1. Sri.Pasunuri Praveen Kumar, Praveen Reddy v. 1. The State of Telangana

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI N.PRAVEEN KUMAR W.P.NO: oF 2021 Between

1. Sri Pasunuri Praveen Kumar , Praveen Reddy, S/o. Late P.Ram Reddy aged about 38 years, Occ. Business Fl/o. H No.2-7-132, Near by Park Road. Jangoan Dist, TS

2. Smt.Bandi Ramulamma, Wo. Bandi jagan aged about 54 years, Occ. Household Rl/o. Nellutla Ghanpuram Mandal, Jangoan Dist.. TS

3. Smt.Bandi Sunitha, Wo. Bandi Srinu aged about 32 years. Oqq. Flousetrcld R/o. Nellutla Village,Lingala Ghanpuram Mandal, Jangoan Dist., TS

4. Smt.Bandi Sirisha, Wo. Bandi Srisailam aged about 26 yearc, _9c9. Household R/o. Nellutla Village,Lingala Ghanpuram Mandal, Jangoan Dist., TS

5. Smt. Bandi Pavani, Wo. Bandi Parvatham aged about 26 years. Occ. Household Rl/o. Neliutla Village,Lingala Ghanpuram Mandal, Jangoan Dist.. TS .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secre_tary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, T.S

2. The District Collector, Jangoan District, Jangoan town. T5-506 167. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangoan Revenue Division, Jangoan District,TS-506 167.

4. The TalrasiHar, Jangoan Mandal, Jangoan District, T5-506 167. S. The Station House Officer, Jangoan Police Station. Jangoan District T.S-506

167. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandarnus, declaring the action of the respondents and their sub-ordinates in trespassing in to the petitioners open plots bearing Nos.13 to 1S(Plot No.6-3-P)and land in Sy., No.182 and 183, situated at Jangoan Village and Mandal and District, illegally and demolishing the tin shed structure and breaking the boundary pillar stones and iron fencing wires and threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their respective plots, without complying the order dated.1Ot11t2O2O in lA No.1 of 2020 in WP No. 15064 of 2O2O passed by the' Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, TS ,as highly illegal, arbitrary, bad and Violation of Articles of Constitution of lndia and also amounts to violation of prirrciples of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents and their sub-ordinates, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective open plots bearing Nos.'t3 to 15 (Plot No.6-3-P) and land in Sy., No.182 and 183. situated at Jangoan Village and Mandal and District, TS in ary manner forthwith. |.A.NO:1 OF 20,21 Petition tJnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerl in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents and their sub-ordinates, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful posse:;sion and enjoyment of their respective open plots bearing Nos.13 to 15 (Plot No.6-3-P) and land in Sy., No.182 and 183, situated at Jangoan Village and Mandal and District, TS in any manner forthwith,, pending disposal of the above writ petiti'cn. Gounsel for the Petitionerc : SR! BETHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 4 : SRI H.RAKESH KUMAR, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S : G.P FOR HOtfE W.P.NO:13991 OF 2021 Between:

1. M/s. N M R Gardens, Rep., by its Managing Paitner Sri.Guda Vijayender Reddy, S.to.G.Laxma Reddy, aged 61 years, Occ. Business and Managing Partner, Office at H No.6-3-61, Suryaper Road,Jangoan town and District,TS 2. Sri.Amritham Narsaiah, S/o. Papaiah, aged 58 years, Occ.Business, R/o H No.6-3-56, Suryaper Road,Jangoan town and District,TS

3. Smt.Siddurala Uma, Wo.S.Ramesh, aged 46 years, Occ.House Wife, Rl/o H No.6-3-57/1 , Suryaper Road,Jangoan town and District,TS

4. SmtRapolu Manjula, Wo.R.Laxmaiah, aged 45 years, Occ.House Wife, R/o H No.6-3-57, Suryaper Road,Jangoan town and District,TS

5. Smt. Bhurcddy Bhagyamma, Wo. B.ram Reddy, aged 50 years, Occ.House Wife, Ri/o H No.6-3-2.Suryaper Road,Jangoan town and District,TS .....PETITIONERS i!!-_-rt*t ,@ /,./ ,j :.:1. ;" AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, T. S

2. The District Collector, Jangoan District, Jangoan town, T5-506 162. 3. The. Revenue Divisional officer, Jangoan. Revenue Division, Jangoan District,TS-506 167.

4. The Tahasildar, Jangoan Mandal, Jangoan District, T5-506 167. 5. The Execqllve Officer, Endowment Department, Sree Chenna Kesava Swamy Temple Office at Nawabpet, Lingalaghanpur Mandal, Jangoan District, T.S. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent No.2 to 4 and their sub-ordinates in making attempts to encroach and interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective premises bearing H,Nos.6-3-61(extent 4983.83 Sq.yards), 6-3- 66(extent 255 Sq.yards),6-3-57/1(extent 90 Sq. yards).6-3-57(extent 90 Sq. yards) and 6-3-2(extent 200 Sq. yards), in Sy., Nos .182 d 183, situated at Jangoan Town and Mandal and District, TS, claiming to be a part of government land in Sy., No.180 and 181 without following due process of law and not conducting the survey and fixing the boundaries to the lands in Sy., Nos 182 and 183, in spite of issuance of notice vide file No.D.E.R MS No/ 13gl 2019, dated.25t11t2}18 n pursuance to the F-Line applications D.E.R 021900437965, dated.31/1012019, to till this date, as highly illegal, arbitrary, bad and Violation of Articles of Constitution of lndia and also amounts to violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents and their sub-ordinates, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective premises in any manner and also direct to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries to the lands in Sy., No s 182 and 183 as per the provisions of the Act forthwith. =-....:-7- I.A.NO:1 OF 202.1 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents and their sub-ordinates, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective premises bearing H.Nos.6- 3-61, 6-3-66, 6-.3-5711 ,6-3-57 and 6-3-2, in Sy.Nos.182 and 183' situated at Jangoan Town and Mandal and District, TS in any manner forthwith,. pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI BETHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRI H.RAKESH KUMAR, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : G.P FOR ENDOWMENTS W.P.NO: 17487 OF 2021 Between:

1. Smt.Vangir Lalitha, Wo. Ramesh, aged 47 years, Occ. Anganwadi Teacher, R/o. Amm,anabole village, Mutakondu(M),Yadadri Bhongir District,TS

2. Smt.Gopagoni Uma, Wo. G.Yadagiri, aged 51 years, Occ. Househ_old, Rl/o H No.5-7019,-4th Ward, Jangoan Road, Narmetta(V)and(M),Jangoan District,TS 3. Smt.Bathini Saritha, Wo. GB.Prasad, aged 37 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o. Nellutla Vi lage, Lingala Ghanpuram Mandal, Jangoan District,Ts

4. Sri.Budiga Durga Prasad, S/o. B.Komuraiah, aged about 39 years, Occ. Todd. Trapper, Rl/o. Kommaipally Village, Gundala Mandal. Yadadri Bhongir District,TS

5. Sri. Pothuganti Yadagiri, S/o. Lingaiah, aged about 63 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. Komnraipally Village, Gundala Mandal. Yadadri Bhongir District,TS

6. Sri. Kondr:boina Satyanarayana, S/o. llaiah, aged about 39 years, Occ. Agriculture,, Rl/o. Kommaipally Village, Gundala Mandal. Yadadri Bhongir District,TS

7. Sri. Kodaparthi Venkatesh, S/o. llaiah, aged about 53 years, Occ. Pvt., Work, Ri/o. Gund;ala Village and Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District,TS

8. Smt.Siripuram Padma, Wo. Upender, aged 49 years, Occ. Housewife, Fl/o. Ammanab':le Vllage, Mutakondur Mandal,Yadadri Bhongir District,TS

9. Sri. U.Rajender, S/o. Gopaiah, aged abor.fr 26 years, Occ. Pvt., Work, Fi/o. Kistagudern Village, Lingala Ghanpuram Mandal, Jangoan Dist., TS

10.Sri. Aliminate Sreenu, S/o. Yadaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ. Pvt.. Work, R/o. Anantharam Village . Gundala Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir Dist., TS

11.Sri. Aliminate Ravi, S/o. Yadaiah, aged about 38 years, Occ. Pvt., Work.. No.10 and 11 are R/o. Anantharam Village Gundala Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir Dist., TS

12.Sri. Kudikala Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Krishnamurthy, aged about 42 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H No.1-11-61, Weavers Colony, Jangoan town and District,TS 13. Sri. Birru Srinivas, S/o. Ramesh, aged about 42 years, Occ. ht. work, Rl/o. Eeravenu Village, Palakurthi Mandal, Jangoan District,TS .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat. Hyderabad, T.S

2. The District Collector, Jangoan District, Jangoan town, T5-506 167. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangoan Revenue Division, Jangoan District T5-506 167.

4. The Tahasildar, Jangoan Mandal, Jangoan District, TS - 506167. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions mo particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent No.2 to 4 and their sub-ordinates in making attempts to encroach and interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their open plots i.e. 1) plot No.7, admsg 200 Sq. yards, 2) admsg., 118.6 Sq., yards,3) admsg., 118.6 Sq., yards,4) plot No.S admsg., 147.5 Sq., yards,5) plot No.8, admsg.,200 Sq.. vards,6) admsg., 261.1 Sq., yards,T) plot No,.9, admsg., 200 Sq., yards, 8) plot No.6, admsg., 2006 Sq., yards, 9) admsg., 233.95 Sq., yards, 10) plot Nos 1'l and 12, admsg.,284.16 Sq., yards,11)admsg., 129.2 Sq., yards and 12) admsg., 130 Sq., yards respectivelyin Sy., Nos.182, 183and 187, situated at Jangoan Town and Mandal and District, TS, claiming to be a part of government land in Sy., No.180 and 181 withoutfollowing due process of lawand not conducting the survey and fixing the boundaries to the lands in Sy., Nos 182,183 and 187, in pursuance to the submission of F-Line application No.D.E.R 021900457680, dated..30/1212019, to till this date, as highly illegal, arbitrary, bad and Violation of Articles of Constitution of tndia and also amounts to violation of -E# --t- -,,i/ )i, ,, '/ principles of nalural justice and consequently direct the respondents and their sub- ordinates, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective open plots in any manner and also direct to conduct the survey and fix the boundaries to the lands in Sy., Nos j82, 183and 187 as per the provisions of the Act forthwith. !.A.NO:1 OF 20221 Petition Llnder Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondentr; and their sub-ordinates, not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective open plots in Sy., Nos .1g2, 183and 187, situ,ated at Jangoan Town and Mandal and District, TS in any manner forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Gounse! forthe Petitioners : SRI BETHI VENKATESWARLU Gounsel for the Respondents : SRI H.RAKESH KUMAR, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL COMMON ORDER: and 1 The present writ petitions are filed by the respective petitioners, whose particulars are given below, under Articte 226 of the constitution of lndia, seeking to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent Nos.2 to 4 and their sub-ordinates in making efforts to encroach and interfere with the petitioners' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective lands and not conducting survey and not lixing the boundaries and not considering the iepresentations of the petitioners as highly illegal, arbitrary, bad and violation of Articles of Constitution of India and also amounting to violation of principles of natural justice and consequentially to direct the respondents and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners lands and to direct them tb conduct a survey and firx the boundaries.

2. In all these writ petitions this Court heard Sri Bethi Venkateshu,arlu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Hingolekar Rakesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on \-- Page 2 of l0 behalf of learned Government Pleader for Revenue Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy

3. Since all these writ petitions are interconnected, this Court disposes of the same by way the present common order.

4. The particulars of the lands of the petitioners in all these writ petitions situated in Sy.Nos.182, 183 and 187 of Jangoan Vitlage and Mandrrl and District, Telangana State are given below: WP No. 15064 ,of 2020 & 9277 202r 13991 202L Plot No. 13 t4 l4 15 6-3-61 6-3-s6 €,-3- s7/t 6-3-57 6-i',-oo2 L7487 202t 7 5 Document No. & Dt. so46l2ols 27.O7.20L5 5O9s/2Ot4 25.09.2014 5092l2Ot4 os.09.2014 so92l20t4 05.09.2014 3781 /2OrO 24.O5.20tO 6t4l 1,987 18.05. r987 t,Lo4/1997 17.O9.t997 9t9l2OO4 21.45.2004 779l20ts 05.o2.20 t5 4A73l2006 18. t I .2006 9O8l2OO7 13.O2.2007 9O7 /2OO7 13.o2.2007 4L68l2006 23.11 .2006 Extent

229.33 Sq.Yds. 150.77 Sq.Yds. t42 Sq.Yds. t 18.14 Sq.Yds. 4983.8 t Sq.Yds. 25s Sq.Yds. 90 Sq.Yds. 90 Sq.Yds. 200 Sq.Yds 200 Sq.Yds 118.6 Sq.Yds. r 18.6 Sq.Yds. 147.5 .Yds Repre- sentation/s Mutation proceedings ROC Nos. ALltos/2oL7, ALlLLLl2OrT, ArlLoT /2017 & ALlto8l2ol7 All dated L4.O9.20L7 ROC Nos. AL l2s9 l2OrO, dt.15.06.2021, Arl29Ol2OrL, dt.24.o5.2011 & ALl2eOl2OtL Dt.24.05.2011 L4.O9.2017 F-Line application dt.31. LO.20t9 F-Line Application No.DER021 900457680 Dt.30. L2.20L9 Page 3 of l0 8 Open 9 6 Open Plot tl& 12 Open Plot Open Plot s684 /2006 02.tL.2006 t74rl2oo7 24.O3.2007 368s 12006 02.rL.2006 487 /2OO7 29.Or.2007 2OLOl2OO7 07.04.2007 3683 l2006 o2.Lt.2006 3301/20rs 13.05.2015 03.o3.2021 200 Sq.Yds 26L.1 Sq.Yds 200 Sq.Yds, 200 Sq.Yds 233.95 Sq.Yds 284.16 Sq.Yds 129.2 Sq.Yds 130 Sq.Yds

5. The brief facts pertaining to WP No.15064 of 2O2O are that the lst petitioner is the sole Olegal heir of la.te Pasunuri Ram Reddy, who in turn inherited agricultural lands from his father, [a.te Pasunuri Mohan Reddy, the originat pattadar and titleholder of lands situated in Survey Nos. 182 and 183 of Jangaon Village, Mandal and District, Telangana. Father of the 1"t petitioner sold portions of the said lands during his lifetime and upon his intestate demise in the year 2013, the 1st petitioner succeeded to the remaining extent and has since been in peaceful possession and enioyment thereof. Further, petitioners No.2 to 5 have also purchased open plots in the said survey numbers through registered sale deeds, as stated in the above table and are likewise in peaceful possession of their respective properti,es. However, due to the non-mutation of names in the revenue records, the name of the lst petitioner's grandfather continues to appear therein. The grievance of the petitioners is that in the year 2OL9, the revenue authorities Page 4 of l0 attempte(l to interfere with their possession and sought to encroach upon their patta lands, under the pretext that portions of the land fall within go\rernment lands pertaining to survey Nos.lgo and 1gl, which are recorciled as Endowment Department lands and are adjacent to the petitioners' lands. Despite several representations and F-Line survey applicatio,s submitted in 20rg and 2020 requesting a proper demarcatir>n of boundaries, no survey has been conducted and instead the revenute officiars continue to interfere, attempting to fix boundarJr stones wi:thout proper identification or rawfur authority, thereby violating flre petitioners' rights and causing a threat of irreparable injury.

6. The brief facts narrated in wp No.927z of 2021 are that as stated in ttre above paragraphs, upon demise of grandfather of the l"t petitioner, rris father, being the sole heir, inherited the lands and sord portions th:rough registered sale deeds. After his intestate death in 2013, t,.e pt:titioner, as the only legal heir, succeeded to the remaining lands and r:ontinues in peacefur possession. Hou,ever, due to non_ mutation, ttLe grandfather's name continues in the revenue records. It is further subrnitted that petitioners 2 to 5, being a joint family, purchased i'dividual prots from the said survey numbers through valid sale deeds as stated in the above tabre, have been in uninterrupted possession- 'r'heir names \f,,ere duly mutated in municipal records, and Page 5 of l0 plot numbers were allotted. The lands of the petitioners lie adjacent to government lands in Sy. Nos. 180 and 181, recorded as Endowment lands. ln 2019, upon allocation of the said government lands for public construction, revenue authorities, without conducting any survey, attempted to fix boundary stones encroaching upon the petitioners' patta lands. Representations dated 04-11-2019, 29-12-2019 and multiple F-Line applications including those dated L3-L2-2O19 and 17- O8-2O2O were submitted requesting demarcation, but no action was taken. Despite an interim order dated 1O-11-2O2O passed in W.P. No.15O46 of 2O2O directing the respondents to process the petitioners' apptications upon submission of relevant documents, Ure authorities failed to comply. Instead, on 06-O4-2021, reslrcndents along with police personnel and a JCB trespassed into the petitioners'plots, demolished a tin shed, damaged fencing, and caused losses amounting to approximately Rs.l,OO,OOOl-, prompting a complaint to higher police authorities. The petitioner contends that these acts are in violation of the interim orders of this Hon'ble Court, arbitrary, and amount to illegal encroachment over private patta lands. The petitioners apprehend further unlawful interference, causing irreparable harm unless restrained by appropriate orders from this Court.

7. Brief facts, as narrated in WP No.1399L of 2O2l are that the petitioner No. ['s partnership [irm, M/s. NMR Gardens, purchased a Page 6 of l0 --- plot admeasuring 4983.8I sq.yds., in sy.Nos. tg2/t e ]'83/1 vide Registere<l Sale Deed dated 24.O5.2O1O. Petitioners 2 to 5 also acquired residential plots situated at Suryapet Road, Jangaon, vide registered instrumerrts as stated above including sale and gift deeds executed by the legal heirs of the original pattadar, Late pasunuri Mohan Reddy, whose neLrne appears in the revenue records. prior to and post_ purchase, building permissions and municipal mutations were duly obtained. The respective structures, including a function hall and residential. houses, were constructed as per sanctioned plans. Municipal receipts and property tax records evidence their lawful possessiorr and enjoyment as absolute owners. The subject lands originally belonged to Late pasunuri Mohan Reddy, who was granted a pattadar passbook and title deed. Upon his demise, his son, pasunuri Ram Redd:r, inherited and sold part of the lands. However, due to non_ mutation, rlte name of the original pattadar stitl appears in the revenue records as per the pahani for 2O2O-21. The petitioners' properties lie adjacent to sy.Nos.l80 and lg r, classil-red as Endowment (Governme:rt) lands. In 2}lg, said Government lands were allotted for public conr;tntction, including a District Collector's office. petitioners allege that revenue authorities, without proper demarcation, attempted to encroach upon their patta lands under the pretext o[ boundary fixation, wtrich was resisted by the petitioners and other plot owners. owing to the boundary dispute between Sy. Nos. I g2 &, r g3 and r Page 7 of l0 Sy.Nos.l8O & 181, as well as with adjacent [ands of Nellutla Revenue Village, F-Line applications were filed. A notice vide File No.D.E.R MS No.139/2019 was issued by respondent authorities for survey, but no survey was conducted despite repeated oral requests. Petitioners have been in uninterrupted possession since 1987, with no disputes until 2OL9. On 18.O6.2O2L, respondent officials, without any authority or prior notice, allegedly trespassed onto petitioners' premises, threatened demolition using JCB machinery and attempted encroachment, which was resisted with the help of local residents. Photographs from that date depict the said incident. A complaint attempt before the local police was reportedly refused. Petitioners claim that revenue authorities are acting under political influence and monetary pressure and deliberately avoiding boundary surveys to facilitate encroachment. They allege threats to demolish their structures and forcible eviction under the false pretext that their plots fall u'ithin Sy.Nos.18O & 181. Similarly placed plot owners have approached this Court and interim orders have been granted in W.P. No.15O64 of 2O2O dated 10.11.2O2O and W.P. No.9277 of 2O2l dated 12.04.2021, both of which remain pending.

8. Brief facts narrated in WP No.17487 of 2021 are that the petitioners are the absolute owners and possessors of various open plots situated in Survey Nos.182, 183 and 187 of Jangaon Town, haviftg lawfully acquired the same through registered sale deeds as Page 8 of I0 ---" stated in the above table between 2006 and 2021 from the legal heirs of '\ [,ate Pasunuri Mohan Reddy, the original pattadar and titleholder. They have beerr in peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective plots sincr: the dates of purchase. These plots are adjacent to lands in Sy.Nos.180 and 181, classified as Government (Endowment) lands, which have been allotted to the Revenue Department for public purposes. From 2Ol9 onwards, the petitioners allege that the respondents, under.political pressure and without legal authorit5r or proper demarcation, made repeated attempts to interfere with and encroach upon their patta lands, claiming them to fall within government boundaries. Despite submission of an F-Line application requesting; an official survey and boundary fixation, no action has been taken by the authorities. The petitioners contend that the deliberate refusal to conduct the survey and continued threats of eviction and demolition, without due process, violate their constitutional and legal rights. Th,3y apprehend irreparable injury if the respondents' actions are not resrtrained. ln these circumstances, the petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226 of tlle Constitution of India seeking appropriate relief to pr:otect their possession and to restrain the authorities from encroachirrg upon their patta lands GHF,+.ffi:: Page 9 of l0

9. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader, by filing a copy of instructions given by Revenue Divisional Oflicer, Jangaon/respondent No.3 would submit that the writ petitions are not maintainable as the petitioners lack written authorizations from other plot owners. It is further submitted that though F-line petitions were frled seeking demarcation of plots in Sy.Nos.182, 183 and 187 of Jangaon Town, no supporting documents were submitted with respect to Sy.No.L87. The land in Sy.No.187 is patta land and there is no L interference by the authorities. [t is also contended that demarcation of Sy.Nos.182 and 183 was carried out based on available village maps due to the non-availability of tippons and discrepancies in extent were observed. The plots claimed by the petitioners are found to fall within Sy.No.184, which has already been acquired for the Collectorate Complex. The settled extents need to be rectified under Section 87 of Telangana [.a.nd Revenue Act for which action is initiated. The land in Sy.No.187 being a patta land to an extent of Ac.1S-OO Gts., is intact and there is no problem with the plots in this survey number and thus, the claim of interference is denied. Demarcation reports, panchanama and location sketches have been submitted for perusal.

10. Having heard the rival contentions advanced on both sides and upon perusal of the record, since the respondents have stated that a survey has already been conducted, this Court, without expressing Page l0 of l0 any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the oflicial respondents to strictly follow the procedure prescribed by law and take appropriate action, if the situation so warrants. 1 1. With the above observations, these writ petitions are disposed o[. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To

1. The Priru;ipal Secretary, Revenue Department, Sd,.A.JAYASREE ISTANT SECTION OFFICER Secretariat. State of Telangrana at Hyderabad, T.S. 2. The District Collector, Jangoan I 3. The Revr:nue Divisional Officer, 4. The Tahersildar, Jangoan Mandal, Jangoan District, TS - 506167. 5. The Statirrn House Officer, Jangoan Police Station. Jangoan District T.5-506 District, Jangoan t6wn, T5-506 167 Jangoan Revenue Division, Jangoan District T5-506 167.

6. The Executive Officer, Endowment Department, Sree Chenna Kesava Swamy Temple Office at Nawabpet, Lingalaghanpur Mandal, Jangoan District, T.S. 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at

8. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court for the State of Telangana

9. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTJ at Hyderabad. [OUTI Hyderabad. TOUTJ

10. One CC trr SRI BETHI VENKATESWARLU, Advocate IOPUC] 1 1 . Two CD Copies SA PMK A, HIGH COIJRT DATED i1'710912025 STrr ic 3 o6 ttB 2026 * I I COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.{ 5064 OF 202A, 9277 , 13991 AND 17487 of 2021 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS n b\ \