One CC to SRI v. RAMESH REDDY

Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High cdurt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction mor. in the natuie of [a1damus, declaring the impugned orders in Rc. No. E5/3057/20.t6, dated 20.3.2016 of the 2nd respondent confirming the orders of the 3rd respondent dated 16.5.2016 in Ro.No. NB11Bt2o1z whereby the 3rd respondent has directed - I 7 for cancellation of the pattedar and Title Deed pass books issued in favour of the petitioners to an extent of Ac. 11-27 gts. in Sy.No.36B and an extent of Ac. 12- 30gts. in Sy.no.369 of Madipally village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District, as being illegal, arbitrary, without any authority of law and is in violation of mandatory stipulations of A.P.Rights in Land and Pattedar Pass Books Act as well established judicial precedents, and consequently set aside the same l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016 P. NO: 4738 OF 2016 Between: Smt. Kunduru Nirmala Devi, Wo Purushotam Reddy, aged about 72 years, Ryo. H.No. 1-2-343i8, Street no.6, Domalaguda, Hyderabad ...PENfl bNER/RESPONDENT NO.5 AND '1 . Byri Veera Swamy, S/o Ganesh Chander Aged about 52 years, resident of H.No.3-50, Unikecherla Village, Dharmasagai Mandal, Warahgal District. 2. Qyl M4jula, Wio Manohar Swamy Aged about 47 years, resident of H.No.1- 8-544, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda, Warangal Distiict.

3. 9yri Manohar Swamy, S/o Ganesh Chander Aged about 49 years, resident of H.No.1-8-544, Balasamudram, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.

4. Puli Anil Kumar, S/o Satyanarayana Aged about 40 years, resident of H.No.'1 5-3-1/3, Rangampet, Warangal, Waiangal District. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

5. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

6. The Joint Collector, Warangal District at Hanamkonda Warangal District. 7. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal Division at Warangal. B. The Tahsildar Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated.147-2016 in WP No.17476 of 2016 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 21482OF 20 16) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed - in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders in Rc. No. ES|30S7l201S, dated 20.3.2016 of the 2nd respondent confirming the orders of the 3rd respondent dated 16.5.2015 in Rc.No. A1811812012 whereby the 3rd respondent has directed for cancellation of the paftedar and ritle Deed pass books issued in favour of the petitioners to an extent of Ac. 11-27 gts. in Sy.No.368 and an extent of Ac. 12-30gts. in Sy.no.369 of Madipally village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District, pending the disposal of the above WP - -_----4-r--_:=_ LA. NO: 1OF 2$17(WPMP. NO :14137 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file the additional material papers i.e., Application under Section 5(A) of ROR Act along with its enclosures filed by the 1st petitioner in the writ petition before the Tahsildar and 13(b) 86 (c) Certificates and Application under Section 5(A) of ROR Act along with its enclosures filed by the 2nd petitioner in the writ petition before the Tahsildarand 13(b) 86 (c) Certificates, 1(B) Register showing the deleting the names of the petitioners in Writ Petition and incorporating the names of the petitioner herein as per the orders of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Pattadar Pass Books and Title Deeds issued in favour of the petitioner herein in respect of the lands in Sy.Nos.368 and 369 of Madipalli Village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District, copy of Pahanies shows the name of the petitioners in the writ petition under pattadar column and possessor columns and Memo issued by the Tahsildar, Hasanparthy Mandal dated 28.03.2013 Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. K N D SWAPNA MADHURI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: SRI V. RAMESH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.6: M/s. BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES The Court made the following: ORDER I 7 I To, THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.L7476 of 2016 ORDER: This petition is coming for hearing since 2016. On

18.12.2024, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, and therefore the matter u,as directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.

2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this petition, shall stand closed. SD/.A.V,S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRl. K N D SWAPNA MADHURI Advocate IOPUCI 2. One CC to SRI V. RAMESH REDDY Advocate [OPUC] ;: o;; cc io nv.. BHARADWAJ ASSoCIATES Advocate IOPUCI 4'TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,H|ghCourtfortheStateofTelangana.

5. Two CD CoPies KKS BS a I I t e. 1HE ST47€ r.) 14,: Ail M :ti !, .'i },,I '.. .,, v ..:,' +).-) L) \r'^ \ HIGH COURT DATED:0810112025 ORDER WP.No.17476 ot 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSEGUTION WITHOUT COSTS q $- 4,, \ )5 @otr\"{