The High Court · 2025

...Respondent No.1/Petitioner/Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 6 V. Vishnuvardhan Reddy,S/o. Gopal Reddy, Aged about.45 years, Occ: Business, R:/o. Manikonda Village, Ranga Reddy District. Mr. C. Rajender,s/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business M. Mohan Goud,S/o Late Yadaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business M. Manohar Goud,S/o Late Yadaiah Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business Mr. Sangam Madhusudhan Rao, S/o. Arjun Rao, Aged about 45 yeais Occ: Business,

7. Mr. Sangam Harish Kumar,S/o Arjun Rao, Aged about 45 years Occ:Business,

8. R. Pramada, Wo R.Janardhan Rao, Aged about 45 years, Occ :Business 9. Smt. N. Radha, Wo B.Venkateswarlu, Aged about 45 years, Occ :Business 10. R. Janardhan Reddy,S/o Not Known, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business 11. S. Dasarath, S/o S.Balaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business 12. S.P. Satish, S/o. S.P. Sattaiah, Aged about 45 years,Occ: Business 13. Yalala Sukkammaa, Wo. late Yalala Ramulu' Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business ...,..5-V /

14.Yalala Jangaiah,S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business

15. Yalala Pochaiah,S/o Achaiah,Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business

16.Yala Pentaiah, S/o Mallaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business

17.Yalala Narsimha,S/o Balaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business '1 8. Yalala Kamalamma,Wo Pentaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business l9.Gangoli Narsamma,Wo Soudaiah, Aged about45 years, Occ: Business

20. Gangoli Narsimha,S/o Achaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business 21 . Gangoli Sayamma, Wo Pentaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business

22. Kummari Pentaiah,S/o. Malaiah, (The Respondents Nos. 2to22 lDefendant No. 1to21 ,areall residents of Manikonda Jagir Village, Rajendra Nagar Mdl, R. R District ) 23 Mr. Dagada Kumar Rajareddy, S/o. Gurreddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No 291179, SBI Colony, Nandyal , Kurriool District.

24. Vijaya Shekhar Reddy, S/o. A. Konda Reddy. Aged about 45 years, 9cc: Business, Flat Nb.601, Suha Appts, H6nuriana Nagar, Rajendra Nagar Mandal. (The Respondent No.2 to 24lRespondents 2 to 231 Defendants No. 1 to 23 are not necessary parties to this CMA). ...RESPONDENTS Nos:2 to 24IRESPONDENTS Nos.2 to23/ DEFENDANTS Nos.1 to 23 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(CMAMP. N O: 1255 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 of C.p.C,, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of impugned order passed in LA. No. 1 2 of 2016, dated.05 01 .2016 and consequential orders passed in LA.No.2Bg of 2016, dated.01 .04.2016, extending the orders in O.S.No.3.10 of 2009, on the file of the Xl Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2016(CMAMP. NO: 2037 OF 2016 ) Between: MOHD ISMAIL, S/o. Md. Yaseen, Aged about 60 yrs, Occ: Employee, R/o. H. No 12-2-41 8 I 3 137, Viswasnagar, Mehdipatnam, Hydera6ad'. ...PETITIONERyRESpONDENT No.1 ]lwr . .-.,/ AND

1. Sateesh Kumar Chinta, S/o Late Pothuraju Chinta, R/o H.No- 5-7- 'l /gs,Hariharapuram Colony, Vanasthalipuram,Hyderabad.

2. V. Vishnuvardhan Reddy,S/o. Gopal Reddy, Aged about 45.years, Occ: Business, R/o. lvlanikonda Village, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Mr. C. Raiender,s/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Business R/o Mani(onda jagir Village,Rajendranagar Mandal' Ranga Reddy district

4. M. Mohan Goud,S/o Late Yadaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Business R/o H. No.1-56,Rayadurg Darga, Rajendranagar Mandal,Ranga Reddy dt.

5. M. Manohar Goud,S/o Late Yadaiah Aged about 45 years, . H.No. 6-21 /2i,Sainagar Colony,Darga, Hyderabad

6. Mr. Sangam lvladhusudhan Rao, S/o. Arjun Rao, Aged about 42 years H.No. 8-1-283/A/l l,Dwarakanagar,Hyderbad.

7. Mr. Sangam Harish Kumar,S/o Arjun Rao,H.No. B'1-2931N11' Dwarakanagar, Hyderbad.

8. R. Pramada, Wo R.Janardhan Rao, Aged about 46 years, 1 -9-1 g2,Dwarakapuram. Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

9. Smt. N. Radha, Wo B.Venkateswarlu, Aged about 50 years, FIat No.102, Garden View Residency, Madhuranagar,Hyderbad-38

10. R. Janardhan Reddy,S/o Not Known Aged about 35 years, 1 -9-1 g2,Dwarakapuram.Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

11. S. Dasarath, S/o S.Balaiah, Aged about 38 years,H.No.6-1-766,Vigneswara Heavens, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

12. S.P Satish, S/o. S.P Sattaiah, Aged about 39 years, H.No.6-1 -766,Vigneswara Heavens,Khairatabad, Hyderabad.

13.Yalala Sukkammaa, Wo. late Yalala Ramulu, Aged about 40 years, H.No.2-74,R/o Manikonda Jagir Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-

14.Yalala Jangaiah,S/o Rajaiah, Aged about 38 years, R/o Manikonda Jagirvillage, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

15. Yalala Pochaiah,S/o Achaiah, R/o Manikonda Jagir village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. '16. Yala Pentaiah, S/o Mallaiah, R/o Manikonda Jagir Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

17.Yalala Narsimha,S/o Balaiah, R/o Manikonda Jagir Village, Ra.iendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. *i=:.r.,i

18. Yalala Kamalamma,Wo Pentaiah, R/o Manikonda Jagir Vi age, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 1 9. Gangoli Narsamma,Wo Soudaiah, R/o Manikonda Jagir Viflage, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

20. Gangoli Narsimha,S/o Achaiah, Aged about 44 years, R/o Manjkonda Jagir Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 2'1. Gangoli Sayamma, Wo Pentaiah, Aged about 43 years, R/o t\4anikonda Jagir Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict. 22- Kummari Pentaiah,S/o.Malaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o Manrkonda Jagir Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandat, Ranga Reddy District

23. Mr. Dagada Kumar Rajareddy,, S/o. Gurreddy, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No 291179, SBI Colony, Nandyal , Kurnool Distriit.

24.Vijaya Shekhar Reddy,S/o. A. Konda Reddy, Occ: Business, FIat No.60j, Suha Appts, Hanumana Nagar, Rajendra Nagar Mandal. (Respondent Nos. 2 to 24 are nol necessary parties) RESPONOENTS/RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 24 Petition under Section 151 of C.P_C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the order passed in CMAIViP.No.l2SS of 2016, in CMA No.610 of 2016dated.22.09 2016. Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. P RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI WASIM AHMED KHAN The Court made the following : JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI CI.L MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.61O of 2016 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for appellant brings on record, the letter dated 07.01.2025, addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hl,derabad, seeking permission of the Court for withdrawal of the Civil Miscellaleous Appeai, as the main suit itself rvas dismissed on 11.O9.2024.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscelianeous applications pending, if any, sha1l stand lt'*o: - ,/TRUE COPY// SD'- A.V.S.S.C'S.M. S-ARMA JOINT REGISTRAR SEc6{-6iFICER To,

1. The Court of the Xl Additional District Judge' Ranga Reddy District' ' t-.e.Nagar, HYderabad'

2. One CC to SRI P RAVI SHANKER' Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI WASIM AHMED KHAN' Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CD CoPies f pcsd/gh HIGH COURT DATED:2910412025 JUDGMENT CMA.No.610 of 2016 :: 'I. a, 'i -rt',r/' /).' 10 sEP zffi

1.. .sPn Lf, --:_-:r;" DISMISSING THE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN b 4 ,/" r A-,/