1. Mohammed Nizamuddin v. The State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of [r/andamus, declaring the action of the third respondent in not passing orders on the representation dated. 2610O12020 requesting to record the names of the petitioners in respect of land to an extent of Ac. 20-00 Gts., each in Sy.No. 59 of Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar [Vlandal, Rangareddy District as illegal, arbitrary, withcut jurisdiction and violative of Principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the third respondent to record the names of the petitioners in respect of land to an extent of Ac. 20-00 Gts., each in Sy.No. 59 of Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangareddy District., as pattedars by deleting the names of existing persons by nane [Vld. Shakeer Hussain, Md. Naseer Hussian and Razia Sultana. lA NO: 1 OF 21t20 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the thirrl respondent not to change the record in respect of land to an extent of Ac. 20-00 Gts., each in Sy No. 59 of Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rang:treddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.Y.L.N. CHARYULU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court macle the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.l 5 L2 1 0F 2020 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the third respondent in not passing orders on the representation dated 26 /0612O20 requesting to record the names of the petitioners in respect of land to an extent of Ac.2O-OO Gts., each in Sy.No.S9 of Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangareddy District as illegal, arbitrar5r, without jurisdiction and violative of Principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the third respondent to record the names of the petitioners in respect of iand to an extent of Ac.20.OO Gts., each in Sy.No.S9 of I{armanghat Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Rangaredd.y District, as pattedars by deleting the names of existing persons by name Md.Shakeer Hussain, Md. Naseer Hussian and Razia Sultana and pass such other order/s that the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest ofjustice 2] When the rnatter was taken up for consideration, ) learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a , -:, ' Page 2 of5 EVV,J W.P.No.15L2l of 2O2O represer.tation has been made before respondent No.3 dated 26.o6.2(t20, by petitioners stating that G.p.A. holders of original land lords by lrar-nes Mohammed Nizamuddin Mohamnred Nissarudin and shakira Begum to take care the propertir:s held by them the rand in sy.No.r:9 of Karmanghat village, isaroornagar Mandal, along with other lands, r,vhere the origlnal land lords filed an applicatron for grant of succession in their favour from younus l(hatoon before responde:nt No.3 under Form 6 of R.o.R. Act and in the month ol February, 2018, the present Tahsildar have been issued n<>tices to the original owners stated supra and others before passing orders and after completion of statutory period asi no objections were received, respondent No.3 after conducting the survey, orders passed. on 20.Lo.2olg, but the names an'e not recorded and implemented in the records and accordinfdy, request has been made in the prescribed Form 6(4) of R.o.R Act in respect of land in sy.No.59 of Karmanghat village, but no action has been taken by respondent No.3. I t: : : EW,J W.P.No.1512L of 2O2O Page 3 of5

3. Learned counsel submits that petitioners are the sufferers due to inaction made by respondent No.3 and hence, would seek appropriate direction to the respondent No.3 to record the names of the petitioners in the revenue records.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that, at present, as per the provisions of Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025, an online application has to be submitted for consideration by the official respondents. In the absence of any such online application, any earlier application made by the petitioners is not being considered by the official respondents. However, would seek a direction to the petitioners to file an online \ application, which in turn will be considered on its merits by the official respondents in accordance with law.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court deems it appropriate to grant liberty to the petitioners to submit an online application as specified under the relevant provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati Page 4 of5 EVV,J W.P.No.15i21 of 2O2O (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2o2s, presently in force, within a period of Irour (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon filing the slame, the official respondr:nts are directed to consider the ,.jarne by fotiowing due process of law and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with law. 6 wi':h the above direction, this writ pciition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed /TRUE COPYII Sd/. M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT}EFISTRAR To SEcTIdN oFFIcER 1. The- Prirrcipal secretary, Revenue Department, The state of Telangana, _ TelanganaSecretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District collector, Rangareddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. q The T_ahsildar, S_algorlqgai Mandal, Rangareddy District.' 4. One CC to SRt D.Y.L.N. CHnRVU|_U, Adiocate jOeUCl 5. Two ccs to GP for REVENUE, High court for the statebf relangana. tourl 6. Two CD Copies BN/MP ,T@ / 4 HIGH COURT DATED:2910812025 ORDER WP.No.15121 of 2020 f 1HE S t 1 iL) '.f I+,, \o" DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS KS tt lzlze l I t: l i I ,] r !. : : ' i i I