✦ High Court of India · 03 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,028 words

Junoothula Srivani lgdQV, W/o. Kishore Reddy, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Managing Directol 2D Pharmaceutical Pvl Ltd, Rio. Road No.9; plot'No.1 85, P|qgg ItI!^qV-{n, Chintalakunta, Mansoorabad, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District - 500074. Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lrzlandamus declaring the action of the 8th respondent in digging the road ...RESPONDENTS area and erecting the pre-cast wall on the road, which is accessible to the petitioners open prlot along with the plot Nos.112, 113, 114,1i5, l.l6 and 117 in layout of the land in Sy.No.1, 2, 3, 4, 3i, 263, 266 and 268 situated at Sampanbole Village, Jagganguda Gram panchayat, Muduchintarapaly Mandar, Medchal - Malkajgiri District, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and violation of sec.58 of relangana Panchayat Raj Act, 2019 and consequently direct the official respondents to remove pre-cast wall and restore the c.c. road in the above layout. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i'r support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, daled 25-o4-2024 1o restore the road area in the layout of KTR and remove the pre-cast wall erected on the road area, which is accessible to the petitioners open plot and agriculture land in Sy.No.6 situated at Sampanbote vi age, Jagganguda Gram Panchayat. Muduchintalapally Mandal, Medchar - Malkalgiri-*Dis"trict, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Pelitioner: SRI NARENDAR JALLI Counsel for the Res;pondent No.1 to 3: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 & 6: SRI p. KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.5: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRt D.y.N.L.N. CHARYULU The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T'MADHAVI DEVI w.P.NO. L1797 of 2024 ORDER: ln this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking a writ of mandamusdeclaringtheactionoftherespondentNo.Sin digging the road area and erecting the pre-cast wall on the road obstructing the access to the petitioners open plot which was in Survey No-41A, adjacent to the plot Nos'112' 113' 114' 115' l16andllTinthelayoutofthelandinSurveyNos'1'2'3'4' 268, situated at Sampanbole Village' 31, 263, 256 and Panchayat, Muduchintalapally Mandal' District, as il1egal, arbitrary and Medchal-Malkajgiri consequently to direct the official respondents to remove the pre-cast r,r'ali and restore the C'C' road and to pass such other crcier cr crders in the interest ofjustice' jagganguda Gram

2. Ai1 the respondent parties have appeared and hled their counter afhdavits and on going through the counter afl-iclavits and considering the rival submissions' this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners have to approach the Civil Court toestablishthelocationoftheirplots,sinceitisnotr,r.ithinthe lavout in rvhich the respondent No'8 has the land' .--- 2

3. It is submitted that the petitioners' plots are located in Survey No.4/A, which is adjacent and aiong the plots of the respondent No.8 and the respondent No'8 has closed t[-re rcad between the plots as her own land and has constructed the pre- cast compcund wall, obstructing the entry of the petitioners into their plots

4. in view of the above submissicns anC in order to protect the inrerests of all the parties' this Court directs the petitioners to approach the Civil Court for the iocation of their plots.Tillsuchtime,therespondents,pa.rticulariyiespondcnt No.8 shall rclrtove the pre-cast wail and shall not cbstruct the entry of thc petitioners into their plots and further' i-esponci:nt No.8 shatl not undertake any construction in thc arca obstructing thc entry of the petitioners into their plots' Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed ol' There J shall be no ':rr'ie r as to costs' Miscellaneous petitions, if any' per-rding in i:ris $'nt petItloI l , sh.lll stand closed' SD/-T. ASSI TIRUMALA DEVI nui nectsrnnn //TRUE COPY// 5E;iiON OFFICER "''' n " P r n c p l S e cre1:*g31?iffifik$;:U?iif a iffiHllilTiffik'in::rlao;*;:rrt';[: gt$;:' ::'"" "" -c,,.id_ I District. Vitlaoe and Mandal, trrledchal - Malkajgiri Dtstrrct- 4 The IVlandal Parishad Development officer (tMPDo), Muduchintalapally 5 ii#Y",h';ildIilr',rrotini"i,i,b,iV rvi'i't"L' Med-chaI,- MaIkaiqiri District S lmi;hleh#::, m 1,1;.',1f il,'"t%,T rfiq,il s ili b :fl [f i:" : : - . 7 Thebtation uouse Onicivr,'!ff#.Urp"t"P;ice s-tati6"n, tvledchal - Malkajgiri s 5';;'c'C to sRl NARENDAR JALLI, Advocate tolqql- ^ ; 6;; 6c i; SRi o.v.x r-.-rrr.'cnnnvulu, Advoiate^[oPucl io SiiE dd i; sRi F. xrsnoiE riAo, sc FoR GHMC [oPUC]^ . i; iil; dd.i""ci ron pn].rblnyAt nnJ, Hish court for the State ot t 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana lOUTl j5 i;; d6t i" cp FoR REVEj\uLl, High coutt for the state of relansana 14. Two CD CoPies Telanoana. [OUT] BN BS s HIGH COURT DATED:031A212025 ORDER WP.No.1179-,7 of 2024 'i ,1S S f4 t o \, \ \ I 2 0 FEB 2025 .SoATC.rr€i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS i!, Ao

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments