✦ High Court of India · 01 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 01 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
01 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,522 words

6. Smt. Pavan Bai, W/o.Late Sinu Singh, 48 years, Housewife, Rl/o.2-3- 7 231C124, Ganganagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. (RR 3 to 6 are lmpleaded Per Court Order dated 1417l2l' 5 in WPMP.No.6327/2014) RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lncl I praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the Higl- Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly ono ir the nature of Writ of Certiorar by calling for the records pertaining the P.o, € ed ngs in C.C.No. H113766176 on lhe file of the 2nd respondent herein and ,1 rash the order dated 27 31586 passed therein as confirmed by thelst respondi) t by order dated 28, 8-2003 in his croc. Commissioner, Appeals in Proc.Nc,: . HYD/3408/86 and declare the orders therein as illegal. arbitrary and again.jr he pr6visl6nr o6,1," Urban Land ( Ce iling and Regulatlon) Act, 1976 and (;( I sequently direct the respondents herein not take over the possession of petitit rers ands in Sy.No. 73lpart and 75lA correlatrng to T.S.No. 32lP, Ward-166, Blr,r k-A cf Amberpet (V), l\rlusherabad Revenue lt/landal of Hyderabad District. |.A.NO:1 OF 2004 (WPMP. NO: 26374 OF 20 04) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c I )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr r)/ be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the petitioner's evict ( I from the lands in Sy.No. 73lpa( and 75lA correlating to T.S.No. 32lP, \\ ard-166, B ock-A of Amberpet (V), N/usheerabad Revenue tr,4anda! of Hyderaba j Distlct in pursuance of the order dated 28-8-2003 passed in Commis;s i )ner , Appeals in Proc. No. HYDi3 407186 on the file of the 1st respondent her€ i Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI T.BHEEMSEN & T.V.PRAt AI KUMAR Counsel for the Proposed petitioner Nos.2 to 7 : SRI V.JITl ENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR LAND ACQUlt; TION Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR ASSIGNMENl Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 7 : SRI C.B.SIDDHAR fH W.P.NO: 20315 OF 2004 Between: 1 . Vittal Singh, (Died as per LRs P2lo P7), S/o. Late Radha Singh, R/o. 3-'l-610, Nimboliadda, Hyderabad.

2. Sevan Bai, W/o. late Vittal Singh, aged 75 years, Occ. Housewife, H. No. 2-3- 7 231C126, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

3. Gowrr Bai, W/o. late f\,4anohar Singh, aged 55 years, Occ. Housewife, H. No. 3- 1-610, Nimboli Adda, Hyderabad.

4. Runda Bai, W/o. Kamal Singh, aged 54 years, Occ. Housewrfe. H. No.2-3- 7 231C126, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

5. Rakesh Singh, S/o. late Vittal Singh, aged 48 years, Occ. Daily Wage Earner, H No 2-3-723lC/26, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

6. Bhagath Singh, S/o. late Vittal Singh, aged 46 years, Occ. Daily Wage Earner, H. No. 2-3-7 231Cl26, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

7. Radha Kishan Singh, S/o. late Vittal Singh, aged 48 years, Occ. Daily Wage Earner, H. No. 2-3-7231C126, Amberpet, Hyderabad (Petitioner Nos. 2 to 7 is brought on record as LRs of the deceased Petitioner No. I as per Court Order dated 12.06.2024 in IA No. 212023). ...,.PETITIONERS AND

1. The Commissioner of Appeals, Office of the Chief Commissioner Land Administration, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, HyCerabad. (Respondent Nos.3 to 7 are impleaded as per Court Order dated 14.07.2015 in WPI\4P.No 6328/201 4).

3. Smt. Paka Satyavathi, Wo. P. Chandraiah, Housewife, 2-3-7231C131, Ganganagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

4. Upparpalli Raju, S/o. U. Pentaiah, 37 years, Employee, 2-3-7231C131, Ganganagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad

5. Smt K.Renuka, W/o. K. Ramulu, 44 yearc, Service, 2-3-7231C18, Ganganagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

6. Nalla Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Muthyalu, 72 yearc, Business, 2-3-7231C127, Ganganagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad

7. tvlandepally Gangaputhra Sangham, (Reg, No. 22212004lrRep. its President M. Kashiram, S/o. late Sailu, 62 yearc, 2-3-720122/1, Ganganagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad.

8. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

9. District Colleclor, Hyderabad District. 1 1 0. Tahsildar. Am berpet lvlandal, Hyderabad District (Respondent Nos. 8 to 10 are impleaded as per Court ( rder dl. 12.06.2024 in l.A.No.1/2023). Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lnJ circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, thrr pleased to issue ar order or direclion more particularly ore Certiorari by calling for the records pertaining to the Pr'r H1/3805/76 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein anc 27.3.1986 passed therein as confirmed by the '1st res t 28.8.2003 in his proc. Commissioner, Appeals in Proc.N r declare the orders therein as illegai, arbitrary and against Urban Land Cei ing and Regulation) Act, 1976 and <;r r respondents herein not take over the possession of Sy.No.73/part and 75lA correlating to T.S.No.32lP, Ward- I Pet)V), lt4ushee:abad Revenue [t/andal of Hyderabad Dist:i: l.A.NO:2 OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 26602 0F 2004) .....RESPONDENTS a praying that in the High Court may be 1 the nature of writ of :eed ings in C.C.Nos. quash the order dt. cndent by order dt. s. HYD/3407/86 and the provisions of the sequently direct the petitioners lands in i6, Block-A of Amber Petition Under Sectron '1 51 CPC praying that in the ci :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rr of all further proceedings including the petitioner's evicti( Sy.No.73lpart and 75lA correlatrng to T S No.32lP, rv Amberpet (V), Musheerabad Revenue lr.4andal of Hyderabac of the order dt. 28.8.2003 passed in Commissioner, ,\ HYD/3407/86 on the file of the 1st respondent herein pend r ry be pleased to stay n from the lands in rrd-166, Block-A of District in pursuance rpeals in Proc. No. g disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI T.BHEEMSEN & T.V.PRp,l AI KUMAR Counsel for the Proposed petitioner Nos.2 to 7 : SRI V.JIIl ENDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR LAND ACQUI.S TION Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5, 11 to 13 : GP FOR F EVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 10 : SRI C.B.RAM MC HAN REDDY The Court made the following COMMON ORDER l THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.2O135 & 20315 of 2OO4 COMMON ORDER: When the matters are taken up for hearing on 22.08.2025 therc \\ras no appearance on behalf of the petitioners Accordinglr,. Lhe matters u-cre directed to be posted under the capLion for "dismissal" on 25.O8.2025- But at thcir request on

25.O8.2025, the matters rrere adjourned to 28.08.2025 under thc same caption. Evcn toclav, there is no appearance on behall of ti're petitioners either in the virtuai mode or in the phy.sicai modc, though the matters are posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. It appears thar thc pctitioners are not interested ir-r pursuing the matters

2. Considering 1he samc, thcrc is no other option to this Conrt exce pt to disrniss thc Writ Pctitions lbr non-pro secu rion.

3. Accordingly, lh e Writ Petitions are drsmissed for non prosecution. There sha1l be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in these petitions, if aly, sha11 stand closed SD/- H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR SISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNIVIENT, High Court 2 Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CCs to GP FO R LAND ACQUISITION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] SECTION OFFICER r he State of Telangana at 3 4 5 6 7 8 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the S.; te of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI T BHEEMSEN & T.V.PRANA| KU|VAF, Advocare [OpUC] One CC to SRI C.B.RA[V IVOHAN REDDY, Advocate { )pUCl One CC ro SRI V.JITHENDER RAO. Advocate [OpU( ] One CC to SRI C B.SIDDHARTH, Advocate (OpUC) Two CD Copies SA BS HIGH COURT DATED:01 10912025 I n- J Irii COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.20135 AND 20315 of 2004 a I 5 .l R {,', * A:) --i ' i DISMISSING THE BOTH WRIT PETITIOIIS FOR NON _ PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. \) J,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments