✦ High Court of India · 15 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,202 words

Petition under Article 226 of Ihe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of f\/andamus declaring the action of the Nos.3 to 5 in non-considering the Online Application of the Petitioner through vide No.2200073405, dated. 08.09.2022 and representation dated 03.03.2023 and non-initiating to delete the land of the Petitioner to an extent of land Ac.2.21 Gts, in Survey No.94/Aa, which is situated at Kankal Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District from the blocking of transactions is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutional and violatioh of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutio nal and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to delete the blocking of transaction on the land of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac.2-21 Gts, in Survey No.94/Aa, which is situated at Kankal Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District. $ LL t k L ! i F E t tTt i- :' [, F .:. p lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to consider the Online Application of the Petitioner through vide No.2200073405, dated. 08.09.2022 And representation dated 03.03.2023 and to delete the blocking of transaction on the land of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac.2 21 Gts, in Survey No.94/Aa, which is situated at Kankal Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Coursel for the Petttioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Coursel forthe Respondents: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court nude the following: ORDER :. r I , $ r I HON'BLE SRI JUS CE C.V. BHASI(AR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.111 82 of 2025 ORDER It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.2.21 guntas in Sy.No.94/Aa, situated at Kankal Village , Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, having acquired the same from his father. It is further stated that the petitioner's father, by name Malipeddi Srihari, had purchascd the said land through registered sale deed bearing document No. 18O9 of 1980, dated O8.O3.198O and after the death of his father, he had succeeded to the said property. It is further stated that the name of the petitioner was mutated in all the revenue records uide proceedings No.B/RS/35/ 6312012, dated 26.02.2012 and pattadar passbook bearing No.T07I50283002 uide Khata No.61296 was also issued in his favour under the provisions of thc Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2O2O (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2O"l. I I is further stated that, while updating the entries in Dharani portal, the nature of the land has been shown as "blocked for any transaction" without issuing any notice or without assigning any valid reasons and therefore, he made online application dated Oa.g.2022 to delete the said (- 2 CVBR, J Wp I ll82_2025 endorsement. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receipt of the said application, the respondent authorities did not consider the same.

2. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

3. Learned counsel lor lhe petitioner has vehemently contended that recording of entries in Dharani Portal is only a consequential act of carrying the entries which have already been made under the provisions of the Act 9 o{ 2O2O. Learned counsel further submitted that the entries made in the pattadar passbook are only compilation of the survey numbers and the accounts for the extent being mentioned in a particular village andltherefore, it does not take away the right of the petitioner in any'manner unless the entries in the revenue rccords are corrected by following due procedure.

4. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, has not disputed the issuance of pattadar passbook in favour of the petitioner under the provisions of the Act 9 of 2O2O and also the submission of 3 CVBR, J Wp I1187 2025 the online application seeking for deletion of the status in Dharani Portal as "blocked for any transactioni.

5. Sub-scction (4) ol- Section 22-A of the Registration Act, I9O8 confers the power on the Stale Government either suo motu or on an application by any person or for giving effect to the final orders of the High Court of Telangana or Supreme Court of India to proceed to de-notify, either in full or in part, the notihcation issued under sub-section (2) and rules made under the provisions of the Act. Further, as per the Standing Order 219 (b) of the Registration Manual Part-II, the revenue authorities are not having any right or authority to list any private patta lands in the prohibited tist that too without conducting any enquiry.

6. For the aforesaid reasons and since the petitioner has already submitted the online application, dated O8.09.2O22 and representation, dated 03.O3 .2023, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing the '.. respondent authorities to examine and consider the same if there are no restraint orders issued by the competent civil Court, Further, in any event, if the petitioner is not entitled for deletion of the status of the land in Dharani Portal, the I I t I 4 CVBR, J lvp lll82 2025 respondent authorities are directed to pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be completed within eight (O'8) u'eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7 . With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs

8. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closecl. ,TRUE COPY// SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL REGI STRAR EPUTY ON OFFICER

2. iH:tr;l;t?ff trI.:l,Hiffri";Y,'il*''"*:ff :11;'l:H::' F To 4 5 b 7 8 I'SK, SS ff*$',r5*-+rF,{L++fl*r-"'1ru:":;:;'"' I I I i I ' I I : I I t HIGH COURT DATED:1510412025 ORDER WP.No.11182 of 2025 14sEHBo (.t: l() 26 nty tW ,i i t DrSna rarrF'-l\ ---:--:.::-:, -a r- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS F r1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments