The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Sri C.Buchi Reddy Counsel for the Respondents : None appeared The Court made the following : JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUBT YARA M.A.C.M.A.No.82L OF 2023 JUDGMENT: On 08.03.2025, the m:rttcr \\'as scttlc'd rr [ort thc Lok Adalzlt and an As arrl ri as passed bv tl're Lok Adzrl:rr . II-t vicu. o[ Lhe same , thc M.A.C M-A. is clisposed of, in tcrrns of tlr, Ar.r rrrd c.lltlccl

08.03.2025, pitsscd bl thc Lok Acl:rlttt. Thc Rcqisirr ts rliret'teci tcr anncx il copl' of lhe Au ard <iatcd O8.03.2025 to tlrrs - trtlgrnent N'[iscellancous Pe litior.ts, if irn-r, pe nrlit-tg in Lirr :tppcal sltitll starrd closccl. 'lhr're sh;rll bc nr> ordcr ils lo costs SD/- MOHD ISMAIL, t} :PUTY REGISTRAR. ,\t //TRUE COPY//

1. The Chairman, MACT Cum lll Additional District Judge I hammam 2. One CC to Sri C Buchi Reddy, Advccate [OPUC] 3 Two CD Copies SECTION OFFICER V To, l$ (Along uith a copr ol'auard dared 08-03-202_5 passed b1. Lok AclalaL k HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 ,/ !'; i *\- -;t 4 7W I i rcr i: JUDGMENT MACMA.No.821 of 2023 DISPOSING OF THE MACMA i? |1I q( 'l ,':.: f BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] Date: 08-03-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Sri Justice Anil Kumar Jukanti, (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Sri 5.Arun Kumar, Advocate, l'{ember M.A.C.M.A.NO .871 of 2A23 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST MVOP No.438 of 2019 (On the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat-Cum-l Addt. District Judge at Khammam) Between: - Shri Ram General lnsurance Co. Ltd., Represented by its tegal Manager, O/o.E-8, EPIP, RllCO, Sitarapura, Jaipur Rajastan Srate, Pincode-302022. AND ...Appellant/Respondent No. 2

1. Batde @ Batdie Govindamma, W/o. Nagaiah, Age: 49 years, Occ: Present nit, R/o.H.No.3-1-49l1, Gokenipatti Vittage of Mudigonda Manda[, Khammam District. .... Petitioner/Respondent

2. Sk.Chand Pasha, S/o.Yakub, Age: Major, Occ: Owner of the Mahindra Max bearing No.AP.20.TA.8774, R/o.H.No.5-135, Janampet Mandal of Pinakapaka Mandat, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...Respondent/Respondent No. 1 Counse[ for Appettant / lnsurance Company : Sri C.Buchi Reddy, Advocate Counse[ for Respondent/ Petitioner/Claimant : Sri M.Appa Rao, Advocate Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammad Babu, Manager This appeat having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: AWARD ) Rs.1,39,480/- (Rupees One lakh thirty-nine thousand four hundred and eighty onty) with proportionate costs and subsequent interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of fiting of original petition titl the date of deposit of the amount. Compensation Awarded bv the Tribunal ra--:-ll' ;).::-.. - -. : ..,''... ,_;iili i1', i:, !-l ,i. . ,\- I I -I the Insurt tce Compan @Lt r, tnstrrancEcoipunv ucgri"u". by the order passed in Op No.43g rr. 2019 by the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat-Cum-lll Addt. District Judqe at Khammam. The Manager of Y and the Petitioner/ Responden t atong with hl ounsel have appeared before the Lok Adatat. During the pendencv c 'this Appeat, both the parties reported compromise and entered in t a setttement and in view of the same, the lnsurance Company/l rpetlant has agreed to pay additional sum of Rs,69,000/-. (Rup : rs Sixty-nine thousand onty) aPart from the amount alr€ .ly deposited and the Peti tioner/ Respondent/C Ia imant has i greed to receive the same towards futI and finaI setttement of l_i ctaim. lt is submitted that an amount of Rs.61 ,347 / - is atready r epostted. The rest of the conditions awarded by the Tribunat intact. Accordingty, the compromi se is recorded and the case is settled before the Lok ar ) Ada(at ln view of the above setttement, the AI lettan t/ lnsurance Company shalI deposit the above said date of receipt of copy of ^il,::"ili' lH:,:? ;:T::Tli:: was deposited, if any. ln the event or Jefautt or detay in making such deposit, the Respondent/petitione. s entitted to claim interest as awarded by the tower tribunat. ompensation Awarded l C (Settlement Reached) in the Lok Adatat. t..+ 't,l i Lo; rl CCUili \ r ADALr'rlr , \\, apportio-nm-ent or Compensation, if any Addition al Direction (s):

1. The Appeltant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid i this appeal. 2. The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Comparl , if any,shatt be 3' Soon after deposit by the rnsurance company, the Respr rden t / petitioner/ given credit to. Claimant is permitted to withdraw the entire amount. rn token of consent for the above setttement and award, *( parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. rn terms of the compromise arrived at between the partie; this case stands disposed of. ''--q" ' N^Acr\\ tr zLt i) t\vo F +32 lt1 i'il) Appellant (s) Respondent (s) ForS-,'' cfuatt$qnce :f Co. Ltd Authorised Signatcry HMo,, ffi Counsel for the APPeltant (s) Counsel for the Res tr ffifta pondent (s) 6\7 HAIRIAAN C Mr[^BER \ o il; I ,: ;'.tit,U.T ,, ,l ..!. (Seat of th e mml ttee )