✦ High Court of India · 17 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,164 words

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleasedtoissueanappropriateWrit'orderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthe natureofWritoftt/landamusdeclaringtheactionoftheRespondents2toTinnot receiving the application form and release the individual service connection to the petitioner, the H No.2-56 lTtA (Parl)' Survey Nos l1l2B and 11i29, admeasuring 100 Sq. yards, situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (lvl), Under GHtt/lC' Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Neighbours House' South- Neighbours House, East- 30 Ft Wide Road, West- 20 Ft Wide Road ' as illegal' null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the tt'r respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition und( r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumt;tances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents ;r to 7 to receive the application and release the individual service connection t,r the petitioner, the H No.2-5617lA (par|), S.rrvey Nos.11l2g and 11129, admeas,rring 100 Sq yards, srtuated at Khanamet (V) Serilingampally (M), Under GHI\nC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North- Neighbours House, South- Neighbours House, Easl- 30 Ft Wide Road, Wr-.st- 20 Ft Wide Road. Counsel for the Petitioners: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 7: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR Counsel for the Respondent No.B: SRI c.MADHUSUDHAN REDDy. SC FOR GHMC TGSPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER ,/ T. I I I I I i l I ::l THE HON'BLE SRI.IUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.116O1 OF 2o25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropiote Wit, order or direction more panlicutarLg one in the nqture oJ Wit of Mandanus declaing the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not receiutng the apptication fonn and reLeose the tndiutductt seruice connection to tlw petitioner, the H.No.2-56/7,/A (Partl Surueg Nos.11/28 and 11/29, admeasuing 1O0 Sq. Aords, situated at Khanamet (V), Seilingampattg (M), Under GHMC' Ranga Reddg Distict, T.5., bounded bg Notltu Neighbour's House; South: Neighbour's House; East: 30'Ft Wide Road; West: 20' F't wide Road., as iltegal, null, uoid, arbitrary and consequentlA direct the respondents to receiue apptication and to release the indiuidual seruice connection without being influenced bA the itastructiotls of the Stt' respontlent and to poss..."

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government Pleader for Enerry for respondent No.l; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 7; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.B. 2 PK,J Up 11601,2025

4. Learnecl counsel for the petitioners submitsr that the subject matr.(-.r of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of l.'-ris Court in W.P.No.326 14 of 20 S, dated

18.12.2075. and requested this Court to pass similir order in the present Writ Petition . also. The same is not seriously disputed b1 the learned Government Pleader ars well as learned Star cling Counsel for the respondents.

5. In viev,' of the above submissions and for th e reasons alike in the order of this Court in W.p.No.326l4 of 2OlS, dated 18. 12.2,015, this Writ Petition is disposed of ,.rermitting the petitione rs to file an online application seeking electricity service conrection to the petitioners' subject prolterty i.e., H.No2-56/7lA (Part), Survey Nos.11/28 and tt/29, admeasurinp, 100 Sq. yards, situated at Khan:rmet (V), Serilingampzrlty (M), under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana SlaLte, within a period of one (1) week frorr the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Upon receipt oi such an application, :,:spondent Nos.2 to 7 are directed to consider the said apolication of the petitioners for releas,e of the electricity povrer supply to the petitioners. subject property {:n l { /" 3 PK,J Wp 11601-2025 within a period of two (2) weeks thereafter. It is however observed that if respondent Nos.2 to 7 pass orders on petitioners' application granting release of the electricity power supply to the petitioners' subject property, the, same shatl be subject to further direction that may be issued by the State of Telangana or the Hon'lcle Apex Court in the litigation pending before it arising out of the order dated l2'O9'2O12 passed in Writ Petition No.2O4O7 of 2008 and batch' Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There sha1l be no order as to costs' To //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PADMANABHA REDDY EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 A J 2 gDi Secretariat, te Southern Power rector, Telangana Sta yuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad The Principal Secretary Power and Energy Depa Hyderabad, State of Telang ana -500022 The Chairman- cum- Managin tiorl C ompany Limited, Drstribu Chief Genera I Manager commercial, l\4int Comp oundTGSPDCL, Hyderabad The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern power Distribution 9.orpglV. Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur TGSpDCL The Asst. Divisional Engrneer, Operation Kondapur TGSpDCL 6 The Assistant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE Op Altapur T G S p D C L 7 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corpdration, o Serilingampally Zone. 9. One CC to SA/T. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate tOpUCI 10.Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

11. One CC to SRI N SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGPSPDCL tOpUCl 12.One CC to SRt c.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC iOpUCl 13.Two CD Copies PSK BS CC TODAY ,;'rATE !) t I r'?H M , ,) *a ,I r-,,tll 'i

1.?' HIGH COURT DATED:1710412025 ORDER WP.No.11601 of 2025 k :) o \t) ^t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t,1aq l{

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments