Tagoor Kalavathi, Wo. Late. T v. 1. The C and M.D. (SCCL)

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased ro direct the respondents No. 1 to 3 not to disburse the compensation amount in favour of 6th Respondent forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between:

1. The C and M.D (SCCL), Singareni Collieries Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Near Lakdi Ka Hyderabad, Telangana state. Company Pul Bridge, Limited, 0/o. Khairtabad, 2 The General Manaqer (SCCL). Sinoareni Godavarikhani Area,- Godavarikhani t-own, State. Collieries Peddapalli Company Limited, District, Telangana 3- The General Manager (Personal), Singareni collieries companv Limited Kothagudem town and Mandal, Badradri-Kothagudem Distrct.i.'G ' - ---' ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS AND

1. Tagoor Kalavathi, Wo. Late. Tagoor pool Singh, Aqe 65 vears. Occ 'NagJr, -GotiavaiiXnani, Housewife, R/o H No.-1.7-6-62l1, -Sanjay Ramagundam, Peddapalli District, T.G ' ' Gandh"i ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Z Inq .District Coilector, peddap^alti District, ;t peddapalli Town and Mandal, Peddapalli District. Telangana'State

3. The Revenue Divisional officer, peddapalli Revenue Division, at peddapalli town, Peddapalli Mandal, peddapalli District, T.G.

4. Tagoor .Sa1iu alias Sa1ja1a,_ Wo. Late Tagoor Sunil. age 35 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o H No.17-6-62ll _sanjay-Gancr. t'lagir, Godiriiit f,ar, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District, T.G ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court rnay be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 221041202s passed in l.A No 'l of 2025 in wp 11933 ot 2025. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Taqoor Saniu alias Sanjana, Wo. Late Tagoor Sr4.!, gOe 9.1 ye3rsr Occ' House -Nagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam, w,i",-nlo ir.r.6i7-a-aill, Sanjay Gancr. Peddapalli District, T.G ...PETITIONER/R6 AND

1. The C and M.D Bhavan, , Telangana state. Singareni Hyderabad (SCCL). Sinqareni Collieries Company hed Hills, Near Lakdi Ka Pul Bridge, Limited, 0/o. Khairtabad,

2. The General Manager (SCCL), Singareni-Collieries -C.ompany Godavaritnanl Aiea," CoOavari(hani t-own, Peddapalli District, T State. Limited, elangana

3. The General Manaqer (Personal), Singareni Collieries ColO3nV Limited' Kothagudem town aiO tvtinOal, Baiiradrikothagudem Distrct, T.G

4. The District Collector, Peddapalli District, at Peddapalli Town and Mandal' Peddapalli District, Telangana State

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli town, Peddapalti Mandal, Peddapalli District, Revenue Division, at Peddapalli T.G.

6. Tagoor Kalavathi, W/o !qtq.-.Tagoor. Pool Sing.h,.,A99- 65 - 'H.No.17-6-62t1, -Sanjay Gandh-i Nagar, Godavarikhani, -years'...O"q' Ho"usewlfe, n7o. Ramagundam, Peddapalli District, T.G ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in pleased to the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High Court may Vacate the lnterim OrO'ers granted by this Honble Court on 2210412025, in l.A.No. 1 0f 2025 in w.p.No.t1egs of 2.025, and direct the official Respondents herein to pay 1t4th share ( out of Rs.30,00,000=00, Rupees Ttrirty Lakhs) to the petitioner (i.e., mother of laie Sri Tagoor Sunil/ husband of the Respondent No'6') and 3t4 th share to the Respondent No.6 and her children. -b^e COUNSEI fOr thE PEtitiONET : DT CHALLA SRINTVASA REDDY Counset for the Respondents No.1to3 : SRI C.RAMAN KUMAR REDDY Gounser ror the Responde"o *l1o&?ti[??3ttJ!$f$.}l*L,E*s counsel for the Respondents No.6 : SRI GURRAM SRINIVAS The Court made the following: ORDER co LrD) i t i I .) ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No. 1 1933 of 20.25 This Writ Petition is filed by the mother of the deceased employee of the respondent Company, seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.l to 3, in.ot paying the 1/4th sha-re of compensation Amount, as illegal, arbitrarv, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice, and consequently, to direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 to pay the 1/4tn share of compensation Amount to the petitioner herein.

2. Heard Dr- Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Sri C. Raman Kumar Reddy, learned Additional Standing counsel for Singareni collieries company Limited, on behalf of respondent Nos.l to 3; and Sri Gurram Srinivas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.6.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner's son was working as a scavenger with the respondent company, he had passed away on 26.05.2022 in harness, and thus, the respondent company assured the payment of Rs.30,00 ,ooo /_ to the petitioner, her daughter-in-law and grand children (wife and children of the deceased) in equal shares. Horvever, respondent Nos.1 to 3, while I / \ 2 prepared to pay the compensation amount to the petitioner's daughter- in-law (respondent No.6), they are ignoring the petitioner herein, which is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice. Therefore, learned counsel seeks indulgence of this court to direct respond.ent Nos.1 to 3 to pay the I /+n share of Compensation Amount to the petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3, submits that the respondent company had proposed the payment of compensation Amount of Rs.3o,0o,o0o/- to the family members of the deceased Safai Karmachari, and only his wife, i.e., respondent No.6 herein, was orally informed to submit a copy of her bank passbook for taking further necessary action, which has not been submitted so far. As such, the payment of said compensation amount is pending. However, there is no liability or promise on behalf of the respond.ent Company with regard to the payment of Corhpensation Amount to the petitioner herein. As such, it is prayed to dismiss the present writ petition.

5. Learned counsel for respondent No.6 filed counter affrdavit stating that the matter is discussed outside the Court and respondent No.6 has no objection with regard to payment of I /+tt share of the Compensation t: 3 Amount of Rs.30,0O,0OO/- to the petitioner. paragraph No.g of the counter aJfidavit reads as under: "It is submitted tlwt, tuithout going tnto the merits and" ci.emerits of the case, uithaut going into rules and regulations and eligibility criteria of the petitioner and respondent No.6, and uithout going into ang other i.ssues, and due to dire need of moneg, and to set e tLrc i.ssue amicable, the respondent No.6, decided to settle the issue in a peaceful ,rtanner and uoluntarilg agreed to giue r/a sltare (one slnre, out of 4 sllores) to the petitioner i.e., mother-in-law of tlrc respondent No.6 (moth.er of the deceased emplogee late Sri Tagoor Sunit/ Late husband of the respondent No.6). Hence this Counter AJ.ficlauit."

6. Having regard to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the respective parties and in view of the specihc no-objection expressed by respondent No.6 herein, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to pay the I /4rh share of compensation Amount of Rs.3O,O0,0O0/ - to the petitioner, as also the remainin C a /4h share to respondent No.6 herein, as expeditiouslv as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs. //TRUE COPY// SDIP. PONNA KRISHNA ISTRAR ASSISTANT SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The C and MD. (SCCL), Singareni Collieries Comparry Limited,0/o. Singareni Bhavan, iRed Hills, Near Lakdi Ka Pul Bridge, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, Telangana state.

2. The General Manager (SCCL), Singareni Collieries Limited, Godavarikhani Area,- Godavarikhani t-own, Peddapalli District, Telangana State. -Company- 'b1:,,3,:TEnv Limited' 3 rhe Gen",.?,^j*Xn;fl5'^rffr,;igX5,,?',lt^T,"#nfo"J',f Kothagudem tt istrict' at Pedd aparri rown a nd M a nd ar' t *l"D ;::.?f1iibgfl i"F,:f:i,ff3l: t.;;: Feddapalli Mandal' Pedde 4 5. rhe Revenue Divisional officg;!,it3frilli, T:i:nue v' 6. One CC to Dr'CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY' Advocate' IOPUCI t T,oneCCtoSRl-C.B$![|NKUMARREDDY,SC{orSingareniCollieries REVENUE' Hish court for the state of relansana at 6ij*pi.v Limiteo [oPuc] Division' at Peddapalli Ir;3":f:otlff$rloR

8. 9. One CC to SRI GURRAIVI SRINIVAS' Advocate' IOPUC] 10.Two CD CoPies \ BSK BSw HIGH COURT \ DATED;2811012025 I \ I f ( ORDER WP.No.11933 of 2025 o tl t{CI'l M * t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS p di'A k."