High Court · 2025

2. Suruguri Srikanth Reddy, S/o S Narsimha Reddy, Aged about 39 Years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No. 1-14l1, Quthullapur Village, Abdullapurment Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Depa(ment Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 3 4 5 6 The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Gachibowli, Ranga Reddy District The Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. K. Laxminarayana, Sub lnspector of Police Hayathnagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. Peninty Srinivas Reddy, S/o P Lachireddy, Aged about 46 Years, Occ. Real Estate Business, Rio Ganesh Nagar, Kuntloor Village, Abdullapurment Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Bangaru Madhan, S/o Laxamaiah, Aged about Major, Occ. Real Estate Business, Rl/oGanesh Nagar, Kuntloor Village, Abdullapurment Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.4 herein in the capacity of 3rd respondent Police in interfering into the civil disputes with peaceful possession of petitioners property in respect of Plot No.462 North part admeasuring 1 50 Sq.Yards, and Plot No. 462 South Part admeasuring 150 Sq. Yards, in Sy No. 376,400,401,402, 405,406, Situated at Pasumamla Village, Now Abdullapurment Mandal Ranga Reddy District-, with the influence of the respondent No. 5 and 6 herein without considering the pendency of the suit in O.S.No. 737 of 2024 On the file of Junior Civil Judge Cum XIV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Hayathrragar, and respondent police calling to the petitioners -to their police station is highly illegal, arbitrary and against the principal of Natural Justice and also violative of Article 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently dire the respondent police not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondent No. 5 and 6 herein lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police particularly 3rd respondent police herein not to interfere into the civil disputes particularly pendency of the civil suit in O.S.No. 737 ol 2024 On the file of Junior Civil Judge Cum XIV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Hayathnagar, and not to call the petitioners to his police station in connection with the petitioners property, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. GAJANAND CHAKRAVARTHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for th€ Respondent Nos.5&6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER I I I i t i I I i I I i Ii I ; t i t 3 THE HON'BLE SRJ WSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1192 8 of2o25 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for offrcial respondent Nos. I to 3, and with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner ol clisposal of the Writ Petition and the nature of lis involvcd, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondeut Nos 4 to 6 is not necessary for adjudication of the prescnt Writ Petition'

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the 3*r respondent is involving in civil disputes at the behcst ol lhc unofficial respondents and in interfering with Lhe pcar:cfr-tl possession of the petitioners over plot No.462 North Part admeasuring 150 sq. yards and Plot No.462 South Part admeasuring 15O sq' yards in survey Nos.376, 4OO, 40 | ' 4O2,405, 406 situated ; I I I I tr-.'' 2 .ri at Pasumamla Vilrage, Now Abdullapurm et Mandar, Ranga Reddy District, which is subject matter cf a civil suit uide O.S.No.737 / 2024 before the competent Civil Court, wherein an injunction has been granted in favour of the petitioners, which action of the 3.d respondent it is contended as illegal, arbitrary and without sanction of law. 4. Per s6ng7a, learned Government plr:ader for Home appearing for respondents_authorities would submit that one Thammineni Shiva Reddy had approached the respondents_authorities and lodged a the petitioners on 01.04.2025; that the respondents recerving the aforesaid complaint, have ma,le a GD entrv, and for the purpose of causing preliminary enqulry to verify as to the correctness of the contents of the said complaint have called the petitioners to the police station; and that the petitioners did not respond to the ca, madc br the rr:spondent s-authorities. cornplaint against

5. Learned Government pleader further submits that since, a complaint has been lodged against t,_re petitioners on O1.O4.2025, the authorities are only seekirrg to conduct I j 3 enquiry into tlee aforesaid complaint and are not involving themselves in civil disputes, as claimed by the petitioners'

6. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home is taken on record.

7. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and since, it is now stated to this Court of a complaint having been lodged against the petitioners on O1'04'2025, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed to take action in furtherance of the aforesaid complaint, strictly in accordance rvith lau''

8. Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. g. Consequenfly, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. /,TRUE COPY// SD/.N. SRIHARI D PUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat' Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate' Gachibowli' Ranga ReddY District

3. The station House fficer, Hayathnagar Police station' Ranga Reddy District 4. One CC to SRl. GAJANAND CHAKRAVARTHI Advocate [OPUCI 5. Two CCs to GP FoR HoME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [oUT] 6 KKS LS Two CD Copies q.0, HIGH COURT DATED:2310412025 'i ,, c_ _ /.{ ,_-\. 'c ( 1{.) t) 2 5 ,tutl 2p5 1ir c,. * )pjr:4r6.qID t ORDER WP.No.11928 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS RS- v\ L5