✦ High Court of India · 21 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 21 Apr 2025

1 [vl//s Praqati Retreat (lNDlA) Wel.Com Private Limited' a. Company ' l#;,.#;E;''rniJi'i6? c5*pinie, Act, .1e56, bearinq corporare ldentification PAN -Number iU;;#"*uiriooi'czoooprco34307, bgrns -aitotted niOCFAOaaX inA hauing its RegistereO office-at Plot No. 1355A, 3rd Floor, Road No. 1 and 45, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad . . - z rvr7. Fir6rii ci""n rvr"ri6*" anil ietorts Limite^d (M/s Pragati Agro.Bio Tech - F"i LirtJo, has been ,"ig"t . M/s pragati Grden tvleadows and Res_orts Limited vide orders passei"by the High Cg"urt.91 A P' in C A' 89/06 and C A Nir. S0ld6 drr.d zarcsiioo}i dorpoiate tdentification No. U01 120TG 1996 i;ico/zs3il-being arroiiJ'pAN- t't"b"t AACCPs2B3H' and having .its Reoistered office at pfoi"flo i gsSn, :'O Floor, Road No l and 45' Jubilee Hilli, Hyderabad. 'pdl,/ Homes lndia Private Limited. a company incorporated Companies Act. 1956, nearing iorpJiitJ ii""iit"'trori N'umoer'U70102TG 2005 Fi'io,iiaib, l;ng"rrrittJJ FANr r'r,mo"t IcABCP0005D and havins its Reoistered office at sri""v itrr.o"i +ia, eraggti Resorts, chilukur Balaji i;#;i;'R;";, Pta.iuirivirhs., Shankarapallv Mandal' Rangareddv District' comnanv incorDorated under the Companies nct, rS5d."6eaiii',U Coipoirt" ldentitication Nuhber U701.O2 iE iol'd"p1biriiili, b;i;s-;il"iia'o pnil Number AAECPoooeR and havins rrro +zo. pragati Resods, Proddutur Village. its Reqistered ottrce at Chilkuiu Balaji Temple Road. Rangareddy Urstrrct' 5 il);" pGtvl iu"nr.!. pvt Limitet. a company incoroorated under the comoanies Act .1956, O"lri"g"b"ip"Lte lJiniifl'cation No U70102TG 2005 Far'r- [r,'ue' AAE-CP 00080 and having .its F;bffi7ilt, ireiiit"reo-ortt 5t proi'io t.assn, era Floor, Road No. 1 and 45, Jubilee Hilli, Hvderabad 6 M/s Praqati Green Avenues Pvt Limited' a companv incoroorated under the " d;;;;H A';"ie6d,i;,;; c";6;;G rdentiricatiirn No U45200 rG 2005 F;iffiB4,'[Li'"s lrr"[6i FANr 'r.l-r.n"r AAD^C P4757H and having its ir"ri"i"o 'ottiie "at sri,"v r'r" +jo, Prggati .Resorts' Proddutur Village' Chiikuru Balaji Temple Road, Rangareddy Drstrrcl 7. Sri E. Amrutha nro, siJi. 6'iyanar5y'n'' Aged about 52 Years' occ ' Eij.;";;, Rlo- prot 1116" aZ. rs6*ri. Viltas, Niar Anadam Apartments. Nizampet Road, Kukat;;rrv,-Hvdeiabad Represented by his AGP-A^H^older r\//s praoati creen rraea"ol,i. ,ii-n"iort. uirhited, vide GPA No. 226012012, iri"o ozi.o7.ioi2, Resistered at SRo, Shankarapallv' B. M/s PGM Real Estates Ftivite fimitbo, a comp-anv incoroorated under the 'd";;il; c"irit*tJ tdeniificition Number u70102TG companies Act, 1956 z}Ospr co47 840, oe'ng?ioiiu"a pA[r- Nu.oer AAECPOoOTB and having .its sl,*;;"Nr*il +ie , eragari Resorts. chilukur Balaji a"";ila;;'tri.,j "i '[Lirii"r'rrJtiJa "su"rv!v Ternple Road Proddutur Village, Shankarapally Mandal, Rar,gareddy District. Represented, :y therr Agreement of Sale-cum-General power -of Atto'rney with Possession Folder Smt. G.V. Kumari Wo Dr. G.B.K. Rao aged about 66 Years, Occ Elusiness, being allotted Pan No ADBpG 1 395E and DIN 00097800, R/rr Plot No. 42, Road No.5 Jubilee Hills. Hyderab rd. AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue (Stamps and Registration), S;ecr6tariat, HyderaOaO. 2. The Distrrct Rr:qistrar, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Sub Regi:;1rar, Shankarpally, Ranga Reddy District. ..PET|T|ONERS ...ttESpONDENTS Petition unde' Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia pra Ting that in the circumstances statec in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue wrii, order or direction more particularly one in tl-e nature of writ of [Vlandamus declarir-rg the action of the 3rd respondent i.e., The sub Registrar. Shankarpally, Rangrr Reddy District, in refusing to recerve, regis.er and release thre sale Deed presented by the petitioners in respect of plot beari,rg Nos.K9 (500 Sq Yards) K177 (50C Sq.Yards), K357A (500 Sq.yards), K373A r500 Sq.yards), KsB1 (500 Sq.Yards K708 (500 Sq Yards), K713,A (500 Sq.yards), ail the above said plots are in General Sector and 253 (500 Sq.yards), 2534 (5t O Sq.yards), in G Villas2 (500 Sq'/ards), 21 (500 Sq yards), 37 (500 Sq ya ds), 37A (500 Sq.Yards),776 (100() Sq.Yards),777 (1OOO Sq.yards),789 (i0OOSq.yards),799 (1000 Sq.Yards), 8(r(i (1000 Sq.yards), in Green lslands phase_1 , 247 (534 Sq Yards), 259 (534 rSq Yards), 311A (262 Sq yards), 312 (534 Sq yards), 338 (267 Sq.Yards), 352 (500), Sq. Yards), total admeasuring 14,.1 3(; Sq.yards, in Sector- K. General Sector, Pragati Green lslands phase-1, G Villas, in Sy Nos.354, 359/A, 35,9/AA, 365, 365/4, 370,313tEE.373A/u, 374, i74t1,374t2, 374lRu, 374Nul 1A 375, 375/4, 375/Ru, 3Z1IEE, 377, 377tA/,, 37ZtE, 378, 378/A, 3781 AA 378,1/u, 379, 381, 3B2tA, 3A2/AA, 382t1 383iA,1i86/A, 386/44, 386/E, 387/4, 387tAA,388, 388iA, 390, 393, 422,423,424,428,4i8tA,430,431 , 432,370.375.379,380, 381, 3BB, 398, 391,400 part,4OO|S,4O1 402,403, 399, 3994, 400, 400/3.3ttit,380, 388, 379, 381 ,37gt A,380/4, 391, 400, 400part, 400t5, 401tA, 402tA, ,103tA, 419, 420, 42otA, 425/A, 376/44, 43t, 365tA, 374, 424, 422, 423, 422/A 423tAA, 422tE, 423tE, 396, 395, 391, 392, 391/tvt, 391/A, 392lAA,392lM,400pztt,400t5,40i and 400, 398, 391, 392, 365tA, 374, 424,422, 423.391 ,392, 395, :t91lAA, 366, 367, 368, 369, 365, 359/4, 3s9/AA, 378, 354 and 377. situated at proddutur Vi age and Gramapanchayath. shankarapaly ,,:. I\ilandal, Ranga Reddy District' on the ground of the document is based on the validateddocumentasalinkdocumentandvalidateddocumentcannotbetreated aSaLinkDocumentvideLetterCandlGEndt.NoClG'I\/aillAR/2o08,dated O2lOljIOOB issued by the respondent no 2, is illegal' arbitrary' in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and also in violation of RegistrationAct,lg0B,besidesinviolationofprinciplesofnaturaljusticeand consequentlytodirectrespondentNo.3toreceiveandregistertheSaleDeed presented by the petitioners in respect of Plot bearing Nos Kg (500 Sq Yards)' K177 (500 Sq Yards), K357A (500 Sq Yards), K373A (500 Sq Yards)' K5B1 (500 Sq.Yards), K708 (500 Sq Yards), K713A (500 Sq Yards)' all the above said plots are in General Sector and 253 (500 Sq.Yards), 2534 (500 Sq Yards)' in G Villas 2 (500 Sq.Yards), 21 (500 Sq.Yards)' 37 (500 Sq Yards)' 37A (500 Sq.Yards)' 776 ({O00 Sq Yards), 777 (1000 Sq Yards), 789 (1000 Sq Yards)' 799 (1000 Sq.Yards), 806 (1000 Sq.Yards), in Green lslands Phase-1' 247 (534 Sq Yards)' 25g (534 Sq.Yards), 311A (267Sq Yards), 3'12 (534 Sq Yards)' 338 (267 Sq.Yards), 354 (500 Sq.Yards), total admeasuring 14'136 SqYards' in Sector-'K" General Sector, Pragati Green lslands Phase- 1' G Villas' in Sy'Nos 354' 359/A' 359/AA, 365, 365/A, 370,3731EE,373A"/u' 374,374t1 ,374t2' 374lRu' 374Nul 1A' 375. 375tA,375/Ru, 37stEE, 377, 377tAA, 377t8' 378' 3781A' 3781 AA' 378A/u' 379,381,382tA,382tt\A'38211,383/4'386/4,386/AA'386/E'387/A'387/AA'388' 388/4, 390, 3g3, 422,423, 424, 428' 4281A, 430,431 , 432' 370', 375', 379', 380' 381, 3BB, 398, 391, 400 Part, 4OOl5, 401 ' 402, 403' 399' 399A' 400' 40013' 392' 380, 388, 379, 381, 379/ A, 380/4, 391, 400' 40oPart' 4OOt5' 4OllA' 4021A' 40314' 41g. 420, 42otA, 425tA,376/AA, 432' 3651A, 374' 424, 422' 423' 4221A', 423tAA' 422tE, 423tE,396, 395, 391, 392, 391/AA, 391/A, 392/AA' 392/AA', 400part' 4OOt5,4O1 and 400, 398, 391, 392, 365/A, 374' 424' 422' 423' 391' 392' 395' 391/rM, 366, 367, 368, 369, 365, 359/A, 359/AA' 378' 354 and 377' situated at ProdduturVillageandGramapanchayath,shankarapallylr4andal'RangaReddy District,WithoutreferenceofLetterCandlGEndt.NoClG.lVlail/AR/20o8,dated02. O1-2008 issued by the respondent no 2 ,i lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petttion unde Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s trpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to receive and register the Sale Deed presented by the petitioners in resp,:ct of Plot bearing Nos.K9 (500 Sq.Yarc s), K177 (SOO Sq Yards), K357A (lir)0 Sq Yards), K373A (500 Sq Yards), KsB1 (500 Sq.yards), K708 (500 Sq Yards), K7134 (500 Sq.Yards), att the above sirid ptots are in General Sector & 2i3 (500 Sq.Yards), 253A (500 Sq.Yards), in G Villas 2 (500 Sq.Yards), 21 (500 {i,1.Yards), 37 (5OO Sq.Yards), 37A (500 Sq y;,rds), 776 (1OOO Sq.Yards), 777 (100) Sq Yards), 789 (1000 Sq Yards), 799 (1000 Sq.yards), 806 ('1000 Sq Yards). ir Green lslands Phase-1, 247 (534 Sq yards), 259 (534 Sq.Yards), 311A (2(.,' Sq Yards), 312 (534 Sq Yards), 338 (267 Sq.yards), 354 (800 Sq Yards), total admeasuring 14,136 Sq.Yards, in Sectc r- ,K,, General Sector, Pragati Gree.rr lslands Phase-1, G Villas, in Sy.Nos.354, 359/A, 359/AA, 36s, 365/4, 370, 3731EE, 373Nu, 374, 374t1, 374t2, 374tRu, 3', 4Nut 1A, 375, 3751A, 37 5/Ru, 37 slEE. 377, 377 tM, 377 tE, 378, 378t A. 37 Bt Al,. 37BNu, 379, 381, 382/4, 382/AA, 38211,3B3IA,386/4, 386/44, 386/E, 3B7iA, 387/AA, 3BB, 388/4. 390, 393, 42? 423,424, 428,428tA,430, 431 ,432, 370,375, 379, 3BO, 381, 388, 398, 391, 100 Part, 400t5, 401, 402, 403, 399, 3994, 4)0, 4OOt3, 392. 380, 388, 379, 381, : ,'9l A, 380/4, 391, 400, 40opart, 4OOts, 40|A , 4O2tA,4O3tA. 419, 420, 420tA, 42at4, 376tAA, 432, 365tA, 374, 424, 422, 423, +22tA, 423/AA, 422/E,423t8,396, 3115, 391, 392, 391/AA, 391/A, 392/AA, 392/fi/, ,+00parr, 400/5, 401 & 400 398, 391, 392, 365/4, 374, 424, 422, 423, 391, 392, 391;, 391/AA, 366, 367, 368, 369, 365, Ii{;g/A, 359/AA,378,354 & 377, situated at pr:ddutur Viltage and Gramapanchaya th, Shankarapally Mandal, Ranga Reddy t istrict, without reference of Letter c & lG Endt. No.clG.lVlail/AR/2008, dated 02-( 1-2008 issued by the respondent no it, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitjoner: SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Resp,ondents: Gp FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRA rlON The Court made the lollowing: ORDER : ;;iil ORDER: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.11565 of 2O25 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration for respondents and perused the entire material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.163 lO of 2019 and batch dated ll.OI.2023 and also the recent Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K. Gopi Vs. The Sub-Registrart and requested to pass similar order in this writ petition.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration has not disputed the submission made by the lezrned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners have not submitted the document before the respondents and if they submit the document, they have to consider the same subject to compliance of the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899' noqs scc online sc 740 2 w P N ).1 1565 of 2025 SK, J

4. The relevant portion of in W.P.No.1(i31O of 2Ol9 and batch dated 1 i.O 1 .t 023 is as 1l). T r: pou,cr of the registering authority to refuse rcgl tration is onll,, if irnv of the grounds or objections thai arc enurlerated under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, ancl tl.rr Rules made thcrt,under in particular Sections 19,20, 21,22-A, 34, 35 and rule 58 olire Telangana Rules under the Registration Act, 19f8, are existing rrr respect of any such document presented 1tr the registratior. Except, the grounds or objections that are cnur lerated under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, the rcg stering authorities lravc no authority to refuse registration of a doclrn ent on any other 13ound. As already noted above, the ground on u,h ch the impugned rcfusal orders in all these batch of Writ petiiicos are passed is t r1t Lhe link document shown in the respective docrLments is a valicla ted and an unregistered document. Bv lookiDg into a validrtv oi -he link document, the registering authority is iIx tirccdy verifving $hether the executants of the respective documer ts are having valiJ title or not to execute the documents in qucstrrn As held in thc r bove referred judgment in the case of Dr. yac11a F nmesh Nardu ( 1 st 1,ra), the registering authority is not entitled to go i rto thc title of thc l)ilrties to the document. It is a settled larv that the rendee under a dolument will not get a better title tharl his vendor and in case if ven,l,rr is not having a valid title over the propertv r,,.rich is the subject ratter of a particular document, the vendee un( er the said docufirnt does not get any title over such property a1]( ntere registration of such document will not have an effect on the ploperty which is thc subject matter of the said document.

14. As rightly conceded by the learned Government plea,ler for Stamps an<[ Registration, the registering authorities are not e-rtitled to refuse l'egistration of a document on mere gtound that the _itle of the executiu'rts of the respective document is based upco the validated d,rr:urnent, though the same is computsorily regist:rable document cannot be accepted and such a ground is not availi ble to 3 w.P.No. 1156s of 2O25 SK, J the registering authorities to refuse retistration of a docurnent on that ground-

19. In the light of the above, this Court is unhesitant to hold that the respondent registering authorities are not entitled to refuse registration of a document on the ground that the link document referred to in the respective document is a validated document or to refuse registration of such document by placing reliance on endorsement, dated O2.01.2008, issued by the Commissioner and Inspector General of Stamps and Registration. Accordingly, the impugned orders in the resPective Writ Petitions are set aside arld Writ Petitions are allowed with a further direction to the respondent registering authorities to receive the returned documents and to process the same subject to the condition of the said documents complying with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

5. In K. Gopi's case (supra 1), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under: "The registering ofltcer is not concerned with the title held by the executant. He has no adjudicatory power to decide whether the executant has any title. Even if an executant executes a sale deed or a lease in respect of a land in respect of which he has no title, the rcgistering offrcer cannot refuse to register the document if all the procedural compliances are made and the necessary stamp duty as well as registration charges/fee are paid We may note here that under the scheme of the 1908 Act, it is not the function of the Sub- Registrar or Registering Authority to ascertain whether the vendor has title to the property which he is seeking to transfer. Once the registering authority is satislied that the parties to the document are present before him and the parties admit execution thereof before him, subject to making procedural compliances as narrated above' the document must be registered. The execution and registration of a document have the effect of transferring only those rights, if any, that the executant possesses. If the executant has no right, title, or interest in the property, the registered document cannot effect any transfer. 4 W.Ir.N ). I 1565 of 2025 SK, J

6. In view of the order passed in W.P.No.163l0 of 2019 and batch cated 11.01.2023 ald also the Judgm:nt of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in K. Gopi's case (supra 1) ald for the reasons rnentioned therein, the Writ P.etition ir, disposed of directing 1he respondent authorities to receive atLd register the sale deeC presented by the petitioners in respect of the subject plotr; without reference to the Letter C & IG Endt. No.CIG.Mai1,,\R/2008 dated 02.Ol.2OO8 issued by the respondent Irlo.2 and subject to condition ol the said document c(,rnplying with the provisions of the Rr,gistration Act, 1908 anci the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. There shall be no order as to co sts. 7 . Mis,:ellarreous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE coPY/ SD/-K. SREE FIAMA MURTHY DEPUl Y REGISTRAR sEc,oN o'iprcen The Principal S€,cretary Revenue (Stamps and Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad. Stale of Telanqana. The District Re Tistrar. Ranga Reddy District. lhe S_u_b Regls iar Shanka-rpally. R'anga Reddy District One CC to SRI IGTIKA RAVTNDER R-EDDY, Advocate tOpUC l Two CCs to GF FOR STAfi/PS AND REGtSTRAT|ON. High C(;urt for the State_oJ Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies To 1 2 3 4 5 6 PSK. us W HIGH COURTT DATED:21 10412025 ORDER WP.No.11565'of 2025 1 it,) 22 APfr 20fi t l') r Sl a r.l \: DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CCISTS 1fn /:

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments