High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the Petitioner and also interfering into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.7 and threatening to handover the house of the Petitioner through vide House No.'l -4, which is situated at Uyyalawada Village, Jajireddygudem Mandal, Suryapet District is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of constitution of rndia and arso vioration of principres of Niturat Justice and consequen.y direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into peaceful life and liberty and also not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioner apd Respondent No.7 and not threaten the petitioner to handover her house bearing No..,_4, which is situated at Uyyalawada Village, Jajireddygudem Mandal, Suryapet District to the Respondent No.7. IA NO:10 F 202s ' Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the writ petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into peacefur rife and riberty and also not to interfere into the civir disputes between the petitioner and Respondent No'7 and not threaten the petitioner to handover her house bearing No.1-4, which is situated at Uyyalawada Village, Jajireddygude* ,r"Or, suryapet District to the Respondent No.7 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 6: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for R1 :--------_ The Court made the following: ORDER l ,4e THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No. 11556 of 2O25 ORDE R: The grievance of the petitioner in thc present Writ petition -is to the action of the respondents-authorities, partrcularly the 6Lh respondent, in involving themselves in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 7ff respondent, and threatening to handover the house bearing No.1_4, siruated at Uyyalawada Village, Jajireddygudem Mandal, Suryapet District, thereby interfering u,ith the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner, which action bf the respondents-authorities it rs contended as being illegal and arbi Lrary.

2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Govcrnment pleader for Home appearing for the offrcial respondent Nos. 1 to 6, and with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the Writ pelition is taken up for hearing and disposal, at admission stage.

3. Having regard to the nature of lls involved in the Writ Petition and the manner of disposal, this court is of the view that nolice to unofficial respondent No.7 is not necessary [or adjudication of the present Writ petition 2 )^t

4. When the matter is taken uP for hearing, learned Government Pleader appearing for ofircial respondents submits that the 7th respondent had approached the respondents- authorities and lodged a complaint, dt.O3.04.2O25; and that the authorities, on receiving the aforesaid complaint, initially have made a GD entry, and thereafter on causing preliminary enquiry, closed the said complaint on 15.04.2025, noting the same as "civil in nature".

5. Learned Government Pleader further submits that except conducting enquiry into the aforesaid complaint lodged by the 7h respondent, the respondents-authorities have not threatened the petitioner to handovcr the aforementioned house property as claimed.

6. The aforesaid submissions made by the learned Government Pleader for Home is taken on record

7. Having regard to the submissions made as above and since, it is now stated before this Court that on a complaint, dt.03.04.2025, todged by the 7n respondent, the respondents- authorities, after causing preliminary enquiry, having closed the said complaint as "civil in nature" on 15.O4.2025, this Court is of the view that while the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition stands redressed, respondents-authorities are to / J,.... ,R 3 be directed not to interfere with the lifc and liberty of the petitioner, except in accordance with law

8. Subject Lo the above observations, the writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs 9 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.L. VIJAYA LAXMI- S STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buirding, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Tdlangana.

2. The Director General of police, Telangana, Hyderabad 3. The Superintendent of Police, Suryapet, Suryapet District 4. The Deputy superintendent of porice, Suryapet Division, Nargonda District. 5. The Circle lnspector of Police, Nagaram Circle, Suryapet District 6. The station House officer, Arvapally police station Jajireddygudem Mandal, Suryapet District.

7. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTJ

9. Two CD Copies BSR BS 6 ;4,it& 1 HIGH COURT DATED:1710412025 ,,F j ORDER WP.No.11556 of 2025 .1.-:"- -1 tre .-.->-.. 5tA/.: \ 5 c t) .o 2 B rPn 2['n a c s 9I: Stl ' r't\E .a t o DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS @40 %p