to withdraw the resolution passed on 25.03.2025 and to withdrawtheWhatsappmessagessentonlo.o4.2o25tothePurchasersand Traders in the Enmamula Agricultural Market, warangal that not kr purchase the Adthi and..Commission Merchant' who is agiilutturat products of the -petitioner's in the market for the past 4 1/2 decades forthwith "iist.d lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased For the rdr.on. stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above Writ Petition, lt is further priyed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased 1o direct the 5th respondent to take actitn on the authorities of the 6th and 7th respondent of the Chamber of commerce in pursuance of the adverse whatsapp messages havt'r been sending from 10-04-2025 at 6-00 A.M to every working day of market to the traders and frr"t'rr."rt of the agricultural products that they should not be purchased agricultural products fiom the peiitioner's Adthi and Commission Ulerchants from lO-Oq-ZOzs onwards to till date forthwith, pending disposal of the vrrit petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in ihe circumstances of the case and interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in -cupport of the petition, the High court may be cleased For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above writ Petition, lt is further prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings inctlaing passed the resolution oth & 7th Respondent on 25.03.2025 that not to do businesi with the Petitioner's Merchant existed in the control of the lith Respondent Market from 10.04 2.025 and in pursuance of the same sending whatsapp messages from 10.04.2025 at 6:00 AM to every working day o1' market to the Traderl that they should not be purchased agricultural procucts from the petitioner,s Adthi ind Commission Merchants forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances ofthe case and interest of justice.. !i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l,3&4: GP FOR AGRICULTURE Counsel for the Respondent NO.2: GP FOR TNDUSTRTES AND COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI N. UMA SHANKAR SC FOR AMC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6&7: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER '.a:'.5 /' THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVT DEVI \\/RIT PETITION No.12I17 of 2025 ORDER This Wr ir. Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mardamus declaring the a,:t.ion of respondent No.5 in not taking any a( tion on the resolution <,1' respondents No.6 and 7 passed on 25.03 .2( t25 and in not pern-rittir,lt the petitioner to do business in the market vard as illegal and arbi .r'ary 2 I'his ,otrrt, vide inlerim order dated 21.04.20115, had directed rcsporclent No.5 to allow the petitioner to ciilry on business u'ith r:gard to the agricultural products broughl to the subject market committee since the petitioner's Iicence is in force. 3 Sri N Uma Shankar, Leamed Standing Counsel lor the Agriculture Nft Lket Committee, appearing for respondent Nc.5, has forwarded a copy of the instructions received vide letter dated I I

22.04.2025, wherein it is stated that after discussing \ ith the representatives of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Warangal, it was observed that the petitioner has liberty to sell the t t 2 TMDJ wp-72117 2025 agri cu ltural products brought to his adthi by the farmers to anv of the licensed traders in the market yard and that the p.titior". .un continue his business in the market yard as earlier. 4' Leamed counser of the petitioner . submitted that the petitioner is carrying on his business by virtue of the interim order of this Court

5. As the market committee seems to have resolved the issue, this Court is of the opinion that the respondents cannot have any objection to the petitioner carrying on his business as long as his licence is in force and shall not prevent him from doing so. 6. this Writ petition is disposed With the above observations, of. There shall be no order as to costs. , I i I I I 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition. shall srand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- K.AMMAJI DEPUW REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 'ffi Lffi Eff b',:f Eifl l""l?:,ry:,:,gglaf i$co-operationMarketins , 5|", |;.,1fl i#r?:?r3#.H:e I nd uskies a n d co m m e rce Depa rtm e nt, ' Ilfi*'rlffis:fset J?flilg:?? 'rTffiflxJan, 4. The Diskict Marketing Officer, Warangal District, Telangana State. ' }!;""t""T:tgd,Agricu lture Market comm ittee, E nmamuta viltage, wara ngat, 1st Froor, D-Brock Brock (g\L'L :-

6. One CC to SR . PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRI N UMA SHANKAR SC FOR AMC IOPUCI 8. Two CCs to GP FOR AGRICULTURE ,High Court for the State of Telangana

9. Two CCs to GP for lndustries and Commerce Department, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

10.Two CD Copies KKS PSK HIGH COURT DATED:23104t2025 ORDER WP.No.12117 ot 2025 CC TODAY I { * _( rE sl' ..) 24 APn G orl M ( :;Si -".*./' DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS tl l,bU