Judgment · High Court

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances sta(ed in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned notice in Lr.No. ADE/oP/Asmg/D-1 0/c/8/D.N o.31 s7 t24 dared 29-03-2025 oI 2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary. IANO:1OF2 025 Petition under section 15r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 3 not to disconnect the petitioners power suppry pursuant to the in pug'red notice Lr'No' ADE/OP/Asmg/D-1 OrC l8lD'N0'3157 124 dated 29-03-202 5 of thr-' 2nd respondent pending disposal of main rarrit petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT' THAKUR ROOPA SINGH counsel for the Rerspondent No'1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Rerspondent Nos'2 and 3: SRIN' S}="=r?Btt REDDY' The Court made ttre following: ORDER 1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.11 408 of 2o25 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is ta_ken up for disposal at the stage of admission. 2 The writ petition is fited with the following prayer: "To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring Lr. No.ADE/OP/ Astng / D _ J.O / C / 8 / D.No.3 LST / 24 respondent". the impugned notice dated 29.3.2025' of 1n 2",1

#3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energz for respondent No. 1, Sri N. Sreedhf Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSpDCL for respondent Nos.2 arld 3 and perused the record.

#4. Today, when the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated,24.g.202 I passed by this Court in W.p.No. 198g4 of 2O2I. The same is not seriously disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 In view o1 the above' for the reasons alike in the older dated 5. 24.8.2[21in W'P'\o' 19884 of 2021' this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to disconnect the power supply subject to the petitioner tlepositing 50% of the amount assessed in 'the impugned letter dated 29 '3'2025' lf the petitioner conrplies with the directions of rhis Court, the respondents shall not de mand the is decid.ed under SectLon 154 of the balance amourlt till the rssue petitioner shall PaY thr: monthly ElectricitY Ac ., 2 003 ' consumPtion chirrges S per the monthly bil1s ' Mis; cellaneous applications, i ' ar r'r, pending in this writ petitio n stanc clo l;ed. The /ffRUE COPY" 'R';$,eflNYA:t'EFRX V t;EC'I'ION OFFICER ffiftffiHtrN*l;**ff i1gr j8'oY?,,,"nn""",u' tnlls,""a [f:"#,'S;,,'"1'#J,ff :fi A$3lat',",??"51 3'.1"St il t? Two CD C lPiet; o. nur Reddv' sc ror rGsPDcLlo P J cl To, 1 2

#3. 4 5 6 7 TJ PS I HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:1610412025 ORDER WP.No.11408 of 2025 \E STATe /r{1' 2',r APfl 2tr6 './,t , I\ _d.lt:ic, t v a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ 2)