High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an ordgr, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the 2nd respondent district collector in not passing ordgrs on the petitioner Dharani application No. 2400020424 dated 30.09.2024 to delete the sy. No. 52Ot2lA from the prohibited list in the Dharani Portal which petitigher have purchased through registered sale deed from her vendor who is pattgdar for the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.5.29 gts in Sy. No 520/2/4 situated at Nednur village, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy district, as illegal, arbitrary -and violative of Article 14, 19,21 and 300 A of the constitution of lndia and consequgntly direct the 2nd respondent remove the aforesaid land from the prohibited list in Dharani portal. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to forthwith direct ti e respondents to pass orders on the petltioner Dharani Application No 24i)00:10424 dated30.09.2024 to delete the S'l N,r. 520l2lAfrom the prohibited list in the , Dharani Portal which petitigner has purc rar,;ed Ac.5.29 gts situated at Nednur vrllage, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy distric . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RATHANGA PAMREDDY Counsel for the Rerspc,nqents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the followinq: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR R"EDDY WRIT PETITION No.11649 of2025 ORDER: This writ petition is hled seeking following relief: "It. is therefore this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the 2"d respondent district collector in not passing orders on the petitioner Dharani application No.24OOO2O424 dated 3O.O9.2024 to delete the Sy. No. 52Ol2lA from the prohibited list in the Dharani Portal which petitioner have purchased through registered sale deed from her vendor who is pattedar for the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.5.29 gts in Sy. No. 52Ol2lA situated at Nednur village, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy district, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 74, 19,2l and 30O A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2"d respondent remove the aforesaid land from the prohibited list in Dharani portal and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem ht and proper in the interest ofjustice."

2. It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of agriculture land admeasuring Acs. 5.29 guntas in Survey No.520/ 5/A, situated at Nednoor Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (for short, 'the subject propertyJ, having purchased the same through registered Sale Deed d,ated, 27.12.2016 uide Document No.8753 ot 2016. It is further stated that after purthase of the subject property, the petitioner submitted an application dated 03.04.2017 uide Application No.MU O2l7Ol2l7249 for mutation, but no action has been taken on the said application. It is further stated that the petitioner has noticed in the Dharani Portal that the subject property was shown in the prohibited list and his vendor's narne is reflecting in the Dharani Portal. The grievance of the petitioner is that she made an online application dated 3O.O9.2O24 in Dharani Portal under TM 15 Module uide Application No.24OOO2O424, Transaction ID No. 3OCDNOOOO95O844 by 2 W.P Nt.11649 of 202 CVB, paying requisite ler to the respondents seeking deietion cf the subject property from the fi-": of prohibited properties and de-notifJ,ir-rg the same and consequential iss ra'r,:e of the pattadar passbook, but t]-rt s ame was not considered by thc rcr.,pondents. Hence, the present wrir pet it ror r.

3. Consi,leled the submissions made by the learnerl crunsel for the parties and with Lheir consent, this writ petition 1S disl;os.ed of at the admission stage 4 . Learn,:cl Assistant Government Pleader for ,-he Revenue appearing lor the -cs;pondents has not disputed the submiss iorr of arl online application in Dh:r-:rrri Portal by the petitioner for deletiorL c,f the subject propdrty from the ist of prohibited properties.

5. The Srrb section (4) of Section 22-A of the Regist..ation Act, 1908 confers the powe - r n the State Government either suo m(;tu or on an application by an1 or:r'son or for giving effect _to the final or< ler s of the High Court of Telanganir o - Supreme Court of India to proceed to 1e notify, either in full or in part, t-he notification issued under sub-sectio:r 2) and rules made under the pr:rvisions of the Registration Act, 1908.

6. In the ins;lant case, since it is the specific case of .he petitioner that she has mar1e :Ln application, dated 3O.O9.2O24 r,ict e Application No.24OOO2O424, T ra t;actron ID No.3OCDNO0OO95O844 for ck,letion of the subject property fron the list of prohibited properties, this; Cc urt deems it 3 CVBR, J W.P.No.11649 of 2O25 appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the respondents to examine the said application strictly irt accordance with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and pass apprcpriate ordets in accordance with law within a periocl of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and cornmunicate the decision thereon to the petitioner.

7. With the above ohservations, this r,vrit petition is disposed of There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneorrs petitions pending, if any, shall stand ,TRUE COPY// _s_9f,4..Y.s-f.Es!4P / DEPUTY REGISTRAR / /, , sEciloiFbFFtcER 'I i The Prrncipal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The District Collector, Rangareddy, Rangareddy District. The TahsildaflMRO, Nednur Village, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy District One CC to SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GF FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at HyderaPad. [OUT] Two CD Copies closed To 1 2 3 4 5 6 PSK. SS ,t HIGH COURl' DATED:1 7104.12025 ORDER WP.No.11649 of 2025 i:' o $ .$' s. \\ \n e ) 'i$-.,=- '! l DTSPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS