One CC to SRl v. T KALYAN

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of lVandamus, to declare the inaction of the official respondent Nos.1 to 4 in not considering the online Applications filed by the petitioners through Dharani portal Transaction lD No 286334000013743 dated 1511012024, Transaction lD No.286334000013744 dated 15-10-2024Transaction lD No 286334000013745 dated 15-10-2024, Transaction lD NO 2863340000.1 37.t, dated tS-1O-2024, Transaction lD No.286334000 0137 42 dated.15-10-2()i 4, Transaction lD 30T082100004771 , dated.16.10.2024,f ransaction tD 30Ti )880000501 i, dated. 17-10-2024 seeking to remove the said survey numbe: from pending court cases category, as illegal, arbitrary and against the pr r ;rples of the natural justice and consequently direct the official respondents lr r s. 1 to 4 to consider the online applications filed by the petitioners as per Iaw lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in thr lrrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cc r rt may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 1 to 4 to consider the online Ap rlications filed by the petitioners through Dharani Po(al vide, Transaction lD I c 286334000013743 dated 15-10-2024. Transaction lD No. 286334000013714,dated r 5_10_2A24. Transaction lD No 2863340000 i 3745, dated.15-10-202.1 rransacrion lD No 286334000013746, dated.15-10-2024,rransaction tD Nr 286334000013742, daIed.15-10-2024, Transaction lD 3O7O821OOOO4771 dated. 16.10.2024, Transaction lD 30T16880000501.1 , dated. 17.10.2O:Z.t filed by the Writ Petitioners as per law, pending disposal of the main writ pe 1 tion Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V. T. KALYAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI L. RAVINDER, lcp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5&6:- The Court made the following: ORDER i I I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.lI30 6 ot2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel lor the petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondent Nos.5 and 6.

2. Petitioncls herein are clain.ring tha[ they are the absolute owners and possessors ol the land situated at Kojjanavanapatty Vitlage, Navabpet Mandal, Vikarabad District. The details of extents; survey numbers etc., are specifically mentioned ln paragraph No.2 of the writ aftrdavit. ln proof of the same, they have filed old pattadar passbooks and sale deeds. They have filed online applications through Dharani Portal vide I.D.Nos.2863 3 400001 31 43, dated I 5. I 0.20 24, 28633400001 37 44, dated 15.t0.2024, 286334000013745, dared t5.t0.2024, 2863340000 I 3'1 46, dated ts.t0.2024, 28633400001 37 42, dated

15.10.2024, 30T082100004771, dated t6.t0.2024 and 30T168800005011, dated 17.10.2024, to respondent No.4 seeking : rectilication ofentries in the revenue record. Despite receiving and 2 acknowledging the said applications, respondent fl .4 did not act upon the sarne. Aggrieved by the said inaction of ri:r pondent No.4, pctitioners f rled thc present writ petition. l. Respondent Nos.5 and 6 herein filed the u L t pe tition i.e., W.P.No 3l903 ol 2021. Vide o'rder dated 03.12 2( ll, this Coutl directed the petitioners to make online applic r ion/s through I)harani Portal seeking rectification of the entries n thc revenue lecord in respect ol- the sub.iect lands, within a perit r of two u'eeks fiom the date ofrcceipt ofa copy of the said order

4. In con.rpliance with the said order, respontltt I Nos.5 and 6 havc filed applications for which respondeut No..l has issued an cnclorsement vide bearing No.Dl/14148/2021 , da<.1 13.09.2022, directing the petitioners therein to make onlint: ipplications tn Dharani Portal along with the relevant documentarl , vidence

5. That being the case, petitioners hereiu are tht: cspondents in the aforesaid writ petition, who have filed applicati, ns in Dharani Portal. The said applications are rejected in a mecL,inical manner with a single word "Court case pending". Chall,rr ging the said rejection order, petitioners filed the present writ pet't on 3

6. l-earned counsel fbr the petitioner rvould contend that their names were mutated in the revenue l'ecord in respect of the subject and pattadar passbooks wcrc also issued. 'fhc subject land is t II situalccl in various survey numbers including Sy'No'65 However, the unofficial respondents have fited W'P'No 3l90l ol 2021 seeking relief in respect of land in Sy.Nos'65 and 103, situated at Kojjavanampalli Village, Narvabpct Mandal, Vikarabad District' without considering thc afbresaid aspects, the olficial respondents rejected the applications subrnittcd by the petitioners in a mechanicaI manner. 7 . Whereas, Mr'.L.ltavinder, learncd Assistant ' Govemment pleadcr for Revenue, on instructions, $,ould subrnit that pctitioners have submittecl applications in Dl.rarani Poltal, which is not in existence. He further submittecl that whcn the Court case is pending, applications canuot be considered by the Competent Authority. Therefore, respondent No.4 has rightly rejected the applications submitted by the petitioners.

8. In the light of the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, tiberty is granted to the petitioners to work out their remedies before the appropriate Forutl' 4 As a scquel, miscellaneous petitions pendintj if any, shall stand closcd. Iiori,cver, there shall be no order as to ( )sts_ SD/.M. NAGAMANI ASSI iTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. V. T KALYAN, Advocate [OP-UC] i i;; ddrio-cp ron nrver.rue ,Hign coi-r.t for the sra e of Telansana at 3. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad [OUT] B t\,1 BS Y+- . -:,-ig -.;,JB HIGH COURT DATED:0811012025 ORDER WP.No.11306 of 2025 ,( \J O -)( -I li .Ai] 2t2; vZ II-l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITIIOUT COSTS G .,ffb ffs.