Smt. Kotagiri Shailaja, Wo. Laxman v. No. 2-195, Seethampeta, Sujthanagar

Petition under Article 226 of the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order nature of writ of [Vlandamus declaring petitioner stay application filed in R consequently grant stay of order passed passed by 3rd respondent confirming orde dated 09-02-2021 passed by 4th respon before 2nd resPondent. onstitution of lndia praying that in the d therewith, the High Court may be r direction more particularly one in the ction of 2nd respondent in taking up vision as illegal and arbitrary and in C.M.A. No. 9/2023 dt. 24-05-2024 passed in LTR Case No.22l2O19lCCP ent during pendency of revision filed i i I i 1 i I i i -1.l., IA NOi 1 0F 2025 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancgsstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ine-Higr, Court may be pleased to grant order passed in c.rv n. No. 9/2023 dt. 24-05-2024 passed by 3rd .trv ie.i,onaent confirming order passed in LTR Case No 22l2019lCCP daled is_b'_an21 passed ny +tn respondent pending disposal of the writ petition. "i Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRl. R R KALYAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER I I I I I I ,l i ?i{{&" THE HON'BLE SRI JUS ICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.1 728 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for e petitioner arld learned Assistant Government Pieader r Socia-l Welfare for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. With heir consent, this Writ Petition is disposed o[ at the stag of admission itself.

2. Learned counsel lor th petitioner submits that the main grievance of the etitioner is that the re spondent No.2 is not disposin of the Revision Petition filed by thc petitioner along wit stay petition, which is filed aggrieved by the order pa sed by the respondent No.3 in CMA.No.9 ol 2023 dated 24.O5.2O24 by confirming the order of the resp ndent No.4 in LTR Case No.22 I 2Ol9lCCP, dated 09.O2.2 2T,

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner hle the Revision Petition aiong with stay petition before e respondent No.2 on \.ti \ S ti. J \\P ll;18 l0t5

15.O7.2024, however, the respondent No.2 has not been taken up the matter for consideration of the stav petitior.r or the Revision Petition ils on this date. IJr-rder the guise of no orders in the stay petition or the Revision Petition, the respondcnt authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner lrom the suit schedule property admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0-03 guntas, which is equivalent to 242 Sq. Yards consisting house bearing No.2 2-176ll situated in Chunchupaili Village and Maldal, Bhadradri- Kothagudem District.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner lurthcr submits that during the pendency of appeal in CMA.No.9 of 2023, this Court passed order in WP.No.27457 of 2022 dated 09.O1.2023 granting interim protection ti1l thc disposal o1'the said appeal. After disposal of the said appeal, the petitioner has liled revision petilion before the respondenl No.2 but the same has not been taken up for hearing. Therefore, learned counsel requested this Court -rlf!.."qrlz '*. .,: ' :/ .., -v 3 SK, J wP_t l?28_2025 to grant interim protection to th petitioner by directing the respondent authorities n t to dispossess the petltioner from the subject prop rty till the disposal of the Revision Petition filed by the etitioner.

5. Learned Assistant G vernment Pleader for Social Wellare submits that the Revision Petition aiong with stay petition Iiled by the pe itioner will be disposed of by the respondent No.2 in d e course and did not dispute the order dated 09.01.2 23 in WP.No.27457 of 2022, tLrus, requested to pass ap ropriate orders.

6. in view of the sub issions made by the learned counsel on the both sid s and on perusing the entire material on record, this Co rt deems it appropriate , , to dispose of the writ petition ith a direction to the I I respondent authorities to cons der and conclude the revision hled under Section 6 f Telangana Scheduled Areas Lald Transfer Regulation 1 of 1959 against the order in CMA.No.9 of 2023 date 24.O5.2O24 passed by 4 SI(,.I \\rP I t?2U 202s the respondent No.3, which conhrms the order in L'I'R Case No .22 I 20 19 I CCP , dated 09 .O2 .202 t bv the respondent No.4, as expeditiously as possible by giving opportunity to the petitioner as well as the respondcnls in the Revision Petition. Ti11 the disposal of the Revision Petition, the respondent authorities are directed to maintain stafus quo, rn all aspects, existing as or-r Lhis

7. With the above direction, this Writ petition is disposed of. There shal1 be no order as to costs. B. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. AMMAJI TY REGISTRAR D t; \SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secrdi'ary, Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Tribai Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Addl. Agent to Government, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.

4. The Spl. Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Bhadrachalam, Bhadradri- Kothagudem District.

5. The Tahsildar, Chunchupalli, Chunchupalli Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District. \

6. Guguloth Ravi Kumar, S/o. Lal Singh Private Employee, Resident of H. No IVlandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem Dist 7. One CC to SRl. R R KALYAN Advoc 8. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELF Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Aged about 45 years, agriculture and 2-1 95, Seethampeta, Sujthanagar ct. te [oPUC] RE, High Court for the State of

9. Two CD Copies

10. One Spare Copy Mmb GJP HIGH COURT DATED: 2110412025 ORDER WP.No.11728 of 2025 ! I r'ar:1?_-_-::_- .. rtl illi: :;14i ,11 AUE 2025 t o '.s ) )', DISPOSED OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \9 \A4-/