✦ High Court of India · 23 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,134 words

Acts & Sections

Judgment

5. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department Secretariat, Hyderabad-500022. Telangana State Southem Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director. The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Divisional Engineer, Operation KondapurT G S P D C L. The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Operation KondapurT G S P D C L. The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allapur TGSPDCL. 6. 7. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Serilingampally Zone. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particulady one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the Plot No.420 Part, in Survey Nos.11119, 1112O and 11121, admeasuring 250 Sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M) Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North. Plot No.423lPart, South. Plot No.419, East. 30 t- inches Wide Road, West. plot No_427., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive af,prication ano to rereise lh" individual seryice connection without being inftuencei by the tnstructions or ft,e itn respondent IANO:1O F 2025 Petition under Section.151 cpc praying that in the cirormstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, t""r-rijr,-corrt .uv L" pr"u.ui u oir*t the Respondents 2 to 6 to receive irre apjricationinJ ,erease flre individuar service connection to the petitioner, the ptot No.420 pa(, i" S;;y Ni;;.iitis,ilff;"0 11121 , admeasuring 250 Sq. yards, situated at Kiranamet (Vt, Serilingampally (M) Under GHMC, Ranoa Reddy-District, f.S., O",.O"J by North. ptot No.423lpart, South. Plot No.419, East 30lnches WiA" n""d, W".i. ptot No.427 Counsel for the petitioners: Smt. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No..t: Gp FOR ENERGY 9:111].for the Respondent Nos.2 to 6: SRt N. SREEDHAR REDDY SC FOR TSSPDCL 9g.:l_r"t for the Respondent No.7: SRt c. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER ar; THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.1212 7 0F 2o.2s ORDE R: This Writ petirion is filed, under Aiticle 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the foilowing relief: "...1o. issue an appropiate Wit, ord.er or direction more particalarlg one in the nature of Wit of Mandamus declaing thl action of, the Respondents 2 to 6 in n6t receiuing the appliiation form and release the indiuidual seruice connectioi to the- fetitioner the Plot No.42O Part, in Surueg Nos. j1/j9, 1l/20 and jj/21, admeasuing 250 Sq.uards situated at Khanamet U);, Seilingampally (M) tJnder GHMC, Ranga ReddA Distict, T.5., bounded bg North: plot No.423/part, Soih: plot fio.41g, East:3}, Wide Road, West: plot No.427, as illegal, null, uoid__, arbitrary and consequentlA d.irect the respond_ents to recetue apptication ind. to reledse the indiuidual seruice connection utthout Leing influenced bV the instnlctions of the 7th respondent and to pcrss....,,

2. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, Iearned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government pleader for Energz for respondent No. 1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 6; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipat Corporation, for respondent No.7. With their consent, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this Writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.32614 of 2OlS, dated 18.t2.2O15, and requested ., P(,J \\'p 12127 2025 q this Court to pass similar-order in tl-re present Writ f)etition also. The same is not seriously disputed by the learned (iovernment Pleader as u,ell as L''arned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

4. In vieu, of t he above submissions and for the reasons alike in the order of this Court in W.P.No.32614 of 1'.075, dated la.12.2015, thrs Writ I)etition is disposed of per:mitting the petitioners to fiic zrn online application seeking electricity service connection to the pctitioners' subject property i.e. bearing plot No-420 Part, in S1'.Nos. 11/19, 1ll20 and 11/21, ,admeasuring 25O Sq.yards, siluated at Khanarnet Village, Serilingampally Marrdal under (]HMC, Ranga Reddy District, Tel:urgana State, within a period of onc (1) rveek from the date of rece,F,t of thc copy of this order. Upon reccipt of such an application, respondent Nos.2 to 6 arr: directed Lo consider the said application of the petitioners frrr release of the electricity polver s,tLpply to the petitioners' sullect propcrty within a period of tvrt> (2) weeks thereafter. IL is however observed tha[ if respondtnt Nos.2 to 6 pass orders olr petitioners' application granting :clease of the electricity pou,<'r supply Lo the petitioners' subject property, the same shall bc snbject to further direction that ma]' be issued by the State ol'lelerngar-ra or the Hon'ble Apex Court i:-r the litigation 3 PK,J 127 _2025 2 pending before it arising out of the order dated 12.Og.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.20407 of 20OB and batch. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. To, sD/- P.cH. //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER ecretariat, partment S ' IffiJ,;B:f€f? Z1i"o,Power and Enersy De '.311?#f, ?:;'H;$zxi'l?g,Ell.,l?,1;J,fl T",ffi :5*,:,",,1H:i,?sH,?!"0, 3. The Superintendino En, . 4' The Divisionar Engineer, operation KondapurTG s p D c L 5 The Asst. Divisionar Engineer, operation Kondapur T G s p D c L. 6. The Assistant Engineer, SEiOp/GHyD East AE Op AIIapur TGSpDCL. 7. Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally compirv r-im"ii;i,v,;;9il%1,,}f; [TS[i,L'i:". lff[?:]#*"r Distrib ution B.

9. 10

11. srNGH Advocate topUCl One CC to Smt. THAKUR one cc to sRr N. ,^uaor*oo'o t:i"ii"r":B:?;Ii?!y,.si[f fl ?.33.i33t3R%,,:h",:;ffi ,_,,, Two CCs to Gp FOR ENERGY,High Court for the Stal Two cD copies rrvrr \-vurr lor Ine state of relangana. [oUTJ -- ' 'r

12. KKS -f I I CCTODAY ';,tt i!lE S14 14: ,> 'i 2 5 APn 2U5 /,1 /:ita l) HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 ORDER WP.No.12127 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITTON WITHOUT COSTS \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments