Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ?ryg/U 2 Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shalt stand closed. I To, /ttRUECOPY// sd/-MOHD. TSMAIL ./ REGISTRAR \l SEC"I'ION OFFICER I 2 4 lhe.f udicial Magistratc of l.-irsr Class…
Judgment
Peti(ioIr trtrtlcr- sc<:tio. 'tr82 of cr.P.c pr-ayirrg tlrat irr tlrc circrrr, stanccs st:rtc(l i. tllc Mcnro.a.<lur, or'(]rou,<rs o[ crir.inar pctili.., tlrc I{igrr c<>urt rrra' rrc ,lcasc<r to ca, for tlrc recor(ls in c c Nr>. 'r'g or 2()21 , o, rlrc lrc .r' trrc .[udiciar N{;rqisrrarc or- Fir.sr crass, Malraltullnagar, an<l qu; rsh tlrc sarnc. I-A NO: I oF 2022 Petitiorl urt<lcr scctro. '[82 ol-cr'P.c prayirrg tlrat rrr tlrc cir<.urrsta.ccs statc(r irr (r)e N4c,ror:rnrrunr o. Gr.urrrrs .r'cri, rinar pctition, tlrc IJig' cour-t ,ra,, rre preasca ro grarrt stal' ol all furtlre r proccc<rings, inclusive o' t'c a(tcrraa.cc or rrre a",,,,"..., ,lr'a.air" on tlle filc of thc.|uclicial Magistratc or First crass, Ma'arrubnagar, Distr.ict, Ibr 48 oI 202l the ollcnces grunishable t.l/s.49 _A, of.lpC, and Secs. 3 arrrl 4 ol. D.p. .\ct. ' -fhis Petitio. cotnirlg .tr lbr lrr:aring, ,po. pcrusi,g tlrc Mcrn.r:rnrlur, ol. Grou.<ls ol'crirrrinal Pctition an<r rrporr rrearing tlrc argunrcrrts .t.Sri M. Marrrr;r'a Rcrl<r1,, Arr'ocarc lor tlre Petrtio, crs an<r (rrc purrric p.osccutor orr bclrarr .[. tlrc Itcs,o.<rc,t No. r , anrr .Sri \/etrkatcslram Goturi, on rehall.of. Rcspondent No.2 'lLrc Court nrade the fbllorving: ORDDR T.HE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.315O OF 2022 ORDER: I This Criminal Petition is hled by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.48 of 2O2l on the Iile of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Mahaboobnagar (for short, "the trial Court").
Heard Mr.M.Madhava Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that C.C.No.48 of 2O2l has been disposed of before the competent criminal Court and no further orders are required in this Criminal Petition. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss this Criminal Petition as infructuous.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor concedes to the said request.
Operative part
Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ?ryg/U 2 Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shalt stand closed. I To, /ttRUECOPY// sd/-MOHD. TSMAIL ./ REGISTRAR \l SEC"I'ION OFFICER I 2 4 lhe.f udicial Magistratc of l.-irsr Class, Mahabubnagar, Distr.icr orrc CC to Sri M. Ma<tha'a n.aay, Air,,"cot"lb"pil"Ci' one cc to The Pubric prosecrrtor, uigr, c'or.irb. Jre stare o[Tcrangana at IJyderabad IOUTJ 1'wo CD Copies "'"'' !i I HI(}H COI]RT DA'fl-D:18/2/2025 t I ORDtrII CRLP.N<r.3I50 of 2022 rr{ 6. Srr 1O 2 E flttr 1[(] \ ,.\ -. \l2l ( ( q J o ,J .v DISN{ISSED AS INI.'Rt rC-T'T IoI rS \$ o-
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.