High Court · 2025

Smt.G Hemalatha, W/o. Venkat Reddy, aged about 36 years Working as Junior Assistant ClD, Telangana State, Hyderabad Rl/o. Tarnaka, Hyderabad .,.PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Governm'ent of lndia, Rep by its Secretary, Ministry of Personal PG and Pensions Department Of Personnel of Training, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan Khan Market, New Delhi 110 001

3. The State Reorganization Committee-Kamalanadhan, Committee Rep by its Secretary, GAD (SR) Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 50O 022

4. The Director General of Police, CID, Telangana, Hyderabad 5. The Additional Director General of Police, ClD, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 6. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, APPA, Hyderabad 7. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Velagapudi, Amaravathi, AP ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Central Government final allocation of the employees between the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh in the police department contrary to the Kamalanathan Committee Report and guidelines pursuant to the recommendations of the Kamalanathan Committee report dated 15.03.2016 and consequently the orders of the Sth respondent impugned Relieving Order dated 31 .O1.2O17 in DO No. 2212017 in C No. TtEllClD-TSt2O14-17 is contrary to the Kamalnathan Committee Guidelines No. 1B (1) and (N) since the petitioner is a local candidate and her husband working in Telangana State (both are locals of Telangana) and since 5 sanctioned posts are vacant out of 36 sanctioned posts junior assistants is illegal and void and against the principles of natural justice and against the Articles 14, 19 and 21 ot the Constitution of lndia including A.P. Reorganization Act including Kamalnadhan Committee Report and consequently to direct the respondents to declare the petitioner is enlitled to continuing Telangana State only l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 9290 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents no. 3 to 6 to continue the petitioner in the 4th respondent CID office by suspending the operation of the impugned order dated 31 .01.2017 in DO No. 2212017 in C no. 7/E|/C|D-TS/2014-'17 passed by the Sth respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition l.A. NO: 4 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 50711 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the additional material i.e., (1) Circular Memo No. 9940/SPE&MC12015 dt.7.8.2017 and (2) GO Ms No. 148 dt 17.10.2017 tor befter adjudication of the above Wdt Petition NO. 7551/2017 and also direct the respondents no. 3 to 6 to continue the petitioner in the 4th respondent CID office Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. AJAY KUMAR MADISETTY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,4&5: SRI B. KRISHNA, GP FOR HOMESERVICES Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, (DY. SOL GEN OF tNDtA) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINI:STRATION Gounsel for the Respondent Nos. 6&7: GP FOR SERVTCES I (AP) The Court made the foltowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.7551 of 2OL7 ORDER.' (Per the Hon'ble Si Justice J. Sreeniuas Rao) This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: '... to issue a Wdt, Order or direclion more particula-rly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Central Government frnal allocation of the employees between the State of Telangara and the State of Andhra Pradesh in tJle police department contra-ry to the Kamalanathan Committee Report and guidelines pursuant to the recommendations of the Kamalalat1an Committee report dated 15.03.2016 and consequently the orders of t}le 5'h respondent impugned Relieving Order dated 3l .Ol.2Ol7 in DO No.22 /2017 in C.No.7/E 1/ CiD-TS /2014-17 is contrar5r to the Kamalnathan Committee Guidelines No.18 (L) & (N) since the petitioner is a loca1 candidate ald her husband working in Telangana State (both are loca-ls of Telangana) artd since 5 sanctioned posts are vacant out of 36 sanctioned posts junior assistants is illegal and void and against the principles of natural justice and against the Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India including A.P. Reorganization Act including Kamalnadhan Committee Report and consequently to direct the respondents to declare the petitioner is entitled to continuing Telangar-ra State only..."

2. Heard Mr.M.Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B. Krishna, learned Government Pleader for Home Services-Telangana appearing for respondent No.1, Mr.Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, and Mr. A. Raghuram, ./ ,/ 2 learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.3, 6 and 7 (State of Andhra Pradesh).

3. This Court while admitting the writ petition on 06.08.2018 granted stahts quo to be maintained regarding the posting and the proposed transfer of the petitioner and the petitioner is permitted to work in the respondents' office by discharging the duties and responsibilities in relation to the post in which she is working. The said status Eto order is in existence.

4. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during pendency of the writ petition, the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh have issued G.Os. and in the said G.Os., the petitioner was allotted to the State of Telangana. By virtue of the sarne, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration.

5. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to revise the writ petition in case her grievance is subsisting. No order as to costs. 3:: Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/-T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ( \ To, 1 2 .7 4 5 o 7 -State . The Principal Secretary, Home Department Secr-etariat' T S 'Hyderabad . iii" s""iitiw,Governmenl oi lndia, Ministry-.of Personal PG and Pensions DeDartment of Personnel oi ri"inihg, 3rd Floor' Lok Nayak Bhavan Khan Market, New Delhi 110 00'1 Reoiganization committe_e_-Kamalanad han, committee, iil ila; n. cn"ol siii ij"'rja rtm ent S ecieta riat, Hvd e ra bad 500 o22 id"dilit"-t 6SnJtrt oipotic", clD, ielangana, Hvderabad . +il; X;iiil;rl oifuiiot ceneiir or-iotice, 6lo' Lalidikapool' Hvderabad . iii; ffi;;i;;CJnelii ot potiie, nnonra Pradesh' APPA' Hvderabad '' Ji' nilahii- iradesh' Home Department xutt tAR MADl s ErrY, Advocate [oPUC] The Principat secretarv]siiid .'siii.-nLhi Velaqapudi, Amaravathi, AP &;"cii; . i;; d6;i"-cC ron seiiVrbLd l'(,qp) Hisr' court ror the state or Telanqana, at HYderabad [OUT1 0.+il'ic;i;-e r'Fon seriVt-cds t 1rc), Hish court for the state of Telanqana, at HYderabad [OUTI f .il;'ic'i;'sRi.'cAoi inh-v#N KUMAR, DY SollclroR GENERAL oF rNDIA IOPUC] r z.iwo Cb. to e p fOn 6ENERAL ADMINISTRATION, High Court for the State 1 1 8 o of Telangana, at HYderabad [OUII \

13.Two CD CoPies BSw BM HIGH COURT DATED:0710112025 I ORDER WP.No.7551 of 2017 rtE s;4 ( 0 7 riB tit5 a I s? * .OCst-,5Tcfl DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ p{