Mahesh Babu v. The State of AP, through P.S. Intezargunj, Warangal
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
The State of AP, through P.S. Intezargunj, Warangal, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P. Hyd. Respondent/complainant in do COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: S. Niranjan Reddy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Public Prosecutor Petition Under Sections 438 of Cr.P.C. praying The High Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners and direct the respondent to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in crime No. 219 of 2004 on the file of the P.S. Intezargunj, Warangal. The Court made the following:
O R D E R:
“Post it on Monday i.e. 13/09/04”. “In the meanwhile, the petitioners shall not be arrested”. // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To KNK
The SHO, P.S. Intezargunj, Warangal.
Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyd., (OUT)
One CC to S. Niranjan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
One Spare Copy. HIGH COURT DATE: 10-9-2004 ORDER CRL.P.No. 4223 of 2004 D I R E C T I O N DRAFTED BY: KNK DRAFTED ON : 10-9-2004 HIGH COURT T.C.S.R.J Dated: 10-9-2004 ORDER CRL.P.No. 4223 of 2004 D I R E C T I O N
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 31 Dec 2004. The bench was T SURYA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.