M / s.Gowtham Sai Infrastructures & Anr. v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Partner, K. Srinivas 202, GSK Towers, 2 ...PETITIONERS AND 1 Greater Hyderabad [Vlun Lower Tank Bund Road, icipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner, Hyderabad. Telangana. 2 Mohammad Nazir Hussain, S/o Late Fakheer Mohammed, aged 52 years, Occ. Business, Rep. by his G.P.A. Holder Mohd. Jawad Hussain, S/o Late tVlohd. NazimHussain, aled about 32 years, Occ. Business, R/o Flat No- 602, Apex Habitat apartment, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1tt Respondent in not disposing of the application dated 21.0g.2018 in file no.1tC1,6t1811212018, for grant of building permission, as arbitrary, iltegal and contrar.y to the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and in clear violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of !ndia. 1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the application dated. 21.0g.201g in file no.11c2611811212018, pending disposal of the main writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner: sRl MOHD |SLAMUDDIN ANSARI counsel for thrs Respondent No.1: sRr G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC counsel for the Respondent No.2: sRl B.VENKATESHWAR RAo The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICD LA>(MI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.11852 of2Ol9 DATED: 02.02.2o26 Between: M / s.Gowtham Sai Infrastructures, Rep. by its Managing Partner, K.srinivas Rao and another. AND ...Petitioners Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Lower Tank Bund, Flyderabad and another. Respondents I t ORDER: This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.i'in not disposing of the application dated 2L.O9.2O18 in file No.1/C26 lt8ll2l2O18, for grant of building permission as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to provisions of GHMC Act, 1955 and for consequential relief.
#2. Sri Mohd.lslamuddin Ansari, learned Counsbl for the petitioners, Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri B.Venkateshwar Rao, learned Counsel for respondent No.2 are present. 2 llt.P.No.I 1852 Z 3' L<:arned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in view of interim order dated 17.06.2019, passed by this court, no further orders zrre required to be passed in the writ petition and the same may be c:losed. 4- Re,:ording the submissions made by the learned counser for the petitif, ners' this writ petition is crosed. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions pe, cling, if any, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISH NA ASSISTANT OFFICER 1' one cc to sRr M.HD T'LAMUDDTN ANSART, Advocate [opUC] 2 one cc to sRr B.,ENKATESHWAR RAo, Advocate topucl 3' one cc t. SRr G-MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, sc FoR GHMC topucr 4. Two CD Copies BSR BS HIGH COURT DATED i tl2l02l2026 t ORDER WP.No.11852 of 2019 THE S 2 5 Fi:8 ?tlzf, '', * CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT GOSTS L 2A A €
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.