High Court · 2025

3. The Superintendent of Police, Kamareddy District. 4. The District Collector, Kamareddy District. 5. Tahsildar, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. 6. The Station House Officer, Domakonda Police Station, Kamareddy District. 7. Smt. K. Venkatalaxmi, W/o K.Damoaar Reddy, Aged 65 years, Occ Agriculture and MPTC Rl/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal. Kamareddy District. B. Kurra Anjaiah (Yerukala), S/o Kurra Yellaiah, Aged 49 yrs., Occ Agriculture, R/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. 9, Ashaboina Srinivas, S/o Rajaiah, Aged Major, Occ. Local Political Leader Rl/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District.

10.Kalva Anjal Reddy, S/o Mallaiah, Aged major Occ. Local Political Leader, Rt/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. '1 1. Kothapally Naresh, S/o Sailu, Aged about 28 years, Occ. Local Political Leader, Ri./o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. 12. Morikala Durgaha, S/o Beeraiah, Aged Major, Occ. Local Political Leader, R/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. l3.Chikoti Mahender Reddy, S/o Raj Reddy, Aged about 46 years Occ. Local Political Leader R:/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District.

14.Jonala Ramulu, S/o Narayana, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Local Political Leader, Rl/o l\/uthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. l5.Katipally Manohar Reddy, S/o Mohan Reddy, Aged about 58 years, Occ. Local Political Leader, Rl/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. l6.Thatipally Tirupath Reddy, Sio Gangaiah, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Local Political Leader, R/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District.

17. Merugu Ramana Reddy, S/o Galaiah, Aged Major, Occ. Local Political Leader, Rl/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District.

18.Vanga Mallareddy, Sio Rajaiah, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Local Political Leader, R/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. l9.Srigada Rama Goud, S/o Yella Goud, Aged Major, Occ. Local Polltical Leader, R/o Muthyampet Village, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District.

20.Gundelli Sailu, S/o Sayanna, Aged 59 years, Occ. Head Master MPPS, Muthyampet. R/o Lingampally Village of Sadashivnagar Mandal, Kamareddy District ...RE''.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not taking action against the respondents 7 to 20 who committed the above said offences on 0110212025 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 16,21 of the Constitution of lndia and violative of principles of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 6 herein to take cognizance against the respondents 7 to 20 herein and to recover,the stolen articles, pursuant to the oral complaint dt.0110212025 and written complaint dt. 06/03/2025, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 Tahsildar, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District to take necessary action against the respondents 6 to 19 and hound over them as per law, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ASADULLA SHAREEF Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 3 AND 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.4 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.7 TO 20: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. 11270 of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 6, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Couft is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.7 to 20 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner, in brief, is that though respondent Nos.7 to 20 have committed an offence on

01.02.2025 and despite the petitioner approaching the respondents- authorities and making an oral complaint on the same date, i.e. on

01.02.2025, followed up with a v.,ritten complaint on 06.03.2025 to the 3'd and 6th respondents, no action has been taken on the persons named in the complaint by registering a FIR, which action of the respondents- authorities it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary and in dereliction of their duties. I I , 2

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 6 would submit that though the respondents-authorities did not register a crime based on the complaint made by the petitioner on 06.03.2025, the authorities having regard to the complaint made by the petitioner on 12.04.2025, have registered a case, videCrime No.53 of 2025 against respondent Nos.g, 11 and 12 herein and others.

5. Learned Government Pleader further submits that since the authorities have registered a case, vide Crime No.53 of 2025, the authorities are conducting investigation into the aforesaid crime and would take further action against the persons named in the aforesaid crime and also others, if any, found involved in commission of the offence/crime by arraying them as accused in the course of investigation.

6. I have taken note ofthe respective contentions urged.

7. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and taking note of the fact that the respondents-authorities have now registered a case videCrime No.53 of 2025 dt.12.04.2025, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed to conduct investigation into the aforesaid crime and bring to book the culprits who are involved in the commission of aforesaid crime, in accordance with law. '- 3 B. Subject to above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

9. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY D PUry REGISTRAR V.r.r,o* oFFrcER I U

1. The Principal Secretary for Home, Telangana State, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. Saifabad, Hyderabad.

2. The Director General of Police, State of Telangana, Office at Lakdikapul,

3. The Superintendent of Police, Kamareddy District. 4. The District Collector, Kamareddy District. 5. Tahsildar, Domakonda Mandal, Kamareddy District. 6. The Station House Officer, Domakonda Police Station, Kamareddy District. 7. One CC to SRI ASADULLA SHAREEF, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court forthe State of Telangana, at

9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Cou( for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUI-I Hyderabad. [OUT] '10. Two CD Copies To PSK. LS +W I I HIGH COURT DATED:1610412025 ORDER WP.No.11270 ot 2025 aJ- v oF TE( .$ 7 *\ N$' :) rH + DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS l4 I