Vanama Swetha, S/o v. Naveen, aged

4. The Superintendent of Police, Warangal District. 5. The District Collector, Warangal. 6. The Tahasildar, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District. 7. Vanama Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Anandeeswer Rao, Aged 43 years' Occ Business, Rl/o. Mallampally (V) Mulugu (M)' Warangal District. B. Vanama Sunitha, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, aged 38 years, Occ House Wife, Rio' Ivlallampally (V), [/ulugu (M), Warangal District.

9. Vanama Naveen, S/o. Anandeeswer Rao, aged 36 years, Occ Business, RL/o Mallampally (V), Mulugu (M), Warangal District.

10.Vanama Santhosh, S/o. Samba Murthy, Occ Business' R/o' Mallampally (V)' Mulugu ( tti{), Warangal District.

11.Vanama Venugopat, S/o.Samba Murthy, Occ Business, R/o. Mallampally (V)' Mulugu (M), Warangal District.

12.Vanama Swetha, S/o. V. Naveen, aged 34 years, Occ Business, Rio' Mallampally (V), Mulugu (M), Warangal District. '1 3. Akinepally Rajani, W/o. Ramchander, aged 44 years, Occ Business, Rl/o' t\/allampally (V). Mulugu (M), Warangal District. l 1

14.Donthi Prathapa Reddy, S/o. Bhadra Reddy, Aged 65 ,, ars, Occ Sarpanch. lvo. Ramachandrapuram, Mulugu (M), Warangal District.

15. Mutkuri Mamalha, W/o. Srinivasareddy, Occ Business. iamachandrapuram (V), Mulugu (lM), Warangal District.

16.Vanama Kamala, W/o. Late Adeeswer Rao, Aged 75 yez rs, Occ House Wife, Mallampally (V), It/ulugu (M), Warangal Districi

17. Donthi Vijender Reddy, S/o Pratap Reddy, Aged 36 year ., occ politician, R/o. Ramachandrapuram (V), [\rlulugu (Mandal) Warangal Dis t ict. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the lligh court may be pleased to issue a orders, direct or writ more appropriately irrhe nature of writ of lVlandamus to direct the Tahasildar IMulugu (M) warangal Di:;t .ict without notice to petitioners not to evict us from the possession of the land I y.Nos. 1123, 112g, .l 139, 1148, 1149, 1155, 1156, 1157 at Ramachandrapurrm Viilage, Mulugu Mandal, warangal District, as shown in the annexure with m., ns and bounds. l.A. NO: 2OF 2016(WPMP . NO: 36946 OF 20161 Petition under section '1 5i cpc praying that in the circ Jmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Police station House officer Mulugu the Respond€,r t No.2 not to disturb petitioners peaceful possession in Sy.Nos. 1123, 1128, 1131 , 114g, 1149,1155, '1 156, 1 157 as per SET WAR, Situated at Ramachandrap, am Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District, pending disposal of the above wr t petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 3694 5 0F 2016) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the cirr umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High courl may be pleased to direct the respondent S.H.o. of the Mulugu police Station n collusion with the respondents Nos.7 to 15 not interfere in the peacefr I possession of the petitioners in Sy.Nos. 1123, 1128, 1.139, .t i48, 1149, . 55, 1156, 1157 at Ramachandrapuram Vi age, Murugu Mandar, warangar Disrr ct, pending disposar of the above writ petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2016(WPMP. NO : 37897 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Tahasildar not to evict and not to disturb petitidners peaceful possession of the leased lands in Sy.Nos. 1123, 1128,'1139, 1148, 1149, 1155, 1 156, 1 157 at Ramachand rapuram Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI GENTELA HARINARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.5&6 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.7to17: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKr''IIAMJI WRIT PETITION No.29854 OF 2016 ORDER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Corr ;titution of lndia seeking the following reliet: "...1o lssue a writ or order more particutarty one in the n ture of writ of mandamus to direct the Tahasitdar Mulugu M Wara ryal District without notice to petitioners not to evict us from the p< ssesslon of the tand Sy.Nos.1123, 1128, 1139, 1148, 1149, 1155, ' 56' 1157 at Ramachandrapuram Village, Mulugu Manda,l Warange ' District as shown in the annexure with means and bounds and l'r pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Couft may deent: fit iust and proper in the circumstances of the case .... " 2 None appeared for the petitioners.

3. Heard Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assis'l rnt Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

4. The Learned Assistant Government Pleader woulc ;ubmit that due to lapse of time the cause might not have subsisted, I ence prayed for appropriate orders.

5. I have carefully perused the material available on -.cord.

6. Having regard to the prayer of the petitoner and ttrr lapse of time and as the petitioner has not pursued the matter, it appe'i rs the cause has become desolate. 2

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the rights of the petitioner are reserved to file appropriate application for revival of the petition if cause survives. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII SD/.U. SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,aa(9 SECTION OFFICER ./ To'

1. One CC to SRI GENTELA HARINARAYANA, Advocate.[OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at : Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies. BSK BS b$ tTS E <l o l I I 2 61 U I ( .? HIGH COURT DATED:0810912025 ORDER WP.No.29854 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Oc"l',,r ur{ \\w