The High Court · 2025

2. Smt. Anita Ajay Oguru, S/o Ajay Kumar Oguru, Aged about 32 years, Occ. House Wife, Ryo H No 7-1-13, near Nalla Pochamma Temple, Ferozguda, Bala Nagar, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Telangana Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Charge Sheet/PRC in PRC No.1212025 in Crime No 83312024 (PS Bala Naga| on the file of Learned Xlll Metropolitan Magistrate at Kukatpally, Cyberabadin terms of compromise dated 08.03,2025. ...RespondenUComplainant l.A. NO: I oF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Charge Sheet/PRC in PRC No 1212025 in Crime No 83312024 (PS Bala Nagar) on the file of Learned Xlll Metropolitan Magistrate at Kukatpally, Cyberabadin pending the disposal of main petition. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 BETWEEN: Smt. Anita Ajay Oguru, S/o Ajay Kumar Oguru, Aged about 32 years, Occ. House Wife, Rio H No 7-1-13, near Nalla Pochamma Temple, Ferozguda, Bala Nagar, Medchal Malkaigiri District, Telangana Petitioner/R2/Complainant in LA.Nos.2 & 3 OF 2025 AND

1. Romperla Ravi Kumar. S/o Kondaiah, Aged about 33 years. Occ. Government Batanagar. Medchat Service, Ryo HNo T_1_13. A;ih#;rilil; Malkajgiri Telangana 'Ferozguda. ...RespondenUpetitioner/Accused in l.A.Nos.2 & 3 OF 2025 2. The State of Telanoana, through the public prosecutor, High Court of Telangana At -Hldeiria;i"" Hyderabad (pS Baia Nis", ...RespondenURl in t.A.Nos.2 & 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section,3sg. (6) of BN1S praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar p"iii"'". ilL'nigh court may be preased to permit the petitioneriR-2 to compound the offences ajarnst tne petitioner/Accused and quash the charge Sheet/pRc_ in pRC Na tiiziisli-c.rru No. 833t2024 [pS Bara Nagarl for the offences uts 15,77,78,.4s r rzl eNi a;inst the petitioner/Accused in the interest of justice. I.A. NO: 30F 2025 Petition under section,35912) gf.aNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of iriminar p"iiiiln, in"'irigh court may be preasect to record the compromise and quash,the ch"rg;6;";;;;c in pRC No 12t2o2sin crime No 833t2024 (ps Bata *r"?]l t:r.J1. "r";;; u/s ;'s', n,78,351[2] BNS asainst the petitioner/Accused in the iriterest otlustic". This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri rmmaneni Rama Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao veeramara, Additionar pubric Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri K.vasudeva Raiu, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. -"- " - '" The Court made the following: COMMON OROER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos. 2 AND 3 0F 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL PETI TION No.5452 0F 2025 COMMON ORDER This criminar petition is fired under Section 52g of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (tor short ,BNSS, 2023,) seeking quashment of the proceedings in p.R.C. No. 12 ot 2O2S (arising out of crime No'833 of 2024 of Baranagar porice station, Medchar) on the fire of the learned Xlll Metropolitan Magistrate at Kukatpally, Cyberabad. 2 The petitioner is sore accused in the preriminary Registration case (F .R.c.) registered for the offences punishabre under section s r5, 77, rg, 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ,2023 (for short ,BNS, 2023,).

3. Heard Mr. Rama Rao lmmaneni, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramaila, rearned Additionar pubric prosecutor, representing respondent No.1-State and Mr. K.Vasudeva Raju, learned counsel for respondent No.2l de_facto complainant.

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingry, respondent No.2rde-facto comprainant fired r.A.Nos. 2 and 3 0f 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise and by recording the setflement to quash the proceedings against-the petitioner/accused in p.R.C. No. 12of 2025. _ 2 --I \l . NTRJ- I. ,l.Not. 2 and ) of 2025 in/ und Cr/.P.No. 5452 of 2(t25

5. This Court vide otdet dated 21 .04.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 28.04.2025 stating that the parties were identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries revealed that the parties have willfully and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise.

6. I have considered .the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace among them, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and anotherl and Anil Mishra v. State of lJ.P.zi State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others3, this Court is of the considered view that quashment of the impugned proceedings in view of the settlement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.1528 of BNSS, 2023, would be in the interest of justice. -l | 2012 (1O) SCC 303 2 202+ lt'tsc tag 3 zors 1s; scc oea 3 NTR,rr I.,4.Not. 2 and ) of 2025 in/ and CrlP.No. 5452 of 2025

8. Accordingly, l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequenfly, all proceedings in P.R.C. No. 12 of 2025 (arising outof Crime No.833 of 2024 of Balanagar Police Station, Medchal) on the file of the learned Xlll Mletropolitan Magistrate at Kukatpally, Cyberabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioner/accused.

9. ln the above terms, the Criminal Petition is disposed of Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUTY RE GISTRAR SECTION OFFICER l The xlll Additionar MetroDoritan magistrate prashanth Nagar, Kukatpa y, cyberabd 2. The Sration House officer, aarang;i F;ilie siiiioi,'c'vdlr"oro. 3. Two CCs to rhe public prosecutoi High C;u,il;;ihe-5iate ot retangana at 1 9n" 99 to Sri lmhaneni Rama Rao, Advocate fOpUCl 5. One CC to Sri K.Vasudeva Raju AOvoCite tOpi_tl--' 6. Two CD Copies Hvderabad IOUTI NVB/PSL Nk HIGH COURT DATED:0910612025 I i i-ii: 5 /,4 t\ 11 JUL [6 7 (;) * rsPArcH COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 And 3 OF 2025 !n/And CRLP.No.5452 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRLP AND ALLOWING THE lA.Nos.2&3OF2025 (+- IT v z! MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (Under Section 359 (6) of B.N.S.S) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE SrArC OiiiINTEENA AT HYDERABAD l.A.No. I Crl.P.No. IN of 2025 of 2025 BETWEEN: Smt. Aaita Ajay Oguru, S/o Ajay Kumar Oguru, Aged about 32 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o H No 7-1-13, near Nalla pochamma Temple, Ferozguda, Bala Nagar, Medchal Malkaj giri District, Telan gana Petitioner/ ...Responden No. 2 AND

1. Romperla Ravi Kumar, S/o Kondaiah, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Government Service, R/o H No 7_1_13, Anthammaguda, BaIa Nagar, Medchal Mafk;jgiri _Ferozguda, Telangana 2 The State of Teiangana through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangarra At Hyderabad (pS Bala Nagar, Hyderabad) ..Responden/ petitioner ...Respondent/ Respondent No, 1 J@ It is submitted that the petitioner/defacato complainalt have amicably settled the dispute dt the intervention of elders, friends arrd weil wishers a,d the matter has been compromised between them. Hence the both I parties came to compromise and the parties of have no claim or rights agarnst each other in the future. \ Sigrrature of accused Signature-tcomptrinant Counsel for the Accused Counsel for the Complainant